[Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-30 Thread Progphil
Just wanted to let you know that discussing recently with Jean-Yves
Huwart, I was contending co-working is an enabler for 'psychological
attitude' changes. He suggested rather 'sociological behavior' change.
Reading all your input, there seems to be more supportive clues for my
initial claim.

'Parallel Play' is indeed a very interesting analogy. It's like the
vicarious learning in the animal world albeit with an additional
feature i.e. 'collaboration'.
The reference to 'Parallel Play' also links to either sport activities
or collaborative game activities. How funny that we hear a lot about
'gamification' in the professional sphere. Could 'co-working' be a
part of that 'gamification' movement ? I mean psychologically ? OK,
may be too hard pushing ... :-)

Personnally, authentic co-working is a very compelling paradigm for it
gives me psychological re-assurance that we are in a position to
better promote ethical values that were becoming 'transparent' in our
self, hence almost meaningless. A co-working space gives me the
feeling that one can still experience the real positive effects of
democracy, humanism and individualism all together. May be it's
because there is no external authority like a 'referee' in a game ?

Recently I saw a twit saying that 'co-working' is 'ein Arbeitsplatz'.
It hurted me. Having followed many courses on 'Psychologie du Travail'
and 'Sociologie du Travail' at university; I could not see any
relationship between a 'workplace' and a 'co-working space' from a
psychological perspective. For me it's almost a 'Lebensraum'.
Listening to the video of Jean-Yves about NextSpace, it is probably
the first time one can connect between different 'spaces' (private,
social, work, etc.), there is a connection because we can have
consistent and coherent behaviors whatever the space we work and live
in.

Remember the 'experience economy' ? Work is Theatre  Every Business
a Stage. The problem with that lies in the psychological tension
created by the differences between the 'work' stage, the 'house' stage
or the 'society' stage. We must put on different masks depending on
the stage, which can be quite disturbing if our mind is weak. A 'co-
working' space is a place where one dosen't need to put on a mask, it
is a place where we can be psychologically connected whether we are in
a social, work or private mode.

I have read some papers recently that were really showing how our
'work' versus 'private' place consciousness had radically changed the
basic ethical principles of mankind. One was writing about 'economic
democracy' to be balanced by 'social democracy'. It hurted me again
because I felt we need 'harmony' not 'equilibrium'. A 'co-working'
space is just about that, harmony ...the true measure of authentic
democracy. Oops ... my pen is ahead of my thoughts ... sorry :-)

Last but not least, the 'game' analogy may lend itself to concepts
such as serendipity (dice) and creativity (no 2 same plays) ?

Philippe (@Phisab)


On 29 mar, 23:11, Angel Kwiatkowski fccowork...@gmail.com wrote:
 Regarding parallel play--
 Check out this article and pay special attention to the last
 paragraph. I've SEEN this happen when new coworkers join. (just
 substitute building blocks for laptops, drinking coffee, 
 etc!)http://wondertime.go.com/learning/article/baby-parallel-play.html

 On Mar 29, 12:50 pm, Alex Hillman dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com
 wrote:



  I can provide some similar context from the software development world,
  where I (typically) live. It's also undergone an interesting shift in
  commoditization and specialization. The people who know how to build and
  maintain ambiant networks for both producing and learning are the ones I
  see continually succeeding.

  Not surprisingly, this was how I started my career independently: I
  continually looked carefully to my professional network for inspiration as
  well as context, which ultimately helped me keep my edge without needing to
  a) be an expert in everything and b) become an expert in everything. If
  anything, my expertise became knowing my own boundaries and not just when to
  look elsewhere, but to where. I defined my first consulting team as a
  dynamic group of superheros or something like it. This model was based on
  small pieces loosely joined by Dave Weinberger (hat tip to Tara Hunt and
  Chris Messina for that making it to my library early on).

  Some key concepts:

   Our core team is small and powerful: full of ideas, talent, and drive.
   These characteristics get even stronger when we scale.
   It's about knowing when to say,
   *'I don't know, let's find someone who does'.*
   Harnessing the power of open source, community driven software and
   communication means we don't waste time doing things that are already 
   done,
   and instead focus on doing things that stem from recognizing a new need.

  And from Weinberger's book (via Wikipedia):

  The web, Weinberger writes, is enabling us to rediscover what we've always

   

[Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-29 Thread Beth Buczynski
Thanks to both Garth and Alex for discussing this here! Really
interesting. I empathize with the feeling of helplessness that results
when we see something significant happening, but don't knowwhat to
call it. It's great to know have a more concrete way to describe one
of the intangible things we see happening in spaces.

Beth

On Mar 28, 8:41 pm, Alex Hillman dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com wrote:
 Reposted to my blog for non-list-readers and easier sharing (with some minor
 edits from the OP here), if anyone's interested.

 http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2011/03/coworking-zones-of-proximal-dev...

 -Alex

 /ah
 indyhall.org
 coworking in philadelphia

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Alex Hillman
 dangerouslyawes...@gmail.comwrote:







  I've spent a good amount of the last year reading more articles and books
  on psychology, sociology, and cognitive science for ideas and lessons to
  apply to coworking...chiefly for the purpose of finding terms like this that
  could lead to more study of the context. It's so often that I observe a
  pattern and the main thing keeping me from understanding it more is not
  knowing what the pattern is called or means, so I can't look up a study or
  research paper on it. Best I can do is write about it and hope somebody
  posts about it. Interestingly enough, I think this concept is a
  meta explanation of exactly that experience. Here's what I mean:

  A quick skim of the concept makes me think there's a lot of application
  here. It also reinforces some of my theories that coworking is most valuable
  when it's not a room full of likeminded people doing the same thing
  (startups, law, technology, creative, communication, writing, art, business,
  science, education, etc) but instead a room full of likeminded people
  doing DIFFERENT things (startups, law, technology, creative, communication,
  writing, art, business, science, education, etc.).

  That is to say, especially as adults, we're less likely to learn from peers
  that are too similar. We spend too much time reinforcing each other's
  existing habits and knowledge instead of creating space for new knowledge to
  be exchanged. That space isn't physical space like a coworking space, but
  conceptual space, like the zone of proximal development.

  Essentially, *we share what we know*. *We don't share* what *we don't know
  *. And *we don't know* what *we don't know*.

  Coworking, in its best forms, creates a zone where we're surrounded by
  people who know what we don't know (and we know what they don't know) and it
  can be shared in loose contexts and formats that we're all increasingly
  comfortable with.

  Cool shit. Thanks for sharing, Garth.

  -Alex

  /ah
  indyhall.org
  coworking in philadelphia

  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Garth garthfrizz...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi all,

  I spent Earth Hour chatting with an old buddy about his passion,
  psychology.  When I told him what we're trying to achieve with
  coworking, he suggested I look up zone of proximal development.  Any
  of you have enough psych background to assess whether there is some
  value in reviewing the literature on that?  Could it be applied to
  coworking?

  curious,
  Garth.
  Two Rivers Business Centre

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Coworking group.
  To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.



[Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-29 Thread Angel Kwiatkowski
Yay! I finally get to pull out my mostly useless psych degree! :)

I've often referred to coworking as parallel play. Yes, the term is
mostly used for 2-5 year olds but I think it hold true for coworkers
too. Here's a link to the full entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_play
but the hilites are:

Parallel play is a form of play where children play adjacent to each
other, but do not try to influence one another's behavior. Parallel
play consists of play that is highly social and contains cooperative
interaction.

An observer will notice that they occasionally see what the other is
doing and then modify their play accordingly.

-Angel

On Mar 29, 8:13 am, Beth Buczynski bethbo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks to both Garth and Alex for discussing this here! Really
 interesting. I empathize with the feeling of helplessness that results
 when we see something significant happening, but don't knowwhat to
 call it. It's great to know have a more concrete way to describe one
 of the intangible things we see happening in spaces.

 Beth

 On Mar 28, 8:41 pm, Alex Hillman dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com wrote:







  Reposted to my blog for non-list-readers and easier sharing (with some minor
  edits from the OP here), if anyone's interested.

 http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2011/03/coworking-zones-of-proximal-dev...

  -Alex

  /ah
  indyhall.org
  coworking in philadelphia

  On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Alex Hillman
  dangerouslyawes...@gmail.comwrote:

   I've spent a good amount of the last year reading more articles and books
   on psychology, sociology, and cognitive science for ideas and lessons to
   apply to coworking...chiefly for the purpose of finding terms like this 
   that
   could lead to more study of the context. It's so often that I observe a
   pattern and the main thing keeping me from understanding it more is not
   knowing what the pattern is called or means, so I can't look up a study or
   research paper on it. Best I can do is write about it and hope somebody
   posts about it. Interestingly enough, I think this concept is a
   meta explanation of exactly that experience. Here's what I mean:

   A quick skim of the concept makes me think there's a lot of application
   here. It also reinforces some of my theories that coworking is most 
   valuable
   when it's not a room full of likeminded people doing the same thing
   (startups, law, technology, creative, communication, writing, art, 
   business,
   science, education, etc) but instead a room full of likeminded people
   doing DIFFERENT things (startups, law, technology, creative, 
   communication,
   writing, art, business, science, education, etc.).

   That is to say, especially as adults, we're less likely to learn from 
   peers
   that are too similar. We spend too much time reinforcing each other's
   existing habits and knowledge instead of creating space for new knowledge 
   to
   be exchanged. That space isn't physical space like a coworking space, 
   but
   conceptual space, like the zone of proximal development.

   Essentially, *we share what we know*. *We don't share* what *we don't know
   *. And *we don't know* what *we don't know*.

   Coworking, in its best forms, creates a zone where we're surrounded by
   people who know what we don't know (and we know what they don't know) and 
   it
   can be shared in loose contexts and formats that we're all increasingly
   comfortable with.

   Cool shit. Thanks for sharing, Garth.

   -Alex

   /ah
   indyhall.org
   coworking in philadelphia

   On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Garth garthfrizz...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi all,

   I spent Earth Hour chatting with an old buddy about his passion,
   psychology.  When I told him what we're trying to achieve with
   coworking, he suggested I look up zone of proximal development.  Any
   of you have enough psych background to assess whether there is some
   value in reviewing the literature on that?  Could it be applied to
   coworking?

   curious,
   Garth.
   Two Rivers Business Centre

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
   Coworking group.
   To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.



[Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-29 Thread Darrel Gilbertson at Qutash
It's great to hear others saying what I've been thinking. When we are
working alongside someone who is outside our field and collaborate
with them that is when the quality goes up for everyone involved.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.



[Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-29 Thread Devin
I think the 'parallel play' idea is brilliant.  Is there more that can be 
drawn from the insight?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.



Re: [Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-29 Thread Alex Hillman
The VERY first article about Indy Hall included reference of Parallel Play,
back in 2007:

http://articles.philly.com/2007-08-19/business/25229858_1_trade-ideas-work-at-home-web-entrepreneur

 It's not job-sharing, with two people taking turns in the same stall in the
 cube farm.

 Instead, think of co-working as an entrepreneurial version of parallel
 play, with owners of their own small businesses working side by side in a
 drop-in place that looks like a coffee cafe, minus the barista, with all the
 accoutrements of what's hip: high ceilings, beer fridge, pool table and
 Internet access.

I've used it in conversation since, but I don't think I've written about it.
I think there's a lot in that concept as well.

-Alex

/ah
indyhall.org
coworking in philadelphia


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Devin devinbalk...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think the 'parallel play' idea is brilliant.  Is there more that can be
 drawn from the insight?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.



Re: [Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-29 Thread Alex Hillman
There's some other excellent quoatables from that article, btw, including:

...networking nights over margaritas were not what he wanted either,
 although he likes margaritas.


And of course...

Oh, a shower's critical, Hillman said. I'm coming from [working at] home,
 where there's no pants before noon and if I don't have to, no shower. Now,
 at least, I put on pants.


Stupid pants. Stupid shower. :)

/ah
indyhall.org
coworking in philadelphia


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Alex Hillman
dangerouslyawes...@gmail.comwrote:

 The VERY first article about Indy Hall included reference of Parallel Play,
 back in 2007:


 http://articles.philly.com/2007-08-19/business/25229858_1_trade-ideas-work-at-home-web-entrepreneur

  It's not job-sharing, with two people taking turns in the same stall in
 the cube farm.

 Instead, think of co-working as an entrepreneurial version of parallel
 play, with owners of their own small businesses working side by side in a
 drop-in place that looks like a coffee cafe, minus the barista, with all the
 accoutrements of what's hip: high ceilings, beer fridge, pool table and
 Internet access.

 I've used it in conversation since, but I don't think I've written about
 it. I think there's a lot in that concept as well.

 -Alex

 /ah
 indyhall.org
 coworking in philadelphia


 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Devin devinbalk...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think the 'parallel play' idea is brilliant.  Is there more that can be
 drawn from the insight?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.



Re: [Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-29 Thread Joshua Marpet
Alex, kudos for the honesty on the pants.  :D

Anyways, I'd like to collate all this.  I'm working up a paper and talk on a
topic near and dear to my heart.  I work and live in the Infosecurity world,
and have WAY too many hobbies (physical security, public speaking, horse
show announcing, and the psychology of geeks).

In Infosec, we have an industry that is commoditizing, and specializing.
 The change, from generalists who do everything, to specialists, who do one
thing and one thing only, is good and bad.  The good is that the specialists
delve very deeply in their specializations.  Cool.  But they don't have
context, history, or the big picture.  Bad.

The idea of parallel play, co-working, etc, is one that was used extensively
by the founders and plank owners of infosec.  Nowadays?  Not so much.

I'm not sure, but I want to see how I can add this concept to my preso.
 Mind you, my preso is little more than some notes and a maelstrom of
thoughts.  I'll have to see how the solution precipitates. But I didn't want
to steal anyone's ideas without mentioning it.  I try not to be rude.

Thanks!

Joshua
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Alex Hillman
dangerouslyawes...@gmail.comwrote:

 There's some other excellent quoatables from that article, btw, including:

 ...networking nights over margaritas were not what he wanted either,
 although he likes margaritas.


 And of course...

 Oh, a shower's critical, Hillman said. I'm coming from [working at]
 home, where there's no pants before noon and if I don't have to, no shower.
 Now, at least, I put on pants.


 Stupid pants. Stupid shower. :)

 /ah
 indyhall.org
 coworking in philadelphia


 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Alex Hillman 
 dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com wrote:

 The VERY first article about Indy Hall included reference of Parallel
 Play, back in 2007:


 http://articles.philly.com/2007-08-19/business/25229858_1_trade-ideas-work-at-home-web-entrepreneur

  It's not job-sharing, with two people taking turns in the same stall in
 the cube farm.

 Instead, think of co-working as an entrepreneurial version of parallel
 play, with owners of their own small businesses working side by side in a
 drop-in place that looks like a coffee cafe, minus the barista, with all the
 accoutrements of what's hip: high ceilings, beer fridge, pool table and
 Internet access.

 I've used it in conversation since, but I don't think I've written about
 it. I think there's a lot in that concept as well.

 -Alex

 /ah
 indyhall.org
 coworking in philadelphia


 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Devin devinbalk...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think the 'parallel play' idea is brilliant.  Is there more that can be
 drawn from the insight?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.



  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.



Re: [Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-29 Thread Alex Hillman
I can provide some similar context from the software development world,
where I (typically) live. It's also undergone an interesting shift in
commoditization and specialization. The people who know how to build and
maintain ambiant networks for both producing and learning are the ones I
see continually succeeding.

Not surprisingly, this was how I started my career independently: I
continually looked carefully to my professional network for inspiration as
well as context, which ultimately helped me keep my edge without needing to
a) be an expert in everything and b) become an expert in everything. If
anything, my expertise became knowing my own boundaries and not just when to
look elsewhere, but to where. I defined my first consulting team as a
dynamic group of superheros or something like it. This model was based on
small pieces loosely joined by Dave Weinberger (hat tip to Tara Hunt and
Chris Messina for that making it to my library early on).

Some key concepts:


 Our core team is small and powerful: full of ideas, talent, and drive.
 These characteristics get even stronger when we scale.



 It's about knowing when to say,
 *'I don't know, let's find someone who does'.*



 Harnessing the power of open source, community driven software and
 communication means we don't waste time doing things that are already done,
 and instead focus on doing things that stem from recognizing a new need.


And from Weinberger's book (via Wikipedia):

The web, Weinberger writes, is enabling us to rediscover what we've always
 known about being human: we are connected creatures in a connected world
 about which we care passionately.


This stuff should be relevant to your paper, and quite frankly, everyone on
this list.

-Alex

/ah
indyhall.org
coworking in philadelphia


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Joshua Marpet
jmar...@datadevastation.comwrote:

 Alex, kudos for the honesty on the pants.  :D

 Anyways, I'd like to collate all this.  I'm working up a paper and talk on
 a topic near and dear to my heart.  I work and live in the Infosecurity
 world, and have WAY too many hobbies (physical security, public speaking,
 horse show announcing, and the psychology of geeks).

 In Infosec, we have an industry that is commoditizing, and specializing.
  The change, from generalists who do everything, to specialists, who do one
 thing and one thing only, is good and bad.  The good is that the specialists
 delve very deeply in their specializations.  Cool.  But they don't have
 context, history, or the big picture.  Bad.

 The idea of parallel play, co-working, etc, is one that was used
 extensively by the founders and plank owners of infosec.  Nowadays?  Not so
 much.

 I'm not sure, but I want to see how I can add this concept to my preso.
  Mind you, my preso is little more than some notes and a maelstrom of
 thoughts.  I'll have to see how the solution precipitates. But I didn't want
 to steal anyone's ideas without mentioning it.  I try not to be rude.

 Thanks!

 Joshua

 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Alex Hillman 
 dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com wrote:

 There's some other excellent quoatables from that article, btw, including:

 ...networking nights over margaritas were not what he wanted either,
 although he likes margaritas.


 And of course...

 Oh, a shower's critical, Hillman said. I'm coming from [working at]
 home, where there's no pants before noon and if I don't have to, no shower.
 Now, at least, I put on pants.


 Stupid pants. Stupid shower. :)

 /ah
 indyhall.org
 coworking in philadelphia


 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Alex Hillman 
 dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com wrote:

 The VERY first article about Indy Hall included reference of Parallel
 Play, back in 2007:


 http://articles.philly.com/2007-08-19/business/25229858_1_trade-ideas-work-at-home-web-entrepreneur

  It's not job-sharing, with two people taking turns in the same stall in
 the cube farm.

 Instead, think of co-working as an entrepreneurial version of parallel
 play, with owners of their own small businesses working side by side in a
 drop-in place that looks like a coffee cafe, minus the barista, with all 
 the
 accoutrements of what's hip: high ceilings, beer fridge, pool table and
 Internet access.

 I've used it in conversation since, but I don't think I've written about
 it. I think there's a lot in that concept as well.

 -Alex

 /ah
 indyhall.org
 coworking in philadelphia


 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Devin devinbalk...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think the 'parallel play' idea is brilliant.  Is there more that can
 be drawn from the insight?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Coworking group.
 To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.



  --
 You received this message because you are 

[Coworking] Re: psych and coworking

2011-03-29 Thread Angel Kwiatkowski
Regarding parallel play--
Check out this article and pay special attention to the last
paragraph. I've SEEN this happen when new coworkers join. (just
substitute building blocks for laptops, drinking coffee, etc!)
http://wondertime.go.com/learning/article/baby-parallel-play.html

On Mar 29, 12:50 pm, Alex Hillman dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com
wrote:
 I can provide some similar context from the software development world,
 where I (typically) live. It's also undergone an interesting shift in
 commoditization and specialization. The people who know how to build and
 maintain ambiant networks for both producing and learning are the ones I
 see continually succeeding.

 Not surprisingly, this was how I started my career independently: I
 continually looked carefully to my professional network for inspiration as
 well as context, which ultimately helped me keep my edge without needing to
 a) be an expert in everything and b) become an expert in everything. If
 anything, my expertise became knowing my own boundaries and not just when to
 look elsewhere, but to where. I defined my first consulting team as a
 dynamic group of superheros or something like it. This model was based on
 small pieces loosely joined by Dave Weinberger (hat tip to Tara Hunt and
 Chris Messina for that making it to my library early on).

 Some key concepts:

  Our core team is small and powerful: full of ideas, talent, and drive.
  These characteristics get even stronger when we scale.
  It's about knowing when to say,
  *'I don't know, let's find someone who does'.*
  Harnessing the power of open source, community driven software and
  communication means we don't waste time doing things that are already done,
  and instead focus on doing things that stem from recognizing a new need.

 And from Weinberger's book (via Wikipedia):

 The web, Weinberger writes, is enabling us to rediscover what we've always

  known about being human: we are connected creatures in a connected world
  about which we care passionately.

 This stuff should be relevant to your paper, and quite frankly, everyone on
 this list.

 -Alex

 /ah
 indyhall.org
 coworking in philadelphia

 On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Joshua Marpet
 jmar...@datadevastation.comwrote:







  Alex, kudos for the honesty on the pants.  :D

  Anyways, I'd like to collate all this.  I'm working up a paper and talk on
  a topic near and dear to my heart.  I work and live in the Infosecurity
  world, and have WAY too many hobbies (physical security, public speaking,
  horse show announcing, and the psychology of geeks).

  In Infosec, we have an industry that is commoditizing, and specializing.
   The change, from generalists who do everything, to specialists, who do one
  thing and one thing only, is good and bad.  The good is that the specialists
  delve very deeply in their specializations.  Cool.  But they don't have
  context, history, or the big picture.  Bad.

  The idea of parallel play, co-working, etc, is one that was used
  extensively by the founders and plank owners of infosec.  Nowadays?  Not so
  much.

  I'm not sure, but I want to see how I can add this concept to my preso.
   Mind you, my preso is little more than some notes and a maelstrom of
  thoughts.  I'll have to see how the solution precipitates. But I didn't want
  to steal anyone's ideas without mentioning it.  I try not to be rude.

  Thanks!

  Joshua

  On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Alex Hillman 
  dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com wrote:

  There's some other excellent quoatables from that article, btw, including:

  ...networking nights over margaritas were not what he wanted either,
  although he likes margaritas.

  And of course...

  Oh, a shower's critical, Hillman said. I'm coming from [working at]
  home, where there's no pants before noon and if I don't have to, no 
  shower.
  Now, at least, I put on pants.

  Stupid pants. Stupid shower. :)

  /ah
  indyhall.org
  coworking in philadelphia

  On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Alex Hillman 
  dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com wrote:

  The VERY first article about Indy Hall included reference of Parallel
  Play, back in 2007:

 http://articles.philly.com/2007-08-19/business/25229858_1_trade-ideas...

   It's not job-sharing, with two people taking turns in the same stall in
  the cube farm.

  Instead, think of co-working as an entrepreneurial version of parallel
  play, with owners of their own small businesses working side by side in a
  drop-in place that looks like a coffee cafe, minus the barista, with all 
  the
  accoutrements of what's hip: high ceilings, beer fridge, pool table and
  Internet access.

  I've used it in conversation since, but I don't think I've written about
  it. I think there's a lot in that concept as well.

  -Alex

  /ah
  indyhall.org
  coworking in philadelphia

  On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Devin devinbalk...@gmail.com wrote:

  I think the 'parallel play' idea is brilliant.  Is there more that can
  be drawn from