Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-18 Thread Brendan Lally
On 1/18/06, Mark Wedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Miguel Ghobangieno wrote:
  Yes, it would be best to remove that option from the
  menu IMHO.

   I just tried this out.  If I select the 'Quit Character' option from the 
 file
 list, it does ask if I want to quit or not.

Regardless of that, I would suggest that it is something that is
something that is so infrequently the intended course of action, that
making the player issue the command themselves would be desirable.

___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire


Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-17 Thread Brendan Lally
Ok, to try and summarise from this. (this is how I'm reading the
existing responses, yell if you think this isn't a fair summary).


Not a target for removal:

Split Information Window (Takes effect next run)
Automatically re-applies a container when you use apply to close it.


Still targeted for removal:

(on) Colored Inventory Lists
(on) Colored Information Text - maybe to be replaced by some future feature
(off) Print Grid Overlay
(on) Cache Images
(on) splash window (gros' suggestion)

Options on how to display resistances: - keeping the two options
involving scroll bars, but still haven't heard from an advocate of the
no-scrollbar option (if this were removed, it could go from 3 buttons
to 1)

the options in the list above need someone to claim the use of them
sometime within the next fortnight.

___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire


Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-17 Thread Miguel Ghobangieno
Yes, it would be best to remove that option from the
menu IMHO.
Could we also make quit ask the person if they really
want to delete their character (and then ask again for
confirmation)? (server side).

--- Brendan Lally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 1/17/06, Rick Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Would it be OT or out of scope to ask for the
 File - Quit Character
  option in the menu to be renamed to File -
 Delete Character ?
 
 Well, it wouldn't be if you instead suggested that
 the menu entry be
 removed altogether.
 
 I'm inclined to think that the better option, it
 isn't as though the
 quit command should be used particularly often.
 
 ___
 crossfire mailing list
 crossfire@metalforge.org

http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire


Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Rick Tanner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Would it be OT or out of scope to ask for the File - Quit Character
option in the menu to be renamed to File - Delete Character ?


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDzDS1hHyvgBp+vH4RAjEfAJ4mH8tcfuQsSYaqlTCvIyZZTli7SQCg/XZp
l+8IIsamAYZooFHSSJEvWw4=
=tDFE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire


Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Miguel Ghobangieno
Update about cached images, if we have checksumming
(not sure if we do) that will update the cached image
if said image is out of date, then cached images
should be set to on as that will decrease bandwith
usage.

--- Brendan Lally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have been poking around gcfclient recently, and
 found a lot of
 options that seem to be at best of limited use, and
 possibly never
 used by anyone, so what I have done, is created a
 list of the options
 in gcfclient's settings menus which I believe are
 unused, or always
 set to the same value. I am going to list the
 option, as well as what
 I think it should be set to.
 
 If anyone wishes an option listed here kept, they
 can reply claiming
 their use/need of it. If after 2 weeks, no one has
 'claimed' an
 option, then I argue that it can be assumed to be
 safe to remove. As
 long as each change is made as a seperate CVS
 commit, it is still
 going to be relatively easy to revert any such
 changes made, should
 someone wish to have a setting return:
 
 The list;
 
 Automatically re-applies a container when you use
 apply to close it. 
 If off, when you use apply to close the container,
 it stays unapplied 
  - set to always be on
 
 Colored Inventory Lists - set to always on.
 
 Colored Information Text - set to always on
 
 Options on how to display resistances: - remove all
 options, set to
 Display all resistances in a single column, will
 use a single
 scrollbar.
 
 Print Grid Overlay (SDL only, Slow, useful for
 debugging/development)
 - set to off
 
 Cache Images - set to on
 
 Split Information Window (Takes effect next run) -
 set to on
 
 ___
 crossfire mailing list
 crossfire@metalforge.org

http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire


Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread ERACC
On Monday 16 January 2006 05:55 pm
Brendan Lally wrote:

[...]
 Options on how to display resistances: - remove all options, set to
 Display all resistances in a single column, will use a single
 scrollbar.
[...]

I use a double column with a scroll bar. I do not like the single
column.

Gene
-- 
Mandriva Linux release 2006.0 (Official) for i586
 23:18:28 up 3 days,  6:11, 10 users,  load average: 0.06, 0.07, 0.03
ERA Computer Consulting - http://www.eracc.com/
eComStation, Linux, FreeBSD, OpenServer  UnixWare resellers

___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire


Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Alex Schultz

Miguel Ghobangieno wrote:


Cached images are bad (for me). I always have this set
off so I get updates from the server. So keep that

Umm It seems you're unaware that the protocol is set up so the 
client always looks at a checksum of the image in case it's been updated.


Alex Schultz

___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire


Re: [crossfire] gcfclient options deathlist

2006-01-16 Thread Miguel Ghobangieno
Yes, it would be best to remove that option from the
menu IMHO.
Could we also make quit ask the person if they really
want to delete their character (and then ask again for
confirmation)? (server side).

--- Brendan Lally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 1/17/06, Rick Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Would it be OT or out of scope to ask for the
 File - Quit Character
  option in the menu to be renamed to File -
 Delete Character ?
 
 Well, it wouldn't be if you instead suggested that
 the menu entry be
 removed altogether.
 
 I'm inclined to think that the better option, it
 isn't as though the
 quit command should be used particularly often.
 
 ___
 crossfire mailing list
 crossfire@metalforge.org

http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

___
crossfire mailing list
crossfire@metalforge.org
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire