Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-30 Thread Sean Moss-Pultz
On 12/1/06 7:45 AM, Jeff Andros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So does this mean that a standard SIM card won't work? Is it one of those
 things where you have to cut up your sim card (wonder what do I tell cingular
 when I bring THAT in)? or are we just talking about some kind of combo system
 on the bus? 

Hehe...if I made it so I standard SIM didn't work in this phone, I should be
publicly hanged. Don't worry, your Cingular SIM will work fine ;-)

-Sean


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Ole Tange

On 11/29/06, Sean Moss-Pultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


We're still deciding on how open we can be with the hardware. Please keep in
mind this is a legal mine field. Every single component we use (expert
perhaps the CPU) needs an NDA just to read the datasheet. I would love to
see open hardware. But this is _far_ more difficult that open software.

...we're working on it though.


As a non-hardware engineer I have been facinated by www.opencores.org.
Can you say if you have looked at using their modules?

/Ole
(Who would go for version 1 if there is a trade-up option. Otherwise
wait for version 2).

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Sean Moss-Pultz
On 11/28/06 7:55 AM, Robert Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 And I hope that you will not unsubscribe, as well,
 I proise  to write more focused in the future ;)

I for one, find your emails quite entertaining. Stuffed full of things that
make us think. Please keep up the good work ;-)

-Sean


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: no bottle opener Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Sean Moss-Pultz
On 11/28/06 7:31 AM, Robert Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 - no bottle opener
 
 
 What!? 
 
 It's a pitty the Neo1973 will not have a case a frame
 made by strong, but light magnesium alloy, with integrated,
 fold-out  bottle opener to open the beer.
 Since years I'm waiting for a mobile with that...
 Which real men needs a camera or bluetooth ?

This is absolutely hilarious ;-)

Why not really, if these guys have one:

http://www.liquorsnob.com/archives/2005/09/reef_bottle_opener_sandals.php

Why can't a phone?

-Sean




___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Ole Tange

On 11/29/06, Sean Moss-Pultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 11/29/06 9:18 PM, Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 /Ole
 (Who would go for version 1 if there is a trade-up option. Otherwise
 wait for version 2).

A trade up option is interesting idea. What exactly do you have in mind?


Optimal for me:
Pay USD 350 for v1. When v2 is out: Return v1 and get a deduction of
the price of USD 350.

But I will assume that this will not work for you: The returned v1s
are probably worthless to you. So a better way might be to include a
voucher with a serial number in the v1 package. The voucher will give
me a discount of 50% if I buy v2. The serial number is important as
you do not want to give the discount to everyone who happens to know
someone who has a v1.

I might accept a lower discount, but if the discount is less than 30%
I personally would prefer to wait for v2.

Come to think of it: You should always value your customers and give
them incentive to buy more from you. So a trade up might apply to the
v2-v3 transition as well.


/Ole

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Dave Crossland

On 29/11/06, Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Optimal for me:
Pay USD 350 for v1. When v2 is out: Return v1 and get a deduction of
the price of USD 350.

But I will assume that this will not work for you: The returned v1s
are probably worthless to you. So a better way might be to include a
voucher with a serial number in the v1 package.


Any such discount would be excellent, but I'll be buying a v1
regardless of price.

Because its about freedom, not price! :-)

--
Regards,
Dave

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: no bottle opener Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread michael





On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:


On 11/28/06 7:31 AM, Robert Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


- no bottle opener



What!?


It's a pitty the Neo1973 will not have a case a frame
made by strong, but light magnesium alloy, with integrated,
fold-out  bottle opener to open the beer.
Since years I'm waiting for a mobile with that...
Which real men needs a camera or bluetooth ?


This is absolutely hilarious ;-)

Why not really, if these guys have one:

http://www.liquorsnob.com/archives/2005/09/reef_bottle_opener_sandals.php

Why can't a phone?


This topic is fun, and sometimes a bit of fun and lateral thinking can lead to
interesting, even useful ideas.

I do a lot of work with machine performance artists (e.g. www.srl.org). Our
work is always unfunded and volunteer based, using surplus/recycled/restored
equipment, meaning that there are always repairs to be made on site, moments
before a show starts, or even while a performance is taking place. Needless to
say, we all carry at least one Leatherman-type of tool, and a popular topic
of conversation is comparing the features of each. Often, we admire one
feature from this tool, another couple from that tool, a few more from a third
tool, etc. which lead some of us to fantisize about a modular pocket tool
(based on an open standard, of course) so that you could buy the tools you
want and assemble the custom tool just right for you.

So in addition to my bottle opener, vice-grips, torx blades, and MIG welding
wire cutter, I also want my Neo1973 module, my 'scope/multimeter module, and
my anything to USB power converter module. And one of those little butane
powered soldering irons.

Michael


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Alessandro Iurlano

On 11/29/06, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 29/11/06, Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Optimal for me:
 Pay USD 350 for v1. When v2 is out: Return v1 and get a deduction of
 the price of USD 350.

 But I will assume that this will not work for you: The returned v1s
 are probably worthless to you. So a better way might be to include a
 voucher with a serial number in the v1 package.

Any such discount would be excellent, but I'll be buying a v1
regardless of price.

Because its about freedom, not price! :-)

--
Regards,
Dave



Yeah that's why I will probably buy version 1 too.
But I will not be able to afford buying each version. A return strategy
could definitely
help about this!

Regards,
Alessandro
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


RE: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Stuart Gray
I would most definitely go for a version 1 if there is an option of trading up 
later.
My only doubts about this phone is if its worth buying that phone only to have 
to buy another when version 2 comes out.
But if a trade up is available I am very likely to get version 1 and then trade 
up when the time comes.
I am unsure if I would buy version 1 if there is no such option available, as I 
am used to getting my phones free on contract, and spending $350 on a phone I 
plan to upgrade not too long after would just be mad.Cant wait though, I am 
really excited for it.  Hopefully all my hopes turn into reality.
 



 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:18:41 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
 community@lists.openmoko.org Subject: Re: Open Moko - GPL?  On 11/29/06, 
 Sean Moss-Pultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   We're still deciding on how 
 open we can be with the hardware. Please keep in  mind this is a legal mine 
 field. Every single component we use (expert  perhaps the CPU) needs an NDA 
 just to read the datasheet. I would love to  see open hardware. But this is 
 _far_ more difficult that open software.   ...we're working on it 
 though.  As a non-hardware engineer I have been facinated by 
 www.opencores.org. Can you say if you have looked at using their modules?  
 /Ole (Who would go for version 1 if there is a trade-up option. Otherwise 
 wait for version 2).  ___ 
 OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org 
 http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community
_
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 22:16, Stuart Gray wrote:
 available, as I am used to getting my phones free on contract, and spending
 $350 on a phone I plan to upgrade not too long after would just be mad.Cant
 wait though, I am really excited for it.  Hopefully all my hopes turn into
 reality.

It also depends a lot on just how long it will take for v2 to be released and 
what it will actually support.


pgp4guyrBcmJK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Sean Moss-Pultz
On 11/30/06 12:41 AM, Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Come to think of it: You should always value your customers and give
 them incentive to buy more from you. So a trade up might apply to the
 v2-v3 transition as well.

It's an interesting idea. At this point let me just sit on it. I need to
figure out if this (internally) would be even possible.

-Sean


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Greetings from Sergei Bubka ;) - Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Robert Michel
Salve Ole, Sean!

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:

 On 11/30/06 12:41 AM, Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Come to think of it: You should always value your customers and give
  them incentive to buy more from you. So a trade up might apply to the
  v2-v3 transition as well.
 
 It's an interesting idea. At this point let me just sit on it. I need to
 figure out if this (internally) would be even possible.

Ohh noo - Ole, you have remind Sean to the strategie of the
pole vaulter Sergei Bubka - he could jump much much more higher
then the others, but he did it in 1cm  stepps, so for years 
(1984-1994) he travelled from competition to competition and every 
time they paid him enough, he achieve a new world record,
otherwise he only won that competition:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Bubka 

Ole, and now please think what you have Sean/FIC make think
- of course would it be easy to let some features out for
giving the costumers a value to buy more.

I don't see the use to make thoughts about v2-v3 - now.
;)

rob



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: feedback on v2 rabatt idea Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-29 Thread Sean Moss-Pultz
On 11/30/06 1:34 AM, Robert Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 But I will assume that this will not work for you: The returned v1s
 are probably worthless to you. So a better way might be to include a
 voucher with a serial number in the v1 package. The voucher will give
 me a discount of 50% if I buy v2. The serial number is important as
 you do not want to give the discount to everyone who happens to know
 someone who has a v1.
 
 Thats sounds better, and of course (I think) FIC will have an interest
 that the best developers will have the latest hardware - maybe also
 zero series devices in the future - consider the cost of just one
 small employee. ;)

I do find this idea a lot for appealing. Shipping is really a major headache
for us ;-)

-Sean


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Steve Salazar


Hi.  First of all I want to repeat what many others on this list have 
already said.  I am very excited about the open moko project and the 
opportunities it represents.  I will be one of the first in line to buy an 
openmoko phone when they are available.


I have a few questions.  Thanks in advance for taking any time to answer:

Software:
--

1. It is mentioned that the gui was designed using gtk.  Will the sources 
for all the interface be released?  For that matter, will the sources for 
everything, including the os itself, drivers, etc be released?  Will 
openmoko follow an open development model similar to debian or fedora?  I 
really hope so and encourage your project to do so since I believe that is 
the model that benefits everyone the most.


2. If all these things are going to be opened, when?  I saw in related posts 
that this might be delayed until after the release because you guys are 
focusing on getting things out the door.  I understand that but I think that 
is a mistake.  The OSS development model achieves high quality and quick 
results because of involvement and extensive testing by the community.  If 
you don't release the code and sdk until after the phones are on sale, there 
is a 100% chance that major bugs or UI features problems will go unfixed or 
uncaught until after release.  Also, everyone is excited to get involved so 
why make us wait?  If you are too busy to deal with supporting the community 
then just do a pre-release on your website that is just a tarball with no 
support or community at all.  Read the cathedral and the bazaar for a good 
explanation of the OSS development model and why it works: 
http://catb.org/esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/.


3. Why did you not use opie or gpe?  If all the drivers and code for 
openmoko are released, will it be possible for me to run qtopia or gpe on my 
own if i want to?  Are you prepared for the possibility that, if people like 
gpe or opie more, nice installers will become available very quickly and 
everyone might just run those environments instead?  If it turns out that 
the public prefers another environment, would the environment for openmoko 
continue to be developed or would you consider getting behind the 
environment chosen by the community?   I haven't seen openmoko yet so maybe 
that will be a giant contribution to the community also but for now it 
really seems like the huge benefit is just the hardware since there are 
other pda/phone environments availble.


Are you prepared to support the voracious appetite the OSS community has for 
the latest and greatest?  Will you always have the latest version of the 
kernel?  Of mplayer?  Minimo?  Etc?  If not forks will quickly form like 
they did for qtopia.  Why not just start an open development project like 
qtopia from the start so instead of creating division between your project 
and the community project, you can leverage that enthusiasm, like Ubuntu, 
Fedora, Debian, etc?  I know this may in fact be your plan so I am just 
asking.


4. What standards or protocols or libraries (other than gtk) were used to 
create openmoko's software suite?  Is there a document editor?  Does it use 
ODT?  Is there a music player?  Does it play ogg?  Is there a mail and 
calendar client?  Do they use ical, can they be synced using opensync?  
These are major issues that have plagued linux pda development in the past.  
People reinvent the wheel and even though the platform is semi-open, there 
is a proliferation of incompatibility.   Please use standards and 
open+existing libraries for everything as much as possible.  In that way you 
maximize the utility of the product and you maximize the leverage you can 
take from existing projects so you can focus on working on other things.  
(Related to why not opie or gpe question).  Everyone wins and the product 
is best.


5. X11 - Does the openmoko interface run on X11 or does it display directly 
on the fb?  Using real X11 keeps the door open for a huge number of 
compatible applications to be run with the openmoko environment.  Without 
X11, openmoko is an island.  My previous point about people potentially 
switching to opie or gpe *will* happen if openmoko does not use X11 because 
that will be the only way that people can use their favorite apps.   This 
will not be limited to just linux nerds.  Look at the popularity of Fink on 
OSX.  Linux has a lot to offer and without X11 there will be a lot of people 
trying to work around or remove openmoko to get at those offerings.  I know 
this may be your plan already so I am just asking.


Hardware:
--

1. This is sort of a rhetorical question:  Why innovate?  Why not just make 
semi-knockoffs of very popular existing phones but with hardware that is 
supported by linux.  For example, if you made something similar to the HTC 
Wizard (especially the new one) that was fully linux compatible I would by 5 
just out of happy delirium.  I know 

Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Steve Salazar schreef:
 
 Hi.  First of all I want to repeat what many others on this list have
 already said.  I am very excited about the open moko project and the
 opportunities it represents.  I will be one of the first in line to buy
 an openmoko phone when they are available.
 
 I have a few questions.  Thanks in advance for taking any time to answer:
 
 Software:
 --
 
 1. It is mentioned that the gui was designed using gtk.  Will the
 sources for all the interface be released? 

'agpsd' will be the only closed source component on your phone

 Are you prepared to support the voracious appetite the OSS community has
 for the latest and greatest?  Will you always have the latest version of
 the kernel?  Of mplayer?  Minimo?  Etc? 

FIC is using openembedded to build their apps, which is already a community 
effort so FIC
gets the latest and greatest basically for free, and you can always build the 
latest and
greatest yourself.


 can they be synced using opensync?  

Dunno, but the pressrelease mentioned funambol, so that should be 'plain' 
syncml.


 5. X11 - Does the openmoko interface run on X11

X11, kdrive to be specific


 4.5 - What about linuxbios? 

BIOS? The gta01 doesn't use an x86 cpu, so there is no bios :)


 6. CPU:  No info on the CPU yet? 

s3c2410

 7.  Other random hardware questions/comments/wishes:
 - Camera:  People who say don't bother with a 1.3Mpix camera are
 photographers or otherwise photography enthusiasts. 

*raises hand*

 90% of the people
 are very happy at 1.3M because at 1.3 you can do photo album sized images

yes

 with very high quality 

no, since the lens is always crap. Spending $5 more during production on a lens 
would
greatly enhance the quality.

 that most people are happy with.

Could be, I only have my a780 for reference, and that sucks, even for 
albumsized images.
You don't get the full res out of a picture due to the lens.

 - USB Host: Please please and make it USB2. 

1.1, limitation of the SoC

 with 128MB RAM that can  plug into a USB2 hub

usb 1.1 can still be plugged into a 2.0 hub. Also note the '2.0' doesn't mean 
480Mbit/s.


 - Storage:  1GB minimum integrated SD for running a real linux.  

Kernel 2.6.17.7 isn't real enough for you? ;)

regards,

Koen

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFa1R1MkyGM64RGpERAlcHAJ0ZLpriWFWy6vEAIPN8klN6ltzUmACfWCIX
ZrDgrmBB2grNnQAxskF1JMw=
=lgDb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Corey schreef:
 On Monday 27 November 2006 14:11, Koen Kooi wrote:
 Steve Salazar schreef:
 - Storage:  1GB minimum integrated SD for running a real linux.
 Kernel 2.6.17.7 isn't real enough for you? ;)

 
 Heheh - when will it become clear that:
 
 linux == kernel   kernel != userland
 
 
 Still, you knew what he meant.  (c8=

I just couldn't resist :)

regards,

Koen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFa1yBMkyGM64RGpERAl94AKCJ/7gPnKoQs/yD83Ng1s55aVgXLgCZAQzS
vkI8CI2nsRYzkgG5qWjWX98=
=Yrgo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Steve Salazar
Wow, thanks for all the very quick responses.  Sorry if I sounded a little 
confrontational or if some of my questions were already answered in other 
posts but, you know, you get a little skeptical and this project does 
*almost* seem too good to be true (because it sounds that good).


Anyway, could you guys please disappoint me in some small way?  I mean all 
your answers are an OSS fan's dream.  Seriously I am very excited and glad 
to hear that things are being done in this way.


Oh, and I missed the release info completely.  Sorry, I just saw press 
info and subconsciously skipped right past that.  Lots of good info there.


Thanks again and good luck!



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Steve Salazar
Hey, now that I read the presentation I feel a little foolish posting a link 
to ESR's essays :)  Oh well.  Once again, thanks and good luck.




___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Robert Michel
Salve Steve!

On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Steve Salazar wrote:

 Wow, thanks for all the very quick responses.  Sorry if I sounded a little 
 confrontational or if some of my questions were already answered in other 
 posts but, you know, you get a little skeptical and this project does 
 *almost* seem too good to be true (because it sounds that good).

Confrontational questions are not unproductive ;)

 Anyway, could you guys please disappoint me in some small way?  I mean all 
 your answers are an OSS fan's dream.  Seriously I am very excited and glad 
 to hear that things are being done in this way.
Some disadvantages yet:
- no wifi
- maybe no bluetooth as well
- unpowered USB port
- case not waterproof
- device not ready to keep 2m falls without damage
- no electrical compass, altometer, accelerometer
- no audio in
- no DRM longwave/shortwave radio
- no multimeter (not isolated against 400V)
- no laser pointer inside
- no camera
- no torch
- no IRDA
- no barcode scanner
- no 3D modell scanner
- no 3D room scanner
- no RS232
- no firelighter
- no swiss knive
- no toothpick
- no bottle opener
Enough or did you need more?
*g*

 Oh, and I missed the release info completely.  Sorry, I just saw press 
 info and subconsciously skipped right past that.  Lots of good info there.
Could be a tipp that on the long term the webpage should not hide
it behind press inf

 Thanks again and good luck!
;)

To see some of your ideas - Ben did a great job and collected them
see:
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2006-November/000256.html


Greetings,
rob

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Open Moko - GPL?

2006-11-27 Thread Corey
On Monday 27 November 2006 16:14, Robert Michel wrote:
snip
 - no bottle opener


What!? 

unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]





___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community