Retailers Experiment With Biometric Payment article

2005-06-09 Thread Heyman, Michael
From
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/08/AR20050
60802335_pf.html:

  You can always get a new Social Security number, but 
  you certainly can't get a new thumbprint..., Lee [of 
  EFF] said...Robinson, of BioPay, argues that a personal 
  check written at a grocery store passes through eight 
  people before it is cashed, a process he considers much 
  less secure than a biometric payment, in which the 
  fingerprint image is connected immediately to the 
  user's bank account. What can I do to hurt you if I 
  have a picture of the tip of your finger? Not much, 
  Robinson said, contending that associating fingerprints 
  with legal troubles is unwarranted. BioPay does not 
  share its biometric data with government agencies, and 
  in fact, the full fingerprints are not stored in the 
  system. Instead, a complex mathematical algorithm is 
  created to represent identifying characteristics of 
  the fingerprint, which are matched to the real thing 
  when a user shows up at a checkout counter.

No discussion on the threat of finger removal...

-Michael

-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Retailers Experiment With Biometric Payment article

2005-06-09 Thread Adam Shostack
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 11:17:59AM -0400, Heyman, Michael wrote:
| From
| http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/08/AR20050
| 60802335_pf.html:

|   share its biometric data with government agencies, and 
|   in fact, the full fingerprints are not stored in the 
|   system. Instead, a complex mathematical algorithm is 
|   created to represent identifying characteristics of 
|   the fingerprint, which are matched to the real thing 
|   when a user shows up at a checkout counter.
|
| No discussion on the threat of finger removal...
| 

Has anyone ever studied the reversability of these algorithms?  It
seems to me that you could make some plausible guesses and generate
fingerprints from certain representations.  I don't know how likely
those guesses are to be right.

Adam

-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Retailers Experiment With Biometric Payment article

2005-06-09 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:02:20PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:

 Has anyone ever studied the reversability of these algorithms?  It
 seems to me that you could make some plausible guesses and generate
 fingerprints from certain representations.  I don't know how likely
 those guesses are to be right.

The fingerprint hash (fingerprint's fingerprint) has to be resistant 
to rotation/translation, area size and subpattern presence, and tolerate 
some skin lesion noise, so it's the very opposite of a cryptographic hash.

Probably quite easy to reverse.

-- 
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature