Re: [Shr-User] Aurora

2011-05-17 Thread Patryk Benderz
Dnia 2011-05-16, pon o godzinie 18:02 +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
pisze:
 NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that way, if
 you want to reply.
Might be troublesome, as I am not subscribed to
smartphones-userl...@linuxtogo.org but I'll try.

[cut]
 non-maintainable Edje file. We have therefore decided to develop a new
 testing/demonstrator for FSO named Aurora that
 is supposed to be the driving force for further development.
[cut]
very good idea! This might also be a good starting point as a simple
reference application for those who want to start developing for
embedded devices. And I hope FreeRunners will be your next target
platform :)
-- 
Patryk LeadMan Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [Shr-User] Aurora

2011-05-17 Thread Martin Jansa
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 05:47:46PM +0200, Dr. Michael Lauer wrote:
 Hi Corey,
 
  On Monday, May 16, 2011 09:02:58 AM Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
  NOTE: Cross-posted to three mailing lists, please keep it that way, if
  you want to reply.
  
  Aurora is supposed to be something we call a featurephone client –
  featurephones being those things we used for telephony before 
  smartphones were invented.
  
  
  Could you please elaborate a bit further for those of us who are 
  unsure of the specific functional differences between a featurephone 
  and a smartphone?
 
 For sure. Featurephone vs. Smartphone is resembling the difference
 of, lets say, a Sony Ericsson K700, and an iPhone.
 
 On the K700, the whole OS is designed around the telephony. While it
 has additional features, it doesn't allow you to install native applications
 (well, yes, there are some Java applets, but these don't count as they
 are not at all integrated into the system and they can't access the phone
 databases nor talk to each other) – it sells because of the quality of the
 telephony.
 
 On the iPhone, the whole OS is designed around the idea of a mobile
 computer that allows you to perform a vast variety of tasks. You can install 
 a myriad
 of apps and only a very minor percentage of these apps have anything to do
 with telephony. The telephony is a feature among many others. In fact,
 telephony is pretty lousy on an iPhone, but that's ok, because it is not the
 feature that sells this device.
 
 Bottom line: feature phone is less flexible, comes with everything 
 preinstalled,
 and is designed around the telephony.

There is nice description of feature phone and smartphone in Chapter 2
http://gnumonks.org/~laforge/papers/gsm_phone-anatomy-latest.pdf
but I guess this doesn't help much to imagine featurephone client :)

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com


pgp2tA8FZVg4E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [Shr-User] Aurora

2011-05-17 Thread Dr. Michael Lauer
Am 17.05.2011 um 18:06 schrieb Martin Jansa:
 Bottom line: feature phone is less flexible, comes with everything 
 preinstalled,
 and is designed around the telephony.
 
 There is nice description of feature phone and smartphone in Chapter 2
 http://gnumonks.org/~laforge/papers/gsm_phone-anatomy-latest.pdf
 but I guess this doesn't help much to imagine featurephone client :)

Yeah, Harald focuses on the BP vs. AP/BP separation, which is a hardware-
centric view – while I tried to capture the 'spirit' ;)

Cheers,

:M:


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community