U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Michael Sokolov
Sorry to bother y'all again with another stupid question...  I have
finally received my GTA02 hardware unit, and I'm starting to bring up
my software stack.  Starting with the bootloader.  I want to use U-Boot,
not Qi.  And I have two questions which I hope someone might be able to
help me with:

1. Which version/branch of U-Boot should I use?  I've tried looking at
   what's available on git.openmoko.org, found the u-boot.git tree, but
   there are several different branches in it, all appearing about
   equally recent, and all feature commit messages that look relevant
   to the GTA02.  Which is the good one to use?

2. How can I find the U-Boot source that *exactly* corresponds to what
   is already in the NOR flash from the factory?  It identifies itself
   as U-Boot 1.3.2-moko12 (May  9 2008 - 10:28:48).  I haven't been
   able to find a tag named moko12 in git, but maybe it's just my poor
   git skills.  U-Boot is GPL'ed...  Doesn't it require supplying the
   source that corresponds *exactly* to the binaries you ship?

Again, sorry to bother you all, but if someone can point me in the
right direction, it would help me a lot.

TIA,
MS

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Gennady.Kupava
I guess i am only u-boot user left in community :)

I tried to fix few annoying bugs and using own u-boot version, you can
find description here:

http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/U-boot-gena2x

It works pretty well here except nasty problem with sd card.

Gennady.

В Срд, 05/10/2011 в 08:43 +, Michael Sokolov пишет:
 Sorry to bother y'all again with another stupid question...  I have
 finally received my GTA02 hardware unit, and I'm starting to bring up
 my software stack.  Starting with the bootloader.  I want to use U-Boot,
 not Qi.  And I have two questions which I hope someone might be able to
 help me with:
 
 1. Which version/branch of U-Boot should I use?  I've tried looking at
what's available on git.openmoko.org, found the u-boot.git tree, but
there are several different branches in it, all appearing about
equally recent, and all feature commit messages that look relevant
to the GTA02.  Which is the good one to use?
 
 2. How can I find the U-Boot source that *exactly* corresponds to what
is already in the NOR flash from the factory?  It identifies itself
as U-Boot 1.3.2-moko12 (May  9 2008 - 10:28:48).  I haven't been
able to find a tag named moko12 in git, but maybe it's just my poor
git skills.  U-Boot is GPL'ed...  Doesn't it require supplying the
source that corresponds *exactly* to the binaries you ship?
 
 Again, sorry to bother you all, but if someone can point me in the
 right direction, it would help me a lot.
 
 TIA,
 MS
 
 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
msoko...@ivan.harhan.org (Michael Sokolov) writes:
 1. Which version/branch of U-Boot should I use?

http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2011/08/msg00046.html

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Liz
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:59:27 +0400
Gennady.Kupava g...@bsdmn.com wrote:

 I guess i am only u-boot user left in community :)

there are a couple of us left

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Giacomo 'giotti' Mariani



  I guess i am only u-boot user left in community

there are a couple of us left


+1



--
##
giacomo 'giotti' mariani
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-key 0x99bfa859
O  ASCII ribbon campaign: stop HTML mail
www.asciiribbon.org
##


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Kosa
El 05/10/11 05:31, Giacomo 'giotti' Mariani escribió:
 
   I guess i am only u-boot user left in community
 there are a couple of us left

 +1

+1 :)

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Michael Sokolov
Gennady.Kupava g...@bsdmn.com wrote:

 I tried to fix few annoying bugs and using own u-boot version, you can
 find description here:

 http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/U-boot-gena2x

I think I have mis-expressed myself in my original post...  I am not
looking for a prebuilt binary, I want a source tree that I would then
compile myself.  That U-boot-gena2x wiki page contains a link to a
binary but no source - isn't that in violation of the GPL?

I would also prefer to stick to one of the branches in the u-boot.git
tree on git.openmoko.org, but my problem is that there are several to
choose from: I see good-looking branches named stable, zecke, andy,
mokopatches and willie.  What are the relative merits of these
branches?  *That* is the question I am looking for help with.

MS

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Gennady.Kupava
В Срд, 05/10/2011 в 16:31 +, Michael Sokolov пишет:
 Gennady.Kupava g...@bsdmn.com wrote:
 
  I tried to fix few annoying bugs and using own u-boot version, you can
  find description here:
 
  http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/U-boot-gena2x
 
 I think I have mis-expressed myself in my original post...  I am not
 looking for a prebuilt binary, I want a source tree that I would then
 compile myself.  That U-boot-gena2x wiki page contains a link to a
 binary but no source - isn't that in violation of the GPL?
Nice that you care about licenses, no violation because link to sources
is provided on wiki page

 I would also prefer to stick to one of the branches in the u-boot.git
 tree on git.openmoko.org, but my problem is that there are several to
 choose from: I see good-looking branches named stable, zecke, andy,
 mokopatches and willie.  What are the relative merits of these
 branches?  *That* is the question I am looking for help with.

Sure you can stick to git.openmoko.org, but nobody maintain that git and
it has few unfixed bugs.

Gennady.


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Michael Sokolov
Gennady.Kupava g...@bsdmn.com wrote:

 Nice that you care about licenses,

More precisely, I care about freedom.  GPL's requirement of providing
the source simply happens to coincide with an identical requirement in
my personal belief system.

 no violation because link to sources
 is provided on wiki page

OK, never mind, it looks like I have found the link to your git repo: I
don't know why I missed it the first time, sorry about that.

Also looking at the commit tree in your git repo seems to have indirectly
answered my original question: please correct me if I missed something,
but it looks like what you have is simply a few of your own commits on
top of openmoko/stable, which is the stable branch from git.openmoko.org.
Did I get that right?  If so, it means the good branch in the
git.openmoko.org tree is the one named stable, right?

When you had started your own branch and chose openmoko/stable as the
baseline, did you evaluate the others?  Does anyone know if they have
any merits over the stable branch?

 Sure you can stick to git.openmoko.org, but nobody maintain that git and
 it has few unfixed bugs.

I will most certainly look at your patches and I may indeed like them.
But I want to establish my baseline first.

MS

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: U-Boot source versions

2011-10-05 Thread Gennady.Kupava
В Срд, 05/10/2011 в 16:57 +, Michael Sokolov пишет:

 When you had started your own branch and chose openmoko/stable as the
 baseline, did you evaluate the others?  Does anyone know if they have
 any merits over the stable branch?

I just choosen branch which had most recent changes.

zecke has only 3 meaningless patches (and lacks some patches from stable),
andy is older and has 1 additional patch (and lacks some patches from
stable),
mokopatches is even older and a root of both above, nothing additional
willie is something even older.

I actually see nothing to choose from.

Gennady.


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community