Re: [computer-go] 19x19 CGOS

2007-10-14 Thread Olivier Teytaud

If needed I can also offer an account on a server with space, webserver
and an account for you to manage the CGOS server, but I don't have the
time to manage it myself.


We (the mogo-team) can install the cgos 19x19 server; we will 
keep and admninister it if everything works well with our network.

Olivier
___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


Re: [computer-go] 19x19 CGOS

2007-10-14 Thread Joshua Shriver
Sure, I have a webserver in a major datacenter so webhosting isn't  a
problem. As for running the server itself I also have a cable modem
with a static IP but wasn't sure if that was enough for run it.

Let me know if I can help. I run linux at home but could setup a VM
Windows box if it's windows only code.

-Josh

On 10/13/07, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 I don't think this requires a great deal of bandwidth.   Right now cgos
 9x9 is getting by with 1 GIG of disk space and it's not enough - so even
 2-5 Gig would be adequate.I have run the server from my home cable
 modem connection and no problem whatsoever.

 It doesn't matter where the web server is as long as the CGOS server can
 write the data directly to a disk somewhere.   I suppose it could even
 write via a networked file system - perhaps something like FUSE mounted
 via ssh (ssh filesystem)

 However, I might have a solution now.   I'm talking right now to David
 Doshay about using one his university machines for this.

 Can I get back to you on this in case it doesn't work out?

 - - Don


 Joshua Shriver wrote:
  What kind of bandwidth would be required and can the webserver be
  different from the cgos host?  If anything I can dedicated free
  webspace, subdomain, whatever.
 
  -Josh
 
  On 10/13/07, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  We are having some trouble getting 19x19 CGOS running on a volunteered
  machine as there is no administration privileges on that machine.
 
  So we still need a volunteer who will host a machine (and hopefully
  administer it as well.)
 
 
  What we need:
 
  1. A linux machine on a reliable network.
  2. Exposed directly to the internet.
  3. A working web server.
  4. Ability to make a port available for the socket.
 
 
  If you can give me an account on this machine I can adminster and set it
  up, but if YOU want to administer it, that is even better.
 
 
  - Don
 ___
 computer-go mailing list
 computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
 
  ___
  computer-go mailing list
  computer-go@computer-go.org
  http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFHEQ8aDsOllbwnSikRAvp2AJ4zl+t9OqBExb0XVRwqkAsPVh0XBQCfZT1i
 DYryzp193k+v3E7XpfI2Qok=
 =C+m3
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 computer-go mailing list
 computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


RE: [computer-go] Mertin's private 9×9

2007-10-14 Thread Stefan Mertin
Jason House jason.james.houseatgmail.com writes
 I believe that pondering is also more popular today.  How the opponent
 uses their time can affect bot performance as well.

Absolutely,
pondering is very important
e.g. for computer play against humans 
as I erperienced with Suzie in Villach!

But my contest is more a test than a competition:
winning is not as important as finding out the exact playing strength!
Pondering is fuzzy and would confuse these results
more than helping to get reliable results.
So I set pondering disabled and give a high time setting instead
and there is no WIN or LOOSE on TIME result!

Stefan
  


___
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/