The Art of Submarine Warfare
Whoooey! Found in Usenet, watched all four video clips. Someone had their car wired for sound, someone else hidden with a video camera, when the police decided to pull the car over for no reason other than a random check. The lady complains about being stopped and asked for her papers... http://www.infowars.com/index.html#ps That new Levi's commercial is so freaky! Sing for me, baby...
RE: Automatic's
At 10:32 PM 6/10/01 -0700, petro wrote: it's not that difficult to get a CCW in California if you are willing to go to the effort required. Give me a call if you want more info. It varies *greatly* with the attitude of the Chief. In my Calif county the CCWs have tripled in the last few years since a Sheriff who trusts citizens was elected. You may not need to be a lawyer, carry lots of cash, or have been threatened, if he's reasonable. (If he were unreasonable those 'elite' reasons may not have sufficed.) In the county I live in, a Bail Bondsman, a man with more felony arrests than most cops (i.e. he's brought more felons to the jail) was denied *renewal* of his CCW. This according to the mans lawyer. -- -- http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html It is one of the essential features of such incompetence that the person so afflicted is incapable of knowing that he is incompetent. To have such knowledge would already be to remedy a good portion of the offense.
ScienceDaily Magazine -- Researchers Find The North Pole Of The Molecular World
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/06/010605075137.htm -- -- Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. Ludwig Wittgenstein The Armadillo Group ,::;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'/ ``::/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ssz.com.', `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
ScienceDaily Magazine -- UCSD Chemists Develop Tiny Silicon Wires To Detect Trace Residues Of Explosives
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/06/010604072746.htm -- -- Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. Ludwig Wittgenstein The Armadillo Group ,::;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'/ ``::/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ssz.com.', `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
Scientists Take Step Toward Single Molecule Switches
http://unisci.com/stories/20012/0622011.htm -- -- Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. Ludwig Wittgenstein The Armadillo Group ,::;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'/ ``::/|/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ssz.com.', `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
INTEGERS: The Electronic Journal of Combinatorial Number Theory
http://www.integers-ejcnt.org/ James Choate Product Certification - Operating Systems Staff Engineer 512-436-1062 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: eBay: Burn DVD movies onto CD?
At 06:15 PM 6/21/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, David Honig wrote: My argument, to any judges reading, is that its *not* circumvention if you've bought the damn thing, no matter how you decode it. If you paid for satellite TV but you build your own descrambler, its *not* illegal circumvention, even though your gizmo (legally) circumvents access controls. Get it? [Rhetorically; Riad is not the problem :-] Hint: its only illegal if its fraud. DeCSS has nothing to do with fraud. cp does. Actually, only humans do, cp is not a moral entity. Actually that won't hold up. There is a distinction that you are missing. What is that distinction? Do you legally purchase service from that cable vendor? If so then even building your own cable descrambling box may be illegal if the contract says so (you're depriving the cable company of contractual income, fraud?). 1. yes, contract law always holds; however govt-backed (eminent-domain, spectral allocation) based monopolies should be as open as possible (cf ATT cable in SF) 2. no one has a 'right to income' only the terms of contracts The only(!!!) way that I can see building your own descrambler and getting away with it is if you have no(!) connection to the vendor, hence they have no claim to a 'loss' since you're not buying any service in the first place. Generally a bit provider requires that you have some equiptment to make use of their bits, however you have no obligation to use their equiptment. Bit provider = ISP | DVD producer. Equiptment = cable modem | DVD-licensed player
Osama on video
How soon before this gets DivX'd Gnutella'd? Will it play at Sundance? June 20, 2001 -- Osama bin Laden's terror network is circulating a chilling recruitment video in which he urges Islamic militants to join his holy war on the United States and Israel - and calls for blood, blood and destruction, destruction. Bin Laden, wearing traditional Yemeni dres with a dagger, is shown on the 100-minute tape telling Muslims they must leave countries that are ruled by allies of Jews and Christians.
More on the Hague Convention
http://slashdot.org/articles/01/06/22/162252.shtml James Choate Product Certification - Operating Systems Staff Engineer 512-436-1062 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt - FBI Oversight by Bootlicking Senators?
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:33:44 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jim Bovard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Matt - FBI Oversight by Bootlicking Senators? Matt: Thought you might get a laugh out of this piece on the Senate Judiciary Committee's first FBI oversight hearing. I don't think there is going to be any BS shortage in Washington this summer. take it easy Jim Bovard's Batterings June 22, 2001 American Spectator Online www.spectator.org FBI Oversight by Bootlicking Senators? By James Bovard The Constitution has been saved! The Senate Judiciary Committee last week held the first of a series of oversight hearings on the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Committee chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) set a lofty tone in his opening statement: Our purpose in holding these hearings is to find ways to restore confidence in the FBI, not to tear it down. There are many irresponsible critics of the FBI who promote their conspiracy theories on Internet Websites and in the popular media. However, anyone who sat through the hearing would have to wonder which is more deluded -- the typical anti-FBI website or the U.S. Senate. The senators supposedly came to discover and proclaim truth. Instead, they did as they usually do -- they groveled at the mere mention of the FBI and competed to heap laurels on the heads of federal agents. The only thing that kept most senators from actually licking boots was FBI Director Louis Freeh's decision to spurn Leahy's invitation to testify at the hearing. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Cal), in her opening statement, proudly announced that I went through the Ruby Ridge hearings and I went through the Waco hearings, which the Senate Judiciary committee conducted in 1995. Her choice of words is accurate: She had sat there like a potted plant during those hearings -- except when she made inane comments or sought to impede other senators from uncovering federal malfeasance. A big clue that Wednesday's hearing was a farce was the lead-off witness: John Saint Jack Danforth, Janet Reno's hand-picked special counsel on Waco. Danforth was his usual pious self, repeatedly assuring senators that the FBI did nothing dark at Waco. Danforth's remarks stirred no controversy -- in the committee's view, evidently, there couldn't be anything dark about sending in tanks in broad daylight to gas young children. Senators are anguishing over the need to create a new oversight mechanism to make double-sure that all FBI agents obey the law. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) announced a bill to create a blue ribbon commission to conduct a top-to-bottom review of the FBI. Their press release noted that the commission would be made up of top law enforcement experts. Schumer hailed the FBI as the premier law enforcement agency in the world and Hatch gushed that the FBI is one of the finest law enforcement agencies in the world. It is most ironic to have Schumer and Hatch in the forefront of FBI reform -- since they were two of the biggest FBI apologists. Hatch worked mightily in 1995 to block Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA)'s valiant efforts to conduct an investigation into federal abuses at Ruby Ridge. Hatch even publicly praised FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi - who killed Vicki Weaver as she stood in her cabin door holding her baby -- as a great American hero. Schumer was the Clinton administration's point person during the House hearings on Waco in the summer of 1995. Schumer continually derided and sneered at any suggestion that the FBI had done anything less than laudatory during its siege and final assault on the Branch Davidians. Schumer did more than any other congressman to protect the FBI coverup on Waco. (During the hearing Wednesday, Schumer congratulated Danforth for doing a great job with his Waco investigation). In sharp contrast to all the other committee members, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) has consistently and courageously pursued allegations of FBI abuses. Grassley is one of the few Republicans who does not instinctively cringe and kowtow at any mention of the FBI's name. Nor does he spend half his allotted speaking time at hearings apologizing for raising any doubts about the FBI's infallibility. Grassley derided the notion of appointing an FBI Review Commission. He noted that the end result of commissions to investigate the FBI has usually been that the FBI ends up with a bigger budget, more jurisdiction, and the Director [of the FBI] walks out with a nice pat on the back. The same could be said of the response by Congress to most of the FBI fiascoes of the last decade. After the FBI sent in the tanks at Waco, Congress provided a hefty budget increase to expand its Hostage Rescue Team. (FBI reforms are percolating elsewhere in Washington. Attorney General John Ashcroft announced Wednesday - a few minutes before the start of the Senate hearing -- his plans to create a Strategic Management Council for the
No Subject
Estimado Cliente, Mi nombre es David, Yo represento a la compania Compu Expert Distribution, que esta situada en la Ciudad de Indusrty, CA en los Estados Unidos de America. La compania tiene mas de tres anos en el mercado. Tenemos clientes a nivel mundial. Por ejemplo tenemos clientes en Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, etc. etc. Algunos de nuestros productos incluyen disco compactos grabables de todo tipo, tamano, color y de mejor calidad (grado A) a un precio increible. Nosotros no solamente ofrecemos la mejor calidad, pero tambien al mejor precio porque tenemos el apoyo total de nuestras fabricas. Le garantizamos que nuestro precio es el mas bajo en el mercado . Nos dedicamos a servir clientes de mundo entero, pero especialmente al continente americano. Nuestras variedades de productos son unicos en California, desde discos compactos regulares para grabar (74min/80min, plata/plata, oro/oro, oro/azul, de colores rojas, amarilla, naranja, azul, negro, verde, regrabables, de tres pulgadas, estilo de tarjeta de negocio, rectangular, etc) , DVD-R y muchos mas productos disponibles. Nuestra compania ofrece discos compactos de la misma calidad como los producidos por la compania Japonesa Sony. Espero que les pueda ayudar a su negocio, porque comprando de nuestra compania les va a ahorrar mucho dinero y ademas sus clientes van a estar muy contento de la calidad del producto. Llamame hoy, mi numero telefonico es (626) 581-3777. Y mi extension es 107. Si no puedes llamarme, tambien me puedes responder por la email. Ahora tambien tenemos un nuevo producto que se llama 3 in 1 label kit, este es un aparato que es usado para etiquetear 3 tipos de discos( CD-R, 3 y discos de tipo tarjeta de negocio), este producto ya viene con etiquetas incluidas y tambien el software para su uso imediamente. Tambien vendemos las etiquetas por separado en caso de que necesites mas. Somos la unica compania que ofrece este tipo de aplicador y tenemos el derecho reservado en America. Tambien ofrecemos el compact flash memoria que se utilizan para camaras digitales y computadoras portatiles de excellente calidad y a un excellente precio. Si esta interesado, dejeme saber para poder enviarle muestra gratis de nuestros excellentes productos y si tiene alguna pregunta no dudes en llamame or enviarme una email. Nuestra pagina de la web esta lista para su informacion. Que tenga un buen dia y espero escuchar de usted muy pronto. Atado a este email estan los archivos que contienen una lista de precios de nuestros productos. Respetuosamente David Tel(626)581-3777 ext107 Fax(626)581-3778 Mi email es [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compu Expert Distribution, Inc. 18539 E. Gale Ave City of Industry, CA 91748 U.S.A DavidCompu Expert Distribution, Inc.18539 E. Gale Ave.,City of Industry, CA 91748U.S.ATel: (626)581-3777 ext 107Fax:(626)581-3778email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]website: www.compuexpertusa.com
Audio one-time pad smart-card?
Hold the ComDot card, a new product from Tel Aviv-based ComSense Technologies Ltd., up to your computer's microphone and squeeze the slight bump in its center. Otherwise indistinguishable from a garden-variety credit card, it emits a high-pitched series of noises similar to that of a fax machine or dial-up modem. Because it communicates via sound, the ComDot doesn't require a specialized card reader like other smart cards -- only a computer with a sound card and a microphone. It is even designed to work over the telephone. [...] The card transmits an encrypted identifying code via high-frequency sound waves -- a long screech, followed by a lower-pitched warble. The computer then verifies the ID with the ComSense servers; the user enters a PIN (personal identification number) for added security, and the log-in is complete. [...] The ComDot itself consists of a three-year battery, computer processor, two speakers and a small amount of memory. It never emits the exact same tone twice, so even if someone trying to gain unauthorized access to patient files were to record the sound and replay it, they would not succeed. [...] Not only could the ComDot sit inside a fraud-proof, ultra-secure credit or ATM card, but the technology could also be used to validate online commerce transactions. Instead of merely requiring consumers to type in their credit card number, they would squeeze their ComDots, and perhaps enter a PIN. [...] http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/ptech/06/22/smart.card.reut/index.html
RE: The Art of Submarine Warfare
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Found in Usenet, watched all four video clips. Someone had their car wired for sound, someone else hidden with a video camera, when the police decided to pull the car over for no reason other than a random check. See my solution to this sort of abuse in my article in the 2.12 issue of WIRED: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/sandfort.if.html?pg=1topic=topic_s et= No one should have any objections to wiring cops. A secure record only hurts bad cops; it protects good cops--all 17 of them. :-D (Sorry, Lon.) S a n d y
I WAS SICK OF BEING FAT!!
I sincerely apologize if you are receiving this e-mail in error. I have been taking an herbal formula for 10 months and it has saved my family and my life. Because of this I have made a commitment to get the word out on this life-changing product, so that it will be available to everyone. My name is Dana Hampton. I'm a married 37-year-old mother of 4 who was a happy size 7 before my first child and who grew 4 dress sizes larger by my fourth pregnancy. It's amazing how long you can avoid dealing with a problem that you simply don't want to face up to. I didn't like the way I looked and I didn't like the way I felt. I was at the point where I just didn't want to live and have to face another day. I WAS SICK OF BEING FAT! I FELT THAT I OWED IT TO MY HUSBAND, MY FOUR CHILDREN, AND MYSELF TO MAKE ONE MORE ATTEMPT AT WEIGHT LOSS. I have researched and tried many weight loss programs during my yo-yo dieting years. I did Slim Fast, Cybervision, Atkins, soup diets, starvation, exercise and eat no fat, chromium picolinate, metabolic enhancers, and more. You name it, I tried it! I lost some pounds with every diet, but eventually gained them back, usually with a few extra pounds. On every one of those diets, I lost energy, and eventually had to eat a lot to feel better. I was grouchy with a short fuse. This even happened during the diet where I exercised and ate less with only low-fat foods, the better-known right way to lose weight. I'm sure losing weight that way works OK for many people, but it just didn't work very well for me. It seemed my metabolism froze, and I was going to stay at that weight forever, but I wanted to look better and be healthy. I was very depressed and disappointed. I dieted on and off, but got nowhere. The weight kept returning. I suddenly realized just how difficult this weight problem had really become. Now I understood why so many people have the same problem. I almost gave up. Then, I remembered something I heard from old my friend Janie. She told me about a company who makes a nutritionally-engineered weight loss product, which ACCELERATES WEIGHT LOSS. It was developed by European Scientists and had been kept a secret for years, UNTIL NOW. Scientists from an American Nutriceutical company met up with their top scientist and brought the secret here. It is a unique product, called BerryTrim Plus, and NO OTHER PRODUCT HAS THESE INGREDIENTS. It sounded too good to be true. I didn't want to get all hyped up about some new program, and I didn't want to add one more diet to my failure list. What really made me decide to try it were all the testimonials I read on their web site, written by so many Doctors, Celebrities, and people like you and me. I called for my 30-day supply and was so amazed when only after the first 3 days, I began to experience a sense of well being - something I hadn't felt for months, maybe years. I felt ENERGIZED, not to mention my sugar/chocolate cravings were absolutely gone! I COULD NOT BELIEVE THE DIFFERENCE I FELT! I began to hope again - maybe I could lose this old weight. I gave this pursuit up months before and had boxed up my smallest clothes to give away! After 5 weeks of BerryTrim Plus I had already lost 10 inches off my hips and thighs and, OH JOY! I FINALLY SEE MY WAIST LINE! Not to mention, THE SCALE WAS ACTUALLY SPINNING BACKWARDS AND SHOWING A TREMENDOUS WEIGHT LOSS! THE BEST PART IS, I DIDN'T CHANGE ANYTHING ABOUT THE WAY I ATE, WHAT I ATE, OR ADD AN EXERCISE ROUTINE TO MY DAILY REGIMEN. ALL I DID WAS USE THE PRODUCT, AND THE WEIGHT SIMPLY CAME OFF EASILY AND SAFELY! THAT'S IT. Well, now today I'm 4 dress sizes 7 jean sizes smaller + 26½ inches are gone! I FEEL ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL! I really wish I could show you how I looked 10 months ago compared to how I look now. The differences are unbelievable. I recently traveled and when I had to show a picture I.D. at the airport for security reasons, the airline agent asked for another form of picture I.D. because my driver's license picture doesn't look like me anymore! It's kind of embarrassing receiving all of the compliments about how great I look now. It's even more embarrassing to mention it. But they keep coming. The greatest compliment I got was from my husband, Recently, he told me, Olivia, you really look great, you look like the young girl I kissed at our wedding. I said, WHAT? He told me that I looked younger. He said my face looked especially younger, you look like the real you! It was true, just like everything I had read about the product. It all came true! That was a first for any weight loss program I had ever tried. The changes that took place were both subtle and obvious. Here are some of them: MY ATTITUDE IMPROVED I HAVE LESS TENSION AND ANXIETY RELATIONSHIPS WITH MY FAMILY IMPROVED QUALITY OF MY SLEEP IMPROVED I NOW SLEEP THROUGH THE ENTIRE NIGHT I HAVE GREATER ENERGY COMPULSIVE EATING DECREASED CRAVINGS FOR SWEETS DECREASED I HAVE LESS
OPT: Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards (fwd)
-- Forwarded message -- Date: 22 Jun 2001 13:27:14 -0400 From: Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Don Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards This is not a crypto flaw. This is an engineering flaw. First, the timestamp of the message is certainly encoded in the signature. This is protection against your first suggested attack. The recipient, upon verifying the signature, notices that it was made, e.g., two months previously. Then one would have to wonder why a two-month-old message was being sent. The other obvious problem is that although the sender's identity is encoded in the message's signature (as well as the time the signature is purported to be made), the original intended recipient's are not encoded within the signed portion of the message. The simple fix would be to include the appropriate mail headers withing the signed portion of the message. In particular, including the 'To' and 'Cc' fields would immediately protect against both of these attacks. The problem is not at all with the crypto. The problem is with the integration of the crypto with applications like e-mail. Have a nice day, -derek Don Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: All current secure-mail standards specify, as their high- security option, a weak use of the public-key sign and encrypt operations. On Thursday the 28th of this month, I'll present my findings and my proposed repairs of the protocols, at the Usenix Technical Conference here in Boston: http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix01/usenix01.pdf Citation: Don Davis, Defective Sign Encrypt in S/MIME, PKCS#7, MOSS, PEM, PGP, and XML. To appear in Proc. Usenix Tech. Conf. 2001, Boston. June 25-30, 2001. A short summary: All current secure-mail standards have a significant cryptographic flaw. There are several standard ways to send and read secure e-mail. The most well-known secure mail systems are PGP and S/MIME. All current public- key-based secure-mail standards have this flaw. Here are some examples of the flaw in action: Suppose Alice and Bob are business partners, and are setting up a deal together. Suppose Alice decides to call off the deal, so she sends Bob a secure-mail message: The deal is off. Then Bob can get even with Alice: * Bob waits until Alice has a new deal in the works with Charlle; * Bob can abuse the secure e-mail protocol to re-encrypt and resend Alice's message to Charlie; * When Charlie receives Alice's message, he'll believe that the mail-security features guarantee that Alice sent the message to Charlie. * Charlie abandons his deal with Alice. Suppose instead that Alice Bob are coworkers. Alice uses secure e-mail to send Bob her sensitive company-internal sales plan. Bob decides to get his rival Alice fired: * Bob abuses the secure e-mail protocol to re-encrypt and resend Alice's sales-plan, with her digital signature, to a rival company's salesman Charlie. * Charlie brags openly about getting the sales plan from Alice. When he's accused in court of stealing the plan, Charlie presents Alice's secure e-mail as evidence of his innocence. Surprisingly, standards-compliant secure-mail clients will not detect these attacks. -- Abstract Simple Sign Encrypt, by itself, is not very secure. Cryptographers know this well, but application programmers and standards authors still tend to put too much trust in simple Sign-and-Encrypt. In fact, every secure e-mail protocol, old and new, has codified na=EFve Sign Encrypt as acceptable security practice. S/MIME, PKCS#7, PGP, OpenPGP, PEM, and MOSS all suffer from this flaw. Similarly, the secure document protocols PKCS#7, XML- Signature, and XML-Encryption suffer from the same flaw. Na=EFve Sign Encrypt appears only in file-security and mail-security applications, but this narrow scope is becoming more important to the rapidly-growing class of commercial users. With file- and mail-encryption seeing widespread use, and with flawed encryption in play, we can expect widespread exposures. In this paper, we analyze the na=EFve Sign Encrypt flaw, we review the defective sign/encrypt standards, and we describe a comprehensive set of simple repairs. The various repairs all have a common feature: when signing and encryption are combined, the inner crypto layer must somehow depend on the outer layer, so as to reveal any tampering with the outer layer. Once I've presented the paper, I'll make this link live: http://world.std.com/~dtd/sign_encrypt/sign_encrypt7.ps - don davis, boston http://world.std.com/~dtd - - The Cryptography Mailing List
Re: Two Countries, One City (A civil libertarian/anarcho-capitalist challenge?)
http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101010611/fcities.html James Choate Oddly enough, this topic came up at home this morning over coffee and pastries on the front porch with someone from a similarly troubled country. Even more oddly, we were in agreement. Want to begin improving the lives of poor people around the world? For starters it seems to me that everywhere the Spanish colonized is royally fucked-up. Family planning will do more to ease the suffering and improve the lot of the poor than a whole grand canyon full of pious, chanting padres. As for the civil libertarian/anarcho-capitalist challenge the poor in these areas ( Mexico, SA, Philippines ) barely have resources to feed their children and don't have the energy or the will to think about political philosophy and realization through technology. That is the domain of their masters, the well-off. Mike
ΪÄúÐû´«ÆóÒµ¡¢²úÆ·¡¢ÍøÕ¾¡¢ÕÐÉÌÐÅÏ¢¡£ÍøÂç¹ã¸æ¡£
ÖйúÍúÍúÉÌÎñwww.china118.com ×£ÄúÉúÒâÐËÍú£¡ *È«Ãâ·Ñ* *×¢²áÄúµÄÆóÒµ *µÇ¼ÄúµÄÍøÕ¾£¨ÍøÒ³£© *·¢²¼ÄúµÄÐÅÏ¢ *²éѯ°ËÍò¶àÌõÐÅÏ¢ *²éѯһÍò¸öÍøÕ¾ *²éѯһÍò¶à¸öÆóÒµ *½»Á÷¡¶Ò×¾¡·ººÑ§ *×Éѯ¡°ÆóÒµ¹ÜÀíÍõ²©Ê¿×ÉѯÐÅÏ䡱¡£ ×ð¾´µÄÆóÒµ»áÔ±¡¢ÅóÓÑÃÇ£ºÄúºÃ£¡ *** ΪÄúÌṩ318Íò¿Í»§EMAIL£¨²»Öظ´£©¡¢Èº·¢Èí¼þ¡¢ÍøÂçÐû´«¼¼Êõ¡£ ½«ÄúµÄÐÅÏ¢Ë͵½318ÍòÍøÉÏ¿Í»§£¨¹úÄÚ£©¡£ *** ΪÄúÍøÂçÐû´«¡¢ÍøÂç¹ã¸æ Ðû´«ÄúµÄÆóÒµ ¡¢ÍøÕ¾¡¢ÕÐÉÌÐÅÏ¢ *** ÖйúÍúÍúÉÌÎñ³ÏÕÐÈ«¹ú¸÷ÊÐÒµÎñ¶À¼Ò×Ü´úÀí ÊÚȨ°üÀ¨£» Ò»¡¢²úÆ·×Ü´úÀí£ºA¡¢É²³µ³¬Ç°Ê¾¾¯ÒÇ£¨JLD-1£© B¡¢ÃÀ¹úSLIMEÆû³µÂÖÌ¥×Ô¶¯·À±¬ÐÞ²¹Òº C¡¢ÃÀ¹úCrazÉñÆæÈ«ÄÜ¿ì½à·ÊÔí ¶þ¡¢¹ã¸æ×Ü´úÀí£º A¡¢Óʼþ¹ã¸æB¡¢µ¯³ö¹ã¸æ C¡¢Í¼±ê¹ã¸æ D¡¢À¸Ä¿¹ã¸æE¡¢ÎÄ×Ö¹ã¸æ¡£ Èý¡¢½¨ÉèÍøÕ¾×Ü´úÀí£º A¡¢Õ¹Ê¾ÐÍÍøÕ¾ B¡¢ÐÅÏ¢·¢²¼ÐÍÍøÕ¾ C¡¢µç×ÓÉÌÎñÐÅÏ¢½»Ò×ƽ̨ d. ¼ÓÃË¡°ÖйúÍúÍúÉÌÎñÈ«¹úÁªÃË¡±ÍøÕ¾ *** ÖйúÍúÍúÉÌÎñÍøԸΪÖС¢ÍâÃûÓŲúÆ·×Ü´úÀí --Ïêϸ×ÊÁÏÇëµã»÷·ÃÎÊ£ºÖйúÍúÍúÉÌÎñÍø www.china118.com Ê×Ò³£º ÖйúÍúÍú¹ã¸æ רÀ¸ÖйúÍúÍúÐÂÎÅרÀ¸ ÖйúÖÐÎ÷²¿¶ÔÍ⿪·ÅÁªÒêÌå ÀíÊ£º Öйú¶«ÄÏÑÇÉÌί»á ίԱ£º ÖйúÍúÍúÉÌÎñÍø www.china118.com ×ܼࣺ ÉÇÍ·Êж«½¾Ã³·¢Õ¹¹«Ë¾ ×ܾÀí£º ¬Æôºº - CDmail by ClanSofthttp://clansoft.yeah.net
