Re: YAML (maybe other modules) might need CPAN smoking
I agree. On Jul 5, 2016 18:43, "Karen Etheridge" wrote: > There should be -TRIAL releases of anything this far upriver, at the very > least. > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Sawyer X wrote: > >> YAML.pm. >> >> It isn't tool chain, but it is relatively upriver, so I thought this >> group would be interested. Additionally this idea can extend to >> non-core toolchain tools. >> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Golden >> wrote: >> > YAML or YAML::Tiny? Only the latter is tool chain. >> > >> > On Jul 5, 2016 8:14 AM, "Sawyer X" wrote: >> >> >> >> YAML broke some stuff. >> >> >> >> I'm beginning to think that YAML is one of the modules that could >> >> really use a CPAN smoke of its own. I think the more upriver the >> >> module, the more this becomes relevant. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> > >
Re: YAML (maybe other modules) might need CPAN smoking
There should be -TRIAL releases of anything this far upriver, at the very least. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Sawyer X wrote: > YAML.pm. > > It isn't tool chain, but it is relatively upriver, so I thought this > group would be interested. Additionally this idea can extend to > non-core toolchain tools. > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Golden > wrote: > > YAML or YAML::Tiny? Only the latter is tool chain. > > > > On Jul 5, 2016 8:14 AM, "Sawyer X" wrote: > >> > >> YAML broke some stuff. > >> > >> I'm beginning to think that YAML is one of the modules that could > >> really use a CPAN smoke of its own. I think the more upriver the > >> module, the more this becomes relevant. > >> > >> Thoughts? >
Re: YAML (maybe other modules) might need CPAN smoking
YAML.pm. It isn't tool chain, but it is relatively upriver, so I thought this group would be interested. Additionally this idea can extend to non-core toolchain tools. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Golden wrote: > YAML or YAML::Tiny? Only the latter is tool chain. > > On Jul 5, 2016 8:14 AM, "Sawyer X" wrote: >> >> YAML broke some stuff. >> >> I'm beginning to think that YAML is one of the modules that could >> really use a CPAN smoke of its own. I think the more upriver the >> module, the more this becomes relevant. >> >> Thoughts?
Re: YAML (maybe other modules) might need CPAN smoking
YAML or YAML::Tiny? Only the latter is tool chain. On Jul 5, 2016 8:14 AM, "Sawyer X" wrote: > YAML broke some stuff. > > I'm beginning to think that YAML is one of the modules that could > really use a CPAN smoke of its own. I think the more upriver the > module, the more this becomes relevant. > > Thoughts? >
