[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-12-09 Thread Jonathan Hung (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16991886#comment-16991886
 ] 

Jonathan Hung commented on HADOOP-16598:


Removing 2.11.0 fix version after branch-2 -> branch-2.10 rename

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.4, 2.9.3, 3.1.4, 3.2.2, 2.10.1
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-11-04 Thread Steve Loughran (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16966875#comment-16966875
 ] 

Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-16598:
-

bq. Michael Stack sir,

I don't think anyone has ever called stack sir except in the special case of a 
TSA employee going "sir -is this your  laptop"

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.4, 2.9.3, 3.1.4, 3.2.2, 2.10.1, 2.11.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-11-01 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16964636#comment-16964636
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16598:


[~stack] sir, seems you pushed wrong patch for branch-2 and branch-2.9? For 
branch-2.x we still need to support jdk7 so we have to use a special guava 
version for the new plugin, but seems the piece of code get lost in the current 
code base.

{noformat}
+  
+
+
+  com.google.guava
+  guava
+  20.0
+
+  
{noformat}

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.4, 2.9.3, 3.1.4, 3.2.2, 2.10.1, 2.11.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-10-19 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16955131#comment-16955131
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16598:


This is only for hadoop-common and hadoop-hdfs, hadoop-yarn will be another 
backport. The reason for this is that, if we modify all the poms at once, the 
pre commit will always timeout since we have to test too many modules...

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-10-17 Thread Michael Stack (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16954173#comment-16954173
 ] 

Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16598:


I tried the 3.2 patch by applying it, cleaning the world, moving protoc out of 
my PATH and then building. It got this far before it started looking for protoc:

{code}
[INFO] --- hadoop-maven-plugins:3.2.2-SNAPSHOT:protoc (compile-protoc) @ 
hadoop-yarn-api ---
[WARNING] [protoc, --version] failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program 
"protoc": error=2, No such file or directory
[ERROR] stdout
...
{code}

Does hadoop-yarn-api need the pom fix?

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-10-04 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944506#comment-16944506
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-16598:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 23m 
31s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
51s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 12m 
11s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 12m 
40s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m  
0s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m 
16s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  4m 
37s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
59s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
23s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 14m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 14m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 14m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 14m  
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 14m  
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 14m  
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  5m 
22s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
7s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  5m 
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  4m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
25s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 10m 
31s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m 
45s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 86m  4s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  7m 54s{color} 
| {color:red} bkjournal in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 16m 
48s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}250m  9s{color} | 
{color:black} {color}

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-10-04 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944253#comment-16944253
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16598:


Uploaded  the rebased patch for branch-2. Patches for branch-3.2, branch-3.1 
and branch-2.9 are still fine.

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-10-04 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944249#comment-16944249
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16598:


Let me rebase...

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-10-03 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944178#comment-16944178
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-16598:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m 10s{color} 
| {color:red} HADOOP-16598 does not apply to branch-2. Rebase required? Wrong 
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-16598 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12982182/HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch
 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/16570/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-10-03 Thread Michael Stack (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944166#comment-16944166
 ] 

Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-16598:


Retry. Was going to commit this tomorrow unless objection. 

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-28 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16940200#comment-16940200
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16598:


{quote}
this isn't going to change protobuf versions is it? It's just moving to the 
jar-based protoc?
{quote}

No, it will not change the protobuf version, it is still 2.5.0. Just use a new 
protobuf maven plugin to resolve the protoc artifact automatically so users do 
not need to install protoc manually.

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-28 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16940037#comment-16940037
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-16598:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
42s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m  
2s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  8m 
58s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 12m  
5s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 10m  
6s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m 
10s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  4m 
25s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
27s{color} | {color:green} branch-2 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
17s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
 2s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m 
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 11m 
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 11m 
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 10m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 10m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 10m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m 
10s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
6s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  4m 
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
18s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  9m 
43s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m 
28s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 73m 31s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  7m 
59s{color} | {color:green} bkjournal in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 17m 
33s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
42s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}195m 55s{color} | 
{color:black}

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-28 Thread Steve Loughran (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16940022#comment-16940022
 ] 

Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-16598:
-

this isn't going to change protobuf versions is it? It's just moving to the 
jar-based protoc?

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2-v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9-v1.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-28 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16939912#comment-16939912
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-16598:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
55s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-2.9 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
53s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 12m 
23s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 12m 
16s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 10m 
33s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m 
38s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  4m 
27s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
25s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
19s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 13m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 13m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 13m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 12m 
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 12m 
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 12m 
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  6m 
16s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
8s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  5m 
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  4m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 11m 
53s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m 
44s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 78m 17s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  7m 
25s{color} | {color:green} bkjournal in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 14m 
29s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
53s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}215m 11s{color} |

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-28 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16939909#comment-16939909
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-16598:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 22m  
3s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-2.9 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
54s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 10m 
53s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m 
53s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  9m 
56s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m 
20s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  4m 
31s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
31s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
17s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 11m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 11m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 10m  
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 10m  
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 10m  
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m 
15s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
7s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  4m 
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
19s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 10m 
30s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m 
27s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 69m 47s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  7m 
57s{color} | {color:green} bkjournal in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 14m 
40s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
44s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}214m 10s{color} |

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-27 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16939852#comment-16939852
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16598:


{noformat}
[INFO] --- protobuf-maven-plugin:0.5.1:compile (src-compile-protoc) @ 
hadoop-common ---
[WARNING] Error injecting: org.xolstice.maven.plugin.protobuf.ProtocCompileMojo
java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/google/common/collect/ImmutableSet 
: Unsupported major.minor version 52.0
{noformat}

Seems the plugin is jdk8 only? Let me check.

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-27 Thread Ayush Saxena (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16939850#comment-16939850
 ] 

Ayush Saxena commented on HADOOP-16598:
---

Branch-2.9 build seems to be red. [~zhangduo] can you check once?

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-27 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16939417#comment-16939417
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-16598:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
43s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-2.9 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  1m 
52s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 11m 
 3s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 11m 
55s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  9m 
48s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m  
9s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  4m 
20s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
21s{color} | {color:green} branch-2.9 passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
17s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} compile {color} | {color:red}  0m 
36s{color} | {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} cc {color} | {color:red}  0m 36s{color} | 
{color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javac {color} | {color:red}  0m 36s{color} 
| {color:red} root in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  9m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  9m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  9m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m  
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
8s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red}  0m 
22s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. 
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red}  0m 
20s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch failed with JDK 
v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. 
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} javadoc {color} | {color:red}  0m 
19s{color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch failed with JDK 
v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_222 {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
18s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  9m 
25s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m 
27s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 73m 23s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-26 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16939080#comment-16939080
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16598:


I assume branch-3.0 and branch-2.8 will be dead soon? If not, will also upload 
patches for them. [~djp].

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-2.9.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-2.patch, HADOOP-16598-branch-3.1.patch, 
> HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-26 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16938534#comment-16938534
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HADOOP-16598:


Will also upload patches for other active branches here, but at least for 
branch-3.1, it is blocked by HADOOP-16600...

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-26 Thread Junping Du (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16938522#comment-16938522
 ] 

Junping Du commented on HADOOP-16598:
-

The patch LGTM. +1. Will commit it shortly if no other comments.

> Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate 
> protobuf classes" to all active branches
> ---
>
> Key: HADOOP-16598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598
> Project: Hadoop Common
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: common
>Reporter: Duo Zhang
>Assignee: Duo Zhang
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-16598) Backport "HADOOP-16558 [COMMON+HDFS] use protobuf-maven-plugin to generate protobuf classes" to all active branches

2019-09-24 Thread Hadoop QA (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16937400#comment-16937400
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-16598:


| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 10m 
15s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} branch-3.2 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  2m 
18s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 21m 
45s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 14m 
33s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m  
6s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
54m 46s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
29s{color} | {color:green} branch-3.2 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
20s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  3m 
 8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 15m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green} 15m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 15m 
33s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  4m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
6s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
12m 15s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  0m 
21s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-project in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  9m 
14s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  1m 
55s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-client in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}104m 55s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 17m  
8s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
48s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}243m 34s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestLeaseRecovery2 |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.server.diskbalancer.TestDiskBalancer |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=19.03.0 Server=19.03.0 Image:yetus/hadoop:63396beab41 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-16598 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12981256/HADOOP-16598-branch-3.2.patch
 |
| Optional Tests |  dupname  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  
mvnsite  unit  shadedclient  xml  cc  |
| uname | Linux 64a3c38f1ec6 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6 
11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality |