Jim McDonald wrote: > Just so that the 'silent majority' don't lose out on this one, I would > like to point out that there are approximately 1,500 people subscribed > to this list. Can we assume that unless we hear from them their vote is > 'no change'? There are pros and cons to each system, but anyone who has > already set up their own filters will have done so on the existing > system so I suggest we leave it as it is.
I am a member of the 'silent majority' - this is my first post - and, yes, please leave it as it is. Having "[OpenMoko-Community]" in front of every subject-line gives me no additional information, since my mail get's sorted into the respective folder automatically, but makes the list less readable. Changing the reply-to is unacceptable. It has always been that simple: if I press "Reply" I'm writing to the author of the e-mail, if I press "Reply All" everybody who got the original mail (except BCCs of course) get's my response. Why should that be different just because the e-mail got delivered by a mailing-list? And I don't think that a MTA should be allowed to change any header, if there isn't a technical necessity. But what I'm wondering most about this topic is: it was discussed several times on half of the mailing-lists I'm subscribed to, but the problem was never solved. But I think that should be easy. Just make it user-configurable. Is it so hard to write that piece of code and convince the mailman-developers to include into the distribution? If that would happen, I would never ever see this discussion again. That would be a relief. Christian _______________________________________________ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community