Nicolas Weeger wrote:
Hello.
The harder part is perhaps that first one - finding leaders.
I wouldn't mind being coding leader, but then right now the conditions aren't
really met.
Code is here to be used for the game, it is not the game. Therefore, if there
is nothing going on game-wise, then it's no use having a living code.
I do admit liking coding, which is sometimes more important for me than
content, unfortunately.
Therefore we'd need a good game content leader who can make the game really
fun and drive development needs.
I think that is really the crux of the problem - it seems to me that most of
the developers are code developers, not content developers. I certainly
include
myself in that category.
There are certainly some folks out there that do work on content - I don't
mean to say that there aren't.
Having a leader of content doesn't do a lot if there are not many folks
willing to write that content. So the question may be how many folks would
move
from doing code to content if that was the drive, and how many really just want
to do code.
I mean by content leader someone who can point out needs to be filled
(missing a town linked to such and such story), accept or reject (saying why
it is rejected) content submissions, who takes into account the whole
coherence of the world and the background story, and such.
And lately since there is no new content, no need to drive the development,
nothing really going on, coding for CF has become some really uninteresting
idea (and I admit the code is starting to be quite messy which is not
helping, either).
I don't necessarily know of those two are related. I know various folks have
done various big projects that were not really driven by content, but rather
this would be a nice feature. And in fact, your list below also falls into
that
- those are not drive by content, but rather features that might be nice.
For the record here is what I'd like to do technically-wise:
- stable server, few bugs (obvious, and not that far a goal right now)
- distributed server, crash-recovery systems: server crashes, clients
dynamically or transparently switch to another and go on playing maybe
without even noticing - at least with minimal loss
- dynamic updating of resources - no need to recollect archetypes to take
into
account an archetype change, or a pic change
- regular releases (anyone remembers when the last one was?), as long as
there
is justification for that and in coordination with content leader
IMO, this sort of falls back to the past problems - from discussions, it
seems
that the most pressing need/desire in crossfire is new/better content, but that
list above doesn't really address that at all. I don't mean to say that those
are bad ideas, and in fact some may be quite good, and at least for some of
them, I would have comments/questions, but that doesn't really seem to be a
focus right now (and you say so yourself). There are some other things I'd add
to that also.
___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
