Re: Mock SCM git repo Name Vs package name

2017-06-27 Thread Jeandet Alexis
Le mardi 27 juin 2017 à 15:24 +0200, Michal Novotny a écrit :
> Hello, please, see the answer below...
> 
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:41 AM, jeandet  org> wrote:
> > Hello Michal,
> > 
> > Thank you for your help, I'm not a RPM/Mock/Copr pro, you confirm
> > that my spec file is Ok, and that copr should use spectool to fetch
> > sources?
> > If yes I'll be happy to submit the request.
> > 
> > Then I didn't find examples of packages using github on copr, is
> > there people doing this?
> 
> Hello, your specfile probably would be ok if we supported spectool. I
> think we will but a user request at bugzilla or on pagure (https://pa
> gure.io/copr/copr) would help ;). You can e.g. see https://copr.fedor
> ainfracloud.org/coprs/g/mock/mock/ as an example project hosted on
> Github that uses MockSCM build method.
Thank you, I tried to fetch mock sources with 'spectool -g mock.spec'
it doesn't work while building mock in mock works as expected.Is there
something related to to %setup -q Vs %autosetup -n?
BTW: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465480 
> > Best regards,
> > Alexis.
> > Le mardi 27 juin 2017 à 11:13 +0200, Michal Novotny a écrit :
> > > COPR does not currently use spectool so the required sources are
> > > not downloaded for you as in the command-line example you
> > > provided. You can file a request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.co
> > > m/enter_bug.cgi?product=Copr so that we start to use spectool :)
> > > (the RFE will be welcome).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:22 PM, jeandet  > > sf.org> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm quite lost here, I followed the doc here:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging
> > > > /SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Services
> > > > 
> > > > My spec file is here:
> > > > https://github.com/jeandet/vera-rpm
> > > > 
> > > > Does not build on copr:
> > > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ajeandet/SciQLop/build/
> > > > 570647/
> > > > 
> > > > On my machine it works with:
> > > > spectool -g -R vera.spec && rpmbuild -bs ./vera.spec &&
> > > > rpmbuild -bb ./vera.spec
> > > > 
> > > > With mock:
> > > > sudo mock -r fedora-25-x86_64 --scm-enable --scm-option
> > > > method=git --scm-option package=vera --scm-option git_get='git
> > > > clone https://github.com/jeandet/vera-rpm' --scm-option --
> > > > spec='vera.spec' --scm-option branch=master --scm-option
> > > > write_tar=True -v
> > > > 
> > > > I get errors on checkout:
> > > > 
> > > > DEBUG: Executing command: ['git', 'checkout', 'master'] with
> > > > env environ({'HOME': '/root', 'DISPLAY': ':1',
> > > > 'USERHELPER_UID': '0', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'TERM': 'xterm-
> > > > 256color', 'LOGNAME': 'root', 'LANG': 'fr_FR.UTF-8', 'PATH':
> > > > '/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/root/bin', 'USER': 'root'}) and
> > > > shell False
> > > > ERROR: Exception occurred in preexec_fn.
> > > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > >   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 886, in 
> > > > main()
> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-
> > > > packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 89, in trace
> > > > result = func(*args, **kw)
> > > >   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 701, in main
> > > > run_command(options, args, config_opts, commands,
> > > > buildroot, state)
> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-
> > > > packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 89, in trace
> > > > result = func(*args, **kw)
> > > >   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 720, in run_command
> > > > scmWorker.get_sources()
> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-
> > > > packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 89, in trace
> > > > result = func(*args, **kw)
> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/scm.py",
> > > > line 102, in get_sources
> > > > util.do(shlex.split(command), shell=False,
> > > > cwd=self.src_dir, env=os.environ)
> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-
> > > > packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 89, in trace
> > > > result = func(*args, **kw)
> > > >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py",
> > > > line 532, in do
> > > > preexec_fn=preexec,
> > > >   File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 676, in
> > > > __init__
> > > > restore_signals, start_new_session)
> > > >   File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 1283, in
> > > > _execute_child
> > > > raise child_exception_type(err_msg)
> > > > subprocess.SubprocessError: Exception occurred in preexec_fn.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Alexis.
> > > > Le mercredi 31 mai 2017 à 14:19 +0200, Michal Novotny a écrit :
> > > > > The problem is with this line: https://github.com/jeandet/ver
> > > > > a/blob/master/vera.spec#L26, where you specify -n vera-master 
> > > > > for %autosetup. That's how directory is called in https://git
> > > > > hub.com/jeandet/vera/archive/master.tar.gz. But in dist-git
> > > > > the directory in the tarball is 

Re: Mock SCM git repo Name Vs package name

2017-06-27 Thread Michal Novotny
Hello, please, see the answer below...

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:41 AM, jeandet 
wrote:

> Hello Michal,
>
> Thank you for your help, I'm not a RPM/Mock/Copr pro, you confirm that my
> spec file is Ok, and that copr should use spectool to fetch sources?
> If yes I'll be happy to submit the request.
>
> Then I didn't find examples of packages using github on copr, is there
> people doing this?
>


Hello, your specfile probably would be ok if we supported spectool. I think
we will but a user request at bugzilla or on pagure (
https://pagure.io/copr/copr) would help ;). You can e.g. see
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/mock/mock/ as an example project
hosted on Github that uses MockSCM build method.


>
> Best regards,
> Alexis.
> Le mardi 27 juin 2017 à 11:13 +0200, Michal Novotny a écrit :
>
> COPR does not currently use spectool so the required sources are not
> downloaded for you as in the command-line example you provided. You can
> file a request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
> enter_bug.cgi?product=Copr so that we start to use spectool :) (the RFE
> will be welcome).
>
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:22 PM, jeandet 
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm quite lost here, I followed the doc here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packag
> ing/SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Services
>
> My spec file is here:
> https://github.com/jeandet/vera-rpm
>
> Does not build on copr:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ajeandet/SciQLop/build/570647/
>
> On my machine it works with:
> spectool -g -R vera.spec && rpmbuild -bs ./vera.spec && rpmbuild -bb
> ./vera.spec
>
> With mock:
> sudo mock -r fedora-25-x86_64 --scm-enable --scm-option method=git
> --scm-option package=vera --scm-option git_get='git clone
> https://github.com/jeandet/vera-rpm' --scm-option --spec='vera.spec'
> --scm-option branch=master --scm-option write_tar=True -v
>
> I get errors on checkout:
>
> DEBUG: Executing command: ['git', 'checkout', 'master'] with env
> environ({'HOME': '/root', 'DISPLAY': ':1', 'USERHELPER_UID': '0', 'SHELL':
> '/bin/bash', 'TERM': 'xterm-256color', 'LOGNAME': 'root', 'LANG':
> 'fr_FR.UTF-8', 'PATH': '/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/root/bin', 'USER':
> 'root'}) and shell False
> ERROR: Exception occurred in preexec_fn.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 886, in 
> main()
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 89, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
>   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 701, in main
> run_command(options, args, config_opts, commands, buildroot, state)
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 89, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
>   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 720, in run_command
> scmWorker.get_sources()
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 89, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/scm.py", line 102, in
> get_sources
> util.do(shlex.split(command), shell=False, cwd=self.src_dir,
> env=os.environ)
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 89, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 532, in
> do
> preexec_fn=preexec,
>   File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 676, in __init__
> restore_signals, start_new_session)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 1283, in _execute_child
> raise child_exception_type(err_msg)
> subprocess.SubprocessError: Exception occurred in preexec_fn.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexis.
> Le mercredi 31 mai 2017 à 14:19 +0200, Michal Novotny a écrit :
>
> The problem is with this line: https://github.com/jeandet/ver
> a/blob/master/vera.spec#L26, where you specify -n vera-master for
> %autosetup. That's how directory is called in
> https://github.com/jeandet/vera/archive/master.tar.gz. But in dist-git
> the directory in the tarball is called vera++-1.3 (name of the package +
> version). If the command was %autosetup -q, it would work. Are you able to
> change the name of the directory in the archive at
> https://github.com/jeandet/vera/archive/master.tar.gz?
>
> clime
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Michal Novotny  wrote:
>
> Hello, I am just deploying a new version of copr-dist-git that should fix
> that particular problem so you can try that. There seems to be a problem
> later on in building phase but we need to solve it afterwards. clime
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Jeandet Alexis <
> alexis.jean...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I try to build a package from gtihub, it seems that git repo name must be
> the same that package name in spec file?
> Looking this build:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ajeandet/SciQLop/build/559025/
> Looking the log here:
> 

Re: Mock SCM git repo Name Vs package name

2017-06-27 Thread jeandet
Hello Michal,
Thank you for your help, I'm not a RPM/Mock/Copr pro, you confirm that
my spec file is Ok, and that copr should use spectool to fetch
sources?If yes I'll be happy to submit the request.
Then I didn't find examples of packages using github on copr, is there
people doing this?
Best regards,Alexis.Le mardi 27 juin 2017 à 11:13 +0200, Michal Novotny
a écrit :
> COPR does not currently use spectool so the required sources are not
> downloaded for you as in the command-line example you provided. You
> can file a request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?pr
> oduct=Copr so that we start to use spectool :) (the RFE will be
> welcome).
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:22 PM, jeandet  rg> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm quite lost here, I followed the doc here:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/Sou
> > rceURL#Git_Hosting_Services
> > 
> > My spec file is here:
> > https://github.com/jeandet/vera-rpm
> > 
> > Does not build on copr:
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ajeandet/SciQLop/build/5706
> > 47/
> > 
> > On my machine it works with:
> > spectool -g -R vera.spec && rpmbuild -bs ./vera.spec && rpmbuild
> > -bb ./vera.spec
> > 
> > With mock:
> > sudo mock -r fedora-25-x86_64 --scm-enable --scm-option method=git
> > --scm-option package=vera --scm-option git_get='git clone https://g
> > ithub.com/jeandet/vera-rpm' --scm-option --spec='vera.spec' --scm-
> > option branch=master --scm-option write_tar=True -v
> > 
> > I get errors on checkout:
> > 
> > DEBUG: Executing command: ['git', 'checkout', 'master'] with env
> > environ({'HOME': '/root', 'DISPLAY': ':1', 'USERHELPER_UID': '0',
> > 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'TERM': 'xterm-256color', 'LOGNAME': 'root',
> > 'LANG': 'fr_FR.UTF-8', 'PATH':
> > '/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/root/bin', 'USER': 'root'}) and
> > shell False
> > ERROR: Exception occurred in preexec_fn.
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 886, in 
> > main()
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-
> > packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 89, in trace
> > result = func(*args, **kw)
> >   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 701, in main
> > run_command(options, args, config_opts, commands, buildroot,
> > state)
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-
> > packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 89, in trace
> > result = func(*args, **kw)
> >   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 720, in run_command
> > scmWorker.get_sources()
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-
> > packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 89, in trace
> > result = func(*args, **kw)
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/scm.py", line
> > 102, in get_sources
> > util.do(shlex.split(command), shell=False, cwd=self.src_dir,
> > env=os.environ)
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-
> > packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 89, in trace
> > result = func(*args, **kw)
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line
> > 532, in do
> > preexec_fn=preexec,
> >   File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 676, in __init__
> > restore_signals, start_new_session)
> >   File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 1283, in
> > _execute_child
> > raise child_exception_type(err_msg)
> > subprocess.SubprocessError: Exception occurred in preexec_fn.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Alexis.
> > Le mercredi 31 mai 2017 à 14:19 +0200, Michal Novotny a écrit :
> > > The problem is with this line: https://github.com/jeandet/vera/bl
> > > ob/master/vera.spec#L26, where you specify -n vera-master for
> > > %autosetup. That's how directory is called in
> > > https://github.com/jeandet/vera/archive/master.tar.gz. But in
> > > dist-git the directory in the tarball is called vera++-1.3 (name
> > > of the package + version). If the command was %autosetup -q, it
> > > would work. Are you able to change the name of the directory in
> > > the archive at
> > > https://github.com/jeandet/vera/archive/master.tar.gz?
> > > 
> > > clime
> > > 
> > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Michal Novotny  > > m> wrote:
> > > > Hello, I am just deploying a new version of copr-dist-git that
> > > > should fix that particular problem so you can try that. There
> > > > seems to be a problem later on in building phase but we need to
> > > > solve it afterwards. clime
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Jeandet Alexis  > > > t...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I try to build a package from gtihub, it seems that git repo
> > > > > name must be the same that package name in spec file?
> > > > > Looking this build:
> > > > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ajeandet/SciQLop/buil
> > > > > d/559025/
> > > > > Looking the log here:
> > > > > http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/per-task-logs/55902
> > > > > 5-f25.log
> > > > > I tried on my desktop, I had to replace the following
> 

Re: Mock SCM git repo Name Vs package name

2017-06-27 Thread Michal Novotny
COPR does not currently use spectool so the required sources are not
downloaded for you as in the command-line example you provided. You can
file a request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Copr
so that we start to use spectool :) (the RFE will be welcome).

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:22 PM, jeandet 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm quite lost here, I followed the doc here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=
> Packaging/SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Services
>
> My spec file is here:
> https://github.com/jeandet/vera-rpm
>
> Does not build on copr:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ajeandet/SciQLop/build/570647/
>
> On my machine it works with:
> spectool -g -R vera.spec && rpmbuild -bs ./vera.spec && rpmbuild -bb
> ./vera.spec
>
> With mock:
> sudo mock -r fedora-25-x86_64 --scm-enable --scm-option method=git
> --scm-option package=vera --scm-option git_get='git clone
> https://github.com/jeandet/vera-rpm' --scm-option --spec='vera.spec'
> --scm-option branch=master --scm-option write_tar=True -v
>
> I get errors on checkout:
>
> DEBUG: Executing command: ['git', 'checkout', 'master'] with env
> environ({'HOME': '/root', 'DISPLAY': ':1', 'USERHELPER_UID': '0', 'SHELL':
> '/bin/bash', 'TERM': 'xterm-256color', 'LOGNAME': 'root', 'LANG':
> 'fr_FR.UTF-8', 'PATH': '/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/root/bin', 'USER':
> 'root'}) and shell False
> ERROR: Exception occurred in preexec_fn.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 886, in 
> main()
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 89, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
>   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 701, in main
> run_command(options, args, config_opts, commands, buildroot, state)
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 89, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
>   File "/usr/libexec/mock/mock", line 720, in run_command
> scmWorker.get_sources()
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 89, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/scm.py", line 102, in
> get_sources
> util.do(shlex.split(command), shell=False, cwd=self.src_dir,
> env=os.environ)
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 89, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 532, in
> do
> preexec_fn=preexec,
>   File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 676, in __init__
> restore_signals, start_new_session)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/subprocess.py", line 1283, in _execute_child
> raise child_exception_type(err_msg)
> subprocess.SubprocessError: Exception occurred in preexec_fn.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexis.
> Le mercredi 31 mai 2017 à 14:19 +0200, Michal Novotny a écrit :
>
> The problem is with this line: https://github.com/jeandet/
> vera/blob/master/vera.spec#L26, where you specify -n vera-master for
> %autosetup. That's how directory is called in https://github.com/jeandet/
> vera/archive/master.tar.gz. But in dist-git the directory in the tarball
> is called vera++-1.3 (name of the package + version). If the command was
> %autosetup -q, it would work. Are you able to change the name of the
> directory in the archive at https://github.com/jeandet/
> vera/archive/master.tar.gz?
>
> clime
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Michal Novotny  wrote:
>
> Hello, I am just deploying a new version of copr-dist-git that should fix
> that particular problem so you can try that. There seems to be a problem
> later on in building phase but we need to solve it afterwards. clime
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Jeandet Alexis <
> alexis.jean...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I try to build a package from gtihub, it seems that git repo name must be
> the same that package name in spec file?
> Looking this build:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ajeandet/SciQLop/build/559025/
> Looking the log here:
> http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/per-task-logs/559025-f25.log
> I tried on my desktop, I had to replace the following options:
> package=vera by package=vera++
> and
> git_get=git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeandet/vera.git vera by
> git_get=git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeandet/vera.git vera++
>
> Did I miss something? On github, it seems that I can't call my repo
> vera++, how can I override previous options?
>
> Best regards,
> Alexis.
>
> ___
> copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
>
>
>
>
> ___
> copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
>
>
>