Will the OSDL/MLI have a yearly report as well? Re: LiMo foundation
Salve David! On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, David Schlesinger wrote: ACCESS is a participating member of both OSDL's Mobile Linux Initiative and of the Linux Phone Standards Forum--I'm acting chair of the MLI Steering Committee and vice-chair of LiPS' Architectural Working Group--and we've contributed to the requirements documents, API specifications, etc. for both those groups. I found this today and that the OSDL/DTL (Desktop working goup) has published it's yearly report and came to the statement that 2006 has been the year of the linux desktop: http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT3453502692.html Linux Organisation membership and organisation politics is not my business, but from the linux-user point of view it is a little confusing that OpenMoko/Neo1973 isn't mentioned here: http://old.linux-foundation.org/lab_activities/mobile_linux/mli Maybe it is not the right time to ask/talk about this, but I think that OSDL is doing good work for promoting Linux and that linking and cooperation would be a bennefit for both OSDL/MLI and OpenMoko... Or let it me say in that way, it would be nice to read about OpenMoko/Neo1973 in a yearly report of OSDL/MLI, at last in the report about year 2007. So I don't think it's accurate to paint those as four different, separate and unrelated parallel efforts. It's our plan of record that the ACCESS Linux Platform will converge with both MLI guidelines and requirements and the set of LiPS-specified applications APIs. Can you, or Sean, when it doesn't take to much time, say something about OpenMoko and OSDL/MLI? Greetings, rob PS: IMHO LiMo looks like powered by lawers and I think that this foundation is not a cooperation by their hearts - so we will have several advantages/chances to have a better, more efficent cooperation. ;) ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
RE: Will the OSDL/MLI have a yearly report as well? Re: LiMo foundation
Linux Organisation membership and organisation politics is not my business, but from the linux-user point of view it is a little confusing that OpenMoko/Neo1973 isn't mentioned here: http://old.linux-foundation.org/lab_activities/mobile_linux/mli Not too confusing. It's not a recent page, and the information on there was provided by members (of which FIC is not currently one, although we've invited them to participate...) Or let it me say in that way, it would be nice to read about OpenMoko/Neo1973 in a yearly report of OSDL/MLI, at last in the report about year 2007. No doubt, but such a yearly report would be a recap of MLI's activities, like DCL's, not a general survey of what's been going on outside the group in the world of Mobile Linux at large so much. Remember: we only first heard of OpenMoko and FIC at Open Source in Mobile 2007, back in November, and--frankly speaking--there's not really much concrete substance to say about it as yet. Can you, or Sean, when it doesn't take to much time, say something about OpenMoko and OSDL/MLI? Not much, really, for the reasons cited above. OpenMoko seems like a worthy and interesting effort, and we'd welcome the participation of FIC in the Linux Foundation or in LiPS whenever they're prepared to join us. ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Will the OSDL/MLI have a yearly report as well? Re: LiMo foundation
On 1/27/07 12:57 AM, David Schlesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Linux Organisation membership and organisation politics is not my business, but from the linux-user point of view it is a little confusing that OpenMoko/Neo1973 isn't mentioned here: http://old.linux-foundation.org/lab_activities/mobile_linux/mli Not too confusing. It's not a recent page, and the information on there was provided by members (of which FIC is not currently one, although we've invited them to participate...) Please don't take this a meaning anything other than we have zero free time ;-) -Sean ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
RE: Will the OSDL/MLI have a yearly report as well? Re: LiMo foundation
Not too confusing. It's not a recent page, and the information on there was provided by members (of which FIC is not currently one, although we've invited them to participate...) Please don't take this a meaning anything other than we have zero free time Oh, believe me, I understand completely, very likely better than most people on this list: I've actually _shipped_ commercial operating systems, and for a few companies... ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: Will the OSDL/MLI have a yearly report as well? Re: LiMo foundation
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 01:51 +0800, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote: Linux Organisation membership and organisation politics is not my business, but from the linux-user point of view it is a little confusing that OpenMoko/Neo1973 isn't mentioned here: http://old.linux-foundation.org/lab_activities/mobile_linux/mli Not too confusing. It's not a recent page, and the information on there was provided by members (of which FIC is not currently one, although we've invited them to participate...) Please don't take this a meaning anything other than we have zero free time ;-) There you go! I, for one, believe that with the lack of actions, intentions count. Sometimes they count for more than actions as those can be misinterpreted or constrained by unforseen and unwanted factors. It would be nice if all of these efforts come together. -- Richi ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
