[GitHub] [hadoop] steveloughran commented on pull request #5315: HADOOP-18206 Cleanup the commons-logging references and restrict its usage in future

2023-02-06 Thread via GitHub


steveloughran commented on PR #5315:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5315#issuecomment-1419375416

   just noticed that http-components pulls in commons logging so things which 
depend on that still need to export it. question then becomes: do we want to 
explicitly manage the dependency there?
   ```
   [info]   | | +-org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-azure:3.3.5
   [info]   | | | +-com.microsoft.azure:azure-storage:7.0.1
   [info]   | | | | +-com.microsoft.azure:azure-keyvault-core:1.0.0
   [info]   | | | | +-org.slf4j:slf4j-api:1.7.12 (evicted by: 2.0.6)
   [info]   | | | | +-org.slf4j:slf4j-api:2.0.6
   [info]   | | | |
   [info]   | | | +-org.apache.hadoop.thirdparty:hadoop-shaded-guava:1.1.1
   [info]   | | | +-org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:4.5.13 (evicted by: 
4.5.14)
   [info]   | | | +-org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:4.5.14
   [info]   | | | | +-commons-codec:commons-codec:1.11 (evicted by: 1.15)
   [info]   | | | | +-commons-codec:commons-codec:1.15
   [info]   | | | | +-commons-logging:commons-logging:1.2
   [info]   | | | | +-org.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore:4.4.16
   ```
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[GitHub] [hadoop] steveloughran commented on pull request #5315: HADOOP-18206 Cleanup the commons-logging references and restrict its usage in future

2023-01-30 Thread via GitHub


steveloughran commented on PR #5315:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5315#issuecomment-1408635376

   so those production classes I am worrying about are already explicitly 
requiring log4j on the CP? OK, that's not as bad as I feared...I was worrying 
that the code was going from commons-logging wrappers of logj to raw log4j, 
which is a problem


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org