Re: [coreboot] Depthcharge License

2018-01-04 Thread tturne 

On 2017-12-24 05:27, Ivan Ivanov wrote:

This commit got merged and the Depthcharge now should have the
requested license files
at its root directory. Dear friend, please let us learn about your
device once it is released,
maybe some of the coreboot developers would want to get your device -
to use, and possibly help

Best regards,
Ivan Ivanov



Forgive my lack of list etiquette.
With this commit, my legal department is satisfied and has given 
engineering the green light.

Will share details on project as and when I can.
Thanks all who responded and contributed to resolving issue raised by 
this thread.

Cheers,
T.mike

2017-12-21 21:34 GMT+03:00 Aaron Durbin via coreboot 
:

https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/platform/depthcharge/+/837589

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:14 AM,  wrote:


On 2017-12-19 09:53, David Hendricks wrote:


To be fair, it appears that many source files refer to a 
non-existent

LICENSE file. Someone on the CrOS team should probably just add the
LICENSE file for depthcharge and/or contact mal@ to see how the
license info is being collected these days (e.g. for
chrome://os-credits [3]).



Thanks for the input on the DC licensing, and because lawyers are 
involved

I need to ask a direct question.
Can a Depthcharge maintainer (anybody who has +2 gerrit authority 
would

suffice) state on this thread
that the Depthcharge project license is GPLv2 (or later)?

I know this feels redundant and that the question has been asked and
answered, I'm just trying
to satisfy our internal legal group.

Per David's point above, this direct question would not be required 
to

satisfy the lawyers
if a top-level COPYING or LICENSE file is added to Depthcharge.  
Which I

will be happy to
add once I'm able to start contributing to the project.
Cheers,
T.mike


On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, ron minnich 
wrote:


Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the
original question, which boils down to Read The Source?

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot
 wrote:

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM,  wrote:
On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org [1] requires us to vet the
various
licenses, etc.

There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the
Depthcharge tree.

My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).

How would I confirm this with an online source?

Cheers,
T.mike

Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot
list?



Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository  have licenses at
the top of each file. They are GPLv2.


Cheers,
T.mike

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]


 --
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]



Links:
--
[1] http://coreboot.org
[2] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
[3] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/licenses




--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot


--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Depthcharge License

2017-12-24 Thread Ivan Ivanov 
This commit got merged and the Depthcharge now should have the
requested license files
at its root directory. Dear friend, please let us learn about your
device once it is released,
maybe some of the coreboot developers would want to get your device -
to use, and possibly help

Best regards,
Ivan Ivanov

2017-12-21 21:34 GMT+03:00 Aaron Durbin via coreboot :
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/platform/depthcharge/+/837589
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:14 AM,  wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-12-19 09:53, David Hendricks wrote:
>>>
>>> To be fair, it appears that many source files refer to a non-existent
>>> LICENSE file. Someone on the CrOS team should probably just add the
>>> LICENSE file for depthcharge and/or contact mal@ to see how the
>>> license info is being collected these days (e.g. for
>>> chrome://os-credits [3]).
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the input on the DC licensing, and because lawyers are involved
>> I need to ask a direct question.
>> Can a Depthcharge maintainer (anybody who has +2 gerrit authority would
>> suffice) state on this thread
>> that the Depthcharge project license is GPLv2 (or later)?
>>
>> I know this feels redundant and that the question has been asked and
>> answered, I'm just trying
>> to satisfy our internal legal group.
>>
>> Per David's point above, this direct question would not be required to
>> satisfy the lawyers
>> if a top-level COPYING or LICENSE file is added to Depthcharge.  Which I
>> will be happy to
>> add once I'm able to start contributing to the project.
>> Cheers,
>> T.mike
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, ron minnich 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the
 original question, which boils down to Read The Source?

 On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot
  wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM,  wrote:
 On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote:
 Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org [1] requires us to vet the
 various
 licenses, etc.

 There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the
 Depthcharge tree.

 My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).

 How would I confirm this with an online source?

 Cheers,
 T.mike

 Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot
 list?
>>>
>>>
>>> Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository  have licenses at
>>> the top of each file. They are GPLv2.
>>>
 Cheers,
 T.mike

 --
 coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
 https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
>>>
>>>  --
>>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
>>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
>>> --
>>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
>>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Links:
>>> --
>>> [1] http://coreboot.org
>>> [2] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>>> [3] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/licenses
>
>
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Depthcharge License

2017-12-21 Thread Aaron Durbin via coreboot 
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/platform/depthcharge/+/837589

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:14 AM,  wrote:

> On 2017-12-19 09:53, David Hendricks wrote:
>
>> To be fair, it appears that many source files refer to a non-existent
>> LICENSE file. Someone on the CrOS team should probably just add the
>> LICENSE file for depthcharge and/or contact mal@ to see how the
>> license info is being collected these days (e.g. for
>> chrome://os-credits [3]).
>>
>>
> Thanks for the input on the DC licensing, and because lawyers are involved
> I need to ask a direct question.
> Can a Depthcharge maintainer (anybody who has +2 gerrit authority would
> suffice) state on this thread
> that the Depthcharge project license is GPLv2 (or later)?
>
> I know this feels redundant and that the question has been asked and
> answered, I'm just trying
> to satisfy our internal legal group.
>
> Per David's point above, this direct question would not be required to
> satisfy the lawyers
> if a top-level COPYING or LICENSE file is added to Depthcharge.  Which I
> will be happy to
> add once I'm able to start contributing to the project.
> Cheers,
> T.mike
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, ron minnich 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the
>>> original question, which boils down to Read The Source?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM,  wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>> Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org [1] requires us to vet the
>>> various
>>> licenses, etc.
>>>
>>> There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the
>>> Depthcharge tree.
>>>
>>> My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).
>>>
>>> How would I confirm this with an online source?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> T.mike
>>>
>>> Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot
>>> list?
>>>
>>
>> Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository  have licenses at
>> the top of each file. They are GPLv2.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>> T.mike
>>>
>>> --
>>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
>>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
>>>
>>  --
>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
>> --
>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
>>
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> --
>> [1] http://coreboot.org
>> [2] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>> [3] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/licenses
>>
>
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Depthcharge License

2017-12-21 Thread tturne 

On 2017-12-19 09:53, David Hendricks wrote:

To be fair, it appears that many source files refer to a non-existent
LICENSE file. Someone on the CrOS team should probably just add the
LICENSE file for depthcharge and/or contact mal@ to see how the
license info is being collected these days (e.g. for
chrome://os-credits [3]).



Thanks for the input on the DC licensing, and because lawyers are 
involved I need to ask a direct question.
Can a Depthcharge maintainer (anybody who has +2 gerrit authority would 
suffice) state on this thread

that the Depthcharge project license is GPLv2 (or later)?

I know this feels redundant and that the question has been asked and 
answered, I'm just trying

to satisfy our internal legal group.

Per David's point above, this direct question would not be required to 
satisfy the lawyers
if a top-level COPYING or LICENSE file is added to Depthcharge.  Which I 
will be happy to

add once I'm able to start contributing to the project.
Cheers,
T.mike


On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, ron minnich 
wrote:


Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the
original question, which boils down to Read The Source?

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot
 wrote:

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM,  wrote:
On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org [1] requires us to vet the
various
licenses, etc.

There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the
Depthcharge tree.

My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).

How would I confirm this with an online source?

Cheers,
T.mike

Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot
list?


Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository  have licenses at
the top of each file. They are GPLv2.


Cheers,
T.mike

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]

 --
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]



Links:
--
[1] http://coreboot.org
[2] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
[3] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/licenses


--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Depthcharge License

2017-12-19 Thread David Hendricks 
To be fair, it appears that many source files refer to a non-existent
LICENSE file. Someone on the CrOS team should probably just add the LICENSE
file for depthcharge and/or contact mal@ to see how the license info is
being collected these days (e.g. for chrome://os-credits
).

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, ron minnich  wrote:

> Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the original
> question, which boils down to Read The Source?
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot <
> coreboot@coreboot.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM,  wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>>
 Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org requires us to vet the various
 licenses, etc.

 There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the Depthcharge
 tree.

 My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).

 How would I confirm this with an online source?

 Cheers,
 T.mike

>>>
>>> Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot list?
>>>
>>>
>> Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository  have licenses at the
>> top of each file. They are GPLv2.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>> T.mike
>>>
>>> --
>>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
>>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>>>
>> --
>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Depthcharge License

2017-12-19 Thread ron minnich 
Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the original
question, which boils down to Read The Source?

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot <
coreboot@coreboot.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM,  wrote:
>
>> On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>
>>> Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org requires us to vet the various
>>> licenses, etc.
>>>
>>> There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the Depthcharge
>>> tree.
>>>
>>> My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).
>>>
>>> How would I confirm this with an online source?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> T.mike
>>>
>>
>> Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot list?
>>
>>
> Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository  have licenses at the
> top of each file. They are GPLv2.
>
> Cheers,
>> T.mike
>>
>> --
>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Depthcharge License

2017-12-19 Thread Aaron Durbin via coreboot 
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM,  wrote:

> On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>
>> Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org requires us to vet the various
>> licenses, etc.
>>
>> There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the Depthcharge
>> tree.
>>
>> My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).
>>
>> How would I confirm this with an online source?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> T.mike
>>
>
> Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot list?
>
>
Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository  have licenses at the top
of each file. They are GPLv2.

Cheers,
> T.mike
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Depthcharge License

2017-12-19 Thread tturne 

On 2017-12-15 13:39, ttu...@codeaurora.org wrote:

Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org requires us to vet the various
licenses, etc.

There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the Depthcharge 
tree.


My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).

How would I confirm this with an online source?

Cheers,
T.mike


Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot list?
Cheers,
T.mike

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] Depthcharge License

2017-12-15 Thread tturne 


Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org requires us to vet the various 
licenses, etc.


There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the Depthcharge 
tree.


My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).

How would I confirm this with an online source?

Cheers,
T.mike

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot