| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2016-10-13 at 10:56 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:13:55 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Dne 10.10.2016 v 18:45 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Could we have copr for F25 ?  and in the future for other
> > > > > > branched
> > > > > > repos ? Please .
> > > > > There is fedora-25-* in Copr for more than month already.
> > > > I guess I understand;  Sérgio asks to have e.g. fedora-25-
> > > > x86_64
> > > > repository
> > > > automatically created from fedora-rawhide-x86_64.
> > > I'm checking now , yes, none of my project have f25 buildroots
> > > enabled,
> > > when f25 was created, projects should (IMHO) inherited same
> > > configuration of rawhide .
> > > 
> > > So yes ," Sérgio asks to have e.g. fedora-25-x86_64 repository
> > > automatically created from fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ".
> > 
> > And checking other projects in copr , all projects that I checked
> > also
> > don't have f25 buildroots enabled , so maybe it not a bad idea
> > apply
> > the rule right now .
> After off-list discussion with Copr admins, this is already
> implemented,
> should be simple as `./manage.py rawhide_to_release A B` run by copr
> administractor, though I haven't had a chance to experiment with it
> yet.

(Now also to the list) 

yes , I remember that [1] , now that we have one disynchronization ,
may be we should have this as a tool for each user :) (joking). 
but if user/project don't have any F25 buildroot maybe can be applied ,
I don't know , as have to decided how do that or if do that . 

[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/QONJ6G5VKCOJLZAMTRON5OJIVHHT7L6T/

> Pavel
> 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Pavel Raiskup]

On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:21:15 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 10.10.2016 v 18:45 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > Could we have copr for F25 ?  and in the future for other branched
> > repos ? Please .
> 
> There is fedora-25-* in Copr for more than month already.

I guess I understand;  Sérgio asks to have e.g. fedora-25-x86_64 repository
automatically created from fedora-rawhide-x86_64.

Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Pavel Raiskup]

On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:11:16 AM CEST Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Since there are no scratch builds in Copr, "testing builds" need to be
> simulated by building in separate Copr project, with appropriate repos
> added and createrepo disabled.  Doing "real builds" is almost the same
> thing.

So? :)  Is Koschei going to do the "real builds" in Copr?

Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Mikolaj Izdebski]

On 10/11/2016 07:05 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Re-citing Mikolaj's comment:
> | Sounds like you are asking for Koschei for Copr.
> | We are working on first bits of integration right now.
> | See: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/113
> 
> On Friday, October 7, 2016 5:29:21 PM CEST cl...@redhat.com wrote:
>> I am very much asking for that. Thanks!
> 
> I'm all for Koschei for Copr too.  Just wanted to say that the original RFE I
> menteioned is not exactly the same.  At least if I understand Koschei purpose
> (trigger a testing build if some dependency changed).

Since there are no scratch builds in Copr, "testing builds" need to be
simulated by building in separate Copr project, with appropriate repos
added and createrepo disabled.  Doing "real builds" is almost the same
thing.

-- 
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Pavel Raiskup]

Re-citing Mikolaj's comment:
| Sounds like you are asking for Koschei for Copr.
| We are working on first bits of integration right now.
| See: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/113

On Friday, October 7, 2016 5:29:21 PM CEST cl...@redhat.com wrote:
> I am very much asking for that. Thanks!

I'm all for Koschei for Copr too.  Just wanted to say that the original RFE I
menteioned is not exactly the same.  At least if I understand Koschei purpose
(trigger a testing build if some dependency changed).

Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Pavel Raiskup]

On Monday, October 10, 2016 11:55:48 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> The lighttpd aliases/redirects will be good to keep copr project's baseurls
> with *rawhide* in it working. You might want to use those.

I still don't get it, even the resolution of the bugzilla from this
thread...

The question is:  Who is going to consume `fedora-26-x86_64` fedora repo
*now*, at the time when f26 == fawhide.  I'm not against creating the aliases,
I'm just asking who is the consumer.

What happens with `--chroot fedora-rawhide-x86_64` after
https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/commit/9ef053b3 ..?  There's no longer
fedora-rawhide-* chroot, even though from discussion it looks like this is not
what most of us want?  What's going to happen with `dnf copr enable USER/COPR`
on rawhide?

Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Michal Novotny]

The lighttpd aliases/redirects will be good to keep copr project's baseurls
with *rawhide* in it working. You might want to use those.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Pavel Raiskup  wrote:

> Hi Michal,
>
> On Monday, October 10, 2016 4:39:11 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> > The current state is that 'rawhide' is going to be renamed to f26.
> >
> > I'll additionally setup aliases (or redirects) from
> >
> > /results/*/*/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/ *to* /results/*/*/fedora-26-$
> basearch/
> >
> > so that no links are lost.
> >
> > There will be no need to rebuild any existing builds.
>
> How exactly users will use the aliases links?  Should I think about those
> aliases too in internal Copr?
>
> Pavel
>
>
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Pavel Raiskup]

Hi Michal,

On Monday, October 10, 2016 4:39:11 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> The current state is that 'rawhide' is going to be renamed to f26.
>
> I'll additionally setup aliases (or redirects) from
> 
> /results/*/*/fedora-rawhide-$basearch/ *to* /results/*/*/fedora-26-$basearch/
> 
> so that no links are lost.
> 
> There will be no need to rebuild any existing builds.

How exactly users will use the aliases links?  Should I think about those
aliases too in internal Copr?

Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Pavel Raiskup]

On Thursday, October 6, 2016 6:34:02 PM CEST Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 10/06/2016 06:30 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:55:29 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > RFE2: It would be nice to have a possibility (opt-in) to do package
> > rebuilds at (before?) branching time.  IOW mass-rebuild alternative .. and 
> > notify
> > owners that his package doesn't build anymore.
> 
> Sounds like you are asking for Koschei for Copr.
> We are working on first bits of integration right now.
> See: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/113

Maybe.  I'm not sure, there are good reasons to rebuild packages periodically.

I.e. I would appreciate "production" builds done automatically and be informed
only when something goes wrong.  It could be done by Koschei, it would be fine.

Do we plan to replace mass-rebulids in Fedora Koschei, too?  Or maybe mass
rebuilds are planned to be less frequent now?

Pavel
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

| Re: Fork "from" or "to" rawhide?

[Mikolaj Izdebski]

On 10/06/2016 06:30 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, October 6, 2016 8:55:29 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> RFE2: It would be nice to have a possibility (opt-in) to do package
> rebuilds at (before?) branching time.  IOW mass-rebuild alternative .. and 
> notify
> owners that his package doesn't build anymore.

Sounds like you are asking for Koschei for Copr.
We are working on first bits of integration right now.
See: https://github.com/msimacek/koschei/issues/113

-- 
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org