Re: [Community-Discuss] AFRINIC and the GDPR
Here is the ARIN blog post about it: https://teamarin.net/2018/03/20/personal-data-privacy-considerations-at-arin/ Rgds, McTim On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Dabu Sifiso <dabu.sif...@yandex.com> wrote: > > Interesting discussion. > > It seems many are not aware of the reality of the European Union's extent > and how RIR divided the world: > > https://www.arin.net/vault/about_us/bot/bot2017_1005.html > "Merike Kaeo indicated that due to General Data Protection Regulations > (GDPR), organizations are going 'dark' with their information because the > fines are so high. The President provided more background on GDPR, and > indicated ARIN was in good shape with regard to GDPR due to its service > region." > > https://www.nro.net/about-the-nro/list-of-country-codes-and- > rirs-ordered-by-country-code/ > Martinique is part of France and EU but is serviced by ARIN, not by RIPE > and there are some more serviced at ARIN. > > If what Mike and Owen are saying is correct, the RIR being outside of EU > is not obliged to be in line with those new rules, but the members from > France (La Reunion, Mayotte) are responsible under French/EU laws? > > The few things I found in regards to GDPR was about exporting private data > to outside of the European Union, does that mean those members will not be > able to make use of the AFRINIC database unless they get confirmation that > AFRINIC is compliant with that GDPR? > > Will AFRINIC move those members and their information to the RIPE where > they will be within the legislation of their own laws? > > > > 11.04.2018, 09:30, "Kris Seeburn" <seebur...@gmail.com>: > > Mike > > Réunion and Mayotte are the outermost region > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_member_state_territories_and_the_European_Union> > of > the European Union <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union> and, as > an overseas department of France, part of the Eurozone > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurozone> > > > > > On Apr 11, 2018, at 18:23, Mike Silber <silber.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > They are not Member States. > > And Owen is not really that accurate in his interpretation. He mixes up > enforcement (real nexus through operations) with some theoretical > applicability which is poorly defined and has no practical expression in > the GDPR and will need national DPAs to provide teeth. > > > On 11 Apr 2018, at 16:19, Andrew Alston <andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com> > wrote: > > Owen, > > Would the fact that AfriNIC serves La Réunion and Mayotte not create > such a nexus since both are formally part of the EU? > > In the same way – there are various EU members served by ARIN? > > > Andrew > > > *From:* Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com <o...@delong.com>] > *Sent:* 11 April 2018 17:12 > *To:* Andrew Alston <andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com> > *Cc:* Mike Silber <silber.m...@gmail.com>; Abibu R. Ntahigiye < > ab...@tznic.or.tz>; General Discussions of AFRINIC < > community-discuss@afrinic.net>; AfriNIC Discuss < > members-disc...@afrinic.net> > *Subject:* Re: [Community-Discuss] AFRINIC and the GDPR > > Roughly translated: >The ability of EU to inflict GDPR on those operators > outside of EU is predicated on that operator >having some business operation or presence within the EU > which allows them to subject you to their >jurisdiction. Determining that you have said presence > requires a specific determination by the >EU member state where said presence exists. > > I’m pretty sure AfriNIC has no such nexus. > > However, what is left out of Mike’s statement is the potential that any > other country may have signed some > sort of treaty with the EU (or a member state) which subjects them to GDPR > and/or grants additional > extraterritorial rights to the EU. Such is (unfortunately) the case with > the US, for example. > > Another key point is that EU citizens not living in Europe are not covered > by GDPR. Non-EU citizens living > within the EU are covered by GDPR. (At least that is my understanding… > AIUI, GDPR applies to EU residents, > not EU citizens.) > > Owen > > > > > On Apr 11, 2018, at 06:44 , Andrew Alston <andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Mike, > > That’s actually pretty useful in some sense – but can I ask for an English > interpretation of the last sentence for those of us that sadly don’t speak > Lawyer ☺ > > Thanks > > Andrew > > > *From: *Mike Silber <silber.m...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, 11 April 2018 at 16:34 >
Re: [Community-Discuss] AFRINIC Annual Financial Statements 2016
Hi Badru, To be absolutely pedantic, the dues paying Members elect the Board, not the "Community", where the Community = fee payers+ interested parties. For the purpose of policy making, we are all equal. For the purpose of asking questions regarding financial matters, I believe the fee paying folks have greater standing. just my 2 bob, McTim On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Badru Ntege <badru.nt...@nftconsult.com> wrote: > Chair > > With all due respect the list of questions in a way underpin my worry. In a > bottom up environment we are all equal and the board and organization serve > the community. > > For clarity the community elects the board, the then board hires the CEO > who then hires the staff so community communications goes to board and > chair. > > CEO has a dual roll of being staff and board member and thus his right to > respond directly to comments. > > In my understanding CEO can also authorize staff to respond to issues if he > so wishes. > > Should you respond to all queries ?? I personally think responding to some > and ignoring others could be taken wrongly by the individual who raises what > they think is a pertinent issue. > > Why my concern ?? I think over the last few months many comments have been > ignored or answered after prompt from the sender. > > On a number of occasions like bellow we have been given information which > turns out to be wrong. Like the issue raised about recovered resources. > > I'm sure I need not go further. It just seems community is becoming a > nuisance to you at times which is unfortunate. And I read this from your > email above and the questions paused > > Regards > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 16 Jun 2017, at 18:32, Sunday Folayan <sfola...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Badru, > > Kindly explain or clarify the gap you have observed, so we can correct this. > > I believe to the best of my ability that as chair and on behalf of the > Board, I have engaged on matters directed at us, even when they clearly > border on operational issues. > > It would also be helpful if you further confirm one or more of these to help > me see how to lead the board to intervene so as to improve things: > > 1. Should Board and staff respond to all issues, and are they obliged to do > so? > > 2. Should Chair or CEO acknowledge all questions and routes to an > appropriate person? > > 3. Chair or CEO acknowledges all posts and provides an estimated response > time?. > > 4. Should members explicitly address chair or CEO in discussions instead of > "can someone respond?" > > 5. Should members directly write Afrinic instead of posting urgent questions > on the mailing lists? > > 6. Should Afrinic policy liaison monitors the lists and brings noteworthy or > urgent issues to the attention of the CEO as the case may be? > > 7. Should the chair always respond to all operational issues or extract > answers from the CEO and relay? > > 8. Are you addressing Chair, Board, Staff or all? > > It is important that I get you right. What do you suggest? > > Thanks > > Sunday. > > > > > On Jun 16, 2017 12:30, "Badru Ntege" <badru.nt...@nftconsult.com> wrote: > > Chair > > A response from any of the responsible persons might be of value. > > I’m concerned that responses coming back to issues raised by community are > not being given the due attention, with some glaring omissions which makes > the members worry if we have all hands on deck. > > Would it be advisable to have some kind of SLA in how long it takes to > respond to community and Member queries?? > > I have noticed it takes quite some time for members to get an > acknowledgement on issues raised. > > Regards > > > > > On 6/15/17, 1:36 PM, "Noah" <n...@neo.co.tz> wrote: > > > > On 14 Jun 2017 3:29 p.m., "Alan Barrett" <alan.barr...@afrinic.net> wrote: > > >> On 6 Jun 2017, at 22:19, Noah <n...@neo.co.tz> wrote: >> Hi Chair, >> >> If the 39,199 was from members who defaulted and went out of business it >> means the resources are no longer in use by those specific members. >> >> Did we recover those resources back into Afrinic inventory for >> re-allocation/assignment? >> >> Can we please get a report on the space that was recovered as I couldnt >> find that anywhere on the AFRINIC website. > > Although I was not asked this question, I perceive that some people may > expect me to answer it. > > > Hi Alan, > > Yes certainly > > > Yes, resources from members who go out of business are recovered. The > recovered resource
Re: [Community-Discuss] Closure: was: Board Statement on Board Member's Conduct
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Danny <afahou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mark, > > Ben Roberts behavior was another abuse of this community's patience. I disagree. I recall a RIPE meeting where the v4 connectivity was shut off to demonstrate what that was like, and no one batted an eye. I thank Liquid for their support and applaud them for their political courage. The point was to show us that it is no fun having your Internet cut off, they made that point quite well I think. Regards, McTim > What if liquid was not sponsoring connectivity. How would Ben have > demonstrated his unnecessary shutdown? > > > Doing such shutdown on a sponsored link under SLA for a major regional > event (AIS) does not give honor to liquid telecom. > > I would suggest that the AIS conveners signal this to liquid telecom top > management in their thank you message. > > Local host should always ensure high availability by having at least 2 > service providers regardless of how many fiber links one provider can bring > into the conference after all even during the workshop week, Liquid internet > was down for 2 hours due to router failure and if there was a second > provider like Safaricon, Wananchi or Seacom such outage would have been > avoided. > > Local host should ensure more than 1 provider in future AIS event after such > premeditated situations. > > Thanks. > > 2017-06-09 14:24 GMT+02:00 Sunday Folayan <sfola...@gmail.com>: >> >> Dear Benjamin, >> >> There is nothing to investigate on that matter. The community protested >> the dramatic shutdown with strong words at the mic that day. >> >> An apology was tendered by Ben Roberts on the floor immediately. I thought >> the community closed the matter then. >> >> The AIS Programme Committee is in the best position to respond and address >> the issue of sole connectivity provider. They know what to learn/unlearn >> from Nairobi. >> >> Cheers. >> >> Sunday. >> >> >> On Jun 9, 2017 12:24, "Benjamin Eshun" <benjamin.es...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Dear Sunday, >> >> Thank you for the information. >> >> Have we investigated the Internet shutdown which occurred during the >> AFRINIC Public Policy meeting at AIS2017, in order to clarify the >> responsibilities of Connectivity sponsor and of AIS NOC team on the Incident >> ? >> >> How come AIS2017 was run with only one Connectivity provider ? >> >> Thanks >> >> Benjamin >> >> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Sunday Folayan <sfola...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Community, >>> >>> In my previous communication to the community dated 29th May 2017, >>> AFRINIC board undertook to further investigate the matter under reference. >>> >>> During the course of the investigation, statements were obtained from >>> Prof. Quaynor as well as others who personally witnessed the incident. >>> >>> Mr Alston, has admitted having made the improper remarks, the subject >>> matter of the incident under reference, in a subsequent apology to the >>> Board. >>> >>> Prof Quaynor has equally apprised the Chairman and Vice- Chairman of the >>> Board that Mr Alston has privately apologized to him. >>> >>> The Board has, after considering the apology tendered, and the nature of >>> the remarks made, issued a written warning to Mr Alston. >>> >>> This is for the information of the Community. >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> >>> Sunday Folayan. >>> >>> Chair, AFRINIC Board. >>> >>> >>> On 29/05/2017 14:24, Sunday Folayan wrote: >>> >>> Dear Community, >>> >>> The attention of the AFRINIC Board has been drawn to an incident which >>> occurred in the hall/lobby of the Boma Hotel, on Saturday 27 May 2017, where >>> AIS 2017 is being held. >>> >>> It has further been confirmed that a sitting board member was involved in >>> the said incident in which Dr Nii Quaynor, a senior and respected member of >>> the African Internet community was allegedly subjected to verbal molestation >>> and humiliation. >>> >>> The AFRINIC Board vehemently condemns any inappropriate act that does not >>> take into consideration the diversity in the community and acceptable norms >>> within African societies and will not condone such acts. >>> >>> The above incident is being further investigated and the Community will >>> be informed of the
Re: [Community-Discuss] [AFRINIC-Announce] AFRINIC Annual Financial Statements 2016
I agree with the Chair here. It is entirely appropriate that the Chair does not task staff for data in this case. Regards, McTim On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Marcus K. G. Adomey <mado...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Dear Sunday, > > > > I agree with you that the CEO is the interface between the Board and the > operation. The point I am making has nothing to do with your “style as > Chair” which is the normal way a board functions. Rather I am concerned > with the business continuity of AfriNIC. In the absence of the CEO, > business continuity requires another interface (acting CEO) who can provide > any information required by the board. > > > > Agree with me that that halting business processes because of one person > is not the right way to go and something must be done about it. > > > > Kind Regards > > > > > > > Marcus > > -- > *From:* Sunday Folayan <sfola...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 7, 2017 9:38:44 AM > *To:* Marcus K. G. Adomey; Noah > > *Cc:* General Discussions of AFRINIC; AfriNIC Discuss > *Subject:* Re: [Community-Discuss] [AFRINIC-Announce] AFRINIC Annual > Financial Statements 2016 > > > Dear Marcus, > > > Normal emails from members meant for registration services are usually > channeled through the ticketing system, and not the Board. > > This particular issue, is addressed to the Chair and the Board. > > It is my style as Chair, not to reach beyond the CEO into the organization. > > > Kind Regards ... > > > Sunday. > > On 07/06/2017 10:18, Marcus K. G. Adomey wrote: > > Hi Sunday, > > > > While I can accept that the matter is not so urgent, I fail to understand > that AfriNIC cannot provide an answer because the CEO is on vacation. Isn’t > there proper delegation of authority as would be expected? > > > > Even then, as this is related to resources, one would assume the > registration service would have this information handy. > > > > Kind regards > > > > > > > Marcus > > -- > *From:* Sunday Folayan <sfola...@gmail.com> <sfola...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 7, 2017 7:25:08 AM > *To:* Noah > *Cc:* General Discussions of AFRINIC; AfriNIC Discuss > *Subject:* Re: [Community-Discuss] [AFRINIC-Announce] AFRINIC Annual > Financial Statements 2016 > > On 06/06/2017 19:19, Noah wrote: > > > > On 1 Jun 2017 3:40 p.m., "Sunday Folayan" <sfola...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2. At 31 December 2016, trade receivables amounting to *USD 39,199 in > 2016* compared to *2015 : USD 26,098*, were impaired and written off > during the year meaning we are not managing our collections. This situation > was expected to improve but that doesn't seem to be the case. > > > The Fees collection situation indeed improved, but the $39,199 you see, is > defaults from members who went out of business. AFRINIC has no control over > members going out of business. It does not make sense to pursue the > recovery of such small amounts using the legal option. > > > Hi Chair, > > If the 39,199 was from members who defaulted and went out of business it > means the resources are no longer in use by those specific members. > > Did we recover those resources back into Afrinic inventory for > re-allocation/assignment? > > Can we please get a report on the space that was recovered as I couldnt > find that anywhere on the AFRINIC website. > > Noah > > > Hello Noah, > > The CEO is on a short vacation. As soon as he returns, I shall provide the > requested information. > > Thanks. > > Sunday. > > > -- > -- > Sunday Adekunle Folayan > Managing Director > General data Engineering Services (SKANNET) > 16 Oshin Road, Kongi Bodija, Ibadan - Nigeria > Phone: +234 802 291 2202 <+234%20802%20291%202202>, +234 816 866 7523 > <+234%20816%20866%207523> > Email: sfola...@skannet.com.ng, sfola...@gmail.com > --- > > > -- > -- > Sunday Adekunle Folayan > Managing Director > General data Engineering Services (SKANNET) > 16 Oshin Road, Kongi Bodija, Ibadan - Nigeria > Phone: +234 802 291 2202 <+234%20802%20291%202202>, +234 816 866 7523 > <+234%20816%20866%207523> > Email: sfola...@skannet.com.ng, sfola...@gmail.com > --- > > > ___ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss@afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > > ___ Community-Discuss mailing list Community-Discuss@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
Re: [Community-Discuss] [rpd] Who is the guarantor of AFRINIC
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Mike Silber <silber.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > Where did I say I support Kieran? > > I simply indicated that the attempt to blame the policy authors for > Kieran's errors is unwarranted. > and the Register often has awful headlines that Kieran has no control over. If people are going to write proposals guaranteed to get media attention, we shouldn't be upset when the media gives attention! regards, McTim > > On 13 Apr 2017, at 20:35, Tutu Ngcaba <pan.afrik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Brother Mike Silber, > > That Kieren McCarthy Author writes mistakes that even in comments of that > bad article about the Afrinic, people have redicule the Afrinic and you can > see even the CEO of the Afrinic has made clarificarions to this McCarthy. > > Even the article title very misleading and call him well known. Maybe he > should not write about the Afrinic anymore. This is bad image for our > motherland. > > Someone even saying we will be like North Korea and such bad articles dont > even give solution. African is a different place my brothers, let us solve > our challengew ourselves. > > Why are you even supporting this McCarthy? > > Best Regards, > > Tutu Ngcaba > Kwazulu Techno Hubs > South Africa > > On 13 Apr 2017 9:21 p.m., "Mike Silber" <silber.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Arnaud > > Kieren McCarthy is a well known author and commentator on Internet issues. > > He follows various lists. > > This was a public policy proposal. Nothing to stop an external party from > picking it up. > > So please don't impute the authors of the proposal just because someone > wrote an article. > > Mike > > On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 at 2:27 PM Arnaud AMELINA <ameln...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> *English :* >> >> Dear member of the community, What is the aim of the authors and the >> initiators of this Article ??? >> >> Do they have the right to share a process that has not yet been adopted >> externally, still coming from a member of the Board of Afrinic, is >> unacceptable, is there no longer any limit In AFRINIC, that the >> different leaders take their respononsibilities and remind to the order the >> indelices >> >> The name AFRINIC has been engaged in this article, even though the >> subject in question has not yet ratified by the community of AFRINIC or the >> BOARD. >> >> >> *French :* >> Chers membre de la communauté, Quel est le but visé par les auteurs et >> les initiateurs de cet Article ??? <https://www.theregister.co.uk/> >> Ont-il le droit de faire part d'un processus non encore adopté à >> l'extérieur, venant encore de la part d'un membre du Board d'Afrinic c'est >> innacceptable, n'y a-t-il plus de limite à AFRINIC, que les différents >> responsables prennent leurs respponsabilités et rappellent à l'odre les >> indélicats. >> >> Le nom d'AFRINIC a été engagé dans cet article alors même que le sujet en >> question ne soit ratifié par la communauté d'AFRINIC ou par le BOARD. >> >> >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/> >> [image: Twitter] >> <https://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_name=theregister> [image: >> Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/VultureCentral> [image: G+] >> <https://google.com/+theregister> [image: LinkedIn] >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-register> >> [image: Home] <https://www.theregister.co.uk/> Data Centre >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/data_centre/> Software >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/software/> Security >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/security/> Transformation >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/transformation/> DevOps >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/devops/> Business >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/business/> Personal Tech >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/personal_tech/> Science >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/science/> Emergent Tech >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/emergent_tech/> Bootnotes >> <https://www.theregister.co.uk/bootnotes/> [image: search] >> <https://search.theregister.co.uk/> >> Data Centre <https://www.theregister.co.uk/data_centre/> [image: Arrow] >> Networks <https://www.theregister.co.uk/data_centre/networks/> >> No more IP addresses for countries that shut down internet access Afrinic >> considers punitive policy for errant governments >> [image: reddit] >> >> <https://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/12/no_ip_addresses_for_countries/=No%20more%20IP%20addresses%20for%20coun
Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] AFRINIC Board Representative to the NRO NC/ASO AC
+1 Janvier! rgds, McTim On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Janvier NGNOULAYE <jnoul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jackson, > I'll just take a simple example among a thousand: In 2008 in US, Hillary > Clinton lost the primary election against Obama, but once Obama elected, > he has taken her as the Minister of Foreign Relations. At that time he > thought that she was the best to handle many internal and external > situations. > In the other hand, for this matter, we have here a technical position, the > community election has more a political perspective which is also good, > while the Board appointment considers a tech skill and a long experience > on the topics for instance on (Post)IANA transition, inter-RIR operations, > etc. > And the end we have a team with a complete skill for the job. > So just keep trusting the Board and let's move forward. > > Warm regards, > Janvier Ngnoulaye > Afrinic Member > > 2016-11-01 13:09 GMT+01:00 Jackson Muthili <jacksonmu...@gmail.com>: > >> Why does the board appoint someone that community rejected in a public >> vote? Did board consider reasons behind community rejection of Fiona? >> Has board decided to neglect the opinion of the community therefore? >> Is Fiona the only one in the whole continent that board could appoint >> to the position after she lost community trust in the same position? >> >> Doesnt the board owe community an explanation for this action? >> >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Mark Elkins <m...@posix.co.za> wrote: >> > Congratulations on your appointment Fiona. >> > Please keep up the great work and representation that AFRINIC has on the >> > ASO AC. >> > >> > On 01/11/2016 12:14, Sunday Folayan wrote: >> >> ** >> >> >> >> *Dear Community,* >> >> >> >> * >> >> >> >> There are three representatives to the NRO NC/ASO AC from the AFRINIC >> >> Service region. Two are elected by the community with staggered >> >> three-year terms, while the third is appointed by the AFRINIC Board. >> >> >> >> >> >> I am pleased to inform you that the AFRINIC Board has appointed Ms. >> >> Fiona Asonga as its representative to the NRO NC/ASO AC, for a one year >> >> term from 1st January to 31st December 2017. She will be replacing Mr. >> >> Mark Elkins who was the Board’s appointee during 2015 and 2016, and >> >> continues to serve until 31 December 2016. Fiona was previously >> elected >> >> by the community, for a term ending on 31st December 2016, and will >> >> change from a community-elected seat to a Board-appointed seat on 1st >> >> January 2017. >> >> >> >> >> >> You will recall that the community elected Mr. Omo Oaiya at the AIS >> >> summit in Gaborone for a three year term that runs from 1st January >> 2017 >> >> to 31 December 2019. Mr. Douglas Onyango is the other representative >> >> elected by the community and his tenure will expire on 31 December >> 2017. >> >> >> >> Congratulations to Fiona, and our thanks and appreciation to Mark >> Elkins >> >> for his service to the community as the Board appointee to the NRO >> >> NC/ASO AC. >> >> >> >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> >> >> >> >> Sunday Folayan >> >> >> >> Chair, AFRINIC Board* >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -- >> >> Sunday Adekunle Folayan >> >> Managing Director >> >> General data Engineering Services (SKANNET) >> >> 16 Oshin Road, Kongi Bodija, Ibadan - Nigeria >> >> Phone: +234 802 291 2202, +234 816 866 7523 >> >> Email: sfola...@skannet.com.ng, sfola...@gmail.com >> >> --- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> Members-Discuss mailing list >> >> members-disc...@afrinic.net >> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa >> > m...@posix.co.za Tel: +27.128070590 Cell: +27.826010496 >> > For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za >> > >> > >> > ___ >> > Community-Discuss mailing list >> > Community-Discuss@afrinic.net >> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss >> > >> >> ___ >> Community-Discuss mailing list >> Community-Discuss@afrinic.net >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss >> > > > ___ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss@afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > > ___ Community-Discuss mailing list Community-Discuss@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Appointment oc Chair and Vice Chair
+1 Rgds, McTim On 13 Jul 2016 05:42, "Mark Elkins" <m...@posix.co.za> wrote: > Congratulations to Sunday an Haitham on their re-appointments as Chair > and Vice-Chair. > > I believe that this continuation of responsibility is good for the > stability of the AFRINIC Board and by extension good for AFRINIC, the > AFRINIC membership and broader AFRINIC community. > > On 12/07/2016 17:43, Alan Barrett wrote: > > During a Board meeting on 6 July 2016, the AFRINIC Board reappointed > > Sunday Folayan as Chairperson, and Haitham el-Nakhal as > > Vice-Chairperson, for one year terms. > > -- > Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa > m...@posix.co.za Tel: +27.128070590 Cell: +27.826010496 > For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za > > > ___ > Community-Discuss mailing list > Community-Discuss@afrinic.net > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > > ___ Community-Discuss mailing list Community-Discuss@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
