What AT commands does NEO1973 support?

2007-03-13 Thread Rockmen Jack

Hi,
 Does NEO1973 support AT command, such as call wait, multiparty call
control, etc? Althought there are BP functions, I don't know where I can
find this information. Can I send AT command directly to BP in development
board via serial port?

Cherrs,
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: What moblie service to get

2007-03-13 Thread Duncan Hudson

Jeremy wrote:

I just wanted to give a little head-up about Cingular data plans.  They are quite confusing, and 
I've looked into them in the past and read several forums at Cingular's website regarding the issue.  
Essentially, the cheaper unlimited plan (smart phone?) gives you walled garden access similar to 
T-Mobile.  If you sign up for this plan and access the internet via a different method, you will get slapped 
with a LARGE bill (depending on your usage).  If you sign up for the PDA plans, you can 
essentially access the internet freely, but you are not allowed to tether your phone, and if you do and they 
catch you (roll of the dice?), then again you'll get a LARGE bill.

And even if you call Cingular and try to ask a sales reps about them, you don't have a 
great chance they'll know any more than you do about the plans.  If you really want to 
get some info, I've been told you should talk to the actual technical support 
people as they apparently know a bit more about how the data network actually operates 
and what is/isn't allowed.

Again, I would like to emphasize that this info was taken from 3rd parties in 
online forums.  I don't have any first hand knowledge on this topic (yet).

Related to the issue of having to buy a Smart phone with a data plan, I don't 
think this is true.  You can add and remove plans to your account at pretty 
much any time.  They don't really care about the device you're using as long as 
you don't break the Terms of Use.  They want your money...
  
The Cingular data plans have been discussed ad nauseum over at 
Treocentral.com.  The consensus is that basically all the plans will 
work fine and with the web access to your account you're free to add or 
subtract any of the data plans w/o dealing w/ customer service.  That 
being said, I've been happily using the $19.99 unlimited data plan for 
the last 3 years.  There doesn't appear to be any 'wall' - I can surf 
anywhere, vpn, ssh, pop, imap, etc.  On a monthly basis my usage is 
between 80 - 90 Mb.


Dunc

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Idea: Wake me during light sleep

2007-03-13 Thread Igor Foox


On 12-Mar-07, at 11:53 AM, Ian Stirling wrote:


Dean Collins wrote:

Hey guys, you're missing the point. You need to stop thinking of the
openmoko  device being a standalone unit, you are always connected to
your pc when in mobile phone coverage. Just use your gprs data link.
Start thinking of the Neo as a portable 'viewer' to applications  
running
on standalone servers then you'll start seeing location is  
irrelevant.

No, it's not.
Absolutely not.
No way.

With most UK contracts and pay to talk deals, I get a whole  
megabyte a month free!

I need to pay around $80(US) per month or so for unlimited GPRS data.
The cheapest 'pay as you go' sort of data tarrifs are around $6/ 
meg, and that requires a contract.


And in many buildings, I don't get a signal.

If it possibly can be done, applications should live on the phone,  
perhaps 'growing' if they can get connectivity.


Connectivity can be anything from GPRS, to SMS, to walking by a  
wifi access point that you have access to, to USB-net.


Having just looked up rates by Canadian providers, I can say that the  
situation here is not any better. Rates are ludicrous at best. So  
having all the applications reliant on a constantly available net  
connection will make them unusable by a lot of people.


Igor


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Sean Moss-Pultz
Dear Community,

OpenMoko is built around the philosophy that far more knowledge exists 
outside the walls of a corporation than within. Internally, we're
struggling with two issues. So we're throwing this out, hoping that some
of you have can help us move past our current crossroads: 
  
  1) We can't find a WiFi Chipset with GPL'ed drivers -- We know 
  this has been discussed (to death) on this list, but as we're 
  beginning work on the next summer hardware refresh we still can't seem
  to find a vendor that meets our strict requirements: Namely, we refuse
  to put anything binary in the kernel. 

  Marvell has some nice for larger devices (the 8388). But we need
  one specifically for mobile phones (like the 8686). If somebody 
  can help us find the right vendor, we'll give you a free Neo1973. 
  
  If you're a vendor and want to work with us to GPL your driver, we'll 
  give you lots of business -- and a free phone ;-) 


  2) We don't have enough UI / Application developers -- If anybody 
  meets (or knows somebody who can meet) the following qualifications:

* = 2 years experience with GTK
* object oriented design and implementation w/ GObject
* experience with writing GUI applications from scratch,
* has software quality assets like:
  o writing maintainable and reusable code
  o refactoring
  o design patterns
  o identifying and extracting common application code 
into frameworks 

  Familiarity with collaborative development tools such as:

* bugtracker,
* source control management,
* wiki,
* mailing lists 

  is a necessity.

  We've love to talk with you! Please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
  links to your previous work and a resume if you have one. (The latter 
  is nowhere near as important as the former.)

Thanks in advance for any help!

-Sean


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: What AT commands does NEO1973 support?

2007-03-13 Thread Matthew S. Hamrick

Since no one else has lept on this one, I'll pipe in with my comment.

At the eTel conference, I asked Sean Moss-Pulz about this indirectly,  
actually asking if the GSM module they're using is open enough for me  
to download the details of their AT command set support.  
Unfortunately, the GSM module is one of those components that comes  
with an NDA, so no, I can't just go and download the specs.


But there is a bright side, 3GPP has a standard set of AT commands  
that all GSM modems are supposed to respond to, and the two that you  
mention MultiParty Call Control (AT+CHLD) and Call Waiting (AT+CCWA)  
are in the list. Sean said that for reasons of adhering to the NDA,  
he couldn't discuss specifics, but it was reasonable to expect the  
modem to respond to standard 3GPP commands.


My concern, however, is that while the commands themselves are more  
or less standardized, the behavior of the module is not. I wrote a  
simple dialer for the Telit GM862 module used by the FrankenPhone /  
SqueakMoPho. Some behavior, such as the amount of time you should  
wait before assuming the module isn't going to compete the call, or  
the state your device is in after it doesn't complete a call. These  
types of behaviors are not covered in the 3GPP spec.


It's not a huge deal, but software that is designed to take timing  
issues into account can provide a more responsive and more robust  
experience. But depending on the robustness of the module they're  
using, it could very well turn out to be a non-issue.


-cheers!
-Matt H.

On Mar 13, 2007, at 2:42 AM, Rockmen Jack wrote:


Hi,
  Does NEO1973 support AT command, such as call wait, multiparty  
call control, etc? Althought there are BP functions, I don't know  
where I can find this information. Can I send AT command directly  
to BP in development board via serial port?


Cherrs,
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia wtorek, 13 marca 2007, Sean Moss-Pultz napisał:

 OpenMoko is built around the philosophy that far more knowledge exists
 outside the walls of a corporation than within. Internally, we're
 struggling with two issues. So we're throwing this out, hoping that
 some of you have can help us move past our current crossroads:
  
   1) We can't find a WiFi Chipset with GPL'ed drivers

Ralink Technology has chipset with GPL driver (outside of mainline kernel, 
also in -mm kernel iirc). Zydas also have GPL driver (in mainline 
kernel).

Ralink chipset takes 40mA less then Zydas. Both are 802.11g and can be 
connected over USB. I do not know can they be connected over SPI.

IIRC both are 3.3V so no need for +5V at all.

-- 
JID: hrw-jabber.org
OpenEmbedded developer/consultant

  Warning: Dates in calendar are closer than they appear.



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Imre Kaloz
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:51:00 +0100, Sean Moss-Pultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:



Hello Sean,


 1) We can't find a WiFi Chipset with GPL'ed drivers -- We know
  this has been discussed (to death) on this list, but as we're
  beginning work on the next summer hardware refresh we still can't seem
  to find a vendor that meets our strict requirements: Namely, we refuse
  to put anything binary in the kernel.

  Marvell has some nice for larger devices (the 8388). But we need
  one specifically for mobile phones (like the 8686). If somebody
  can help us find the right vendor, we'll give you a free Neo1973.
 If you're a vendor and want to work with us to GPL your driver, we'll
  give you lots of business -- and a free phone ;-)


Atheros AR6K - check http://atheros.com/pt/AR6001Bulletins.htm , and for  
the fully GPL'ed driver and SDIO stack please check  
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdio-linux/


I hardly think you will find a better alternative ;)


Regards,
Imre

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread dimitris
Intel's laptop-oriented chips have GPL drivers, albeit with binary
modules - but not *kernel* binary modules.

The 3945abg driver uses a binary userspace daemon and a binary on-chip
microcode:

http://ipw3945.sourceforge.net/

The 2200bg/2945abg driver relies on a binary on-chip firmware:

http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/

The latter one is in the mainline kernel too.

D.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread dimitris
 Atheros AR6K - check http://atheros.com/pt/AR6001Bulletins.htm , and for
 the fully GPL'ed driver and SDIO stack please check
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdio-linux/
 
 I hardly think you will find a better alternative ;)

Do you know if the on-chip MAC is a full MAC?

Last time I used an Atheros-based Wifi card (for an AP application) the
predominant Linux driver - Madwifi - relied on binary in-kernel modules
(ath_hal).  Is that still the case (for this chip)?

Sean, given the uncertainty surrounding Wifi drivers, would an
externally-accessible SDIO slot be a better step for the next hw revision?

D.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread jeff

Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:51:00 +0100, Sean Moss-Pultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:



Hello Sean,


 1) We can't find a WiFi Chipset with GPL'ed drivers -- We know
  this has been discussed (to death) on this list, but as we're
  beginning work on the next summer hardware refresh we still can't seem
  to find a vendor that meets our strict requirements: Namely, we refuse
  to put anything binary in the kernel.

  Marvell has some nice for larger devices (the 8388). But we need
  one specifically for mobile phones (like the 8686). If somebody
  can help us find the right vendor, we'll give you a free Neo1973.
 If you're a vendor and want to work with us to GPL your driver, we'll
  give you lots of business -- and a free phone ;-)


Atheros AR6K - check http://atheros.com/pt/AR6001Bulletins.htm , and for 
the fully GPL'ed driver and SDIO stack please check 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdio-linux/


I hardly think you will find a better alternative ;)


From common_atheros_sdiostack.patch (in sdio-linux tarball):

Any implementation of the Simplified Specification may require a license from 
the SD Card Association or other third parties.


Any insight on may in this case?

Thanks,

-Jeff

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Hans Cats

2007/3/13, dimitris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Intel's laptop-oriented chips have GPL drivers, albeit with binary
modules - but not *kernel* binary modules.

The 3945abg driver uses a binary userspace daemon and a binary on-chip
microcode:

http://ipw3945.sourceforge.net/

The 2200bg/2945abg driver relies on a binary on-chip firmware:

http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/

The latter one is in the mainline kernel too.

D.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



A better option would be to use one of the chipset that has runtime firmware
that (even) OpenBSD is allowed to distribute.

You'll find a good article on the problems with binary firmwares on
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/293

For a round up:

atu (4) - Atmel AT76C50x USB IEEE 802.11b wireless network device
ral (4) - Ralink Technology IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless network device (2nd
gen 802.11 Ralink)
rum (4) - Ralink Technology USB IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless network device
zyd (4) - Zydas ZD1211 USB IEEE 802.11b/g wireless network deviceMarcin
Juszkiewicz already mentioned some of them.

Hans
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 18:49:17 dimitris wrote:
 Sean, given the uncertainty surrounding Wifi drivers, would an
 externally-accessible SDIO slot be a better step for the next hw revision?

I would very much welcome a standard SD slot anyhow. SD cards are available in 
bigger sizes than MicroSD. 

Possibly even better, retain the microsd slot for storage and add an fullsize 
SDIO one for well whatever people want ;)


pgplCzTTQBG7o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Martin Lefkowitz
I don't know much about the intel one except that I wouldn't be
surprised it downloaded the firmware into the chipset.  I Broadcom also
does this as well as TI.  There is an opensource version of the TI driver.

Getting attention from a Chipset manufacturer is another story.

Marty


 Message: 7
 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:38:38 -0700
 From: dimitris [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Intel's laptop-oriented chips have GPL drivers, albeit with binary
 modules - but not *kernel* binary modules.

 The 3945abg driver uses a binary userspace daemon and a binary on-chip
 microcode:

 http://ipw3945.sourceforge.net/

 The 2200bg/2945abg driver relies on a binary on-chip firmware:

 http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/

 The latter one is in the mainline kernel too.

 D.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Imre Kaloz

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:49:17 +0100, dimitris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Atheros AR6K - check http://atheros.com/pt/AR6001Bulletins.htm , and for
the fully GPL'ed driver and SDIO stack please check
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sdio-linux/

I hardly think you will find a better alternative ;)



Last time I used an Atheros-based Wifi card (for an AP application) the
predominant Linux driver - Madwifi - relied on binary in-kernel modules
(ath_hal).  Is that still the case (for this chip)?


Check the urls, the AR6001 has nothing to do with the AR5000 series ;)

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Martin Lefkowitz
I don't know much about the intel one except that I wouldn't be
surprised it downloaded the firmware into the chipset.  I Broadcom also
does this as well as TI.  There is an opensource version of the TI driver.

Getting attention from a Chipset manufacturer is another story.

Marty


 Message: 7
 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:38:38 -0700
 From: dimitris [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Intel's laptop-oriented chips have GPL drivers, albeit with binary
 modules - but not *kernel* binary modules.

 The 3945abg driver uses a binary userspace daemon and a binary on-chip
 microcode:

 http://ipw3945.sourceforge.net/

 The 2200bg/2945abg driver relies on a binary on-chip firmware:

 http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/

 The latter one is in the mainline kernel too.

 D.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Jonathon Suggs

Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:

On Tuesday 13 March 2007 18:49:17 dimitris wrote:
  

Sean, given the uncertainty surrounding Wifi drivers, would an
externally-accessible SDIO slot be a better step for the next hw revision?



I would very much welcome a standard SD slot anyhow. SD cards are available in 
bigger sizes than MicroSD. 

Possibly even better, retain the microsd slot for storage and add an fullsize 
SDIO one for well whatever people want ;)
  



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
  
Don't know how much re-work that would require, but I really like that 
idea.  I already have 2GB and 4GB SD cards.  I'm not overly thrilled 
about having to use a different format.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 19:22:08 you wrote:
 Don't know how much re-work that would require, but I really like that
 idea.  I already have 2GB and 4GB SD cards.  I'm not overly thrilled
 about having to use a different format.

SDIO has one disadvantage: the cards are rather pricey. The Spectec card is 
the cheapest by far and still retails for 75EUR in Switzerland... Ralink 
based USB Sticks are less than one third of that.



pgp2rd5SPEQLH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Imre Kaloz

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:03:48 +0100, Hans Cats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


2007/3/13, dimitris [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Intel's laptop-oriented chips have GPL drivers, albeit with binary
modules - but not *kernel* binary modules.

The 3945abg driver uses a binary userspace daemon and a binary on-chip
microcode:

http://ipw3945.sourceforge.net/

The 2200bg/2945abg driver relies on a binary on-chip firmware:

http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net/

The latter one is in the mainline kernel too.


A better option would be to use one of the chipset that has runtime  
firmware

that (even) OpenBSD is allowed to distribute.

You'll find a good article on the problems with binary firmwares on
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/293

For a round up:

atu (4) - Atmel AT76C50x USB IEEE 802.11b wireless network device
ral (4) - Ralink Technology IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless network device (2nd
gen 802.11 Ralink)
rum (4) - Ralink Technology USB IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless network device
zyd (4) - Zydas ZD1211 USB IEEE 802.11b/g wireless network deviceMarcin
Juszkiewicz already mentioned some of them.

Hans


The PCI based devices (Intel and the first Ralink) would harldy fit into a  
phone both physically and power-usage wise. Regarding the USB ones, the  
Atmel is pretty much EOL'ed as far as I know, and the driver for the  
others are not stable nor too portable. And we didn't speak about wireless  
characterisks, sensivity and other lower priority stuff.



Imre

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Imre Kaloz
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:26:16 +0100, Eric Heinemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:



My only concern with a full SDIO slot is the bulk that it would
require.  One thought could be to have 2 microSD slots since there is a
microSD WiFi card (http://www.spectec.com.tw/sdw823.htm).  I would
think it conforms to standard SDIO spec, but I do not know.



-Eric


Those don't have GPL'ed driver and it's unlikely that they will have one,  
ever. Also, a SDIO based wireless chip can be placed on the board, so the  
device doesn't have to have a full sized SD slot (and this way it will  
take up way less space, look at  
http://atheros.com/pt/images/AR6001X_BGA.gif ).



Imre

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Fwd: Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
[the reply to issue bit me another time ;)]
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 17:51:00 Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
   Marvell has some nice for larger devices (the 8388). But we need
   one specifically for mobile phones (like the 8686). If somebody
   can help us find the right vendor, we'll give you a free Neo1973.

Well for starters it would help if you could give a somewhat more concise 
requirement ;)

Aside of the aforementioned Ralink and Zydas (which USB works easily with 
Linux and doesn't even seem to need a firmware blob [1]).



http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/293/ (posted on 2006-12-27)


Atmel:
For some things we do require non-disclosure agreements, but we are generally 
able to provide the API documentation and the firmware driver interface 
specifications for our hardware. As to why others may not be able to do 
this... well, our software is developed in-house, but others might out 
outsource their driver development to third-party companies, so they may not 
even have the documentation that a programmer requests.

We usually provide driver source code, and we try to put it under the GPL if 
possible, so that's usually good enough if you want to write your own driver. 
If you want to see more than that, we generally require an NDA, or if you're 
an embedded customer, we provide reference platforms. Some of the Atmel 
drivers are even in 2.6.20 as is Zydas.

Realtek and RAlink have similar statements of wanting to work with Linux 
vendors. And that investigation was done by someone who didnt actually want 
to buy anything.

Realteks USB chips require 3.3V and 1.8V, 5V is tolerated for input.
http://www.realtek.com.tw/products/productsView.aspx?Langid=1PNid=24PFid=1Level=6Conn=5ProdID=36
they don't seem to support SPI. Realtek seems to think they are fit for use in 
phones and lists mobile phone as application area explicitely. Publically 
available data doesn't seem to list power consumption. Driver tarball on the 
site seems to consist of sources only.

[1] I once looked at the driver tarball and didn't find it, in any case. It 
might still be hidden inside some variable deepdown in a source file.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia wtorek, 13 marca 2007, Imre Kaloz napisał:

 Regarding the USB ones, the Atmel is pretty much EOL'ed as far as 
 I know, and the driver for the others are not stable nor too portable.

Not portable? There are users or ARM (Xscale, IOP) machines which use 
ralink and zydas dongles with their hardware...

-- 
JID: hrw-jabber.org
OpenEmbedded developer/consultant

 You can logoff, but you can never leave.
-- Nina Liedtke, CyberJoly Drim



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Scott Rushforth
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:46:57 -0400
Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Good to see things moving forward on the wifi issue.  But,
 
 I was going to be a developer for this platform, but in light of my 
 recent thread, and the lack of wifi support, I don't think I can, at 
 least not until it's launched to the general public, which defeats
 the entire purpose of the developer release phase.  It's because of
 the following:
 
 1. The sheer quantity of information about finding a mobile provider 
 with a data plan that will support the neo, as indicated by the
 useful responses to my recent thread.  And the lack of certainty of
 that information.  I think this will work.  I appreciate those
 responses from non-openmoko people, because it's all we've got to go
 on.  And that brings me to problem 2:
 
 2. The fact that the openmoko guys have apparently just washed their 
 hands of the entire issue of which services will work, and aren't 
 providing any information on the site (and very little on the wiki).
 (At least start with the big countries/regions).  Your device is
 great, guys, your platform sounds great too. But you can't leave us
 all on our own when it comes to getting the thing on the net.  Your
 neo is a $350 doorstop without a working service provider.
 
 3. If there was wifi on the device this wouldn't be nearly as much of
 an issue, obviously, because we wouldn't need to rely on the provider
 to get on the net.
 
 Either give us detailed information on which providers and plans will 
 work, or get wifi on the device.  Those are the two roads at the
 crossroads.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenMoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Not sure what this has to do with Wifi?

I think part of the issue is that the openmoko is a GSM device, and GSM
is available all over the world.  I bet the majority of the company
(FIC), and current developers are probably not even in the same country
you are.  (i have no clue).

So especially in this first developer phase, I think its fair and
understandable that developers and interested individuals do their own
research and experimentation to find out how they will make it work for
them, and contribute that back to the community.

Let's face it, the device is in its very early form, and a lot of
things are not going to be very polished it seems.  I for one am
willing to pay the 350, and also willing to check my account status
with cingular online every few days to see what my usage will look like.

I think if one wants a more polished, internet capable device,
hopefully this community will help that happen by September.  But it
will take a community, research, dedication, and time from many
individuals.  We are at the beginning.

Cheers, and I can't wait for phase 1.

-Scott

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Mike



Scott Rushforth wrote:



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



Not sure what this has to do with Wifi?

I think part of the issue is that the openmoko is a GSM device, and GSM
is available all over the world.  I bet the majority of the company
(FIC), and current developers are probably not even in the same country
you are.  (i have no clue).

So especially in this first developer phase, I think its fair and
understandable that developers and interested individuals do their own
research and experimentation to find out how they will make it work for
them, and contribute that back to the community.

Let's face it, the device is in its very early form, and a lot of
things are not going to be very polished it seems.  I for one am
willing to pay the 350, and also willing to check my account status
with cingular online every few days to see what my usage will look like.


What this has to do with wifi is covered in my last email.  If I can't 
have wifi on the device, then I have to rely on the mobile service 
provider.  If I have to rely on the mobile service provider, then I have 
to figure out what plan to get.  If we have to do that, then the 
openmoko people shouldn't leave us entirely on our own.  If they're 
going to sell worldwide then they should FIGURE OUT worldwide.


This is open source development.  So we developers aren't making money 
here.  I for, one am NOT willing to pay $350 to get a device that I'm 
not sure will work with whatever service I choose, and therefore that 
I'm not sure I can even develop for.







___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Imre Kaloz
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:00:14 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Dnia wtorek, 13 marca 2007, Imre Kaloz napisał:


Regarding the USB ones, the Atmel is pretty much EOL'ed as far as
I know, and the driver for the others are not stable nor too portable.


Not portable? There are users or ARM (Xscale, IOP) machines which use
ralink and zydas dongles with their hardware...



...and they suffer from the same problems since the vendor code-drop.  
Don't get me wrong, I really appreciate the work the rt2x00 guys are  
doing, but there will be quite some time before that driver will work  
reliable - and it's not their fault, they had to base the whole work on  
the vendor driver, not actual datasheets.


Regarding the ZyDAS chip, probably you either mean the 802.11b version,  
which is EOL'ed and has a clean and nice driver, or the 802.11b/g one,  
which has currently 3 different drivers with different bugs.


Oh, mea culpa, most of the ZyDAS portability problems only affect big  
endian systems ;)



Imre

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Mike



Jonathon Suggs wrote:

Jonathon Suggs wrote:
I HIGHLY doubt (I'd actually be willing to bet) that the Neo is 
incapable of working with the US carriers.  Now, that doesn't mean 
that it will be easy in the first few weeks/months of the developers 
edition of the device, but it is not a hardware limitation.  So, don't 
worry about whether or not you will be able to get onto the 
network...you will.  


On which plan!??!  Which plan can I get on the network with and which 
can I not?  There's a big different between a $9.99/mo plan and a 
$39.99/mo plan.  I don't want to become a neo developer if it's going to 
cost me an additional $480/year beyond the initial device cost.  This 
whole don't worry about it, you can get on somehow crap is absurd!




It just may require a little elbow grease to get
it working.  However, if you actually did read the wiki, the 
developers edition is NOT meant for non-technical users, or users that 
can't handle bugs. 
Just to clarify, I'm betting that the Neo WILL be able to get onto the 
networks via GPRS.  I know there is a lot of discussion, but GSM and 
GPRS are standardized protocols.  Therefore, if the NEO hardware is able 
to implement these standards, then it WILL be able to get onto the 
network (which I'm willing to bet that it does).


Sorry to be condescending, in that last email, but it was written in a 
somewhat arrogant tone.  So, please no bad blood on the mail list.
Bottom line, you WILL be able to use the Neo on GPRS networks in the 
US.  My other email has the plans that will work.  Again, they may take 
some additional work to get up and running, but eventually it will work 
and will be a much more user-friendly experience.  But if you want a 
phone during the developers phase, then don't count on it happening 
within a specific timetable unless you are willing to do the work yourself.




Johnathan, it's not as simple as just a GPRS network in the US.  See 
my thread What mobile service to get.  There are 12 data plans offered 
by cingular. Different prices.  Some of them have Blackberry in the 
title.  Can neo work with those?  How do you know?  After all, it's a 
GPRS network.  As I said in my original response in this thread, the 
sheer volume of information, and the tentative way everyone presented it 
in my thread, indicates that finding a mobile plan is, in fact, not 
simple, and I SHOULD worry about it.


The openmoko people had better provide us some information about what 
will work and what won't, or I'm out and advising others to do the same.





___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Alberto García Hierro
El Tuesday 13 March 2007 22:10:03 Mike escribió:
 Johnathan, it's not as simple as just a GPRS network in the US.  See
 my thread What mobile service to get.  There are 12 data plans offered
 by cingular. Different prices.  Some of them have Blackberry in the
 title.  Can neo work with those?  How do you know?  After all, it's a
 GPRS network.  As I said in my original response in this thread, the
 sheer volume of information, and the tentative way everyone presented it
 in my thread, indicates that finding a mobile plan is, in fact, not
 simple, and I SHOULD worry about it.

 The openmoko people had better provide us some information about what
 will work and what won't, or I'm out and advising others to do the same.

I'm sure that your provider can do a better work at it, just call them 
and 
ask. I called Orange this afternoon an, at least here in Spain, the plan 
names don't matter. You can get the Blackberry Foo and Windows Mobile Bar 
plans without a specific device, they don't care. In fact, they have a 
interesting Blackberry labeled plan which offers unlimited POP and IMAP 
traffic to your server (you need to give them the ip when you sign the 
contract). I've started thinking of setting up a proxy listening on port 110 
and configuring the Neo for using it for all the internet traffic[1], so I 
can get unlimited internet access for 12 €/mo.

Regards,
Alberto

[1] http://httppc.sourceforge.net/

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Tomasz Zielinski

2007/3/13, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


The openmoko people had better provide us some information about what
will work and what won't, or I'm out and advising others to do the same.


We, others, don't need babysitting. Especially we don't expect Asian
hardware manufacturer will provide any information about our local (EU
or US) GSM services and pricing. We can read, do we?

--
Tomek Z.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Jonathon Suggs

Rod Whitby wrote:

I can't believe this thread.
Anyone who is going to be a phone developer should be able to do their own 
research on phone plans.
With the attitude being displaying (I'm out and advising others to do the 
same), I wonder what the reaction would be to a P1 device with bugs in it.
Anyone with an attitude of OpenMoko must spoon feed me everything should 
probably wait for September ...
Sheesh!
-- Rod

-Original Message-
The openmoko people had better provide us some information about what will work 
and what won't, or I'm out and advising others to do the same.





___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
  

Agreed.
And since Mike couldn't read my other post that had this exact same 
information, I will post it one more time...just for him.  This time 
with a little more detail.


Cingular - SmartPhone Connect or Data Connect will work
T-Mobile - Can't find the exact details, but you can sign up for a voice 
plan, then add on a data plan as well...those data plans will work with 
the Neo.


Does that help?

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Idea: Wake me during light sleep

2007-03-13 Thread Tomasz Zielinski

2007/3/13, Edwin Lock [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


And I don't think there will be many countries that have cheaper
prices...correct me if I'm wrong!


http://msmobiles.com/catalog/i.php/578.html

In Poland flat rate GPRS/EDGE/3G is available for private person for
~EUR 15  (cheapest option, data transfer may be limited after first GB
/ month).

--
Tomek Z.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Martin Lefkowitz
I don't see what plan you should be getting has anything really to do
with Openmoko, other than helpful people relaying their experiences with
data plans in the USA.

Regardless of what phone you get you still have to navigate through the
different plans and what they mean.  If you think OpenMoko is going to
open a kiosk in a mall because you said so, your living in a fantasy
world. 

Why don't you collect all the information that came on this email list
and post it to the Wiki, or FAQ?


Marty



 What this has to do with wifi is covered in my last email.  If I can't 
 have wifi on the device, then I have to rely on the mobile service 
 provider.  If I have to rely on the mobile service provider, then I have 
 to figure out what plan to get.  If we have to do that, then the 
 openmoko people shouldn't leave us entirely on our own.  If they're 
 going to sell worldwide then they should FIGURE OUT worldwide.

 This is open source development.  So we developers aren't making money 
 here.  I for, one am NOT willing to pay $350 to get a device that I'm 
 not sure will work with whatever service I choose, and therefore that 
 I'm not sure I can even develop for.


   


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Mike



Jonathon Suggs wrote:

Mike wrote:

SmartPhone Connect and Data Connect ONLY?

All t-mobile data plans will work? All?

Are you with the openmoko project or is your advice conjecture?  Is 
your advice official?


This is my point.

I would shut up since on this subthread, I look like the only one with 
the problem.  But if you read my What mobile plan... thread, you'd 
find others with similar questions and confusion.
First of all, if you can't accept help from anyone other than and 
official OpenMoko developer, then you probably should not be a part of 
this community.  We will make things work together by helping each 
other.  There are only a few official OpenMoko developers, but there 
are many of us here in the community that will give you a hand if you 
will allow us.


That said, PLEASE ALLOW ME TO HELP YOU! (It's amazing that I have to beg 
you for permission to help you).


Johnathon let me phrase it like this-

I love the help of the open source community, I'm a part of it myself. 
But when it comes to whether or not I spend $350 plus an 
officially-unknown monthly price, and likely with a two year contract, 
then yea, I want big official advice with a golden seal of approval on a 
silver platter with a company logo in a spotlight and smiling showgirls 
on either side.


You talk about it like you're putting mobile service advice in the same 
category as advice for debugging my code.  I don't need official people 
to debug my code, but I DO need someone official to tell me how much 
it's going to cost me to develop for this platform, before I start 
signing two year contracts with providers.


The rest of your email is great thanks much, I'll add it to my (growing) 
notes file on service plans for the neo,


m







___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Jonathon Suggs

Mike wrote:

SmartPhone Connect and Data Connect ONLY?

All t-mobile data plans will work? All?

Are you with the openmoko project or is your advice conjecture?  Is 
your advice official?


This is my point.

I would shut up since on this subthread, I look like the only one with 
the problem.  But if you read my What mobile plan... thread, you'd 
find others with similar questions and confusion.
First of all, if you can't accept help from anyone other than and 
official OpenMoko developer, then you probably should not be a part of 
this community.  We will make things work together by helping each 
other.  There are only a few official OpenMoko developers, but there 
are many of us here in the community that will give you a hand if you 
will allow us.


That said, PLEASE ALLOW ME TO HELP YOU! (It's amazing that I have to beg 
you for permission to help you).


T-Mobile
http://wiki.howardforums.com/index.php/T-Mobile_Data
http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/plans/default.aspx?plancategory=7

The stand-alone data plans are more expensive.  I can only speak from my 
personal experience in that I pay $19.95/month for unlimited internet as 
an add-on to my voice plan.  I'm sorry that I cannot find a direct link 
to an official site that says this is possible/available.  However, 
I'm just speculating that it is still available.


Cingular
http://wiki.howardforums.com/index.php/Cingular_Data_Plans
If you read, both Smartphone Connect and PDA Connect have unlimited 
access to wap.cingular.com  I've looked into this pretty extensively as 
I was considering switching to Cingular (from T-Mobile) due to coverage 
at my house.  I talked to an offical Cingular representative on the 
phone.  He said that I could use my PocketPC on the Smartphone Connect 
plan.  Therefore, in my non-official opinion, you should be able to 
use the Neo on the Smartphone Connect Plan.  It costs $19.95/month.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Rod Whitby
Mike wrote:
 SmartPhone Connect and Data Connect ONLY?
 
 All t-mobile data plans will work? All?
 
 Are you with the openmoko project or is your advice conjecture?  Is your
 advice official?
 
 This is my point.
 
 I would shut up since on this subthread, I look like the only one with
 the problem.  But if you read my What mobile plan... thread, you'd
 find others with similar questions and confusion.

Please consider that it may not be the actual question you are asking,
but the way in which you are asking it.

Threatening OpenMoko by saying that you will tell lots of other people
to leave the project is not a useful way to get your question answered ...

Saying that OpenMoko should have details of *all* phone plans
*worldwide* well ahead of a September public release is also not very
realistic.

[Especially when in most (if not all) of the world GSM is GSM and the
Neo will just work with whatever plan people already have for their
existing GSM phone.]

Remember that you are being given a *developer preview* of a future
mobile phone that is being released in September.  If it was a different
company, you would not see *anything* other than a press release before
September.  You should temper your expectations accordingly ...

I personally would prefer that OpenMoko staff continue working on
development of the phone hardware and software, rather than spend months
of time documenting and testing all the phone plans in the world, just
so you don't have to do the legwork yourself.

-- Rod

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Mike Krier



Marcel de Jong wrote:

What exactly do you expect for an answer, Mike?



I expect something official for an answer from someone official.


Are you going to Nokia/Motorola/Sony-Ericsson to demand they tell you
whether their GSM phones works with T-Mobile US / Cingular?
Of course it will work with their GSM phones, since GSM and GPRS are 
standards.


No, because Cingular can tell me that. They can't tell me that for the neo.


I'll tell you, here in The Netherlands, we have PCMCIA cards with
SIMcard slots. You put these PC-cards in your laptop, insert your
SIMcard and you have GPRS internet access on your laptop. They can't
stop you. In fact, they offer that service here in The Netherlands
themselves.


(I'm assuming you weren't directing that paragraph for me, I'm not in 
the netherlands).




___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Mike



Rod Whitby wrote:

Please consider that it may not be the actual question you are asking,
but the way in which you are asking it.

Threatening OpenMoko by saying that you will tell lots of other people
to leave the project is not a useful way to get your question answered ...


I disagree.



Saying that OpenMoko should have details of *all* phone plans
*worldwide* well ahead of a September public release is also not very
realistic.


I didn't say that exactly.



[Especially when in most (if not all) of the world GSM is GSM and the
Neo will just work with whatever plan people already have for their
existing GSM phone.]

Remember that you are being given a *developer preview* of a future
mobile phone that is being released in September.  If it was a different
company, you would not see *anything* other than a press release before
September.  You should temper your expectations accordingly ...


If it was a different company, it wouldn't be open source, and, thus, 
they wouldn't need a developer preview.  It's a circular point.






___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Robin Sonefors
I have a much more important question, however: will the Neo work with
european electrons, or will I need to import asian ones? If I'd need to
import a new set of electrons to use for charging my battery every time
it runs out, it'd become very expensive very soon. If, on the other
hand, I could use my regular wall outlet, the power would be free.

Can anyone *OFFICIAL* give me any advice on this? If you don't do that
within 10 minutes, I'll get a Windows Mobile phone instead.

ons 2007-03-14 klockan 08:17 +1030 skrev Rod Whitby:
 I can't believe this thread.
 Anyone who is going to be a phone developer should be able to do their own 
 research on phone plans.
 With the attitude being displaying (I'm out and advising others to do the 
 same), I wonder what the reaction would be to a P1 device with bugs in it.
 Anyone with an attitude of OpenMoko must spoon feed me everything should 
 probably wait for September ...
 Sheesh!
 -- Rod
 
 -Original Message-
 The openmoko people had better provide us some information about what will 
 work and what won't, or I'm out and advising others to do the same.
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenMoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Scott Rushforth
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:45:36 -0400
Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If it was a different company, it wouldn't be open source, and, thus, 
 they wouldn't need a developer preview.  It's a circular point.

Exactly, Mike.

And now that we are all on the same page about this being an
open-source project, it appears that it is being handled in the same
manner as most if not all open-source projects, through a community.

To me, if a community member has taken the time to do research for me,
and email me back with weblinks, and enough basic information for me to
make a fairly educated decision, I would not only be satisfied, but I
would be very grateful.

It really should not make a differece if the word was official.  At
this point most of the people on this list are either developers are
linux hobbyists.  So I think that we should all be smart enough that by
collaborating, come up with some decent solutions.  If this makes you
feel unfortable about the unknown, then it would indeed be better to
wait until september for you.  I am sure that many aspects of this
project will handled in a similar pattern of communication, through the
community.

For me, this is not an issue.  I plan on actively participating, and I
am not worried about plans, because with any modern GSM carrier
(cingular and t-mo included) you can change your plan if it does not
suit you.

Folks, the point of this thread is for the community to ask the
community for help in finding an open-source wifi device.  This thread
has gotten completely taken over by this miscellaneous discussion about
plans.

Lets move the topic back to wifi chips.  This is the whole point of
open-source, we all have a say.  Right now the community needs to work
together, so lets do that!

How Much Is Your Time Worth I ask :) ?

Cheers
-scott

 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenMoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Clare Johnstone

On 3/14/07, Martin Lefkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Why don't you collect all the information that came on this email list
and post it to the Wiki, or FAQ?


Marty



Aha! Thank you Marty, that is a way out of this Merry-Go_round.
Otherwise I was thinking about the normal advice Don't feed the trolls
clare

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [openmoko-announce] Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Grahame Jordan

Hi Sean,

What about the  Marvell® 88W8385 module used on the wifistix

Open source drivers can be found at http://gumstix.com

Cheers

Grahame Jordan


Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:

Dear Community,

OpenMoko is built around the philosophy that far more knowledge exists 
outside the walls of a corporation than within. Internally, we're

struggling with two issues. So we're throwing this out, hoping that some
of you have can help us move past our current crossroads: 
  
  1) We can't find a WiFi Chipset with GPL'ed drivers -- We know 
  this has been discussed (to death) on this list, but as we're 
  beginning work on the next summer hardware refresh we still can't seem

  to find a vendor that meets our strict requirements: Namely, we refuse
  to put anything binary in the kernel. 


  Marvell has some nice for larger devices (the 8388). But we need
  one specifically for mobile phones (like the 8686). If somebody 
  can help us find the right vendor, we'll give you a free Neo1973. 
  
  If you're a vendor and want to work with us to GPL your driver, we'll 
  give you lots of business -- and a free phone ;-) 



  2) We don't have enough UI / Application developers -- If anybody 
  meets (or knows somebody who can meet) the following qualifications:


* = 2 years experience with GTK
* object oriented design and implementation w/ GObject
* experience with writing GUI applications from scratch,
* has software quality assets like:
  o writing maintainable and reusable code
  o refactoring
  o design patterns
  o identifying and extracting common application code 
into frameworks 


  Familiarity with collaborative development tools such as:

* bugtracker,
* source control management,
* wiki,
	* mailing lists 


  is a necessity.

  We've love to talk with you! Please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
  links to your previous work and a resume if you have one. (The latter 
  is nowhere near as important as the former.)


Thanks in advance for any help!

-Sean


  


begin:vcard
fn:Grahame Jordan
n:Jordan;Grahame
org:Glass Expansion
adr:;;15 Batman St;West Melbourne;VIC;3003;Australia
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Product Development Engineer
tel;work:+61 (0)3 9320 
tel;fax:+61 (0)3 9320 1112
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.geicp.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [openmoko-announce] Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Steve Bibayoff

Hello,

On 3/13/07, Sean Moss-Pultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  1) We can't find a WiFi Chipset with GPL'ed drivers -- We know
  this has been discussed (to death) on this list, but as we're
  beginning work on the next summer hardware refresh we still can't seem
  to find a vendor that meets our strict requirements: Namely, we refuse
  to put anything binary in the kernel.

  Marvell has some nice for larger devices (the 8388). But we need
  one specifically for mobile phones (like the 8686). If somebody
  can help us find the right vendor, we'll give you a free Neo1973.


Have you guys looked into Nanoradio? Specifically NRX700/2 :
http://www.nanoradio.com/?NavID=278

Haven't worked (or actually talked) w/ them, but stumbled across them
when working on another project. Seem small, so they may work w/ Free
Software technologist.


I have a longer list some where, just need to dig it up, will post it
when I find it.

Steve

ps. Sorry to send directly to you(Sean), I'm not subscribed to the
community list and not sure if this would get through.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [openmoko-announce] Crossroads

2007-03-13 Thread Imre Kaloz
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:07:45 +0100, Grahame Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:



Hi Sean,

What about the  Marvell® 88W8385 module used on the wifistix

Open source drivers can be found at http://gumstix.com

Cheers

Grahame Jordan



Hello Grahame,

No open source drivers for that either. If you check the Makefile of the  
wireless driver [1], you can see that they are using a binary-only driver  
for 6 months now [2].



Imre


P.S: You have to use username gumstix with password gumstix  
(http://docwiki.gumstix.org/Software_development_kit)


[1]  
http://websvn.gumstix.com/filedetails.php?repname=Buildrootpath=%2Ftrunk%2Fpackage%2Fwifistix%2Fwifistix.mkrev=0sc=0
[2]  
http://websvn.gumstix.com/log.php?repname=Buildrootpath=%2Ftrunk%2Fpackage%2Fwifistix%2Fwifistix.mkrev=0sc=0isdir=0


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community