Re: [Computer-go] March KGS bot tournament - slow

[David Doshay]

Is there any way to forward this to the AlphaGo team? Comparing AlphaGo to the 
regular set of participants would be enlightening.

Cheers,
David G Doshay

ddos...@mac.com





> On 17, Mar 2016, at 5:57 AM, Nick Wedd  wrote:
> 
> The March KGS slow bot tournament will start on Sunday, March 27th, at 22:00 
> UTC and end by 14:00 UTC on Wednesday 30th.  It will use 19x19 boards, with 
> time limits of 235 minutes (almost four hours) each plus fast Canadian 
> overtime, and komi of 7.5.  See http://www.gokgs.com/tournInfo.jsp?id=1020 
> 
> 
> Please register by emailing me, with the words "KGS Tournament Registration" 
> in the email title, at mapr...@gmail.com  .
> 
> Nick
> -- 
> Nick Wedd  mapr...@gmail.com 
> ___
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] Go Bot for the Browser?

[Benjamin Teuber]

This is really cool. Now it just needs to learn 9x9 via reinforcement
learning ;-)

Josef Moudrik  schrieb am Fr., 18. März 2016 10:21:

> Aha! Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Josef
>
> Dne pá 18. 3. 2016 9:59 uživatel Darren Cook  napsal:
>
>> > If I remember correctly, it is not browser implementation, but rather a
>> > frontend. The actual computation runs on server, browser only
>> communicates the
>> > moves and shows the results.
>>
>> No, a quick test shows once it loads it has not made any server calls.
>> It has a 14MB file which looks like [1]
>>
>> Darren
>>
>>
>> [1]:
>> // 8 layer network trained on GoGoD data, truncated to 6 decimal places
>> to reduce size
>> var json_net = {"layers": [{"layer_type": "input", "out_sy": 25,
>> "out_depth": 8, "out_sx": 25}, {"layer_type"
>> : "conv", "sy": 25, "sx": 25, "out_sx": 19, "out_sy": 19, "stride": 1,
>> "pad": 0, "biases": {"depth":
>>  64, "sx": 1, "sy": 1, "w": [0.519023, -1.379795, -0.495255, -0.051380,
>> -0.466160, -1.380873, -0.630742
>> , -0.174662, -0.743714, -1.288785, -0.607110, -0.536119, -0.819585,
>> -0.248130, -0.629681, -0.004683,
>>  -0.408890, -1.701742, -0.011255, -0.833270, -0.665327, -0.127002,
>> -0.793772, -0.518614, -1.390844, -1
>> .982825, -0.012530, -0.140848, -1.255086, -0.761665, -0.077154,
>> -0.748323, -0.086952, -0.175683, -1.526860
>> , 0.098685, -0.030402, -0.903232, -
>> ...
>>
>> ___
>> Computer-go mailing list
>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
> ___
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] March KGS bot tournament - slow

[uurtamo .]

I like that: "the alphago"
On Mar 17, 2016 2:12 PM, "Lukas van de Wiel" 
wrote:

> Aja Huang is on the mailing list, and he is also on the compyer-go mailing
> list. So the AlphaGo is aware. :-)
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:29 AM, uurtamo .  wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> It'd be cool if they were willing to spend a few $K to participate (Just
>> a guess about what the CPU time would cost). They've proven their strength
>> (4 - 1 means easily pro strength, I think), so it would be a gift to the
>> community if they participated.
>>
>> steve
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:15 AM, David Doshay  wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way to forward this to the AlphaGo team? Comparing AlphaGo
>>> to the regular set of participants would be enlightening.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David G Doshay
>>>
>>> ddos...@mac.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17, Mar 2016, at 5:57 AM, Nick Wedd  wrote:
>>>
>>> The March KGS slow bot tournament will start on Sunday, March 27th, at
>>>  22:00 UTC and end by 14:00 UTC on Wednesday 30th.  It will use 19x19
>>> boards, with time limits of 235 minutes (almost four hours) each plus
>>> fast Canadian overtime, and komi of 7.5.  See
>>> http://www.gokgs.com/tournInfo.jsp?id=1020
>>>
>>> Please register by emailing me, with the words "KGS Tournament Registration"
>>> in the email title, at mapr...@gmail.com .
>>>
>>> Nick
>>> --
>>> Nick Wedd  mapr...@gmail.com
>>> ___
>>> Computer-go mailing list
>>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Computer-go mailing list
>>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Computer-go mailing list
>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>>
>
>
> ___
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Re: [Computer-go] computergo.org

[Joshua Shriver]

Agree, main reason I snagged it was mostly to make sure it would be
used and not end up some spam or adult site.

I do like the idea of re-directing and that could be done in minutes.
Which do you feel is better the host of this list, or the .info one?

-Josh

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:58 PM, David Doshay  wrote:
> sorry about that auto-correct ‘typo. The first one is supposed to be 
> computergo.org, but that should be clear anyway ...
>
> Cheers,
> David G Doshay
>
> ddos...@mac.com
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 18, Mar 2016, at 1:56 PM, David Doshay  wrote:
>>
>> From my perspective, having both a computer.org and a computer-go.org seems 
>> redundant.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David G Doshay
>>
>> ddos...@mac.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 18, Mar 2016, at 12:49 PM, Gonçalo Mendes Ferreira  wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't know how up-to-date computer-go.info is, but it appears a better
>>> target for redirecting.
>>>
>>> - Gonçalo
>>>
>>> On 18/03/2016 19:46, Xavier Combelle wrote:
 2016-03-17 16:16 GMT+01:00 Joshua Shriver :

> Does anyone have interest in that domain name? I'd be willing to
> transfer it to a new owner for free.  It came up a year or so back and
> I grabbed it just in case but never used it.
>
> Rather see it go to someone who can use it rather than squat. It's
> already for another year.
>
> -Josh
> ___
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go


 I would vote for redirecting to computer-go.org if everybody agree (or the
 other direction should be good too)



 ___
 Computer-go mailing list
 Computer-go@computer-go.org
 http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

>>> ___
>>> Computer-go mailing list
>>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>>
>> ___
>> Computer-go mailing list
>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>
> ___
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go