Core Libs Dev[9] Review request for 8039041: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.naming

2014-04-03 Thread alexander stepanov

Hello,

Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039041

Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8039041/webrev.00/

Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code 
affected.


Thanks.

Regards,
Alexander


Re: Core Libs Dev[9] Review request for 8039041: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.naming

2014-04-03 Thread Sergey Bylokhov

Hello,
I think doclint should checks this type of issues?

On 03.04.2014 13:01, alexander stepanov wrote:

Hello,

Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039041

Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8039041/webrev.00/

Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code 
affected.


Thanks.

Regards,
Alexander



--
Best regards, Sergey.



Re: Core Libs Dev[9] Review request for 8039041: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.naming

2014-04-03 Thread Lance @ Oracle
Looks fine 


Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com
Sent from my iPad

On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:01 AM, alexander stepanov 
alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com wrote:

 Hello,
 
 Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039041
 
 Webrev corresponding:
 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8039041/webrev.00/
 
 Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code 
 affected.
 
 Thanks.
 
 Regards,
 Alexander


Re: Core Libs Dev[9] Review request for 8039041: tidy warnings cleanup for javax.naming

2014-04-03 Thread Alan Bateman

On 03/04/2014 10:01, alexander stepanov wrote:

Hello,

Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039041

Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8039041/webrev.00/

Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code 
affected.

This looks okay to me.

-Alan.