Re: [CGUYS] Death to M$; Death to Apple

2009-11-20 Thread mike
A little less of your ego and you might actually consider what I'm saying.
We, you and I have no idea what technology will be here in a decade, two
decades, longer..it is presumptuous to assume you are just smarter than the
previous generations and will just grok it.


On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, b_s-wilk  wrote:

> mike escribió:
>
>
>
>> I get the feeling Betty is that farmer on the side of the road 100 years
>> ago
>> ridiculing his neighbor for using a fancy tractor with one of those
>> engines
>> to plow his field instead of the tried and true mule or team of horses.
>>  Sure the next few years...decade...the horse was pretty reliable, but it
>> didn't take long before that farmer was left behind still crowing about
>> how
>> bad those jalopies were.
>>
>> I think back to teaching my great uncle the computer basics, a man with
>> two doctorates, a world traveler, decorated officer in WW2,
>> composer...friend to several presidents.  The computer was just beyond
>> him...technology had grown from his grasp of the age he was born in.  Will
>> we be like that when our children or grand children are running around
>> with
>> the newest tech?
>>
>
>
> Hej sonny boy. Old folks in your great uncle's generation--and
> older--invented computers.
>
> I studied programming long before PCs. I've worked for companies via the
> Internet and never met any other employees in person. My brother and I built
> a mechanical computer as a school project [after the 5 foot slide rule was
> done]. There are sensible uses for technology, fun things to do, expensive
> business applications, and pie-in-the-sky geek fantasies.
>
> It makes sense to use redundant remote storage for business. It's overkill
> for an individual to store all personal files remotely. It's also stupid.
> Why? The Internet isn't everywhere, so your files are locked away in the
> "cloud" until you can get them. I store duplicates of important files on the
> Internet for when we're traveling. Most of the time I can't access them from
> our remote locations, so I have to carry cryptic info with me.
>
> Put your imagination to work on something more useful. Why not write some
> viruses? That's a fun hobby.
>
> Betty
>
>
>
> *
> **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
> **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
> *
>


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Try Out Chrome OS In a Virtual Machine

2009-11-20 Thread b_s-wilk

from Slashdot [glad I just installed VirtualBox]:

Technology: Try Out Chrome OS In a Virtual Machine
Friday November 20, @09:55PM
Posted by Soulskill on Friday November 20, @09:55PM
from the that-didn't-take-long dept.

itwbennett writes: "Some very generous Alpha OS geeks have snagged the 
Chrome OS source code and compiled a version to share with the rest of 
us, writes blogger Peter Smith. 'The build comes in the form of a 
virtual machine, which means you'll need VMWare or VirtualBox running, 
and of course the image of Chrome OS itself. The folks at gdgt are 
distributing the latter, and they've set up a page with all the links 
you'll need. You'll need to create a gdgt account if you don't have one 
yet. The Chrome OS image is only a bit over 300 megs, so it's a fast 
download. If you need a little more handholding, TechCrunch has a 
step-by-step guide to getting Chrome OS installed and running using 
VirtualBox, and a Chrome OS torrent they link to.'"


find links: 
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/11/21/0022253/Try-Out-Chrome-OS-In-a-Virtual-Machine


Betty


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Death to M$; Death to Apple

2009-11-20 Thread b_s-wilk

mike escribió:



I get the feeling Betty is that farmer on the side of the road 100 years ago
ridiculing his neighbor for using a fancy tractor with one of those engines
to plow his field instead of the tried and true mule or team of horses.
 Sure the next few years...decade...the horse was pretty reliable, but it
didn't take long before that farmer was left behind still crowing about how
bad those jalopies were.

I think back to teaching my great uncle the computer basics, a man with
two doctorates, a world traveler, decorated officer in WW2,
composer...friend to several presidents.  The computer was just beyond
him...technology had grown from his grasp of the age he was born in.  Will
we be like that when our children or grand children are running around with
the newest tech?



Hej sonny boy. Old folks in your great uncle's generation--and 
older--invented computers.


I studied programming long before PCs. I've worked for companies via the 
Internet and never met any other employees in person. My brother and I 
built a mechanical computer as a school project [after the 5 foot slide 
rule was done]. There are sensible uses for technology, fun things to 
do, expensive business applications, and pie-in-the-sky geek fantasies.


It makes sense to use redundant remote storage for business. It's 
overkill for an individual to store all personal files remotely. It's 
also stupid. Why? The Internet isn't everywhere, so your files are 
locked away in the "cloud" until you can get them. I store duplicates of 
important files on the Internet for when we're traveling. Most of the 
time I can't access them from our remote locations, so I have to carry 
cryptic info with me.


Put your imagination to work on something more useful. Why not write 
some viruses? That's a fun hobby.


Betty


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Death to M$; Death to Apple

2009-11-20 Thread mike
I get the feeling Betty is that farmer on the side of the road 100 years ago
ridiculing his neighbor for using a fancy tractor with one of those engines
to plow his field instead of the tried and true mule or team of horses.
 Sure the next few years...decade...the horse was pretty reliable, but it
didn't take long before that farmer was left behind still crowing about how
bad those jalopies were.

I think back to teaching my great uncle the computer basics, a man with
two doctorates, a world traveler, decorated officer in WW2,
composer...friend to several presidents.  The computer was just beyond
him...technology had grown from his grasp of the age he was born in.  Will
we be like that when our children or grand children are running around with
the newest tech?

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:30 PM, b_s-wilk  wrote:

> It's the stupid cloud again! No. The cloud won't obscure computers.
> Ridiculous, as in worthy of ridicule, as only in geek fantasies.
>
> Computers are changing, but aren't going away any time soon, and neither
> are Apple or MS, as long as they keep changing as technology evolves. Apple
> is in a better position than MS, in that they create the hardware that's
> evolving instead of MS keeping up with software competition.
>
> The cloud will never be able to overwhelm computers, at least in the US,
> since it's not available all the time, everywhere. My local computer, Touch,
> and/or smart phone are more reliable than the cloud will ever be, as long as
> it's not ubiquitous. You can't integrate with the Internet if it's not there
> or remains too expensive.
>
> CloudHAHAHAHAHAHA. George Carlin had some wonderful comments about
> ephemisms like "the cloud" and the stupidity of euphemisms in general.
> Cloud...DUH! Where's my free Internets??? Where's my cheap Internets?
> Where's the "everywhere" Internets
>
> Do you trust Google with all your precious and personal data? Do you
> _trust_ the Cloud?
>
> mike escribió:
>
>  Somehow I don't think MS or especially Apple have anything to worry about.
>> Google is going to race to the bottom with this one for a little while I
>> think.  Look out for bad sales on win 7 starter in the future...if there
>> ever were a future for starter.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:16 AM, tjp  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/chromeos-announcement.ars
>>>
>>> "Put differently, in more concrete and less aesthetic terms, Apple and
>>> Microsoft began decades ago with "the PC," and they're currently involved
>>> in
>>> a slow and painful process of trying to stretch and push "the PC" out
>>> towards the Internet and towards a more useful and integrated
>>> relationship
>>> with the cloud as a new type of server.
>>>
>>
>
> *
> **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
> **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
> *
>


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] syncing google calendar with a WM6 phone

2009-11-20 Thread Jeffrey Myers
Is there an equivalent of MS ActiveSync I can use to sync my Samsung
Blackjack II WM6 phone and google calendar through my computer.  I want to
avoid having to go through MS Outlook.

Thanks,
Jeff Myers


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Death to M$; Death to Apple

2009-11-20 Thread b_s-wilk
It's the stupid cloud again! No. The cloud won't obscure computers. 
Ridiculous, as in worthy of ridicule, as only in geek fantasies.


Computers are changing, but aren't going away any time soon, and neither 
are Apple or MS, as long as they keep changing as technology evolves. 
Apple is in a better position than MS, in that they create the hardware 
that's evolving instead of MS keeping up with software competition.


The cloud will never be able to overwhelm computers, at least in the US, 
since it's not available all the time, everywhere. My local computer, 
Touch, and/or smart phone are more reliable than the cloud will ever be, 
as long as it's not ubiquitous. You can't integrate with the Internet if 
it's not there or remains too expensive.


CloudHAHAHAHAHAHA. George Carlin had some wonderful comments about 
ephemisms like "the cloud" and the stupidity of euphemisms in general. 
Cloud...DUH! Where's my free Internets??? Where's my cheap Internets? 
Where's the "everywhere" Internets


Do you trust Google with all your precious and personal data? Do you 
_trust_ the Cloud?


mike escribió:


Somehow I don't think MS or especially Apple have anything to worry about.
Google is going to race to the bottom with this one for a little while I
think.  Look out for bad sales on win 7 starter in the future...if there
ever were a future for starter.

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:16 AM, tjp  wrote:


http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/chromeos-announcement.ars

"Put differently, in more concrete and less aesthetic terms, Apple and
Microsoft began decades ago with "the PC," and they're currently involved in
a slow and painful process of trying to stretch and push "the PC" out
towards the Internet and towards a more useful and integrated relationship
with the cloud as a new type of server. 



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Death to M$; Death to Apple

2009-11-20 Thread mike
Somehow I don't think MS or especially Apple have anything to worry about.
Google is going to race to the bottom with this one for a little while I
think.  Look out for bad sales on win 7 starter in the future...if there
ever were a future for starter.

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:16 AM, tjp  wrote:

> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/chromeos-announcement.ars
>
> "Put differently, in more concrete and less aesthetic terms, Apple and
> Microsoft began decades ago with "the PC," and they're currently involved in
> a slow and painful process of trying to stretch and push "the PC" out
> towards the Internet and towards a more useful and integrated relationship
> with the cloud as a new type of server. Google, on the other hand, began
> with the Internet, and it presumes the cloud in everything it does. With
> Chrome OS, the company is now trying to push and stretch the Internet back
> down onto "the PC" as just one of a growing range of cloud clients. Google
> acknowledged that it will eventually move Chrome OS to laptops and
> conventional PCs, so the Chrome OS portable is just Google's first battle in
> a long, ambitious campaign to thoroughly cloudify the entire computing
> experience."
>
>
>
>
> *
> **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
> **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
> *
>


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Will Postfix talk to Thunderbird?

2009-11-20 Thread tjpa

On Nov 20, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Paul Cannon wrote:

Shows another method on how to setup an account to use Movemail.


Thanks, but alas...

"Movemail support has been removed for OSX. The assumption appears to  
be that if you could configure a movemail account you can create a  
movemail.rdf file. See this article on ISP hooks."


Hacking the profile.js is easier than creating an RDF. And I see some  
posts that the RDF route is actually broken.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Patent Issued For Podcasting

2009-11-20 Thread b_s-wilk

From Slashdot today [here we go again!]:

Patent Issued For Podcasting
on Friday November 20, @12:14PM

from the next-a-patent-on-the-eardrum dept.

..."The EFF is reaching out for help after a company called Volomedia 
got the Patent Office to grant them exclusive rights to 'a method for 
providing episodic media' that could threaten the community of 
podcasters and millions of podcast listeners, 
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/11/eff-tackles-bogus-podcasting-patent-and-we-need-yo. 
'It's a ridiculously broad patent, covering something that many folks 
have been doing for many years,' writes Rebecca Jeschke. 'Worse, it 
could create a whole new layer of ongoing costs for podcasters and their 
listeners.' To bust this patent, EFF is looking for additional 'prior 
art' — evidence that the podcasting methods described in the patent were 
already in use (PDF) before November 19, 2003, 
http://w2.eff.org/patent/wanted/volomedia/EFF_volomedia_prior_art.pdf. 
'In particular, we're looking for written descriptions of methods that 
allow a user to download pre-programmed episodic media like audio files 
or video files from a remote publisher, with the download occurring 
after the user subscribes to the episodes, and with the user continuing 
to automatically receive new episodes.'"


http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/11/20/1422202/Patent-Issued-For-Podcasting


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Death to M$; Death to Apple

2009-11-20 Thread tjp

http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/chromeos-announcement.ars

"Put differently, in more concrete and less aesthetic terms, Apple and  
Microsoft began decades ago with "the PC," and they're currently  
involved in a slow and painful process of trying to stretch and push  
"the PC" out towards the Internet and towards a more useful and  
integrated relationship with the cloud as a new type of server.  
Google, on the other hand, began with the Internet, and it presumes  
the cloud in everything it does. With Chrome OS, the company is now  
trying to push and stretch the Internet back down onto "the PC" as  
just one of a growing range of cloud clients. Google acknowledged that  
it will eventually move Chrome OS to laptops and conventional PCs, so  
the Chrome OS portable is just Google's first battle in a long,  
ambitious campaign to thoroughly cloudify the entire computing  
experience."





*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Will Postfix talk to Thunderbird?

2009-11-20 Thread Paul Cannon
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Help_Documentation:Creating_an_Account

Shows another method on how to setup an account to use Movemail.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 05:27:12PM -0500, tjpa wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2009, at 3:35 PM, John DeCarlo wrote:
> >Postfix doesn't do POP or IMAP, just SMTP and such (AFAIK).
> 
> I figured it out.
> 
> sudo postfix start
> sudo chmod 777 /var/mail   (So that Thunderbird can write its
> lock file.)
> 
> Configure Thunderbird for POP using usern...@localhost for the
> account and localhost as the incoming and outgoing servers.
> 
> Quit Thunderbird.
> 
> Edit the user's Thunderbird profile.js to change the
> "mail.server.server2.type" from "pop3" to "movemail"
> 
> Start Thunderbird and enjoy.
> 
> 
> 
> Can one do this with Win7?
> 
> 
> *
> **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
> **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
> *
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] 1and1.com is the best!

2009-11-20 Thread tjpa

On Nov 19, 2009, at 8:12 PM, chrper...@aol.com wrote:
After yet another disaster with my mailing list because of a problem  
that ez webhost had, rather than something I initiated, I took Tom's  
advice and signed on with 1and1.com despite the fact that my ez  
webhost account runs through May 2010. 1and1 has been incredibly  
helpful. I was on the phone doing set-up for about 2 hours with them  
last night. The gal who helped me (from the Philippines, no less)  
was polite, knowledgeable, and incredibly helpful. We uploaded all  
my web files to the site and set-up 2 mailing lists in that time.   
I'm really looking forward to working with them. Having telephone  
support is making my life much, much easier! I'm very grateful for  
having been pointed in 1and1.com's direction. It looks like they  
will really make my life and internet interaction easier.


Thanks. I encourage you all to think of posting to the list when good  
things happen. We don't just want to hear from you when you have a  
problem. If you share your solutions with the List many of us can  
benefit from the good news.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] CD differences (?)

2009-11-20 Thread tjpa

On Nov 20, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Brian Jones wrote:
My nephew purchased an audio CD recorder a few years ago to record  
music his band was playing.  I too thought that any CD will do, but  
this unit looked for some marker on the CD to indicate that it was  
an Audio CD before it would write to it.  It would reject standard  
data CD's.


I did not know that this was being enforced by the hardware. Bummer!

It is good to know that every blank disc has an information block that  
is read when the disc is inserted into a burner. This is why there is  
a bit of a delay when a disc is inserted into a burner as the burner  
has to figure out what you have fed it. Different discs are made with  
different materials and the burner has to adjust to the requirements  
of the disc. It is quite amazing how this complicated setup is handled  
so invisibly that most of us don't even know it is going on.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Fw: [CGUYS] CD differences (?)

2009-11-20 Thread Brian Jones
This is an old Thread (May 09)... But I have a bit of info that was not 
mentioned.


My nephew purchased an audio CD recorder a few years ago to record music his 
band was playing.  I too thought that any CD will do, but this unit looked 
for some marker on the CD to indicate that it was an Audio CD before it 
would write to it.  It would reject standard data CD's.


So there you have it.. the audio CD has a bit set somewhere that the Audio 
CD recorder can find, and as Tom says, it indicates that the 'royalties' 
have been paid in advance.


 - Brian


From: "Tom Piwowar" 
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] CD differences (?)



>So the question is 'What happens if I write an audio content to these

purported "data" CDs ?"


Audio content is data.

The "audio" designation is for discs that include a royalty to the RIAA
to cover the cost of all the music they think you will be stealing.

Your friend will insist that they bought the music on the vinyl record,
but the RIAA insists that all they sold was a license and that this
license does not allow copying the music to a CD.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Region 2

2009-11-20 Thread b_s-wilk

mike  escribió:


Check VLC, I think it's region free.


VLC, http://www.videolan.org/, works OK with our videos from Spain. Be 
sure that your default video player doesn't open first when you insert 
the DVD. Your computer may automatically reject the disk before VLC 
opens it.


Whatever happens, DON'T change the region code in your DVD burner. You 
can also buy commercial DVD players that ignore region codes so you can 
watch your movies on the huge TV you'll be getting on Black Friday. We 
have a Yamakawa that's region-free; there are many more, and they're not 
expensive. The Yamakawa was around $30, at least 5 years ago.


VLC--Yes! Enjoy the videos, with popcorn!


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*