http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_7230967?source=commented
Nacchio affects spy probe
His court filings point to government surveillance months before 9/11
By Andy Vuong
The Denver Post
Article Last Updated: 10/20/2007 11:38:08 PM MDT
Extras
Previously sealed documents filed by former Qwest chief executive Joe Nacchio
in connection with his top-secret defense strategy, in which he argued that he
was privy to classified information that led him to believe the company was in
line to receive lucractive government contracts. The documents were released
Wednesday at the request of The Denver Post.
[Follow the link above to get the links to these court documents. --gnu]
* Read file 1, Sept. 29, 2006 (PDF, 46 pages).
* Read file 2, Oct. 31, 2005 (PDF, 84 pages).
* Read file 3, Jan. 4, 2007 (PDF, 10 pages).
* Read file 4, Oct. 31, 2006 (PDF, 25 pages).
* Read file 5, Jan. 22, 2007 (PDF, 3 pages).
* Read file 6, Feb. 20, 2007 (PDF, 25 pages).
* Read file 7, May 25, 2007 (PDF, 12 pages).
Recent revelations about former Qwest chief executive Joe Nacchio's
classified-information defense, which went unheard during his insider-trading
trial, are feeding the furor over the government's warrantless-wiretapping
program.
Nacchio alleges the National Security Agency asked Qwest to participate in a
program the phone company thought was illegal more than six months before the
Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, according to court documents unsealed at the
request of The Denver Post.
Nacchio also maintains that when he refused to participate, the government
retaliated by not awarding lucrative contracts to Qwest.
Previously sealed transcripts released at the same time as the court documents
indicate the government was prepared to counter Nacchio's claims.
Though specifics about the wiretapping program were redacted from the court
documents, Nacchio's attorney Herbert Stern said in May 2006 that Nacchio
rejected requests from the government for customers' phone records in fall 2001.
The recently unsealed documents push that time frame back to February 2001 and
indicate the NSA may have also sought to monitor customers' Internet traffic
and fax transmissions.
Nacchio's claims could affect President Bush's controversial efforts to grant
legal immunity to large telecommunications companies such as ATT, which has
been sued in connection with the surveillance program.
The Nacchio materials suggesting that the NSA had sought telco cooperation
even before 9/11 undermines the primary argument for letting the phone
companies off the hook, which is the claim that they were simply acting in good
faith to help the president fight the terrorists after 9/11, said Kevin
Bankston, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a
civil-liberties group.
The fact that these materials suggest that cooperation with the program was
tied to the award of certain government contracts also contradicts their (phone
companies') claims that they were simply acting in good faith to help fight the
terrorists when it appears that they may have been motivated by financial
concerns instead, Bankston said.
Up to this point, discussions on Capitol Hill over telecom immunity have
focused on government surveillance efforts spurred by the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks.
This is, sooner or later, going to be the stuff of congressional hearings
because a new starting point has been established for this controversy. A new
starting point seven months before 9/11, said Ron Suskind, author of The One
Percent Doctrine, which reported examples of how companies worked with the
government in its fight against terrorism after Sept. 11.
The idea that deals were getting cut between the government and telecom
companies in secret in the early part of 2001 creates a whole new discussion as
to intent, motivation and goals of the government, Suskind said.
Last week, Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., chairman of the House Judiciary
Committee, asked federal intelligence officials for more information about
Nacchio's allegations.
The extent to which this is true could shed light on the efficacy of this
program and raise questions about the reasons behind its implementation,
Conyers wrote on his blog.
For his part, Nacchio wanted to introduce the claims to show he didn't sell
Qwest stock illegally in early 2001. The government alleged Nacchio dumped
Qwest stock because he had inside information that the Denver company's
financial health was deteriorating. He was convicted on 19 counts of insider
trading in April after a month-long trial and sentenced to six years in prison.
He remains free on $2 million bond pending his appeal, which, among other
charges, is challenging rulings U.S. District Judge Edward Nottingham made
related to the classified-information defense.
Nacchio has maintained he was upbeat about Qwest because he had top-secret
information that the company
