Re: [coreboot] UEFI project ideas

2016-06-07 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
Hello Rudolf,

I already wrote about this, and this was in my plans TO DO (investigate)
for Y2016:
https://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2016-February/080969.html

Good that you again revamped this topic. I am on the same page with you.

Thank you,
Zoran


On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Rudolf Marek  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that seabios/libpayload could have interresting use cases and I
> want
> to share/discuss them.
>
> 1) Have a SeaBIOS be a UEFI application. This would benefit on UEFI
> platforms
> without CSM.
>
> 2) Provide a minimum UEFI environment. As I noticed u-boot started to have
> such
> support. In fact it has UEFI glue to u-boot drivers. As such it provides a
> minimal boot services + minimum runtime services. In seabios, it is almost
> there, only PE loader and filesystem support is missing.
>
> The 2) could be perhaps be some independent project utilizing the coreboot
> libpayload library.
>
> Maybe those can be done in next year GSoC.
>
> I guess 2) could be useful to boot future OSes without legacy support.
>
> Thanks
> Rudolf
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] UEFI project ideas

2016-06-06 Thread Rudolf Marek
Hi all,

I noticed that seabios/libpayload could have interresting use cases and I want
to share/discuss them.

1) Have a SeaBIOS be a UEFI application. This would benefit on UEFI platforms
without CSM.

2) Provide a minimum UEFI environment. As I noticed u-boot started to have such
support. In fact it has UEFI glue to u-boot drivers. As such it provides a
minimal boot services + minimum runtime services. In seabios, it is almost
there, only PE loader and filesystem support is missing.

The 2) could be perhaps be some independent project utilizing the coreboot
libpayload library.

Maybe those can be done in next year GSoC.

I guess 2) could be useful to boot future OSes without legacy support.

Thanks
Rudolf

-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot