Re: [computer-go] Positions illustrative of computer stupidity ?
Le mercredi 22 novembre 2006 20:44, Rémi Coulom a écrit : Hi, I am in search of Go positions that are easy to understand for humans, and difficult for computers. Hi Maybe too late ... Nethertheless, i remember a funny thing. Some time ago i implemented opponent good move is good for me in a GNU Go bot and this gave funny things like reverse monkey jump. David Doshay reported this too with early SlugGo (which also takes into account opponent good moves) XXXO ..XO ..X. .a.. Instead of blocking the monkey jump, O plays in a :) I m pretty sure no human player would think of this. Alain ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
Re: [computer-go] post
Original-Nachricht Datum: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 08:47:04 -0800 (PST) Von: Mike Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: computer-go@computer-go.org Betreff: [computer-go] post I am looking for tutorials and articles on the web to learn go. Would you please direct me to these resources if possible. Thank you - Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Hello You will find some links there http://www.dgob.de/yabbse/index.php?topic=1714.msg128562#msg128562 Have fun Wolfgang -- Ein Herz für Kinder - Ihre Spende hilft! Aktion: www.deutschlandsegelt.de Unser Dankeschön: Ihr Name auf dem Segel der 1. deutschen America's Cup-Yacht! ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
Re: [computer-go] Positions illustrative of computer stupidity ?
This is a good example of a reasonable heuristic leading to an undesired solution after a correct evaluation. Most of the time SlugGo did this it was correct that stopping the opponent's monkey-jump was the biggest move on the board, so using the heuristic was valuable. It just took things too far and chose the exact same move for the fix. We had to soften the heuristic to Moves near their best move may be very good for me. Playing with the weights for near cut down on the number of reverse monkey jumps. Cheers, David On 3, Dec 2006, at 5:17 AM, alain Baeckeroot wrote: Le mercredi 22 novembre 2006 20:44, Rémi Coulom a écrit : Hi, I am in search of Go positions that are easy to understand for humans, and difficult for computers. Hi Maybe too late ... Nethertheless, i remember a funny thing. Some time ago i implemented opponent good move is good for me in a GNU Go bot and this gave funny things like reverse monkey jump. David Doshay reported this too with early SlugGo (which also takes into account opponent good moves) XXXO ..XO ..X. .a.. Instead of blocking the monkey jump, O plays in a :) I m pretty sure no human player would think of this. Alain ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
[computer-go] language choices
Since we have been talking about programming language recently, I was curious as to whether anyone on this group has experimented with the digital mars D programming language? From the hype on the web page, it looks an extremely capable programming language that is supposed to be fast native code compiled like C, but have all the features you might ask for in a higher level language. It may be complete garbage for all I know, but at least from the description it seems like something I would be happy to use.It looks like a cleaned up version of C, with a bunch of higher level language features built right in such as associative arrays, garbage collection, dynamic arrays, oop, etc.It compiles to native code, has a GCC compiler as well as a digital mars compiler. Since my go program is tiny, I may give it a try and do a speed comparison. But I was wondering if anyone else has had any experience with it, good or bad. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html - Don ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
Re: [computer-go] language choices
A note: we're working on converting Orego back from C++ to Java, and we're getting 5,000 (totally random at this point) simulated games per second. We'll probably continue in this direction. Peter Drake Assistant Professor of Computer Science Lewis Clark College http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/ ___ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
