[cross-project-issues-dev] Visit count on a page on eclipse.org?

2018-02-12 Thread Leo Ufimtsev 
Hello,

Do we have any sort of visit/hit count on eclipse.org?
If so, do contributors have access to it?

I'd like to know how many people visit this page on a daily/weekly/monthly
basis:
https://www.eclipse.org/swt/snippets/

Or I'd be happy with parent also:
https://www.eclipse.org/swt/

Thank you.

-- 
Leo Ufimtsev, Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been disabled

2018-02-12 Thread Lars Vogel 
I suggest to nominate Nick as TM committer

Am 12.02.2018 16:06 schrieb "Doug Schaefer" :

> Nick, who specifically on that “team” do you think should get those
> changes in for you? To help, here is the commit log from the git repo.
>
>
>
> http://git.eclipse.org/c/tm/org.eclipse.tm.git/log/
>
>
>
> Kaloyan Raev is the only active committer and from his note earlier in
> this chain, he has removed the dependency from the projects he works on.
>
>
>
> We really need to be crystal clear at this point what the plan is.
>
>
>
> Doug.
>
>
>
> *From:* cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Nick Boldt
> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 9:49 AM
> *To:* issues, Cross project 
> *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has
> been disabled
>
>
>
> AFAIK it's out.
>
>
>
> But if I find time to submit the changes from my/Rob's github fork as
> gerrit review(s) back to the master fork on git.eclipse.org, that team
> can evaluate it, merge it, and maybe decide they want to be included for
> M6. Then it'll be up to the Planning Council to approve the late addition.
>
>
>
> At least that's my interpretation of the rules. EMO might have a different
> view. :)
>
>
>
> Nick
>
> --
>
> Nick Boldt
> Senior Software Engineer, RHCSA
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
> IM: @nickboldt / @nboldt / http://nick.divbyzero.com
> Sent from my Android phone
>
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2018 11:29 AM, "Simon Bernard" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sry for the delay, I re-enabled LDT removing ldt.remote feature which
> depends on RSE.
> So this should be ok for photon M6.
>
> I'm a bit confuse. Will RSE be reintegrated or is  it officially and
> definitely not part of Photon ?
>
> Thx,
>
> Simon
>
>
> Le 01/02/2018 à 12:22, Frederic Gurr a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Kaloyan, Dawid and Eugene for fixing and re-enabling the
> contributions of DLTK, PDT and TCF.
>
> The only contribution missing is LDT.
> Since it's already past the +3 window, LDT will miss Photon M5.
> Hopefully they can rejoin for M6.
>
> Regards,
>
> Fred
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been disabled

2018-02-12 Thread Doug Schaefer 
Nick, who specifically on that “team” do you think should get those changes in 
for you? To help, here is the commit log from the git repo.

http://git.eclipse.org/c/tm/org.eclipse.tm.git/log/

Kaloyan Raev is the only active committer and from his note earlier in this 
chain, he has removed the dependency from the projects he works on.

We really need to be crystal clear at this point what the plan is.

Doug.

From: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org 
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Nick Boldt
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 9:49 AM
To: issues, Cross project 
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been 
disabled

AFAIK it's out.

But if I find time to submit the changes from my/Rob's github fork as gerrit 
review(s) back to the master fork on git.eclipse.org, 
that team can evaluate it, merge it, and maybe decide they want to be included 
for M6. Then it'll be up to the Planning Council to approve the late addition.

At least that's my interpretation of the rules. EMO might have a different 
view. :)

Nick
--

Nick Boldt
Senior Software Engineer, RHCSA
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
IM: @nickboldt / @nboldt / http://nick.divbyzero.com
Sent from my Android phone

On Feb 8, 2018 11:29 AM, "Simon Bernard" 
> wrote:
Hi,

Sry for the delay, I re-enabled LDT removing ldt.remote feature which depends 
on RSE.
So this should be ok for photon M6.

I'm a bit confuse. Will RSE be reintegrated or is  it officially and definitely 
not part of Photon ?

Thx,

Simon


Le 01/02/2018 à 12:22, Frederic Gurr a écrit :
Hi,

Thanks to Kaloyan, Dawid and Eugene for fixing and re-enabling the
contributions of DLTK, PDT and TCF.

The only contribution missing is LDT.
Since it's already past the +3 window, LDT will miss Photon M5.
Hopefully they can rejoin for M6.

Regards,

Fred

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SimRel - TM contribution has been disabled

2018-02-12 Thread Nick Boldt 
AFAIK it's out.

But if I find time to submit the changes from my/Rob's github fork as
gerrit review(s) back to the master fork on git.eclipse.org, that team can
evaluate it, merge it, and maybe decide they want to be included for M6.
Then it'll be up to the Planning Council to approve the late addition.

At least that's my interpretation of the rules. EMO might have a different
view. :)

Nick

-- 

Nick Boldt
Senior Software Engineer, RHCSA
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
IM: @nickboldt / @nboldt / http://nick.divbyzero.com
Sent from my Android phone

On Feb 8, 2018 11:29 AM, "Simon Bernard" 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sry for the delay, I re-enabled LDT removing ldt.remote feature which
> depends on RSE.
> So this should be ok for photon M6.
>
> I'm a bit confuse. Will RSE be reintegrated or is  it officially and
> definitely not part of Photon ?
>
> Thx,
>
> Simon
>
>
> Le 01/02/2018 à 12:22, Frederic Gurr a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks to Kaloyan, Dawid and Eugene for fixing and re-enabling the
>> contributions of DLTK, PDT and TCF.
>>
>> The only contribution missing is LDT.
>> Since it's already past the +3 window, LDT will miss Photon M5.
>> Hopefully they can rejoin for M6.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Fred
>>
>>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

[cross-project-issues-dev] Bug 530887 - Mark Dirtyable field from Part Descriptor for deletion

2018-02-12 Thread Lars Vogel 
Hi,

we are planning to mark the field Dirtyable from the MPartDescriptor
for deletion.

See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=530887

This flag was never used by the Eclipse IDE or the default
implementation for RCP. Also, the JavaFX RCP port from Tom does not
use it.

Best regards, Lars

-- 
Eclipse Platform project co-lead
CEO vogella GmbH

Haindaalwisch 17a, 22395 Hamburg
Amtsgericht Hamburg: HRB 127058
Geschäftsführer: Lars Vogel, Jennifer Nerlich de Vogel
USt-IdNr.: DE284122352
Fax (040) 5247 6322, Email: lars.vo...@vogella.com, Web: http://www.vogella.com
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Photon EPP Repo Inconsistent

2018-02-12 Thread Markus Knauer 
Thanks for mentioning it... it is fixed now with the following children in
the EPP Photon repo:

  



  

Regards,
Markus

On 12 February 2018 at 09:30, Ed Merks  wrote:

> I noticed that the EPP Photon composite repo is inconsistent right now. I
> noticed this because this familiar problem is cropping up every time I try
> to do completion in JDT:
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.eclipse.jface.internal.tex
> t.html.HTMLPrinter.insertPageProlog(Ljava/lang/StringBuilder
> ;ILorg/eclipse/swt/graphics/RGB;Lorg/eclipse/swt/graphics/
> RGB;Ljava/lang/String;)V
> at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.AbstractJavaCompletion
> Proposal.getAdditionalProposalInfo(AbstractJavaCompletionProposal.
> java:610)
> at org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.AdditionalInfoControlle
> r$Timer$2$1.run(AdditionalInfoController.java:113)
> at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:56)
>
> The file /home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/package
> s/photon/compositeContent.jar does not contain a reference to
> /home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/photon/M5/
> so when you try to install Photon M5 from the release train composite you
> actually end up with Photon M4 which seems to cause some inconsistent of
> JDT and JFace Text.
>
> Note that I see the following in /home/data/httpd/download.ecli
> pse.org/releases/photon/:
>
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
>   
>   
>  
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
>
> So while it might point at M5 via 201802021000, it points at an EPP
> composite that does not include M5 packages so you'll definitely end up
> with M4 packages and whatever those requirements decide to pull in, which
> seems to be a mixture of M4 and M5.
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

[cross-project-issues-dev] Photon EPP Repo Inconsistent

2018-02-12 Thread Ed Merks 
I noticed that the EPP Photon composite repo is inconsistent right now. 
I noticed this because this familiar problem is cropping up every time I 
try to do completion in JDT:


java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 
org.eclipse.jface.internal.text.html.HTMLPrinter.insertPageProlog(Ljava/lang/StringBuilder;ILorg/eclipse/swt/graphics/RGB;Lorg/eclipse/swt/graphics/RGB;Ljava/lang/String;)V
    at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.AbstractJavaCompletionProposal.getAdditionalProposalInfo(AbstractJavaCompletionProposal.java:610)
    at 
org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.AdditionalInfoController$Timer$2$1.run(AdditionalInfoController.java:113)

    at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:56)

The file 
/home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/photon/compositeContent.jar 
does not contain a reference to 
/home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/photon/M5/ 
so when you try to install Photon M5 from the release train composite 
you actually end up with Photon M4 which seems to cause some 
inconsistent of JDT and JFace Text.


Note that I see the following in 
/home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/releases/photon/:




type='org.eclipse.equinox.internal.p2.metadata.repository.CompositeMetadataRepository' 
version='1.0.0'>

  
    
    
    
  
  
 location='http://download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/photon/'/>

    
    
    
  


So while it might point at M5 via 201802021000, it points at an EPP 
composite that does not include M5 packages so you'll definitely end up 
with M4 packages and whatever those requirements decide to pull in, 
which seems to be a mixture of M4 and M5.



___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev