Re: [VOTE] Hadoop 3.2.x EOL
+1 On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 8:09 PM Xiaoqiao He wrote: > Dear Hadoop devs, > > Given the feedback from the discussion thread [1], I'd like to start > an official thread for the community to vote on release line 3.2 EOL. > > It will include, > a. An official announcement informs no further regular Hadoop 3.2.x > releases. > b. Issues which target 3.2.5 will not be fixed. > > This vote will run for 7 days and conclude by Dec 13, 2023. > > I’ll start with my +1. > > Best Regards, > - He Xiaoqiao > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bbf546c6jz0og3xcl9l3qfjo93b65szr >
Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK11 on Linux/x86_64
For more details, see https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java11-linux-x86_64/593/ [Dec 3, 2023, 9:39:55 AM] (github) HDFS-17260. Fix the logic for reconfigure slow peer enable for Namenode. (#6279). Contributed by huangzhaobo99. [Dec 3, 2023, 10:36:20 AM] (github) YARN-11561. [Federation] GPG Supports Format PolicyStateStore. (#6300) Contributed by Shilun Fan. [Dec 4, 2023, 1:16:38 PM] (github) HDFS-17218. NameNode should process time out excess redundancy blocks (#6176). Contributed by Haiyang Hu. [Dec 4, 2023, 1:19:33 PM] (github) HDFS-17250. EditLogTailer#triggerActiveLogRoll should handle thread Interrupted (#6266). Contributed by Haiyang Hu. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Hadoop 3.2.x EOL
+1 -Ayush > On 06-Dec-2023, at 9:40 AM, Xiaoqiao He wrote: > > Dear Hadoop devs, > > Given the feedback from the discussion thread [1], I'd like to start > an official thread for the community to vote on release line 3.2 EOL. > > It will include, > a. An official announcement informs no further regular Hadoop 3.2.x > releases. > b. Issues which target 3.2.5 will not be fixed. > > This vote will run for 7 days and conclude by Dec 13, 2023. > > I’ll start with my +1. > > Best Regards, > - He Xiaoqiao > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bbf546c6jz0og3xcl9l3qfjo93b65szr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[VOTE] Hadoop 3.2.x EOL
Dear Hadoop devs, Given the feedback from the discussion thread [1], I'd like to start an official thread for the community to vote on release line 3.2 EOL. It will include, a. An official announcement informs no further regular Hadoop 3.2.x releases. b. Issues which target 3.2.5 will not be fixed. This vote will run for 7 days and conclude by Dec 13, 2023. I’ll start with my +1. Best Regards, - He Xiaoqiao [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bbf546c6jz0og3xcl9l3qfjo93b65szr
Re: [DISCUSS] Make some release lines EOL
Thanks all for your feedback, I will start an official vote thread. Best Regards, - He Xiaoqiao On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:23 PM Masatake Iwasaki wrote: > +1 on marking 3.2 EOL. > > For branch-2.10, just keeping cherry-picking critical our CVEs without > release sounds good. > If someone really want, I can try to put 2.10.3 up. > dev-support/bin/create-release looks still working with some trivial fixes. > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:45 PM Steve Loughran > wrote: > > > > +1 for making 3.3 and 3.4 the maintained lines > > > > 3.2.x we should say -as it is true- that the age of the dependencies is > > such that it is transitively insecure. To fix those, people must upgrade. > > > > For 2.10.x, we should think about whether to cherrypick our own CVEs > there, > > but not actually do any new ASF releases. > > I couldn't even get hold of a java7 JDK to do the release even if I > wanted > > to -the same must hold for many others; getting a new release qualified > > would be hard. Best to say "upgrade time'. > > > > > > This goes well with a 3.4.0 release, as there's a clear story: we have a > > new 3.4.x line stabilising, if you want something already stable move > onto > > 3.3.x if you hadn't already > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:39, Xiaoqiao He wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > There are many discussions about which release lines should we still > > > consider actively > > > maintained in history. I want to launch this topic again, and try to > get a > > > consensus. > > > > > > From download page[1] and active branches page[2], we have the > following > > > release lines: > > > Hadoop 3.3 Release (release-3.3.5 at Jun 22 2022), 360 commits > checked in > > > since last release. > > > Hadoop 3.2 Release (release-3.2.4 at Jul 11, 2022) 36 commits checked > in > > > since last release. > > > Hadoop 2.10 Release (release-2.10.2 at May 17, 2022) 24 commits > checked in > > > since last release. > > > > > > And Hadoop 3.4.0 will be coming soon which Shilun Fan (maybe > cooperating > > > with Ahmar Suhail?) > > > has been actively working on getting the 3.4.0 release out. > > > > > > Considering the less updates for some active branches, should we > declare to > > > our downstream > > > users that some of these lines will EOL? > > > > > > IMO we should announce EOL branch-2.10 and branch-3.2 which are not > active > > > now. > > > Then we could focus on minor active branches (branch-3.3 and > branch-3.4) > > > and increase release pace. > > > > > > So how about to keep branch-3.3 and branch-3.4 release lines as > actively > > > maintained, And mark branch-2.10 and branch-3.2 EOL? Any opinions? > Thanks. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > - He Xiaoqiao > > > > > > [1] https://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html > > > [2] > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+Active+Release+Lines > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Make some release lines EOL
+1 on marking 3.2 EOL. +1 just keeping cherry-picking critical our CVEs without release on branch-2.10. +1 The new version is released based on version 3.4.0. I am willing to take on the work during the release of the new version and look forward to a smooth release. Best Regards, Shilun Fan. Original From:"Masatake Iwasaki"< >; Date:2023/12/5 23:21 To:"Hadoop Common"< common-dev@hadoop.apache.org >;"Hdfs-dev"< hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org >;"yarn-dev"< yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org >; "mapreduce-dev"< mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org >;"< priv...@hadoop.apache.org>"< priv...@hadoop.apache.org >; Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Make some release lines EOL +1 on marking 3.2 EOL. For branch-2.10, just keeping cherry-picking critical our CVEs without release sounds good. If someone really want, I can try to put 2.10.3 up. dev-support/bin/create-release looks still working with some trivial fixes. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:45 PM Steve Loughran wrote: > > +1 for making 3.3 and 3.4 the maintained lines > > 3.2.x we should say -as it is true- that the age of the dependencies is > such that it is transitively insecure. To fix those, people must upgrade. > > For 2.10.x, we should think about whether to cherrypick our own CVEs there, > but not actually do any new ASF releases. > I couldn't even get hold of a java7 JDK to do the release even if I wanted > to -the same must hold for many others; getting a new release qualified > would be hard. Best to say "upgrade time'. > > > This goes well with a 3.4.0 release, as there's a clear story: we have a > new 3.4.x line stabilising, if you want something already stable move onto > 3.3.x if you hadn't already > > > > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:39, Xiaoqiao He wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > There are many discussions about which release lines should we still > > consider actively > > maintained in history. I want to launch this topic again, and try to get a > > consensus. > > > > From download page[1] and active branches page[2], we have the following > > release lines: > > Hadoop 3.3 Release (release-3.3.5 at Jun 22 2022), 360 commits checked in > > since last release. > > Hadoop 3.2 Release (release-3.2.4 at Jul 11, 2022) 36 commits checked in > > since last release. > > Hadoop 2.10 Release (release-2.10.2 at May 17, 2022) 24 commits checked in > > since last release. > > > > And Hadoop 3.4.0 will be coming soon which Shilun Fan (maybe cooperating > > with Ahmar Suhail?) > > has been actively working on getting the 3.4.0 release out. > > > > Considering the less updates for some active branches, should we declare to > > our downstream > > users that some of these lines will EOL? > > > > IMO we should announce EOL branch-2.10 and branch-3.2 which are not active > > now. > > Then we could focus on minor active branches (branch-3.3 and branch-3.4) > > and increase release pace. > > > > So how about to keep branch-3.3 and branch-3.4 release lines as actively > > maintained, And mark branch-2.10 and branch-3.2 EOL? Any opinions? Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > - He Xiaoqiao > > > > [1] https://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html > > [2] > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+Active+Release+Lines > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@hadoop.apache.org
Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch-2.10+JDK7 on Linux/x86_64
For more details, see https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/ No changes -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: compile golang hadolint mvninstall mvnsite pathlen unit The following subsystems voted -1 but were configured to be filtered/ignored: cc checkstyle javac javadoc pylint shellcheck whitespace mvninstall: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-mvninstall-root.txt [56K] compile: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-compile-root.txt [32K] cc: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-compile-root.txt [32K] golang: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-compile-root.txt [32K] javac: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-compile-root.txt [32K] checkstyle: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/buildtool-patch-checkstyle-root.txt [20K] hadolint: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/diff-patch-hadolint.txt [4.0K] mvnsite: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-mvnsite-root.txt [20K] pathlen: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/pathlen.txt [12K] pylint: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/diff-patch-pylint.txt [20K] shellcheck: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/diff-patch-shellcheck.txt [72K] whitespace: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/whitespace-eol.txt [12M] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/whitespace-tabs.txt [1.3M] javadoc: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-root.txt [36K] unit: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-assemblies.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-build-tools.txt [20K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-annotations.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-auth.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-auth-examples.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-kms.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-minikdc.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-nfs.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-client.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-httpfs.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-native-client.txt [4.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-nfs.txt [8.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt [8.0K] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1232/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs_src_contrib_bkjournal.txt [4.0K]
Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86_64
For more details, see https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/ [Dec 4, 2023, 1:16:38 PM] (github) HDFS-17218. NameNode should process time out excess redundancy blocks (#6176). Contributed by Haiyang Hu. [Dec 4, 2023, 1:19:33 PM] (github) HDFS-17250. EditLogTailer#triggerActiveLogRoll should handle thread Interrupted (#6266). Contributed by Haiyang Hu. -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: blanks hadolint pathlen xml The following subsystems voted -1 but were configured to be filtered/ignored: cc checkstyle javac javadoc pylint shellcheck The following subsystems are considered long running: (runtime bigger than 1h 0m 0s) unit Specific tests: XML : Parsing Error(s): hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/resources/xml/external-dtd.xml hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/test/resources/nvidia-smi-output-excerpt.xml hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/test/resources/nvidia-smi-output-missing-tags.xml hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/test/resources/nvidia-smi-output-missing-tags2.xml hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-nodemanager/src/test/resources/nvidia-smi-sample-output.xml hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/resources/fair-scheduler-invalid.xml hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/resources/yarn-site-with-invalid-allocation-file-ref.xml cc: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/results-compile-cc-root.txt [96K] javac: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/results-compile-javac-root.txt [12K] blanks: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/blanks-eol.txt [15M] https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/blanks-tabs.txt [2.0M] checkstyle: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/results-checkstyle-root.txt [13M] hadolint: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/results-hadolint.txt [24K] pathlen: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/results-pathlen.txt [16K] pylint: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/results-pylint.txt [20K] shellcheck: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/results-shellcheck.txt [24K] xml: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/xml.txt [24K] javadoc: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1431/artifact/out/results-javadoc-javadoc-root.txt [244K] Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-19004) S3A: Move to a new HttpSigner for S3Express
Steve Loughran created HADOOP-19004: --- Summary: S3A: Move to a new HttpSigner for S3Express Key: HADOOP-19004 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19004 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub-task Components: fs/s3 Affects Versions: 3.4.0 Reporter: Steve Loughran Assignee: Harshit Gupta The latest AWS SDK changes how signing works, and for signing S3Express signatures the new {{software.amazon.awssdk.http.auth}} auth mechanism is needed -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-18961) S3A: add s3guard command "bucket" to create buckets
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran resolved HADOOP-18961. - Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 Resolution: Fixed Fixed in HADOOP-18996 > S3A: add s3guard command "bucket" to create buckets > --- > > Key: HADOOP-18961 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18961 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: fs/s3 >Affects Versions: 3.4.0 >Reporter: Steve Loughran >Assignee: Steve Loughran >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.4.0 > > > cloudstore has an mkbucket command > https://github.com/steveloughran/cloudstore/blob/main/src/main/site/mkbucket.md > however, its v1 api, has problems with spans and needs rework for v2. Oh, and > it has not tests. > * move the command into hadoop-aws > * add a test or two, > * add a mapper of 409 to bad request, as "BucketAlreadyOwnedByYouException" > comes in as a 409. > Testing will be tricky...as well as not actually wanting to create new > buckets, my test a/c doesn't even have the permission to do so. > Proposed tests > # invalid args must be rejected > # trying to create the current bucket must be rejected. This happens even if > you lack the permission to create > *No actual attempts to create a new bucket* -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-18955) AWS SDK v2: add path capability probe "fs.s3a.capability.aws.v2"
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Loughran resolved HADOOP-18955. - Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 Resolution: Fixed Fixed in HADOOP-18996 > AWS SDK v2: add path capability probe "fs.s3a.capability.aws.v2" > > > Key: HADOOP-18955 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18955 > Project: Hadoop Common > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: fs/s3 >Affects Versions: 3.4.0 >Reporter: Steve Loughran >Assignee: Steve Loughran >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.4.0 > > > Add a "hasPathCapability()" probe for s3a v2 builds to aid diagnostics > -avoids needing to look for specific s3a files on classpath. > plus bucket-info to enum all capabilities which may be present -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Make some release lines EOL
+1 on marking 3.2 EOL. For branch-2.10, just keeping cherry-picking critical our CVEs without release sounds good. If someone really want, I can try to put 2.10.3 up. dev-support/bin/create-release looks still working with some trivial fixes. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:45 PM Steve Loughran wrote: > > +1 for making 3.3 and 3.4 the maintained lines > > 3.2.x we should say -as it is true- that the age of the dependencies is > such that it is transitively insecure. To fix those, people must upgrade. > > For 2.10.x, we should think about whether to cherrypick our own CVEs there, > but not actually do any new ASF releases. > I couldn't even get hold of a java7 JDK to do the release even if I wanted > to -the same must hold for many others; getting a new release qualified > would be hard. Best to say "upgrade time'. > > > This goes well with a 3.4.0 release, as there's a clear story: we have a > new 3.4.x line stabilising, if you want something already stable move onto > 3.3.x if you hadn't already > > > > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:39, Xiaoqiao He wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > There are many discussions about which release lines should we still > > consider actively > > maintained in history. I want to launch this topic again, and try to get a > > consensus. > > > > From download page[1] and active branches page[2], we have the following > > release lines: > > Hadoop 3.3 Release (release-3.3.5 at Jun 22 2022), 360 commits checked in > > since last release. > > Hadoop 3.2 Release (release-3.2.4 at Jul 11, 2022) 36 commits checked in > > since last release. > > Hadoop 2.10 Release (release-2.10.2 at May 17, 2022) 24 commits checked in > > since last release. > > > > And Hadoop 3.4.0 will be coming soon which Shilun Fan (maybe cooperating > > with Ahmar Suhail?) > > has been actively working on getting the 3.4.0 release out. > > > > Considering the less updates for some active branches, should we declare to > > our downstream > > users that some of these lines will EOL? > > > > IMO we should announce EOL branch-2.10 and branch-3.2 which are not active > > now. > > Then we could focus on minor active branches (branch-3.3 and branch-3.4) > > and increase release pace. > > > > So how about to keep branch-3.3 and branch-3.4 release lines as actively > > maintained, And mark branch-2.10 and branch-3.2 EOL? Any opinions? Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > - He Xiaoqiao > > > > [1] https://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html > > [2] > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+Active+Release+Lines > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-19003) S3A Assume role tests failing against S3Express stores
Steve Loughran created HADOOP-19003: --- Summary: S3A Assume role tests failing against S3Express stores Key: HADOOP-19003 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19003 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub-task Components: fs/s3, test Affects Versions: 3.4.0 Reporter: Steve Loughran The test suits which assume roles with restricted permissions down paths still fail on S3Express, even after disabling createSession. This is with a role which *should* work. Either the role setup is wrong, or there's something special about role configuration for S3Express buckets -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-19002) Delete invalid code logic
zhangzhanchang created HADOOP-19002: --- Summary: Delete invalid code logic Key: HADOOP-19002 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19002 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Reporter: zhangzhanchang -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Make some release lines EOL
+1 for making 3.3 and 3.4 the maintained lines 3.2.x we should say -as it is true- that the age of the dependencies is such that it is transitively insecure. To fix those, people must upgrade. For 2.10.x, we should think about whether to cherrypick our own CVEs there, but not actually do any new ASF releases. I couldn't even get hold of a java7 JDK to do the release even if I wanted to -the same must hold for many others; getting a new release qualified would be hard. Best to say "upgrade time'. This goes well with a 3.4.0 release, as there's a clear story: we have a new 3.4.x line stabilising, if you want something already stable move onto 3.3.x if you hadn't already On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:39, Xiaoqiao He wrote: > Hi folks, > > There are many discussions about which release lines should we still > consider actively > maintained in history. I want to launch this topic again, and try to get a > consensus. > > From download page[1] and active branches page[2], we have the following > release lines: > Hadoop 3.3 Release (release-3.3.5 at Jun 22 2022), 360 commits checked in > since last release. > Hadoop 3.2 Release (release-3.2.4 at Jul 11, 2022) 36 commits checked in > since last release. > Hadoop 2.10 Release (release-2.10.2 at May 17, 2022) 24 commits checked in > since last release. > > And Hadoop 3.4.0 will be coming soon which Shilun Fan (maybe cooperating > with Ahmar Suhail?) > has been actively working on getting the 3.4.0 release out. > > Considering the less updates for some active branches, should we declare to > our downstream > users that some of these lines will EOL? > > IMO we should announce EOL branch-2.10 and branch-3.2 which are not active > now. > Then we could focus on minor active branches (branch-3.3 and branch-3.4) > and increase release pace. > > So how about to keep branch-3.3 and branch-3.4 release lines as actively > maintained, And mark branch-2.10 and branch-3.2 EOL? Any opinions? Thanks. > > Best Regards, > - He Xiaoqiao > > [1] https://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+Active+Release+Lines >