Re: qtmoko v45

2012-07-09 Thread Marc Langlois
Hi,

I confirm with the command "AT_OWANCALL=1,1,1", the connection works
(I ping google.com).

Now I have two questions:
How to run the GUI for controlling the UMTS connection? and Why it
does not work now (software installation as Navit can break the
connection login scripts) ?

Thank you again for your help.

Marc


2012/7/2 NeilBrown :
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 21:57:28 +0200 Marc Langlois 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After execution of Neil Brown's howto for GPRS on the GTA04, I would
>> conclude as:
>> +> For the connection to /dev/ttyHS3, I use minicom with the default
>> settings but the connection does not work consistently.
>> +> AT+CFUN = 3D1 (set phone functions on), and AT_OWANCALL=3D1,1,1
>> returns me "ERROR".
>>
>> Here is my log:
>> AT+COPS
>> OK
>> AT+COPS?
>> + COPS: 0,0, "004f00720061006e0067006500200046", 0
>>
>> OK
>> AT_OWANCALL = 3D1,1,1
>
> Try dropping the spaces and the '3D' (which a mime-encoding artefact  - '='
> is sometimes encoded in email messages as '=3D').
> So:
>
>   AT_OWANCALL=1,1,1
>
> NeilBrown
>
>
>> ERROR
>> AT_OWANDATA?
>> OK
>>
>> What are the tips for the connection débuger?
>> Can you used the modem mode multiplexing (neocontrol) with a GTA04A4?
>> The UMTS signal reception is good in my house.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> >>Neil Jerram  writes:
>> >> Marc Langlois  writes:
>> >>
>> >>> Neil,
>> >>>
>> >>> My phone is GTA04A4.
>> >>
>> >> Ah, thanks.  Has GPRS actually been integrated yet in QtMoko on the
>> >> GTA04?  I'm not sure that it has.
>> >
>> >For ease of reference, here's Neil Brown's howto for GPRS on the GTA04
>> >(and which it's well worth creating another copy of):
>> >
>> >> 0/ connect to /dev/ttyHS3  (others might work)
>> >> 1/ make sure you are registered with network.
>> >>   e.g.
>> >>  AT+CFUN=3D1
>> >>  AT+COPS
>> >>  AT+COPS?
>> >>
>> >> 2/ establish data connection
>> >>  AT_OWANCALL=3D1,1,1
>> >>
>> >> 3/ collect status
>> >>
>> >>AT_OWANDATA?
>> >>   My response was
>> >>_OWANDATA: 1, 49.179.102.244, 0.0.0.0, 211.29.132.12, 61.88.88.88, 
>> >> 0.0.0=
>> >> .0, 0.0.0.0,144000
>> >>  ^IP address   ^  ^DNS-1--^  ^DNS-2^
>> >>
>> >> 4/  configure network
>> >>
>> >> ifconfig hso0 49.179.102.244 up
>> >> route add default dev hso0
>> >>
>> >> echo nameserver 211.29.132.12 > /etc/resolv.conf
>> >> echo nameserver 61.88.88.88 >> /etc/resolv.conf
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> And you should be set to go.  If you want tethering via USB then add:
>> >>  on GTA04:
>> >> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward=20
>> >> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.200 -j MASQUERADE
>> >>
>> >>(here 192.168.0.200 is the IP of my notebook on the USB interface.)
>> >>
>> >>  on notebook/desktop/whatever
>> >>
>> >> route add default gw 192.168.0.202
>> >> echo nameserver 211.29.132.12 > /etc/resolv.conf
>> >> echo nameserver 61.88.88.88 >> /etc/resolv.conf
>> >>
>> >>(192.168.0.202 is IP of GTA04 of USB link).
>> >>
>> >> To terminate data call
>> >>
>> >>   AT_OWANDATA=3D1,0,1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> You don't need pppd at all.
>> >
>> >But there are no occurrences of "OWAN" in the qtmoko codebase - so I'm
>> >pretty sure it hasn't been integrated yet.
>> >
>> >  Neil
>>
>> ___
>> Openmoko community mailing list
>> community@lists.openmoko.org
>> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [Gta04-owner] QtMoko v45

2012-07-09 Thread Robin Paulson
On 2 July 2012 19:59, Radek Polak  wrote:
> On Monday, July 02, 2012 08:01:55 AM Robin Paulson wrote:
>
>> great to see qtmoko progressing more, v45-1 installing now. i see that
>> GTA02 only gets kernel 2.6.34, is there any reason why not a more
>> recent kernel, like GTA04 has? is there something missing upstream,
>> radek?
>
> I think 2.6.34 is last kernel for Freerunner which works reasonably for daily
> usage. But since my daily phone is GTA04 i have stopped watching GTA02 kernel.
> If someone provides good newer kernel i can integrate it in QtMoko.

oh, are there some downstream changes that have not been merged back
into the kernel?

or some other reason why 3.x is not suitable?

is it not a case of compiling and creating a .deb package?

-- 
robin

http://fu.ac.nz - Auckland's Free University

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community