Re: Hadoop Summit: Security Design Lounge Session

2013-07-09 Thread Larry McCay
Adding additional takeaways that were articulated by Alejandro and expanded by 
me in another thread - so that we have it all in one place…thanks again, 
Alejandro!



Hi Alejandro -

I missed your #4 in my summary and takeaways of the session in another thread 
on this list.

I believe that the points of discussion were along the lines of:

* put common security libraries into common much the same way as hadoop-auth is 
today making each available as separate maven modules to be used across the 
ecosystem
* the was a concern raised that we need to be cognizant of not using common as 
a dumping grounds
- I believe this to mean that we need to ensure that the libraries that 
are added there are truly cross cutting and can be used by the other projects 
across Hadoop
- I think that security related things will largely be of that nature 
but we need to keep it in mind

I'm not sure whether #3 is represented in the other summary or not…

There was certainly discussions around the emerging work from Daryn related to 
pluggable authentication mechanisms within that layer and we will immediately 
have the options of kerberos, simple and plain. There was also talk of how this 
can be leveraged to introduce a Hadoop token mechanism as well. 

At the same time, there was talk of the possibility of simply making kerberos 
easy and a non-issue for intra-cluster use. Certainly we need both of these 
approaches.
I believe someone used ApacheDS' KDC support as an example - if we could 
standup an ApacheDS based KDC and configure it and related keytabs easily than 
the end-to-end story is more palatable to a broader user base. That story being 
the choice of authentication mechanisms for user authentication and easy 
provisioning and management of kerberos for intra-cluster service 
authentication.

If you agree with this extended summary then I can update the other thread with 
that recollection.
Thanks for providing it!

--larry

On Jul 4, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:

 Leaving JIRAs and design docs aside, my recollection from the f2f lounge
 discussion could be summarized as:
 
 --
 1* Decouple users-services authentication from (intra) services-services
 authentication.
 
 The main motivation for this is to get pluggable authentication and
 integrated SSO experience for users.
 
 (we never discussed if this is needed for external-apps talking with Hadoop)
 
 2* We should leave the Hadoop delegation tokens alone
 
 No need to make this pluggable as this is an internal authentication
 mechanism after the 'real' authentication happened.
 
 (this is independent from factoring out all classes we currently have into
 a common implementation for Hadoop and other projects to use)
 
 3* Being able to replace kerberos with something else for (intra)
 services-services authentication.
 
 It was suggested that to support deployments where stock Kerberos may not
 be an option (i.e. cloud) we should make sure that UserGroupInformation and
 RPC security logic work with a pluggable GSS implementation.
 
 4* Create a common security component ie 'hadoop-security' to be 'the'
 security lib for all projects to use.
 
 Create a component/project that would provide the common security pieces
 for all projects to use.
 
 --
 
 If we agree with this, after any necessary corrections, I think we could
 distill clear goals from it and start from there.
 
 Thanks.
 
 Tucu  Alejandro


On Jul 1, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Larry McCay lmc...@hortonworks.com wrote:

 All -
 
 Last week at Hadoop Summit there was a room dedicated as the summit Design 
 Lounge.
 This was a place where like folks could get together and talk about design 
 issues with other contributors with a simple flip board and some beanbag 
 chairs.
 We used this as an opportunity to bootstrap some discussions within 
 common-dev for security related topics. I'd like to summarize the security 
 session and takeaways here for everyone.
 
 This summary and set of takeaways are largely from memory. 
 Please - anyone that attended - feel free to correct anything that is 
 inaccurate or omitted.
 
 Pretty well attended - companies represented:
 * Yahoo!
 * Microsoft
 * Hortonworks
 * Cloudera
 * Intel
 * eBay
 * Voltage Security
 * Flying Penguins
 * EMC
 * others...
 
 Most folks were pretty engaged throughout the session.
 We set expectations as a meet and greet/project kickoff - project being the 
 emerging security development community.
 
 In order to keep the scope of conversations manageable we tried to keep 
 focused on authentication and the ideas around SSO and tokens.
 
 We discussed kerberos as:
 1. major pain point and barrier to entry for some
 2. seemingly perfect for others
   a. obviously requiring backward compatibility
 
 It seemed to be consensus that:
 1. user authentication should be easily integrated with alternative 
 enterprise identity solutions
 2. that 

RE: Hadoop Summit: Security Design Lounge Session

2013-07-03 Thread Kyle Leckie
Thanks for the excellent summary Larry,

Questions for the group:
I have taken a quick look at how pluggable token validation could be added to 
the RPC endpoints:
- Are there any current approaches that I should examined before I 
continue with my investigation?
- For server Auth; I would like to consider TLS. Has there been any 
benchmarking of a well implemented server stack (supports session caching and 
has algorithms configured for performance)?
--
Kyle

-Original Message-
From: Larry McCay [mailto:lmc...@hortonworks.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 2:40 PM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Hadoop Summit: Security Design Lounge Session

All -

Last week at Hadoop Summit there was a room dedicated as the summit Design 
Lounge.
This was a place where like folks could get together and talk about design 
issues with other contributors with a simple flip board and some beanbag chairs.
We used this as an opportunity to bootstrap some discussions within common-dev 
for security related topics. I'd like to summarize the security session and 
takeaways here for everyone.

This summary and set of takeaways are largely from memory. 
Please - anyone that attended - feel free to correct anything that is 
inaccurate or omitted.

Pretty well attended - companies represented:
* Yahoo!
* Microsoft
* Hortonworks
* Cloudera
* Intel
* eBay
* Voltage Security
* Flying Penguins
* EMC
* others...

Most folks were pretty engaged throughout the session.
We set expectations as a meet and greet/project kickoff - project being the 
emerging security development community.

In order to keep the scope of conversations manageable we tried to keep focused 
on authentication and the ideas around SSO and tokens.

We discussed kerberos as:
1. major pain point and barrier to entry for some 2. seemingly perfect for 
others
a. obviously requiring backward compatibility

It seemed to be consensus that:
1. user authentication should be easily integrated with alternative enterprise 
identity solutions 2. that service identity issues should not require thousands 
of service identities added to enterprise user repositories 3. that customers 
should not be forced to install/deploy and manage a KDC for services - this 
implies a couple options:
a. alternatives to kerberos for service identities
b. hadoop KDC implementation - ie. ApacheDS?

There was active discussion around:
1. Hadoop SSO server
a. acknowledgement of Hadoop SSO tokens as something that can be 
standardized for representing both the identity and authentication event data 
as well and access tokens representing a verifiable means for the authenticated 
identity to access resources or services
b. a general understanding of Hadoop SSO as being an analogue and 
alternative for the kerberos KDC and the related tokens being analogous to TGTs 
and service tickets
c. an agreement that there are interesting attributes about the 
authentication event that may be useful in cross cluster trust for SSO - such 
as a rating of authentication strength and number of factors, etc
d. that existing Hadoop tokens - ie. delegation, job, block access - 
will all continue to work and that we are initially looking at alternatives to 
the KDC, TGTs and service tickets 2. authentication mechanism discovery by 
clients - Daryn Sharp has done a bunch of work around this and our SSO solution 
may want to consider a similar mechanism for discovering trusted IDPs and 
service endpoints 3. backward compatibility - kerberos shops need to just 
continue to work 4. some insight into where/how folks believe that token based 
authentication can be accomplished within existing contracts - SASL/GSSAPI, 
REST, web ui 5. what the establishment of a cross cutting concern community 
around security and what that means in terms of the Apache way - email lists, 
wiki, Jiras across projects, etc 6. dependencies, rolling updates, patching and 
how it related to hadoop projects versus packaging 7. collaboration road ahead

A number of breakout discussions were had outside of the designated design 
lounge session as well.

Takeaways for the immediate road ahead:
1. common-dev may be sufficient to discuss security related topics
a. many developers are already subscribed to it
b. there is not that much traffic there anyway
c. we can discuss a more security focused list if we like 2. we will 
discuss the establishment of a wiki space for a holistic view of security 
model, patterns, approaches, etc 3. we will begin discussion on common-dev in 
near-term for the following:
a. discuss and agree on the high level moving parts required for our 
goals for authentication: SSO service, tokens, token validation handlers, 
credential management tools, etc
b. discuss and agree on the natural seams across these moving parts and 
agree on collaboration by tackling various pieces in a divide and conquer 
approach

Hadoop Summit: Security Design Lounge Session

2013-07-01 Thread Larry McCay
All -

Last week at Hadoop Summit there was a room dedicated as the summit Design 
Lounge.
This was a place where like folks could get together and talk about design 
issues with other contributors with a simple flip board and some beanbag chairs.
We used this as an opportunity to bootstrap some discussions within common-dev 
for security related topics. I'd like to summarize the security session and 
takeaways here for everyone.

This summary and set of takeaways are largely from memory. 
Please - anyone that attended - feel free to correct anything that is 
inaccurate or omitted.

Pretty well attended - companies represented:
* Yahoo!
* Microsoft
* Hortonworks
* Cloudera
* Intel
* eBay
* Voltage Security
* Flying Penguins
* EMC
* others...

Most folks were pretty engaged throughout the session.
We set expectations as a meet and greet/project kickoff - project being the 
emerging security development community.

In order to keep the scope of conversations manageable we tried to keep focused 
on authentication and the ideas around SSO and tokens.

We discussed kerberos as:
1. major pain point and barrier to entry for some
2. seemingly perfect for others
a. obviously requiring backward compatibility

It seemed to be consensus that:
1. user authentication should be easily integrated with alternative enterprise 
identity solutions
2. that service identity issues should not require thousands of service 
identities added to enterprise user repositories
3. that customers should not be forced to install/deploy and manage a KDC for 
services - this implies a couple options:
a. alternatives to kerberos for service identities
b. hadoop KDC implementation - ie. ApacheDS?

There was active discussion around:
1. Hadoop SSO server
a. acknowledgement of Hadoop SSO tokens as something that can be 
standardized for representing both the identity and authentication event data 
as well and access tokens representing a verifiable means for the authenticated 
identity to access resources or services
b. a general understanding of Hadoop SSO as being an analogue and 
alternative for the kerberos KDC and the related tokens being analogous to TGTs 
and service tickets
c. an agreement that there are interesting attributes about the 
authentication event that may be useful in cross cluster trust for SSO - such 
as a rating of authentication strength and number of factors, etc
d. that existing Hadoop tokens - ie. delegation, job, block access - 
will all continue to work and that we are initially looking at alternatives to 
the KDC, TGTs and service tickets
2. authentication mechanism discovery by clients - Daryn Sharp has done a bunch 
of work around this and our SSO solution may want to consider a similar 
mechanism for discovering trusted IDPs and service endpoints
3. backward compatibility - kerberos shops need to just continue to work
4. some insight into where/how folks believe that token based authentication 
can be accomplished within existing contracts - SASL/GSSAPI, REST, web ui
5. what the establishment of a cross cutting concern community around security 
and what that means in terms of the Apache way - email lists, wiki, Jiras 
across projects, etc
6. dependencies, rolling updates, patching and how it related to hadoop 
projects versus packaging
7. collaboration road ahead

A number of breakout discussions were had outside of the designated design 
lounge session as well.

Takeaways for the immediate road ahead:
1. common-dev may be sufficient to discuss security related topics
a. many developers are already subscribed to it
b. there is not that much traffic there anyway
c. we can discuss a more security focused list if we like
2. we will discuss the establishment of a wiki space for a holistic view of 
security model, patterns, approaches, etc
3. we will begin discussion on common-dev in near-term for the following:
a. discuss and agree on the high level moving parts required for our 
goals for authentication: SSO service, tokens, token validation handlers, 
credential management tools, etc
b. discuss and agree on the natural seams across these moving parts and 
agree on collaboration by tackling various pieces in a divide and conquer 
approach
c. more than likely - the first piece that will need some immediate 
discussion will be the shape and form of the tokens
d. we will follow up or supplement discussions with POC code patches 
and/or specs attached to jiras

Overall, design lounge was rather effective for what we wanted to do - which 
was to bootstrap discussions and collaboration within the community at large. 
As always, no specific decisions have been made during this session and we can 
discuss any or all of this within common-dev and on related jiras.

Jiras related to the security development group and these discussions:

Centralized SSO/Token Server