Re: [Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1
+1 :-) Jesse McConnell wrote: Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users and feedback on it. The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of, hundred's of jira's fixed and many new additions in functionality. I have it staged at: http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum Normal voting rules, 72 hours, +1/0/-1 As wendy mentioned in the thread for preparing this release, a successful vote here will allow me to make an announcement on the continuum users list and I'll move the relevant files to http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 +1 from me jesse
Re: [Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1
+1 Rahul - Original Message - From: "Emmanuel Venisse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:43 AM Subject: Re: [Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1 +1 Emmanuel Jesse McConnell a écrit : Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users and feedback on it. The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of, hundred's of jira's fixed and many new additions in functionality. I have it staged at: http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum Normal voting rules, 72 hours, +1/0/-1 As wendy mentioned in the thread for preparing this release, a successful vote here will allow me to make an announcement on the continuum users list and I'll move the relevant files to http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 +1 from me jesse
Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
Even if it's a minor releases, we need to put them in the repo, because we're under the Maven umbrella so it's better if we respect the Maven philosophy. My 2 cents. Emmanuel Jesse McConnell a écrit : well, my thought is that its not like anyone would be coding against the modules in continuum as a dependency, so why bother putting these minor releases into the main repositories? We don't even deploy updated snapshots of continuum modules much if at all.. jesse On 4/20/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't think it's a pb to release alpha in 2 weeks and put them in the main repo. Emmanuel Jesse McConnell a écrit : > well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release > in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but > I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow > up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks.. > > jesse > > On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this >> going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored). >> >> Cheers, >> Rahul >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM >> Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1 >> >> >> > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into >> >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging >> >> setup? >> > >> > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user >> > list. Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue. >> > >> > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and >> > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason. I created >> > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a >> > development build.) >> > >> > How about putting it under >> > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ? >> > >> > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE. I don't see >> > them in my last Continuum build. >> > >> > -- >> > Wendy >> >> > >
Re: [Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1
dangit, thats what I get for going the last bit by hand since that war signing deal cropped up. I'll take a look and see if I can get that ironed out real quick jesse On 4/20/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users > and feedback on it. > > The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of, hundred's > of jira's fixed and many new additions in functionality. > > I have it staged at: > > http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum > > Normal voting rules, 72 hours, +1/0/-1 -1 -- the .tar.gz distribution does not contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE files. :( http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain -- Wendy -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
well, my thought is that its not like anyone would be coding against the modules in continuum as a dependency, so why bother putting these minor releases into the main repositories? We don't even deploy updated snapshots of continuum modules much if at all.. jesse On 4/20/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't think it's a pb to release alpha in 2 weeks and put them in the main repo. Emmanuel Jesse McConnell a écrit : > well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release > in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but > I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow > up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks.. > > jesse > > On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this >> going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored). >> >> Cheers, >> Rahul >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM >> Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1 >> >> >> > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into >> >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging >> >> setup? >> > >> > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user >> > list. Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue. >> > >> > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and >> > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason. I created >> > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a >> > development build.) >> > >> > How about putting it under >> > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ? >> > >> > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE. I don't see >> > them in my last Continuum build. >> > >> > -- >> > Wendy >> >> > > -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1
On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users and feedback on it. The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of, hundred's of jira's fixed and many new additions in functionality. I have it staged at: http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum Normal voting rules, 72 hours, +1/0/-1 -1 -- the .tar.gz distribution does not contain the required LICENSE and NOTICE files. :( http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain -- Wendy
Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
I don't think it's a pb to release alpha in 2 weeks and put them in the main repo. Emmanuel Jesse McConnell a écrit : well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks.. jesse On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored). Cheers, Rahul - Original Message - From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1 > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging >> setup? > > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user > list. Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue. > > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason. I created > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a > development build.) > > How about putting it under > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ? > > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE. I don't see > them in my last Continuum build. > > -- > Wendy
Re: [Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1
+1 Emmanuel Jesse McConnell a écrit : Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users and feedback on it. The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of, hundred's of jira's fixed and many new additions in functionality. I have it staged at: http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum Normal voting rules, 72 hours, +1/0/-1 As wendy mentioned in the thread for preparing this release, a successful vote here will allow me to make an announcement on the continuum users list and I'll move the relevant files to http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 +1 from me jesse
Re: [Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1
Cool, great job Jesse (and the rest).. I've been waiting on those features! +1 for me On 4/20/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1 On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users > and feedback on it. > > The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of, hundred's > of jira's fixed and many new additions in functionality. > > I have it staged at: > > http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum > > Normal voting rules, 72 hours, +1/0/-1 > > As wendy mentioned in the thread for preparing this release, a > successful vote here will allow me to make an announcement on the > continuum users list and I'll move the relevant files to > > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 > > +1 from me > > jesse > > -- > jesse mcconnell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride
Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks.. jesse On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored). Cheers, Rahul - Original Message - From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1 > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging >> setup? > > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user > list. Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue. > > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason. I created > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a > development build.) > > How about putting it under > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ? > > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE. I don't see > them in my last Continuum build. > > -- > Wendy -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1
1 On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users and feedback on it. The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of, hundred's of jira's fixed and many new additions in functionality. I have it staged at: http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum Normal voting rules, 72 hours, +1/0/-1 As wendy mentioned in the thread for preparing this release, a successful vote here will allow me to make an announcement on the continuum users list and I'll move the relevant files to http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 +1 from me jesse -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride
Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored). Cheers, Rahul - Original Message - From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1 On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging setup? The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user list. Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue. Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason. I created people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a development build.) How about putting it under http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ? BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE. I don't see them in my last Continuum build. -- Wendy
[Vote] release continuum 1.1 alpha 1
Its that time, to start releasing continuum in alpha to get some users and feedback on it. The fixes are far too numerous to specify a concise list of, hundred's of jira's fixed and many new additions in functionality. I have it staged at: http://people.apache.org/~jmcconnell/continuum Normal voting rules, 72 hours, +1/0/-1 As wendy mentioned in the thread for preparing this release, a successful vote here will allow me to make an announcement on the continuum users list and I'll move the relevant files to http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 +1 from me jesse -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1
hm, thats a great way to do it, thanks wendy.. I'll just call the vote then :) jesse On 4/20/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into > the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging > setup? The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user list. Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue. Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason. I created people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a development build.) How about putting it under http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ? BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE. I don't see them in my last Continuum build. -- Wendy -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: nice to have features
hi emmanuel, thx for the quick reply. its nice to know that all of this is coming rather soon :-) as for the notifier: i do experience the effect, that a successful build result is always propagated though the configured notifier effectively ignoring any previous build result. i'm using mail-notifiers only - the alwaysSend option is set to "false" in the configuration xml file of the continuum server. any idea why i do get all "successful" build results? i'm still running continuum 1.0.3. thx again Freundliche Grüße / With kind regards Thomas Zirke S&N AG Klingenderstr. 5 D 33100 Paderborn voice +49 5251/1581-984 fax +49 5251/1581-71 eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web http://www.s-und-n.de Vorstand Klaus Beverungen Josef Tillmann Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates Heinz-Dieter Wendorff Handelsregister Amtsgericht Paderborn HRB 3270 Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 20.04.2007 11:57 Bitte antworten an continuum-dev An: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Kopie: Thema: Re: nice to have features hehe, you'll be happy with continuum 1.1. We'll release a first alpha next week and it integrate all your points. About the notifier, it send a report only if the state change. If your project is always in success the report is sent only the first time but if your project is always in failure, the report is always sent Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > hi guys, > > i've been using continuum now for about 4 month. several projects are > running on it. overall it is a nice continuous integration server but > there are still a few key features missing. > > - project based acl (access for users with the possibility to allow > usergroups to access only specific projects) > - user must be allowed to change his password independently from > usermanagement role > - any notifier should have the opion of sending a successful build result > only on result change - the successful build report is only sent if the > previous build result != successful > - ssl support for frontend (not sure about this - might already be > integrated) > > are any of these features planned to be integrated into continuum? and > what do you guys think of these features in general? > thx in advance, > > Freundliche Grüße / With kind regards > Thomas Zirke > > S&N AG > Klingenderstr. 5 > D 33100 Paderborn > > voice +49 5251/1581-984 > fax +49 5251/1581-71 > eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web http://www.s-und-n.de > > Vorstand > Klaus Beverungen > Josef Tillmann > > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates > Heinz-Dieter Wendorff > > Handelsregister > Amtsgericht Paderborn HRB 3270
Re: Continuum & CVS
Ok, so file an issue on Maven-SCM project (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM) and we'll fix it. Hilco Wijbenga a écrit : On 4/19/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is your continuum version? Continuum 1.0.3 use the command line cvs client and since few days, continuum 1.1 use a pure java cvs client. Sorry, I shouldn't have left that little bit of information out. We're running the latest and greatest ... straight from trunk. So Continuum 1.1-SNAPSHOT. Cheers, Hilco
Re: nice to have features
hehe, you'll be happy with continuum 1.1. We'll release a first alpha next week and it integrate all your points. About the notifier, it send a report only if the state change. If your project is always in success the report is sent only the first time but if your project is always in failure, the report is always sent Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : hi guys, i've been using continuum now for about 4 month. several projects are running on it. overall it is a nice continuous integration server but there are still a few key features missing. - project based acl (access for users with the possibility to allow usergroups to access only specific projects) - user must be allowed to change his password independently from usermanagement role - any notifier should have the opion of sending a successful build result only on result change - the successful build report is only sent if the previous build result != successful - ssl support for frontend (not sure about this - might already be integrated) are any of these features planned to be integrated into continuum? and what do you guys think of these features in general? thx in advance, Freundliche Grüße / With kind regards Thomas Zirke S&N AG Klingenderstr. 5 D 33100 Paderborn voice +49 5251/1581-984 fax +49 5251/1581-71 eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web http://www.s-und-n.de Vorstand Klaus Beverungen Josef Tillmann Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates Heinz-Dieter Wendorff Handelsregister Amtsgericht Paderborn HRB 3270
nice to have features
hi guys, i've been using continuum now for about 4 month. several projects are running on it. overall it is a nice continuous integration server but there are still a few key features missing. - project based acl (access for users with the possibility to allow usergroups to access only specific projects) - user must be allowed to change his password independently from usermanagement role - any notifier should have the opion of sending a successful build result only on result change - the successful build report is only sent if the previous build result != successful - ssl support for frontend (not sure about this - might already be integrated) are any of these features planned to be integrated into continuum? and what do you guys think of these features in general? thx in advance, Freundliche Grüße / With kind regards Thomas Zirke S&N AG Klingenderstr. 5 D 33100 Paderborn voice +49 5251/1581-984 fax +49 5251/1581-71 eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web http://www.s-und-n.de Vorstand Klaus Beverungen Josef Tillmann Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates Heinz-Dieter Wendorff Handelsregister Amtsgericht Paderborn HRB 3270
