Re: which SHR image

2009-01-13 Thread Helge Hafting
Thomas Franck wrote:
 Helge Hafting wrote:
 [an excellent and helpful text]
 
 Wow.. that was thorough... Thank you for that - although I'm past that
 stage it was very good to read..
 
 Maybe one more thing to ask (as I have no clue):
 
 Do you happen to know the difference between the unstable and testing
 images of SHR..?
 
Not completely sure, but I guess this is like debian:

testing:  Reasonably rested, but not necessarily release quality.
unstable: Newer stuff than in testing. This is where you find the very
   latest stuff, but untested. Sometimes, unstable stuff
   doesn't work. So you can test it to see what is coming, but
   be prepared to revert to testing or some earlier unstable
   image if it fails badly. Not what you want for a quick
   upgrade of your daily phone.

Helge Hafting

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: which SHR image

2009-01-13 Thread Julien Cassignol
Helge, would you be so kind as to copy your text somewhere on the wiki? :-)

-- 
Julien Cassignol
http://www.ainulindale.net

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: which SHR image

2009-01-13 Thread Al Johnson
On Monday 12 January 2009, Helge Hafting wrote:
 The .tar.gz file is not an image for flashing. It is simply an archive
 with all the files. It is useful in that you can extract the
 files on a pc easily. You may then copy single files to the freerunner
 in order to fix a botched customization without having to reflash. If
 you have customized over several weeks, then perhaps you don't want to
 reflash and start from scratch.

It is also the file you want if you are going to run from SD rather than 
flash.

 Both of the other two works. The summary file is slightly bigger, but
 is preferable. I have no idea why - but was told so.

IIRC the .summary file has some extra filesystem info present that allows it 
to be mounted faster.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


which SHR image

2009-01-12 Thread Fernando Martins
I would like to try SHR but there are plenty of images in SHR image 
folder. Which files should I get for flashing?

Regards,
Fernando

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: which SHR image

2009-01-12 Thread Julien Cassignol
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Fernando Martins ferna...@cmartins.nl wrote:
 I would like to try SHR but there are plenty of images in SHR image
 folder. Which files should I get for flashing?

The latest! :-)

-- 
Julien Cassignol
http://www.ainulindale.net

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: which SHR image

2009-01-12 Thread Helge Hafting
Fernando Martins wrote:
 I would like to try SHR but there are plenty of images in SHR image 
 folder. Which files should I get for flashing?

The latest is what you want, but of course there are several latest 
images too. At this time of writing, the latest is dated dec.16 and 
dec.17.  The images dated dec.17 don't seem to be newer, the upload
must have happened around midnight.

Some of them are described here:
http://trac.shr-project.org/trac/wiki/Get Started
This describes the difference between the lite image and
the image that isn't lite. Basically, lite has fewer apps.

So most users don't want lite, unless they want it as a basis
for customization.


Images with gta02 in them are for the neo freerunner, images
with gta01 in them are for the older neo 1973.

Images with very short names, such as
shr-image-om-gta02.jffs2 are just links to images with longer names.
See the file sizes to see just which ones.

Files with rootfs in their names are root file systems (contains
standard linux software and distribution apps). This gives you three
files to choose from for a freerunner, assuming you don't want lite:

openmoko-shr-image-glibc-ipk--20081216-om-gta02.rootfs.jffs2
openmoko-shr-image-glibc-ipk--20081216-om-gta02.rootfs.jffs2.summary 
openmoko-shr-image-glibc-ipk--20081215-om-gta02.rootfs.tar.gz

The .tar.gz file is not an image for flashing. It is simply an archive
with all the files. It is useful in that you can extract the
files on a pc easily. You may then copy single files to the freerunner
in order to fix a botched customization without having to reflash. If 
you have customized over several weeks, then perhaps you don't want to 
reflash and start from scratch.

Both of the other two works. The summary file is slightly bigger, but 
is preferable. I have no idea why - but was told so.


You also need a linux kernel image, in addition to the root file system.
Kernel images all start with uImage. The name contain gta01 or
gta02, depending on what phone they are for. Simply get the
newest that is correct for your phone.

You may also want a modules file. If you get one, get the one
that matches your kernel. If your kernel has oe03 and gta02 in
the name, then so should the module file. The git part of the
name should match too. Modules are extra drivers.  You don't
need them right away, I haven't bothered yet. You may need them if you 
want to do something slightly unusal, such as connecting USB devices
to the phone.

module files aren't images for flashing, you unpack them on the phone
using linux commands, after you have the SHR image running normally.

Helge Hafting

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: which SHR image

2009-01-12 Thread Thomas Franck
Helge Hafting wrote:
[an excellent and helpful text]

Wow.. that was thorough... Thank you for that - although I'm past that
stage it was very good to read..

Maybe one more thing to ask (as I have no clue):

Do you happen to know the difference between the unstable and testing
images of SHR..?

 I used to flash the testing images (as linked to by the wiki[1]) but
noticed the other folder the other day..

Cheers..

[1] http://shr.bearstech.com/trac/wiki/Get%20Started
-- 
Thomas

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
Consultant's Creed
If you think *I'm* expensive, wait until you hire an amateur.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: which SHR image

2009-01-12 Thread Fernando Martins
Very much appreciated, thanks.

the obvious suggestion for the right person would be to have your reply 
as a readme file in the folder...

Fernando

Helge Hafting wrote:
 Fernando Martins wrote:
   
 I would like to try SHR but there are plenty of images in SHR image 
 folder. Which files should I get for flashing?
 

 The latest is what you want, but of course there are several latest 
 images too. At this time of writing, the latest is dated dec.16 and 
 dec.17.  The images dated dec.17 don't seem to be newer, the upload
 must have happened around midnight.

 Some of them are described here:
 http://trac.shr-project.org/trac/wiki/Get Started
 This describes the difference between the lite image and
 the image that isn't lite. Basically, lite has fewer apps.

 So most users don't want lite, unless they want it as a basis
 for customization.


 Images with gta02 in them are for the neo freerunner, images
 with gta01 in them are for the older neo 1973.

 Images with very short names, such as
 shr-image-om-gta02.jffs2 are just links to images with longer names.
 See the file sizes to see just which ones.

 Files with rootfs in their names are root file systems (contains
 standard linux software and distribution apps). This gives you three
 files to choose from for a freerunner, assuming you don't want lite:

 openmoko-shr-image-glibc-ipk--20081216-om-gta02.rootfs.jffs2
 openmoko-shr-image-glibc-ipk--20081216-om-gta02.rootfs.jffs2.summary 
 openmoko-shr-image-glibc-ipk--20081215-om-gta02.rootfs.tar.gz

 The .tar.gz file is not an image for flashing. It is simply an archive
 with all the files. It is useful in that you can extract the
 files on a pc easily. You may then copy single files to the freerunner
 in order to fix a botched customization without having to reflash. If 
 you have customized over several weeks, then perhaps you don't want to 
 reflash and start from scratch.

 Both of the other two works. The summary file is slightly bigger, but 
 is preferable. I have no idea why - but was told so.


 You also need a linux kernel image, in addition to the root file system.
 Kernel images all start with uImage. The name contain gta01 or
 gta02, depending on what phone they are for. Simply get the
 newest that is correct for your phone.

 You may also want a modules file. If you get one, get the one
 that matches your kernel. If your kernel has oe03 and gta02 in
 the name, then so should the module file. The git part of the
 name should match too. Modules are extra drivers.  You don't
 need them right away, I haven't bothered yet. You may need them if you 
 want to do something slightly unusal, such as connecting USB devices
 to the phone.

 module files aren't images for flashing, you unpack them on the phone
 using linux commands, after you have the SHR image running normally.

 Helge Hafting

 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

   


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community