Re: [coreboot] Does coreboot table still exist in F000 segment?

[Stefan Reinauer]

* WANG FEI  [171013 20:20]:
> Hi, all
> 
> Beside placing coreboot table (lb_header) in low RAM (0x0-0x1000), I remember 
> a
> copy of coreboot table should be placed at F000 segment and it can be
> controlled with a Kconfig flag, does this feature still exist? I just can't
> find it right now.

SeaBIOS will copy the coreboot table from the low segment (0x530) into
the F segment. Typically the majority of the coreboot table lives in
CBMEM at the end of memory below 4G.

Stefan


-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Does coreboot table still exist in F000 segment?

[Marc Jones]

I believe that is a seabios option.

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:21 PM WANG FEI  wrote:

> Hi, all
>
> Beside placing coreboot table (lb_header) in low RAM (0x0-0x1000), I
> remember a copy of coreboot table should be placed at F000 segment and it
> can be controlled with a Kconfig flag, does this feature still exist? I
> just can't find it right now.
>
> -Fei
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

-- 
http://marcjonesconsulting.com
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] Does coreboot table still exist in F000 segment?

[WANG FEI]

Hi, all

Beside placing coreboot table (lb_header) in low RAM (0x0-0x1000), I
remember a copy of coreboot table should be placed at F000 segment and it
can be controlled with a Kconfig flag, does this feature still exist? I
just can't find it right now.

-Fei
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot