DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29794] - [lang] Add convenience format(long) methods to FastDateFormat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 06:11 --- 2.1 released, closing. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29794] - [lang] Add convenience format(long) methods to FastDateFormat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.1 Final -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29794] - [lang] Add convenience format(long) methods to FastDateFormat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794 [lang] Add convenience format(long) methods to FastDateFormat [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-07 01:28 --- tested implementation, couldn't find a way to make it any faster. good stuff! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29794] - [lang] Add convenience format(long) methods to FastDateFormat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794 [lang] Add convenience format(long) methods to FastDateFormat [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Summary|Add convenience format(long)|[lang] Add convenience |methods to FastDateFormat |format(long) methods to ||FastDateFormat --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-05 22:39 --- Code adde that simply creates a Date object and calls on. Creating a Date object is relatively inexpensive, and does not create a GregCalendar. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29794] - [lang] Add convenience format(long) methods to FastDateFormat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29794 [lang] Add convenience format(long) methods to FastDateFormat --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-06 02:57 --- cheers, appreciated. btw. final statement is not exactly correct as the format (Date) methods create a Calendar and call on to format(Calendar). As I was trying to avoid this extra Object creation I came up with the proposed implementation rather than the much simpler one as implemented. I should have performance tested though, as there is no significant difference between the simple and complex implementations that I could see under Java 1.3 or 1.4. Do you want me to verify or close it? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
