Re: Re[2]: [compiz] Compiling compiz 0.5.0 on SLED 10 SP1
Denis Thanx for the tip on the fuse package. It ships with SLED and once installed the fuse plugin loads. Do you perhaps know what is required to get the annotate plugin to compile ? Regards JK On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 7:58 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Denis F. Latypoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Johan, Tuesday, April 10, 2007, 2:32:12 AM, you wrote: JP Thanx for the tip. I managed to get hold of the xorg-x11-compat70-devel package. I have managed to compile compiz 0.5.0, but I am unable to get ./configure to enable the fuse and annotate plugins. The fuse plugin is the reason I want to play with compiz 0.5.0. I have tried --enable-fuse, --disable-fuse=no and a number of other variants, but nothing seems to work. How do I enable the fuse plugin to be built. Below is the last part of the output from ./configure. the following optional plugins will be compiled: gconf:yes place:yes dbus: yes annotate: no svg: no inotify: yes fuse: no and the following optional features will be compiled: svg: no gtk: yes metacity: yes gnome:yes kde: no I should install fuse and fuse-dev before compiling compiz http://fuse.sourceforge.net/ I don't know exactly how that package named in the SLED/SuSE Thanx JK On Mon, Apr 9, 2007 at 2:15 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:00 +0100, Johan Kotze wrote: Dennis I thought of that, but there are no such packages available for SLED or SuSE. It seems that all of that have been incorporated into the xorg-devel package, but the .pc files are missing. What else can I try ? SLED 10 has an older xorg (before .pc's were shipped iirc), you need to dig up an xorg-x11-compat70-devel package. -JP -- JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc. -- Best regards, Denis Latypoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling compiz 0.5.0 on SLED 10 SP1
Dennis I thought of that, but there are no such packages available for SLED or SuSE. It seems that all of that have been incorporated into the xorg-devel package, but the .pc files are missing. What else can I try ? Johan Kotze On Mon, Apr 9, 2007 at 4:48 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Denis F. Latypoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Johan, Monday, April 9, 2007, 2:58:50 AM, you wrote: Hi I am trying to compile compiz 0.5.0 on SLED 10 SP1. I have installed all the requirements as per the docs but when I run ./configure I get the following error: checking for COMPIZ... configure: error: Package requirements (libpng xcomposite xfixes xdamagexrandr xinerama ice sm libstartup-notification-1.0 = 0.7) were not met: No package 'xrandr' found No package 'xinerama' found No package 'ice' found No package 'sm' found The packages that it complains about are all part of xorg and all the xorg devel files are installed. What am I missing ? There are might be required libraries installed, but no *.pc files in the /usr/lib/pkgconfig. You should install xrandr-dev, xinerama-dev, ice-dev and sm-dev packages Johan Kotze -- Best regards, Denis Latypoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling compiz 0.5.0 on SLED 10 SP1
JP Thanx for the tip. I managed to get hold of the xorg-x11-compat70-devel package. I have managed to compile compiz 0.5.0, but I am unable to get ./configure to enable the fuse and annotate plugins. The fuse plugin is the reason I want to play with compiz 0.5.0. I have tried --enable-fuse, --disable-fuse=no and a number of other variants, but nothing seems to work. How do I enable the fuse plugin to be built. Below is the last part of the output from ./configure. the following optional plugins will be compiled: gconf:yes place:yes dbus: yes annotate: no svg: no inotify: yes fuse: no and the following optional features will be compiled: svg: no gtk: yes metacity: yes gnome:yes kde: no Thanx JK On Mon, Apr 9, 2007 at 2:15 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:00 +0100, Johan Kotze wrote: Dennis I thought of that, but there are no such packages available for SLED or SuSE. It seems that all of that have been incorporated into the xorg-devel package, but the .pc files are missing. What else can I try ? SLED 10 has an older xorg (before .pc's were shipped iirc), you need to dig up an xorg-x11-compat70-devel package. -JP -- JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc. ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re[2]: [compiz] Compiling compiz 0.5.0 on SLED 10 SP1
Hello Johan, Tuesday, April 10, 2007, 2:32:12 AM, you wrote: JP Thanx for the tip. I managed to get hold of the xorg-x11-compat70-devel package. I have managed to compile compiz 0.5.0, but I am unable to get ./configure to enable the fuse and annotate plugins. The fuse plugin is the reason I want to play with compiz 0.5.0. I have tried --enable-fuse, --disable-fuse=no and a number of other variants, but nothing seems to work. How do I enable the fuse plugin to be built. Below is the last part of the output from ./configure. the following optional plugins will be compiled: gconf:yes place:yes dbus: yes annotate: no svg: no inotify: yes fuse: no and the following optional features will be compiled: svg: no gtk: yes metacity: yes gnome:yes kde: no I should install fuse and fuse-dev before compiling compiz http://fuse.sourceforge.net/ I don't know exactly how that package named in the SLED/SuSE Thanx JK On Mon, Apr 9, 2007 at 2:15 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 09:00 +0100, Johan Kotze wrote: Dennis I thought of that, but there are no such packages available for SLED or SuSE. It seems that all of that have been incorporated into the xorg-devel package, but the .pc files are missing. What else can I try ? SLED 10 has an older xorg (before .pc's were shipped iirc), you need to dig up an xorg-x11-compat70-devel package. -JP -- JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc. -- Best regards, Denis Latypoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling compiz 0.5.0 on SLED 10 SP1
Hello Johan, Monday, April 9, 2007, 2:58:50 AM, you wrote: Hi I am trying to compile compiz 0.5.0 on SLED 10 SP1. I have installed all the requirements as per the docs but when I run ./configure I get the following error: checking for COMPIZ... configure: error: Package requirements (libpng xcomposite xfixes xdamagexrandr xinerama ice sm libstartup-notification-1.0 = 0.7) were not met: No package 'xrandr' found No package 'xinerama' found No package 'ice' found No package 'sm' found The packages that it complains about are all part of xorg and all the xorg devel files are installed. What am I missing ? There are might be required libraries installed, but no *.pc files in the /usr/lib/pkgconfig. You should install xrandr-dev, xinerama-dev, ice-dev and sm-dev packages Johan Kotze -- Best regards, Denis Latypoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
On Oct 20, 06 11:47:03 -0400, David Reveman wrote: Yes, I have one or two more fixes that should go into compiz 0.2 branch and then I'll push out a 0.2.1. However, I'm not breaking the ABI in the 0.2 branch so making the these additional plugins work with the 0.2 branch is going to require more work to the plugins and it's probably not worth it. I guess so. I'll check which ones of the plugins would work with 0.2, and if there are none or too few I will let the extra package depend on the newer git version. Matthias -- Matthias Hopf [EMAIL PROTECTED], SuSE labs, Zimmer 3.2.06, Tel. 74053-715 ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
On Oct 18, 06 15:20:11 +0100, Mike Dransfield wrote: This is the location of the old compiz-quinn packages. They are not updated anymore, now that they have forked into Beryl. I am specifically looking for an rpm of compiz-0.2.0 as was released by David. Find the compiz package now in the openSUSE X11:XGL project, on which Jigish / Cyberorg added me as maintainer :^) For some reason, compiz is currently in blocked state on XOrg7_SUSE_Linux_10.1, but it has been compiled for the same release in my home directory home:mhopf. For download: http://software.opensuse.org/download/X11:/XGL/ or http://software.opensuse.org/download/home:/mhopf/ Unfortunately, the XOrg7_SUSE_Linux_10.1 packages built in my home project don't show up yet. I guess this needs some time. BTW - Jigish, I think the SL10.1xorg7, SLE10, SLE_10, and SUSE_Linux_Factory directories should be deleted on the download side of X11:XGL, do you agree? It would be nice if someone could package compiz and then create an additional package with the third-party plugins in. AFAIK so far most of the additional plugins (if not all) do not compile/run for upstream compiz at the moment. Matthias -- Matthias Hopf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg(_ | | (_ |__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone +49-911-74053-715__) |_| __) |__ labs www.mshopf.de ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
It would be nice if someone could package compiz and then create an additional package with the third-party plugins in. AFAIK so far most of the additional plugins (if not all) do not compile/run for upstream compiz at the moment. All of the plugins on this page work with compiz, the exception is neg which requires a patch to the core. They all work with hardly any modification, just some annoying differences. To compile them just download, unpack and type make install as your normal user. http://www.anykeysoftware.co.uk/compiz/plugins/ ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
On Oct 20, 06 13:05:54 +0100, Mike Dransfield wrote: All of the plugins on this page work with compiz, the exception is neg which requires a patch to the core. They all work with hardly any modification, just some annoying differences. To compile them just download, unpack and type make install as your normal user. http://www.anykeysoftware.co.uk/compiz/plugins/ That's great. I'll add a package compiz-extra for these plugins. I assume the animation patches are needed for compiz 0.2.0 as well? Thanks Matthias -- Matthias Hopf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg(_ | | (_ |__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone +49-911-74053-715__) |_| __) |__ labs www.mshopf.de ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
Matthias Hopf wrote: On Oct 20, 06 13:05:54 +0100, Mike Dransfield wrote: All of the plugins on this page work with compiz, the exception is neg which requires a patch to the core. They all work with hardly any modification, just some annoying differences. To compile them just download, unpack and type make install as your normal user. http://www.anykeysoftware.co.uk/compiz/plugins/ That's great. I'll add a package compiz-extra for these plugins. I assume the animation patches are needed for compiz 0.2.0 as well? Compiz 0.2.0 covers a lot of different versions, any checkout from git after 13/10 will be OK with animation. I think we need to work out a common versioning scheme for these, maybe something like 0.2.0.20061020 where the last date is the git checkout date. Eventually the releases should be updated more often and stable releases made. You are probably OK to take a git checkout from today since its as stable as it has always been. The correct version by now should really be something like 0.2.5 since there are have been a lot of changes since the original 0.2.0 release. These numbers are probably up to David to change so for now I would probably use the date it was checked out from git as the version. All of the packagers should try to work together so that the versions are the same across distros, this will make support much easier. I am personally using a git checkout from a few weeks ago and it is fine There is no reason why those plugins shouldn't compile with todays checkout. If you have any problems please let me know. If there are any other plugins people would like to see, please let me know. I have only converted the main ones but I realize there are others. Blur FX is a problem because it relies on changes made to emerald but everything else should be OK. If anyone makes packages, could you please add them to the Wiki along with some basic instructions on how to install. This will make it easier for any new users and keep everything in one place. ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
On Oct 20, 06 14:22:42 +0100, Mike Dransfield wrote: Compiz 0.2.0 covers a lot of different versions, any checkout from git after Actually, no. 0.2.0 is exactly the release version of compiz 0.2. Newer versions would be 0.2.1 or similar. Choosing git versions in-between is actually against the spirit of version 0.2 being a stable version. So I doubt this is a good idea. I probably will include the necessary patches only in compiz-git. as stable as it has always been. The correct version by now should really be something like 0.2.5 since there are have been a lot of changes since the original 0.2.0 release. These numbers are probably up to David to change so for now I would probably use the date it was checked out from git as the version. All of the packagers should try to work together so that the versions are the same across distros, this will make support much easier. Release versions are always a PITA :-/ David, care for a rev++? Even 0.2.1 would be ok... If anyone makes packages, could you please add them to the Wiki along with some basic instructions on how to install. This will make it easier for any new users and keep everything in one place. Which wiki pages exactly? openSUSE/compiz? Matthias -- Matthias Hopf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg(_ | | (_ |__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone +49-911-74053-715__) |_| __) |__ labs www.mshopf.de ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 15:15 +0200, Matthias Hopf wrote: On Oct 20, 06 14:22:42 +0100, Mike Dransfield wrote: Compiz 0.2.0 covers a lot of different versions, any checkout from git after Actually, no. 0.2.0 is exactly the release version of compiz 0.2. Newer versions would be 0.2.1 or similar. Choosing git versions in-between is actually against the spirit of version 0.2 being a stable version. So I doubt this is a good idea. I probably will include the necessary patches only in compiz-git. as stable as it has always been. The correct version by now should really be something like 0.2.5 since there are have been a lot of changes since the original 0.2.0 release. These numbers are probably up to David to change so for now I would probably use the date it was checked out from git as the version. All of the packagers should try to work together so that the versions are the same across distros, this will make support much easier. Release versions are always a PITA :-/ David, care for a rev++? Even 0.2.1 would be ok... Yes, I have one or two more fixes that should go into compiz 0.2 branch and then I'll push out a 0.2.1. However, I'm not breaking the ABI in the 0.2 branch so making the these additional plugins work with the 0.2 branch is going to require more work to the plugins and it's probably not worth it. I'll push out a compiz-0.3.2 as well and it makes much more sense to package this and create a compiz-extra-0.3.2 package that works with this version. -David ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
forget the attachment.
-David
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 13:05 +0100, Mike Dransfield wrote:
It would be nice if someone could package compiz and then create an
additional package
with the third-party plugins in.
AFAIK so far most of the additional plugins (if not all) do not
compile/run for upstream compiz at the moment.
All of the plugins on this page work with compiz, the exception is neg
which requires a patch to the core. They all work with hardly any
modification, just some annoying differences.
To compile them just download, unpack and type make install as your
normal user.
http://www.anykeysoftware.co.uk/compiz/plugins/
___
compiz mailing list
compiz@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
--- ../neg.old/neg.c 2006-10-08 22:56:48.0 -0400
+++ ./neg.c 2006-10-20 11:55:50.0 -0400
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
NEG_SCREEN (w-screen);
NEG_WINDOW (w);
-if (nw-isNeg !(mask PAINT_WINDOW_DECORATION_MASK))
+if (nw-isNeg (texture-name == w-texture-name))
{
glPushMatrix ();
___
compiz mailing list
compiz@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
Tuukka I have tried your suggestions but they are a bit too technical for me. What I am actually looking for is a compiled rpm of compiz 0.2.0 for SLED i586 and x86_64. Do you perhaps know where I can find that. Thanx Johan Kotze On Tue Oct 17 2006 at 11:26 PM in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuukka Hastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue 17 Oct 2006 Johan Kotze wrote: I have downloaded compiz-0.2.0 and tried to compile it. The INSTALL file talks about autgen.sh but I am unable to locate it. I tried ./configureRight in development versions you need to run ./autogen.sh but inrelease versions thats already done and ./configure is where you shouldstart at. but it complains about a number of missing packages. Is there any docs on how to compile compiz on SLED 10 I have searched in a lot ofIve found the distribution packages to be helpful in these cases even ifyou want to compile your own. You can install the latest binary packageavailable in your distribution to get most of the runtime dependencies onthe side. Similarily you can install and build the latest source package.src.rpm file on SLED to get at least most of the build-timedependencies satisfied.Alternatively the compiz.spec file inside the source RPM has theinformation you need: Requires-lines for runtime and BuildRequires-linesfor build-time. Google finds at least the spec file for compiz 0.2.0 in arandom distribution:http://developer.momonga-linux.org/viewvc/trunk/pkgs/compiz/compiz.specrevision=11695view=markupThe package names might not match SLED though. places but have not been able to dig up anything. A detailed list of what packages is required and where to locate them would be greatly appreciated.You could also try to read the provided configure.ac file. For exampletheres a list of COMPIZ_REQUIRES and various PKG_CHECK_MODULESstatements.This is not most user-friendly though. Perhaps someone else can provideyou with the information you actually asked for :- Trying to catch me Just follow up my Electric Fingerprints-- To help you: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.iki.fi/Tuukka.Hastrup/ ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
On 10/18/06, Johan Kotze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have tried your suggestions, but they are a bit too technical for me. What I am actually looking for is a compiled rpm of compiz 0.2.0 for SLED (i586 and x86_64). Do you perhaps know where I can find that. http://software.opensuse.org/download/Compiz-Quinn/ ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
I make a point all the same of announcing that there are official compiz packages , (I know for ubuntu), mine :P. http://gandalfn.club.fr/ubuntu Moreover I profit that you evoke the third-party plugins to raise a problem of packaging. I seek to create packages for those but I cannot find which version I put: compiz version ?, ABI compiz version ? I think that it would be important to put a number of version for each so that a modest packager can find himself there. Le mercredi 18 octobre 2006 à 15:20 +0100, Mike Dransfield a écrit : Johan Kotze wrote: Jigish This is the location of the old compiz-quinn packages. They are not updated anymore, now that they have forked into Beryl. I am specifically looking for an rpm of compiz-0.2.0 as was released by David. I think this is a major problem at the moment, there do not appear to be any packagers for the official compiz. I believe that all of them are involved in Beryl and have given up supporting compiz, which is a shame because it reduces the choice of the 'community'. It would be nice if someone could package compiz and then create an additional package with the third-party plugins in. ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz #0; ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
On 10/18/06, Matthias Hopf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 18, 06 15:40:37 +0100, Johan Kotze wrote: I am willing to be a packager for SLED and openSuse 10.1 10.2 if someone would be willing to teach me what to do. I have a good programming background (Delphi Pascal) and I learn quickly. I have no idea as to how to build rpm's, but I am willing to try. I just asked David if he's fine with me pushing our internal packages to the openSUSE build service. Waiting for an answer, as he's doing the internal packages now (I did that before). I have not updated the BS packages as the recent code requires metacity 2.15, while we use metacity 2.12 on sled and SUSE 10.1. I would be updating the package anyway using early gtk-window-decorator that worked with matacity 2.12 for SLED10 and 10.1 users. -J ___ cyberorg ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
[compiz] Compiling Compiz
I have downloaded compiz-0.2.0 and tried to compile it. The INSTALL file talks about autgen.sh but I am unable to locate it. I tried ./configure but it complains about a number of missing packages. Is there any docs on how to compile compiz on SLED 10 I have searched in a lot of places but have not been able to dig up anything. A detailed list of what packages is required and where to locate them would be greatly appreciated. Johan Kotze ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] Compiling Compiz
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Johan Kotze wrote: I have downloaded compiz-0.2.0 and tried to compile it. The INSTALL file talks about autgen.sh, but I am unable to locate it. I tried ./configure Right, in development versions you need to run ./autogen.sh, but in release versions that's already done and ./configure is where you should start at. but it complains about a number of missing packages. Is there any docs on how to compile compiz on SLED 10 ? I have searched in a lot of I've found the distribution packages to be helpful in these cases even if you want to compile your own. You can install the latest binary package available in your distribution to get most of the runtime dependencies on the side. Similarily, you can install and build the latest source package (.src.rpm file on SLED) to get at least most of the build-time dependencies satisfied. Alternatively, the compiz.spec file inside the source RPM has the information you need: Requires-lines for runtime and BuildRequires-lines for build-time. Google finds at least the spec file for compiz 0.2.0 in a random distribution: http://developer.momonga-linux.org/viewvc/trunk/pkgs/compiz/compiz.spec?revision=11695view=markup The package names might not match SLED though. places, but have not been able to dig up anything. A detailed list of what packages is required (and where to locate them) would be greatly appreciated. You could also try to read the provided configure.ac file. For example, there's a list of COMPIZ_REQUIRES and various PKG_CHECK_MODULES statements. This is not most user-friendly though. Perhaps someone else can provide you with the information you actually asked for :-) -- -- Trying to catch me? Just follow up my Electric Fingerprints -- To help you: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iki.fi/Tuukka.Hastrup/ ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
