Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 1.0.0 RC1

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

Thanks Sammi for getting this out!

+1 (binding)

 * Verified signatures.
 * Built from source.
 * Deployed small non-HA un-secure cluster.
 * Verified basic Ozone file system.
 * Tried out a few basic Ozone shell commands - create, list, delete
 * Ran a few Freon benchmark tests.

Thanks,
Rakesh

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 11:53 AM Jitendra Pandey
 wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> 1. Verified signatures
> 2. Built from source
> 3. deployed with docker
> 4. tested with basic s3 apis.
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:01 AM Sammi Chen  wrote:
>
> > RC1 artifacts are at:
> > https://home.apache.org/~sammichen/ozone-1.0.0-rc1/
> > 
> >
> > Maven artifacts are staged at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1278
> >  >
> >
> > The public key used for signing the artifacts can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hadoop/common/KEYS
> >
> > The RC1 tag in github is at:
> > https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/releases/tag/ozone-1.0.0-RC1
> > 
> >
> > Change log of RC1, add
> > 1. HDDS-4063. Fix InstallSnapshot in OM HA
> > 2. HDDS-4139. Update version number in upgrade tests.
> > 3. HDDS-4144, Update version info in hadoop client dependency readme
> >
> > *The vote will run for 7 days, ending on Aug 31th 2020 at 11:59 pm PST.*
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sammi Chen
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.0 - RC0

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

Thanks Brahma for getting this out!

+1 (binding)

Verified the following and looks fine to me.
 * Built from source with CentOS 7.4 and OpenJDK 1.8.0_232.
 * Deployed 3-node cluster.
 * Verified HDFS web UIs.
 * Tried out a few basic hdfs shell commands.
 * Ran sample Terasort, Wordcount MR jobs.

-Rakesh-

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 3:57 AM Brahma Reddy Battula 
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> This is the first release candidate for the first release of Apache
> Hadoop 3.3.0
> line.
>
> It contains *1644[1]* fixed jira issues since 3.2.1 which include a lot of
> features and improvements(read the full set of release notes).
>
> Below feature additions are the highlights of the release.
>
> - ARM Support
> - Enhancements and new features on S3a,S3Guard,ABFS
> - Java 11 Runtime support and TLS 1.3.
> - Support Tencent Cloud COS File System.
> - Added security to HDFS Router.
> - Support non-volatile storage class memory(SCM) in HDFS cache directives
> - Support Interactive Docker Shell for running Containers.
> - Scheduling of opportunistic containers
> - A pluggable device plugin framework to ease vendor plugin development
>
> *The RC0 artifacts are at*:
> http://home.apache.org/~brahma/Hadoop-3.3.0-RC0/
>
> *First release to include ARM binary, Have a check.*
> *RC tag is *release-3.3.0-RC0.
>
>
> *The maven artifacts are hosted here:*
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1271/
>
> *My public key is available here:*
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hadoop/common/KEYS
>
> The vote will run for 5 weekdays, until Tuesday, July 13 at 3:50 AM IST.
>
>
> I have done a few testing with my pseudo cluster. My +1 to start.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Brahma Reddy Battula
>
>
> 1. project in (YARN, HADOOP, MAPREDUCE, HDFS) AND fixVersion in (3.3.0) AND
> fixVersion not in (3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.1.3) AND status = Resolved ORDER BY
> fixVersion ASC
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Separate Hadoop Core trunk and Hadoop Ozone trunk source tree

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

+1

Rakesh

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:29 AM Aaron Fabbri  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks to the Ozone folks for their efforts at maintaining good separation
> with HDFS and common. I took a lot of heat for the unpopular opinion that
> they should  be separate, so I am glad the process has worked out well for
> both codebases. It looks like my concerns were addressed and I appreciate
> it.  It is cool to see the evolution here.
>
> Aaron
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:37 AM Steve Loughran  >
> wrote:
>
> > in that case,
> >
> > +1 from me (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Elek, Marton  wrote:
> >
> > >  > one thing to consider here as you are giving up your ability to make
> > >  > changes in hadoop-* modules, including hadoop-common, and their
> > >  > dependencies, in sync with your own code. That goes for filesystem
> > > contract
> > >  > tests.
> > >  >
> > >  > are you happy with that?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes. I think we can live with it.
> > >
> > > Fortunatelly the Hadoop parts which are used by Ozone (security + rpc)
> > > are stable enough, we didn't need bigger changes until now (small
> > > patches are already included in 3.1/3.2).
> > >
> > > I think it's better to use released Hadoop bits in Ozone anyway, and
> > > worst (best?) case we can try to do more frequent patch releases from
> > > Hadoop (if required).
> > >
> > >
> > > m.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Moving Submarine to a separate Apache project proposal

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

+1, Thanks for the proposal.

I am interested to participate in this project. Please include me as well
in the project.

Thanks,
Rakesh

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:59 AM zhankun tang  wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks for Wangda's proposal.
>
> The submarine project is born within Hadoop, but not limited to Hadoop. It
> began with a trainer on YARN but it quickly realized that only a trainer is
> not enough to meet the AI platform requirements. But now there's no
> user-friendly open-source solution covers the whole AI pipeline like data
> engineering, training, and serving. And the underlying data infrastructure
> itself is also evolving, for instance, many people love k8s. Not mentioning
> there're many AI domain problems in this area to be solved.
> It's almost for sure that building such an ML platform would utilize
> various other open-source components taking ML into consideration
> initially.
>
> I see submarine grows rapidly towards an enterprise-grade ML platform which
> could potentially enable AI ability for data engineer and scientist. This
> is an exciting thing for both the community and the industry.
>
> BR,
> Zhankun
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 13:34, Xun Liu  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Hello everyone, I am a member of the submarine development team.
> > I have been contributing to submarine for more than a year.
> > I have seen the progress of submarine development very fast.
> > In more than a year, there are 9 long-term developers of different
> > companies. Contributing,
> > submarine cumulative code has more than 200,000 lines of code, is growing
> > very fast,
> > and is used in the production environment of multiple companies.
> >
> > In the submarine development group, there are 5 PMCs and 7committer
> members
> > from Hadoop, spark, zeppelin projects.
> > They are very familiar with the development process and specifications of
> > the apache community,
> > and can well grasp the project development progress and project quality.
> > So I recommend submarine to be a TLP project directly.
> >
> > We will continue to contribute to the submarine project. :-)
> >
> > Xun Liu
> > Regards
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 12:01, Devaraj K  wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks Wangda for the proposal.
> > > I would like to participate in this project, Please add me also to the
> > > project.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Devaraj K
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 8:50 PM zac yuan  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Submarine will be a complete solution for AI service development.  It
> > can
> > > > take advantage of two best cluster systems: yarn and k8s, which will
> > help
> > > > more and more people get AI ability. To be a separate Apache project,
> > > will
> > > > accelerate the procedure of development apparently.
> > > >
> > > > Look forward to a big success in submarine project~
> > > >
> > > > 朱林浩  于2019年9月3日周二 上午10:38写道：
> > > >
> > > > > +1,
> > > > > Hopefully, that will become the top project,
> > > > >
> > > > > I also hope to make more contributions to this project.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > At 2019-09-03 09:26:53, "Naganarasimha Garla" <
> > > > naganarasimha...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >+ 1,
> > > > > >I would also like start participate in this project, hope to
> get
> > > > > myself
> > > > > >added to the project.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Thanks and Regards,
> > > > > >+ Naga
> > > > > >
> > > > > >On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:35 AM Wangda Tan 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Sree,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I put it to the proposal, please let me know what you think:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The traditional path at Apache would have been to create an
> > > incubator
> > > > > >> > project, but the code is already being released by Apache and
> > most
> > > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> > developers are familiar with Apache rules and guidelines. In
> > > > > particular,
> > > > > >> > the proposed PMC has 2 Apache TLP PMCs and proposed initial
> > > > committers
> > > > > >> > have 4 Apache TLP PMCs (from 3 different companies). They will
> > > > provide
> > > > > >> > oversight and guidance for the developers that are less
> > > experienced
> > > > in
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > Apache Way. Therefore, the Submarine project would like to
> > propose
> > > > > >> becoming
> > > > > >> > a Top Level Project at Apache.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> To me, putting to TLP has mostly pros, it is an easier process
> > (same
> > > > as
> > > > > ORC
> > > > > >> spin-off from Hive), much less overhead to both dev community
> and
> > > > Apache
> > > > > >> side.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Wangda
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 2:04 PM Sree Vaddi <
> > sree_at_ch...@yahoo.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > +1 to move submarine to separate apache project.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > It is not clear in the proposal, if submarine majority 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.1 (RC0)

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

Thanks Sammi for getting this out!

+1 (binding)

Verified the following and looks fine to me.

 * Built from source.
 * Deployed 3 node cluster with NameNode HA.
 * Verified HDFS web UIs.
 * Tried out HDFS shell commands.
 * Ran Mover, Balancer tools.
 * Ran sample MapReduce jobs.


Rakesh

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Chen, Sammi  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is the first dot release of Apache Hadoop 2.9 line since 2.9.0 was
> released on November 17, 2017.
>
> It includes 208 changes. Among them, 9 blockers, 15 critical issues and
> rest are normal bug fixes and feature improvements.
>
> Thanks to the many who contributed to the 2.9.1 development.
>
> The artifacts are available here:  https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/hadoop/2.9.1-RC0/
>
> The RC tag in git is release-2.9.1-RC0. Last git commit SHA is
> e30710aea4e6e55e69372929106cf119af06fd0e.
>
> The maven artifacts are available at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1115/
>
> My public key is available from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hadoop/common/KEYS
>
> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days,
> ending on 4/25/2018 PST time.
>
> Also I would like thank Lei(Eddy) Xu and Chris Douglas for your help
> during the RC preparation.
>
> Bests,
> Sammi Chen
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

Thanks Andrew for getting this out !

+1 (non-binding)

* Built from source on CentOS 7.3.1611, jdk1.8.0_111
* Deployed non-ha cluster and tested few EC file operations.
* Ran basic shell commands(ls, mkdir, put, get, ec, dfsadmin).
* Ran some sample jobs.
* HDFS Namenode UI looks good.

Thanks,
Rakesh

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Wang 
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Thanks as always to the many, many contributors who helped with this
> release. I've created RC0 for Apache Hadoop 3.0.0. The artifacts are
> available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~wang/3.0.0-RC0/
>
> This vote will run 5 days, ending on Nov 19th at 1:30pm Pacific.
>
> 3.0.0 GA contains 291 fixed JIRA issues since 3.0.0-beta1. Notable
> additions include the merge of YARN resource types, API-based configuration
> of the CapacityScheduler, and HDFS router-based federation.
>
> I've done my traditional testing with a pseudo cluster and a Pi job. My +1
> to start.
>
> Best,
> Andrew
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 (RC1)

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

Thanks Junping for getting this out.

+1 (non-binding)

* Built from source on CentOS 7.3.1611, jdk1.8.0_111
* Deployed 3 node cluster
* Ran some sample jobs
* Ran balancer
* Operate HDFS from command line: ls, put, dfsadmin etc
* HDFS Namenode UI looks good


Thanks,
Rakesh

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Junping Du  wrote:

> Hi folks,
>  I've created our new release candidate (RC1) for Apache Hadoop 2.8.2.
>
>  Apache Hadoop 2.8.2 is the first stable release of Hadoop 2.8 line
> and will be the latest stable/production release for Apache Hadoop - it
> includes 315 new fixed issues since 2.8.1 and 69 fixes are marked as
> blocker/critical issues.
>
>   More information about the 2.8.2 release plan can be found here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+2.8+Release
>
>   New RC is available at: http://home.apache.org/~
> junping_du/hadoop-2.8.2-RC1 du/hadoop-2.8.2-RC0>
>
>   The RC tag in git is: release-2.8.2-RC1, and the latest commit id
> is: 66c47f2a01ad9637879e95f80c41f798373828fb
>
>   The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org repository.apache.org/> at: https://repository.apache.org/
> content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1064 repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1062>
>
>   Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5
> days, ending on 10/24/2017 6pm PST time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Junping
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3)

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

Thanks Junping for getting this out.

+1 (non-binding)

* downloaded and built from source with jdk1.8.0_45
* deployed HDFS-HA cluster
* ran some sample jobs
* run balancer
* executed basic dfs cmds


Rakesh

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Jian He  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> - built from source
> - deployed a pseudo cluster
> - ran basic example tests.
> - Navigate the UI a bit, looks good.
>
> Jian
>
> > On Mar 22, 2017, at 9:03 PM, larry mccay  wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - verified signatures
> > - built from source and ran tests
> > - deployed pseudo cluster
> > - ran basic tests for hdfs, wordcount, credential provider API and
> related
> > commands
> > - tested webhdfs with knox
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Ravi Prakash 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for all the effort Junping!
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >> + Verified signature and MD5, SHA1, SHA256 checksum of tarball
> >> + Verified SHA ID in git corresponds to RC3 tag
> >> + Verified wordcount for one small text file produces same output as
> >> hadoop-2.7.3.
> >> + HDFS Namenode UI looks good.
> >>
> >> I agree none of the issues reported so far are blockers. Looking
> forward to
> >> another great release.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Ravi
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Junping Du 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks all for response with verification work and vote!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sounds like we are hitting several issues here, although none seems to
> be
> >>> blockers so far. Given the large commit set - 2000+ commits first
> landed
> >> in
> >>> branch-2 release, we may should follow 2.7.0 practice that to claim
> this
> >>> release is not for production cluster, just like Vinod's suggestion in
> >>> previous email. We should quickly come up with 2.8.1 release in next 1
> >> or 2
> >>> month for production deployment.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> We will close the vote in next 24 hours. For people who haven't vote,
> >>> please keep on verification work and report any issues if founded - I
> >> will
> >>> check if another round of RC is needed based on your findings. Thanks!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Junping
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> From: Kuhu Shukla 
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 3:17 PM
> >>> Cc: Junping Du; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org;
> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org
> >> ;
> >>> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.8.0 (RC3)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> - Verified signatures.
> >>> - Downloaded and built from source tar.gz.
> >>> - Deployed a pseudo-distributed cluster on Mac Sierra.
> >>> - Ran example Sleep job successfully.
> >>> - Deployed latest Apache Tez 0.9 and ran sample Tez orderedwordcount
> >>> successfully.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you Junping and everyone else who worked on getting this release
> >> out.
> >>>
> >>> Warm Regards,
> >>> Kuhu
> >>> On Tuesday, March 21, 2017, 3:42:46 PM CDT, Eric Badger
> >>>  wrote:
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> - Verified checksums and signatures of all files
> >>> - Built from source on MacOS Sierra via JDK 1.8.0 u65
> >>> - Deployed single-node cluster
> >>> - Successfully ran a few sample jobs
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Eric
> >>>
> >>> On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:56 PM, John Zhuge 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> +1. Thanks for the great effort, Junping!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  - Verified checksums and signatures of the tarballs
> >>>  - Built source code with Java 1.8.0_66-b17 on Mac OS X 10.12.3
> >>>  - Built source and native code with Java 1.8.0_111 on Centos 7.2.1511
> >>>  - Cloud connectors:
> >>>  - s3a: integration tests, basic fs commands
> >>>  - adl: live unit tests, basic fs commands. See notes below.
> >>>  - Deployed a pseudo cluster, passed the following sanity tests in
> >>>  both insecure and SSL mode:
> >>>  - HDFS: basic dfs, distcp, ACL commands
> >>>  - KMS and HttpFS: basic tests
> >>>  - MapReduce wordcount
> >>>  - balancer start/stop
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Needs the following JIRAs to pass all ADL tests:
> >>>
> >>>  - HADOOP-14205. No FileSystem for scheme: adl. Contributed by John
> >> Zhuge.
> >>>  - HDFS-11132. Allow AccessControlException in contract tests when
> >>>  getFileStatus on subdirectory of existing files. Contributed by
> >>> Vishwajeet
> >>>  Dusane
> >>>  - HADOOP-13928. TestAdlFileContextMainOperatio
> >> nsLive.testGetFileContext1
> >>>  runtime error. (John Zhuge via lei)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 AM, John Zhuge 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>  Yes, it only affects ADL. There is a workaround of adding these 2
>  properties to core-site.xml:
> 
>  
>    fs.adl.impl
>    org.apache.hadoop.fs.adl.AdlFileSystem
>  
> 
>  
>    

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0-alpha1 RC0

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

Thanks for getting this out.

+1 (non-binding)

- downloaded and built tarball from source
- deployed HDFS-HA cluster and tested few EC file operations
- executed few hdfs commands including EC commands
- viewed basic UI
- ran some of the sample jobs


Best Regards,
Rakesh
Intel

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:19 AM, John Zhuge  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Build source with Java 1.8.0_101 on Centos 6.6 without native
> - Verify license and notice using the shell script in HADOOP-13374
> - Deploy a pseudo cluster
> - Run basic dfs, distcp, ACL, webhdfs commands
> - Run MapReduce workcount and pi examples
> - Run balancer
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> John Zhuge
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Gangumalla, Uma <
> uma.ganguma...@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > Overall it¹s a great effort, Andrew. Thank you for putting all the
> energy.
> >
> > Downloaded and built.
> > Ran some sample jobs.
> >
> > I would love to see all this efforts will lead to get the GA from Hadoop
> > 3.X soon.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Uma
> >
> >
> > On 8/30/16, 8:51 AM, "Andrew Wang"  wrote:
> >
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >Thanks to the combined work of many, many contributors, here's an RC0
> for
> > >3.0.0-alpha1:
> > >
> > >http://home.apache.org/~wang/3.0.0-alpha1-RC0/
> > >
> > >alpha1 is the first in a series of planned alpha releases leading up to
> > >GA.
> > >The objective is to get an artifact out to downstreams for testing and
> to
> > >iterate quickly based on their feedback. So, please keep that in mind
> when
> > >voting; hopefully most issues can be addressed by future alphas rather
> > >than
> > >future RCs.
> > >
> > >Sorry for getting this out on a Tuesday, but I'd still like this vote to
> > >run the normal 5 days, thus ending Saturday (9/3) at 9AM PDT. I'll
> extend
> > >if we lack the votes.
> > >
> > >Please try it out and let me know what you think.
> > >
> > >Best,
> > >Andrew
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.3 RC0

[Rakesh Radhakrishnan]

Thank you Vinod.

+1 (non-binding)

- downloaded and built from source
- deployed HDFS-HA cluster and tested few switching behaviors
- executed few hdfs commands from command line
- viewed basic UI
- ran HDFS/Common unit tests
- checked LICENSE and NOTICE files

Regards,
Rakesh
Intel

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Zhihai Xu  wrote:

> Thanks Vinod.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Downloaded and built from source
> * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE
> * Deployed a pseudo cluster
> * Ran through MR and HDFS tests
> * verified basic HDFS operations and Pi job.
>
> Zhihai
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vino...@apache.org
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.3.
> >
> > As discussed before, this is the next maintenance release to follow up
> > 2.7.2.
> >
> > The RC is available for validation at:
> > http://home.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.3-RC0/ <
> > http://home.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.3-RC0/>
> >
> > The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.3-RC0
> >
> > The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org <
> > http://repository.apache.org/> at
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1040/
> <
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1040/
> >
> >
> > The release-notes are inside the tar-balls at location
> > hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/docs/releasenotes.html. I
> > hosted this at
> > http://home.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.3-RC0/releasenotes.html <
> > http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.2-RC1/releasenotes.html>
> for
> > your quick perusal.
> >
> > As you may have noted, a very long fix-cycle for the License & Notice
> > issues (HADOOP-12893) caused 2.7.3 (along with every other Hadoop
> release)
> > to slip by quite a bit. This release's related discussion thread is
> linked
> > below: [1].
> >
> > Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vinod
> >
> > [1]: 2.7.3 release plan:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/hdfs-dev%40hadoop.apache.org/msg24439.html
> <
> > http://markmail.org/thread/6yv2fyrs4jlepmmr>
>