Low level munchkin...oh I didn't mention, Phil Schiller himself rejected the
app.
I'm sure it's not just silly cause it's apple under attack, couldn't be
that.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:06 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2009, at 12:37 PM, mike wrote:
>
>> The full version of what happened surrounding GV being rejected (so says
>> google) or not rejected (so says apple) was finally released. Google
>> released a redacted version of their side earlier but now the full version
>> has been released and it says clearly that Apple rejected the app
>> completely. Apple's reason of course was the same reason as they stated
>> in
>> the make believe world in which they said they didn't reject it but IF
>> they
>> were to this would be why...ridiculous reasoning to be sure.
>>
>
> Even if some low-level munchkin rejected it for that reason it is entirely
> possible that this reason was later rejected by higher management. I tell my
> staff that this is the reason I have staff.
>
> What's the point of insisting that Apple rejected it? If Apple says they
> are studying the issue how does it benefit anyone to insist that they stop
> studying and issue a rejection. This whole argument is silly.
>
>
> *
> ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
> ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
> *
>
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*
