[cross-project-issues-dev] Neon M4 is now available
Neon M4 has been added to the repository at http://download.eclipse.org/releases/neon/ That repo is a composite that now contains M4, M3, and M2. Most of the M4 EPP packages are available at https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/index-developer.php A few packages had a problem with an error dialog at startup (See Bug 484629). A work around was found and applied to those that had the problem, and an M4a version of those packages will be available early next week. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [mdt-bpmn2.dev] The Neon Opt-in Deadline is Friday
I would like to have a couple of the Science projects join the simultaneous
release, but this will be our first time through the process. Is there a
drop date in case we can't make it?
Jay
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Bob Brodt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> SOA-BPMN2 Modeler will participate in the Neon release as version 1.3.0
> with offset +1, release record is here:
>
> https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/soa.bpmn2-modeler/releases/1.3.0
>
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
>
> Robert ("Bob") Brodt
> Senior Software Engineer
> JBoss by Red Hat
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
>
>> The opt-in deadline for Neon is on Friday.
>>
>> AFAICT, we haven't heard from these projects:
>>
>>
>>- WindowBuilder
>>- Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN2)
>>- BPEL Designer
>>- Target Management
>>
>>
>> If you don't opt-in, you're not in.
>>
>> I've copied each of these projects' dev lists on this note (note that I
>> have superpowers that allow me to post on a project mailing list without
>> joining it, so I won't see your response unless you post to
>> cross-project-issues-dev). If you're receiving this and your project
>> doesn't have at least one representative on the cross-project-issues-dev
>> mailing list, please get somebody to join.
>>
>> I've confirmed the IP dates with the IP team. I've updated the Neon wiki
>> page. For reference:
>>
>> Dec 18/2015 - Opt-in deadline
>> Feb 12/2016 - CQ Submission deadline (specify that the CQ is required for
>> Neon)
>> May 26/2016 - IP Log submission deadline
>> June 2/2016 - Review materials due
>> June 9/2016 - End of Release Review Period
>>
>> I've also opened an "Every Detail Matters for Neon" bug [1]. I intend to
>> drive this bug a little harder than last year's as we put more emphasis on
>> user experience.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=48
>> --
>> Wayne Beaton on behalf of the Eclipse Management Organization
>> @waynebeaton
>> The Eclipse Foundation
>> [image: EclipseCon NA 2016]
>>
>> ___
>> mdt-bpmn2.dev mailing list
>> mdt-bpmn2@eclipse.org
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-bpmn2.dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Robert ("Bob") Brodt
> Senior Software Engineer
> JBoss by Red Hat
>
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
--
Jay Jay Billings
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] WindowBuilder to participate in Neon
WindowBuilder will participate in the Neon release as version 1.9.0 with offset +2: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.windowbuilder/releases/1.9.0 ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [tm-dev] Any RSE dependencies in Neon?
On 15 Dec 2015, at 14:59, Greg Watson wrote: Many companies are receiving significant financial benefits from incorporating software such as RSE in their products, and it is up to these companies and other interested individuals to step up and commit to supporting a project if they wish it to continue. If you’re interested in doing so, then I’d be happy to nominate you as a committer to the project. Please nominate him :) I think I've seen at least three people from different companies the last year asking what can be done to help. I'll repeat mine - if keeping RSE alive and in release train (and I believe release train is important) is just about making sure release engineering work is done I'm fine offering help. But so far what I've seen/noticed the releng part is the easy part. Enhancing RSE is not on my radar since I know it will be an uphill battle, but keeping it in RSE while the "new" remote is still not a viable alternative is on my radar. /max http://about.me/maxandersen ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] SWT plans to move to Java 7
Hi everyone, There is interesting work to detect UI thread issues at compile time[1] but this works requires Java 8-style type annotations. As this is quite important topic (IMHO) together with some other reasons a bug for updating SWT to Java 8 was raised [2]. The concern there was that jumping from Java 5 to Java 8 at once would be too big of a change (people involved in the bugs/discussions feel free to correct me). As a result a middle step - updating to Java 7 for Neon [3] in in the plan now. Active SWT committers, Project lead and PMC members (2 for now) are in favor of the the change. If you have any concern about that plan please raise your voice with good arguments. For me - we as a community have to decide - progress with the cost that might come from that or stay compatible as long as possible and stagnate. [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=482891 [2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=481195 [3] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=483635 Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
