| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

2016-10-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup 
Re-citing Mikolaj's comment:
| Sounds like you are asking for Koschei for Copr.
| We are working on first bits of integration right now.
| See: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/113

On Friday, October 7, 2016 5:29:21 PM CEST cl...@redhat.com wrote:
> I am very much asking for that. Thanks!

I'm all for Koschei for Copr too.  Just wanted to say that the original RFE I
menteioned is not exactly the same.  At least if I understand Koschei purpose
(trigger a testing build if some dependency changed).

Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

2016-10-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup 
On Monday, October 10, 2016 11:55:48 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> The lighttpd aliases/redirects will be good to keep copr project's baseurls
> with *rawhide* in it working. You might want to use those.

I still don't get it, even the resolution of the bugzilla from this
thread...

The question is:  Who is going to consume `fedora-26-x86_64` fedora repo
*now*, at the time when f26 == fawhide.  I'm not against creating the aliases,
I'm just asking who is the consumer.

What happens with `--chroot fedora-rawhide-x86_64` after
https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/commit/9ef053b3 ..?  There's no longer
fedora-rawhide-* chroot, even though from discussion it looks like this is not
what most of us want?  What's going to happen with `dnf copr enable USER/COPR`
on rawhide?

Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

2016-10-10 Thread Michal Novotny 
The lighttpd aliases/redirects will be good to keep copr project's baseurls
with *rawhide* in it working. You might want to use those.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Pavel Raiskup  wrote:

> Hi Michal,
>
> On Monday, October 10, 2016 4:39:11 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> > The current state is that 'rawhide' is going to be renamed to f26.
> >
> > I'll additionally setup aliases (or redirects) from
> >
> > /results/*/*/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/ *to* /results/*/*/fedora-26-$
> basearch/
> >
> > so that no links are lost.
> >
> > There will be no need to rebuild any existing builds.
>
> How exactly users will use the aliases links?  Should I think about those
> aliases too in internal Copr?
>
> Pavel
>
>
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

2016-10-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup 
Hi Michal,

On Monday, October 10, 2016 4:39:11 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> The current state is that 'rawhide' is going to be renamed to f26.
>
> I'll additionally setup aliases (or redirects) from
> 
> /results/*/*/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/ *to* /results/*/*/fedora-26-$basearch/
> 
> so that no links are lost.
> 
> There will be no need to rebuild any existing builds.

How exactly users will use the aliases links?  Should I think about those
aliases too in internal Copr?

Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org