Re: sensors on GTA04

2014-04-02 Thread L. B.
ok, I'll have a look. I'll make some notes and send it to the list if I
find something.

Lionel


On 2 April 2014 06:15, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller  wrote:

>
> Am 02.04.2014 um 03:17 schrieb L. B.:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to play with the compass but the info from the documentation page
> does not correspond with what I got on my phone (using qtmoko v58). The
> page I use is that one:
> http://projects.goldelico.com/p/gta04-kernel/page/Sensors/
>
> In the 'compass' section there is a switch to enable/disable sampling. On
> my phone there is a directory
>
> /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-2/2-001e/
>
> but there is no 'rate' file in there. Same applies for the gyroscope.
> Has anything been changed?
>
>
> No. The kenrel doc is for the Goldelico kernels which were 2.6.32 some
> years ago and now reflect the drivers of 3.12 (ff).
>
> QtMoko AFAIK uses a 3.7 kernel and since the /sys node names are not
> stable (and never will be) you might have to do a little guesswork and look
> into the 3.7 kernel source code to find out how the driver works.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Nikolaus
>
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
>
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


sensors on GTA04

2014-04-01 Thread L. B.
Hi,

I'd like to play with the compass but the info from the documentation page
does not correspond with what I got on my phone (using qtmoko v58). The
page I use is that one:
http://projects.goldelico.com/p/gta04-kernel/page/Sensors/

In the 'compass' section there is a switch to enable/disable sampling. On
my phone there is a directory

/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-2/2-001e/

but there is no 'rate' file in there. Same applies for the gyroscope.
Has anything been changed?

Thanks,

Lionel
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Community interest (was: community Digest, Vol 353, Issue 3)

2013-08-30 Thread L. B.
Hi all,

I am one of those who bought a GTA04 out of both curiosity and a feeling of
contributing to a project that, I feel, is important in many aspects. I
have read many emails from the community but as you guys say, I have not
done much more than contributing financially. the reason being that I do
not have the technical skills required to help on the software or hardware
sides.

> Third our community watched them failing without even trying to raise
> awareness for our community phone.

I would really like the phone to survive, I insist on that because it must
be quite depressing for the developers to miss the positive feeback they
deserve. however, when I discuss with colleagues or friends it is very hard
for me to argue that an open source phone is a good thing that is worth
spending money in if there is no well-known source to back me up. my
feeling is that the community is not visible enough for lay persons, so it
is hard to advertise the product.

My suggestion to try and get out of this problem is to rise interest among
the journalists. Global surveillance is a top story at the moment, so if we
succeed in attracting the attention of, say, a BBC reporter then we can
start making some noise on a large scale. And if the story is good it may
attract many people and inform them why open-source phone is important, on
the hardware side too.

Another point that I would like to rise is the fact that mobile phones are
considered as luxuary products by the consumers. Starting from this, I
would suggest either to work on making a very nice finish for the casing
(the plastic casing of the GTA02 looks very good) and for the software
(animated backgrounds, or the likes...), or to start a trend on its own
that would focus on highly personalised phones with make-your-own reprap
casing and choose-your-own operating system (which is what the GTA04 seems
to be, at least for me).

I would personally go for the second option. With a couple of good
reprappers and with a couple of working operating systems, you can make a
nice web page to present all the options availables to the buyer so that
each one can buy a specific combination of case, hardware and software.
Making the website visually attractive and more interactive would probably
contribute to getting more attention on that matter.

Anyway, all I can give to the community for now are ideas and cheerings, I
hope I am doing that well.

Lionel
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [Community] OpenPhoenux Logo contest - Phase 2 (voting)

2013-01-14 Thread L. B.
I like number 3 but the legs should be removed.
Number 6 looks good too, but maybe a bit bulky.

Lionel


On 14 January 2013 18:24, Ed Kapitein  wrote:

>  I like proposal 8, but i think the chain should be "broken"
> one open link, to free the project from the past.
>
>
>
> On 01/14/2013 06:09 PM, Adrien Dorsaz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > So I voted for proposal #5 and #6. I wanted to give a precision for the
> > proposal #5 : I'd prefer his variant b with "phone" colored letters.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adrien
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Openmoko community mailing list
> > community@lists.openmoko.org
> > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
>
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community