Re: [CGUYS] Digital humanity (was: apple-stanza-usb)

2010-02-06 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Eric S. Sande esa...@verizon.net wrote:

 Actually the Russian space agency provides this service at lower cost  and
 greater accuracy (because it has not been deliberately dumbed
 down by the generals).


 Don't get too confused on this.  GPS is a strategic necessity.  Or
 something like it is.  The US doesn't depend on the Russians for strategic
 necessities.


The Clinton ordered US Military stopped fuzzing the numbers on the civilian
system in 2000 when GPS became an economic engine.  There is nothing to stop
them from doing so again except a ton vital civilian uses like airplane
navigation.

The Russians could also mess with the satellite signals if they had a
reason.


 What goes on at NASA is for public consumption.  What goes on
 in the military arena is a totally different kettle of fish, IMHO.



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *




-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital humanity (was: apple-stanza-usb)

2010-02-05 Thread Roger D. Parish

At 11:05 AM -0500 2/4/10, Constance Warner wrote:


[snippage]
P.S.: And if you want to continue to use GPS, you might drop a note 
to your Congressperson about funding for NASA.  GPS depends on a set 
of aging satellites and, AFAIK, there are no replacements in the 
pipeline.




The GPS system is owned and operated by the U.S. Air Force. NASA has 
nothing to do with GPS, other than being a possible customer/user.

--
Roger
Lovettsville, VA


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital humanity (was: apple-stanza-usb)

2010-02-05 Thread Constance Warner
Then write your congressperson about the GPS system in general.  And  
NASA is the main agency in the satellite business (cf. the weather  
satellites we all depend on) and could well launch the replacements  
for GPS, if any.

On Feb 5, 2010, at 6:38 AM, Roger D. Parish wrote:


At 11:05 AM -0500 2/4/10, Constance Warner wrote:


[snippage]
P.S.: And if you want to continue to use GPS, you might drop a  
note to your Congressperson about funding for NASA.  GPS depends  
on a set of aging satellites and, AFAIK, there are no replacements  
in the pipeline.




The GPS system is owned and operated by the U.S. Air Force. NASA  
has nothing to do with GPS, other than being a possible customer/user.

--
Roger
Lovettsville, VA


** 
***
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **
** 
***



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital humanity (was: apple-stanza-usb)

2010-02-05 Thread tjpa

On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Constance Warner wrote:
Then write your congressperson about the GPS system in general.  And  
NASA is the main agency in the satellite business (cf. the weather  
satellites we all depend on) and could well launch the replacements  
for GPS, if any.


Actually the Russian space agency provides this service at lower cost  
and greater accuracy (because it has not been deliberately dumbed down  
by the generals).



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital humanity (was: apple-stanza-usb)

2010-02-05 Thread Constance Warner

Actually, launching stuff on cut-rate vehicles has its perils.

My brother worked for ten years on a project that got launched on a  
cut-rate, non-NASA launch vehicle--there was political pressure to  
show cost savings at the time.


You guessed it: straight into the Pacific; straight to the bottom  
with some very expensive gear and ten years' time of numerous  
scientists and engineers.


And I don't expect the Air Force to ask the Russians to launch  
sensitive gear with military applications and, no doubt, lots of  
military secrets.  Let's not forget that GPS was originally for  
military use only.  But with the satellites up there, civilian  
companies started building GPS gear, and the rest is history.

On Feb 5, 2010, at 2:23 PM, tjpa wrote:


On Feb 5, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Constance Warner wrote:
Then write your congressperson about the GPS system in general.   
And NASA is the main agency in the satellite business (cf. the  
weather satellites we all depend on) and could well launch the  
replacements for GPS, if any.


Actually the Russian space agency provides this service at lower  
cost and greater accuracy (because it has not been deliberately  
dumbed down by the generals).



** 
***
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **
** 
***



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital humanity (was: apple-stanza-usb)

2010-02-05 Thread Eric S. Sande
Actually the Russian space agency provides this service at lower cost  and 
greater accuracy (because it has not been deliberately dumbed

down by the generals).


Don't get too confused on this.  GPS is a strategic necessity.  Or something 
like it is.  The US doesn't depend on the Russians for strategic 
necessities.


What goes on at NASA is for public consumption.  What goes on
in the military arena is a totally different kettle of fish, IMHO.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital humanity (was: apple-stanza-usb)

2010-02-04 Thread Constance Warner
A new type of human, thanks to the digital age?  Well, not exactly.   
I agree that cellphones have made a HUGE difference in the third  
world.  A Bangladeshi peasant can now check market prices for the  
agricultural products he/she is raising, so he/she can no longer be  
cheated by the middleman who buys the goods wholesale and resells  
them in the city.   In the Congo, peacekeepers are now paid via  
cellphone; the credit is transmitted to their phones, and they go to  
a cellphone provider's booth to collect the actual currency.  In  
Iran, social networking sites are used to organize protests against a  
tyrannical regime.  Things like this are stupendously marvelous, IMHO.


But a  whole new type of human, which was what the program claimed?   
I don't think so.  Human evolution doesn't go that fast, and human  
brains aren't that plastic.  And there has been rapid connectivity  
since at least the Victorian period, for middle-class persons in  
developed countries.  Remember those Sherlock Holmes movies and  
stories where Holmes finishes the Marsh test and scribbles a note for  
the errand boy, who runs to the telegraph office, where the message  
flashes to another telegraph office and is instantly carried to its  
destination?  Email and phone texting are faster, but the difference  
is one of degree, not of kind.  And can you REALLY reach anybody, any  
time--or even anybody in your immediate social circle, at any time?   
You can leave a message for them almost any time, but you could have  
done that before, by talking to the answering machine--or even the  
receptionist.  You could even have sent a letter or a postcard, which  
has definite legal advantages--if you try certain kinds of hanky  
panky through the U.S. mail, it's a Federal rap.


 As for the other things on the program: you see mostly middle-class  
people doing middle-class things.  Children are doing their homework  
on their laptops, while Daddy works on his laptop and the toddlers  
amuse themselves with Mom's iPhone.  In a rich suburban school, a  
teacher manipulates pictures on a screen that covers half the wall.   
In another school, every child has a laptop.  In Korea, a child is  
sent to camp for two weeks to try to cure him of his video-game  
addiction, and children learn songs about proper behavior on the  
Internet.  All very nice, but all very local, developed, and middle- 
class.


The majority of people on this planet don't have these advantages.   
And in the current economic situation, a lot fewer people in this  
country will have such advantages.  The program depicted a middle- 
class movement for high-income people in developed areas.


So claims for a new type of human are, at best, overstated.

P.S.: And if you want to continue to use GPS, you might drop a note  
to your Congressperson about funding for NASA.  GPS depends on a set  
of aging satellites and, AFAIK, there are no replacements in the  
pipeline.




And speaking of silly--the Frontline program on the Digital  
Revolution (or whatever) on WETA last night.  I agree that looking  
things up on Google is a lot faster than looking them up in the  
encyclopedia, and texting to your friends is a little faster than  
talking on the phone, but will we have a whole new type of human  
being, just because a lot of middle-class people have bought  
wireless plans and carry smartphones?  Because students cheat by  
downloading a plot synopsis of Romeo and Juliet instead of  
getting it from Cliff's Notes?


I have not watched it yet, but I wonder if you are missing the  
major qualitative changes that even a small change in technology  
can achieve. Cell phones give ubiquitous connectivity. The ability  
to reach out to people at any time from any place changes how we  
organize our daily lives. Add to this mix Apple's apps innovation  
and you not have the same ubiquitous ability to reach data. Add to  
this GPS and you can become aware of your environment in a way that  
is wholly different. This is a big deal.



** 
***
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **
** 
***



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital humanity (was: apple-stanza-usb)

2010-02-04 Thread tjpa

On Feb 4, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Constance Warner wrote:
But a  whole new type of human, which was what the program claimed?   
I don't think so.


How about this guy...
Sun CEO Announces Resignation On Twitter
http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/open_source/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=222601162


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*