[CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Tom Piwowar
Speed Test: Windows 7 May  Not Be Much Faster Than Vista
http://www.pcworld.com/article/164485/speed_test_windows_7_may_not_be_much_
faster_than_vista.html

PC World's speed tests against Vista show Win7 is 1-4 percent faster, 
below the threshold of human perception.

Why am I not $urprised?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Jeff Wright
 Speed Test: Windows 7 May  Not Be Much Faster Than Vista

http://www.pcworld.com/article/164485/speed_test_windows_7_may_not_be_much_
 faster_than_vista.html
 
 PC World's speed tests against Vista show Win7 is 1-4 percent faster,
 below the threshold of human perception.

Wow.  They couldn't even wait for the article to whip out the weasel words.
*May* not be *much* faster?  On a synthetic test?

Ye gods!  What an indictment!  Guards!  Guards!

 Why am I not $urprised?

Because, like the Spanish Inquisition, no one ever expects confirmation bias
(not).

BTW, is the $ pronounced like a lisp or more of a whistle?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Tom Piwowar
Wow.  They couldn't even wait for the article to whip out the weasel words.
*May* not be *much* faster?  On a synthetic test?

Is this the best you could do? 

I guess it is tough not having right on your side.

Why am I nor $urprised?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] OT: Cable Digital TV

2009-05-07 Thread b_s-wilk
I ordered a Tivax STB-T8 yesterday. Has good reviews, customers and 
review sites.


I have it and much regret the purchase. Poor sensitivity. Crummy remote. 
Slow to change channels. Poor display of program info. Suspect they paid 
for good reviews or the other boxes must be really bad. The RCA box we 
have works much better.


We have an excellent RCA powered VHF/UHF antenna that we'll use with it; 
might hook up the roof antenna. Since the TV's only used for late night 
shows and watching sports when local stations are blacked out, it 
doesn't have to be anything except a receiver. I don't care about 
program info display, just picture. I know which channels to watch [must 
find new numbers] and when the shows are on. Besides we can always look 
at our big TVs for program info.


Reception depends a lot on where you live and which antenna you use, 
too. Customer reviews vary widely on all products, so you have to pick 
and choose, then cross your fingers when you buy a device. This one got 
great reviews and awful reviews, like most converters, except the ones 
that only got awful reviews. None got all good reviews.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Jeff Wright
 Is this the best you could do?

*I* don't have to do much at all.  The question you should be asking, Is
this the best the reviewer could do?

 I guess it is tough not having right on your side.

Very true, which is why the article comes off as so weak.  Speaking of weak:

 PC World's speed tests against Vista show Win7 is 1-4 percent faster,
 below the threshold of human perception.

When the subject was DDR3 RAM, the measly 2-5% increase in performance was
worth real money to you.  Now, a virtually identical range is imperceptible.
Which is it?

Oh, you have conflicting opinions again.  Me? Surprised?  Nah.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS)
Writers in the tech press are stating frankly that M$ (lisp or whistle
here, which ever appeals) is continuing their trend of slowing operating
systems.  XP was slower than NT/2000.  Vista is slower than XP.  Now w7
will be slower than Vista.  My dog can detect trends this obvious!
 
Thank you,

Mark Snyder
-Original Message-
Wow.  They couldn't even wait for the article to whip out the weasel
words.
*May* not be *much* faster?  On a synthetic test?

Ye gods!  What an indictment!  Guards!  Guards!

 Why am I not $urprised?

Because, like the Spanish Inquisition, no one ever expects confirmation
bias (not).

BTW, is the $ pronounced like a lisp or more of a whistle?



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy
**
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/
**

*


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Jeff Wright
 Writers in the tech press are stating frankly that M$ (lisp or whistle
 here, which ever appeals) is continuing their trend of slowing
 operating
 systems.  XP was slower than NT/2000.  Vista is slower than XP.  Now w7
 will be slower than Vista.  My dog can detect trends this obvious!

Time to send Fido back to trend analysis school.  Even the article didn't
say that Win7 is slower than Vista.  


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Tom Piwowar
Time to send Fido back to trend analysis school.  Even the article didn't
say that Win7 is slower than Vista.  

As you pointed out, testing used synthetic benchmarks. Vendors tend to 
code for these well-known benchmarks. We expect real world experience to 
be worse.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Jeff Wright
 As you pointed out, testing used synthetic benchmarks. Vendors tend to
 code for these well-known benchmarks. We expect real world experience
 to
 be worse.

Actually, the expectation is that real-world results will be just be
different.  Synthetic benchmarks only measure what they were designed to
measure.

Let's just conveniently forget the hundreds of hands-on reviews that *all*
indicated much better performance on the same hardware over Vista.  We found
the one that says what you want it to say.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Jeff Wright
 You have a talent for missing the obvious.
 
 My comment about DDR was in regards to one improvement out of many. A
 series of small improvements will add up: 2% here, 3% there, 1%
 someplace
 else... and the total can be 20%, 30%, 40%, 100% or more. That's how
 the
 job is done.

You said no such thing in this instance.  You said: Old benchmarks run with
old chipsets that don't take advantage of DDR3 show speed increases of 2 to
5 percent. Not much, but not bad for $12.  You then tried to pull a fast
one by linking to a Mac Mini review that was faster for all sorts of reasons
other than the RAM.

So which is it?  Is 1-4% not bad or imperceptible?  Note that 75% of the
range of 1-4% is within 2-5%.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Jeff Wright
Just for grins and googles, I did sample searches and found the following:

Results 1 - 10 of about 4,350 for windows 7 faster
http://www.google.com/search?source=ighl=enrlz=q=%22windows+7+faster%22a
q=foq=

Results 1 - 10 of about 98 for windows 7 slower
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=%22windows+7+slower%22

A 44-1 ratio of the word faster over slower.

And, oh look!, a review where Win7 is faster than both Vista and XP SP3:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3187

It all depends on what you measure and how you measure performance.

 -Original Message-
 As you pointed out, testing used synthetic benchmarks. Vendors tend to
 code for these well-known benchmarks. We expect real world experience
 to
 be worse.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Verizon TV Box

2009-05-07 Thread Richard P.
Is it possible to buy the Verizon TV box rather than leasing them? I
would like to take advantage of the great deals Verizon is pushing
right now, but the leasing of a box for each TV is a deal killer.

Are there aftermarket boxes which will work?

Can we use one box and distribute it around the house to the other TV's?

Thanks in advance,

Richard P.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Tom Piwowar
A 44-1 ratio of the word faster over slower.

Did you search on unimpressive?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Wayne Dernoncourt
Jeff Wright
 As you pointed out, testing used synthetic benchmarks.
 Vendors tend to code for these well-known benchmarks.
 We expect real world experience to be worse.

 Actually, the expectation is that real-world results will
 be just be different.  Synthetic benchmarks only measure
 what they were designed to measure.

 Let's just conveniently forget the hundreds of hands-on
 reviews that *all* indicated much better performance on
 the same hardware over Vista.  We found the one that
 says what you want it to say.

The only thing I've heard of definitively is that it doesn't
require as much in the line of resources (memory, graphics
performance, etc.)  System performance is still waiting for
Release Candidate experience.

-- 
Take care  | This clown speaks for himself, his job doesn't
Wayne D.   | supply this, at least not directly
What's 20,000 lawyers rotting in a swamp? A GOOD Start!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Tom Piwowar
Mac Mini review that was faster for all sorts of reasons

Despite your ureasoned commentary, the text you quote makes exactly that 
point faster for all sorts of reasons. That's the difference of looking 
at parts vs looking at the whole. This magazine's speed test shows that 
as a whole Win7 is unimpressive. QED

Perhaps you want to start a rant about PCWorld being a bunch of Mac 
zealots?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Tom Piwowar
Let's just conveniently forget the hundreds of hands-on reviews that *all*
indicated much better performance on the same hardware over Vista.  We found
the one that says what you want it to say.

PCWorld is the first to run scientific benchmarks. 

I find your don't-bother-me-with-the-facts attitude appalling.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Verizon TV Box

2009-05-07 Thread Tom Piwowar
Are there aftermarket boxes which will work?

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires that aftermarket boxes work. 
They have to supply a CableCARD for a nominal fee. Like many other 
laws under Bush, this requirement has not been effectively enforced. Nice 
article on this at Wikipedia.

Can we use one box and distribute it around the house to the other TV's?

Yes, but all sets would get the same channel as the box contains the 
tuner.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Jeff Wright
 Despite your ureasoned commentary, the text you quote makes exactly
 that
 point faster for all sorts of reasons. That's the difference of
 looking
 at parts vs looking at the whole. This magazine's speed test shows that
 as a whole Win7 is unimpressive. 

Guard, turn, dodge, parry, spin, thrust!  

Can't answer the question?  I didn't think you could.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread mike
You bet it's appalling, that's exclusively your gig.

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:



 PCWorld is the first to run scientific benchmarks.

 I find your don't-bother-me-with-the-facts attitude appalling.


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Jeff Wright
 PCWorld is the first to run scientific benchmarks.

Three unconfirmed tests by some slacker are scientific?  You sound like a
fine, upstanding young man, allow me to tell you about a slightly used
bridge I have for sale.

Oh, and no they aren't the first; far from it.  I linked to a scientific
test posted in December 2008 that showed very different results.

 I find your don't-bother-me-with-the-facts attitude appalling.

I find your just-show-me-the-facts-I-want-to-see attitude sad.  Funny too,
but mostly sad.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Verizon TV Box

2009-05-07 Thread Richard P.
I would guess that a nominal fee would still involve a monthly
charge. I'd rather just pay once up front.

Understood about the single box = single channel. How would the
distribution be done? Is there a recommended device?

Thanks in advance.

Richard P.


Are there aftermarket boxes which will work?

 The Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires that aftermarket boxes work.
 They have to supply a CableCARD for a nominal fee. Like many other
 laws under Bush, this requirement has not been effectively enforced. Nice
 article on this at Wikipedia.

Can we use one box and distribute it around the house to the other TV's?

 Yes, but all sets would get the same channel as the box contains the
 tuner.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Verizon TV Box

2009-05-07 Thread Tom Piwowar
I would guess that a nominal fee would still involve a monthly
charge. I'd rather just pay once up front.

It might. I vaguely remember something like $2.

Understood about the single box = single channel. How would the
distribution be done? Is there a recommended device?

Standard coax splitter I would think. It depends on the signal strength 
and the number of taps you need. Worse case you get a distribution 
amplifier.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Verizon TV Box

2009-05-07 Thread MrMike6by9
Just because they use the word FiOS doesn't mean the company
policies/motives differ from those of the cablecos. The laws and regs (they
helped to deveop them through lobbying, etc.) only mandate that you can get
a signal that works with your equipment but it doesn't require those firms
to give that signal to you for free. Thus, it is rare, if not impossible,
for you to be able to purchase an interface device that the provider is
required to let you use for free access to the provider's content. They
are free to charge you for that interface device on a recurring basis (aka
monthly rental) and are not required to sell it to you or to authorize your
privately acquired device(s) on their system. The old, analog OTA, was
grandfathered in but that is going away with the digital transition. Comcast
is converting the analog tier to digital because of the capacity competition
from Verizon. Up to 6 digital channels fit in the space required for 1
analog channel. Think business model. It is not unlike the old days of the
Bell monopoly when you were required to rent their devices to use on their
systems to make/receive phone calls. Maybe something similar will happen
there ... we can only hope.

I just switched from Comcast (Baltimore County) to Verizon 2 days ago.
because of the rebate for my bundle and the fact that Comcast had already
begun to disable my ability to use my DVDR's  Tivo's for
time-shifting/viewing WETA and the Cartoon Network. No jokes please, I
happen to like Adult Swim. I can eventually get cablecards for my Series 3
but, for now, I'm using the FiOS DVR's to see if I'd prefer use them
(rentals) vs. renting the cable cards needed for the Series 3 since cable
cards do not currently support OnDemand (which I occasionally use) and PPV
(never used).

In answer to the second question, you would get the same channel on all
outlets.

YMMV

PS - I miss my PiP, especially during intense sports seasons.

YMMV, part deux

---
This scotch tastes incredibly expensive . . . I can practically feel my bank
account being emptied with every subsequent dram . . . note the rich
character . . . he is now a poor character. . .


--

 Subject: Verizon TV Box

 Is it possible to buy the Verizon TV box rather than leasing them? I
 would like to take advantage of the great deals Verizon is pushing
 right now, but the leasing of a box for each TV is a deal killer.

 Are there aftermarket boxes which will work?

 Can we use one box and distribute it around the house to the other TV's?

 Thanks in advance,




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread Rich Schinnell

FWIW,

I installed Win 7 RC on a Intel dual core w 2 gigs ram and a nvidia
512 graphics card. 160gb new SATA drive  in less than 20 minutes to 
the final desktop.


YMMV
Rich 



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Win7 Speed Improvement Was M$ B$

2009-05-07 Thread mike
Don't start getting facts in the way of Tom's BS, I'm using it to help get
my yard in this weekend.

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Rich Schinnell richnrockvi...@gmail.comwrote:

 FWIW,

 I installed Win 7 RC on a Intel dual core w 2 gigs ram and a nvidia
 512 graphics card. 160gb new SATA drive  in less than 20 minutes to the
 final desktop.

 YMMV
 Rich

 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] EMachines Recovery Disc cutoff date

2009-05-07 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

At one time Emachines came with discs.

I am still bale to download drivers from the web.

best option?

Install new HD and load XP The same flavor that came with it.)

Make sure you have downloaded the drivers and put them on a CD or a 
flash drive, and load it up.


makes a nice print server.

Stewart




At 02:07 PM 5/5/2009, you wrote:
I am trying to repair a wormy EMachines W3107 with a damaged 
recovery partition.


I contacted tech support for a disc set, and they said:
  We do not keep recovery disc images prior to March 2006.
and they could not provide a set.

This is a very disturbing development ...   Comments? Help?;


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Botnets

2009-05-07 Thread Michael Fernando

http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2009/05/researchers-hijack-botnet-score-56000-passwords-in-an-hour.ars


Researchers at the University of California Santa Barbara have
published a paper detailing their findings after hijacking a botnet
for ten days earlier this year. Among other things, the researchers
were able to collect 70GB of data that the bots stole from users,
including 56,000 passwords gathered within a single hour.

...

(Comically, the report notes that 0.1 percent of Torpig victims
love exchanging insults online ...



Only 0.1% ?  Obviously, people in this list weren't a part of
_that_ botnet.  BTW, interesting last paragraph in the article.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Steve added you as a friend on MyLife!

2009-05-07 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Boy you are no fun.

Make mine a Labatts.

Stewart


At 08:45 PM 5/6/2009, you wrote:

Um...no. Unless you throw in beer and pizza. I'll be friends with anyone for
beer and pizza!

Good plan. Count me in for beer and pizza too as long as it is not
Budweiser, the Vista of Beers.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Verizon TV Box

2009-05-07 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 I would guess that a nominal fee would still involve a monthly
 charge. I'd rather just pay once up front.

 It might. I vaguely remember something like $2.


Might be $3/month/card but that is the right ball park.  A TiVO series 3
needed two cable cards and would not work with the multi cable card.



 Understood about the single box = single channel. How would the
 distribution be done? Is there a recommended device?

 Standard coax splitter I would think. It depends on the signal strength
 and the number of taps you need. Worse case you get a distribution
 amplifier.

 You need to hook your router/modem as supplied by Verizon to the cable
wires in the house.  I have a pretty gnarly collection of wires from the
Cox/Media General cable days that they hooked the cable feed to from the
outside FIOS box.  It worked fine in SD all over the house until they went
all digital.  I now need a QAM decoder to watch what cable channels are in
the clear and a box that will either accept a cable card or a box from
Verizon.  I think there are boxes that you can tell VZ something like a MAC
address but I haven't researched that yet.

John Duncan Yoyo
---o)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Steve added you as a friend on MyLife!

2009-05-07 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall 
popoz...@earthlink.net wrote:

 Boy you are no fun.

 Make mine a Labatts.


You DRINK Lab rats? I thought you roast them on a stick.

-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*