Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-03 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2013-10-31 at 19:55 -0700, coderman wrote:
 pub  3072D/0x65A847E7C2B9380C 1970-01-01 hidden@dot.onion (born on January 
 31 1979 .. all prime numbers .. I would sit on the floor in my bedroom and 
 just count.) hidden@dot.onion

The quote appears to be a reference to Daniel Tammet, a British autistic
savant who perceives mathematics visually.

http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2005/feb/12/weekend7.weekend2

Those who are better at crossword puzzles than I might spot a
connection.

As to the Tor address, if I played with such things I'd try taking the
public key from the PGP packet and treating it as the public key of the
target onion server, so would take the fingerprint of the relevant onion
serialisation of the data structure to form the address to route to (but
might stick to the hidden@dot.onion within the SMTP session, since
otherwise there's no specified LHS; if that doesn't work, use one of the
keyid forms of the PGP key as the LHS?).

But that's just speculation.

-Phil
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography


Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Natanael
No hints at what kind of client it takes? Custom config or recompile?

- Sent from my phone
Den 1 nov 2013 05:11 skrev coderman coder...@gmail.com:

 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
  my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider.
 
  there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i
  agree fully.  however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure
  email.  yes your default client will balk.  this is a feature not a
  bug...  you must be this high to ride...


 still no successful encrypted responses.  do i have to sweeten this pot?

 let's try an experiment: one bitcoin (~200$USD) to whoever
 successfully encrypts a message to my key.

 ... ready, set, go!
 ___
 cryptography mailing list
 cryptography@randombit.net
 http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography


Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Dave Howe
On 01/11/2013 12:04, Natanael wrote:

 No hints at what kind of client it takes? Custom config or recompile?

From the url in the key, I am assuming it is a tor hidden service, hence
you would need a local MTA able to route over TOR.
tempted to have a go myself this weekend, given I haven't seen a tor
smtp implementation before and it intrigues me...
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography


Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Dave Howe davehowe.pentest...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 01/11/2013 12:04, Natanael wrote:

 No hints at what kind of client it takes? Custom config or recompile?

 From the url in the key, I am assuming it is a tor hidden service, hence
 you would need a local MTA able to route over TOR.
 tempted to have a go myself this weekend, given I haven't seen a tor
 smtp implementation before and it intrigues me...

That's a cute idea, but dot.onion is too short to be a *real* onion
address; the label before onion is the base32 encoding of a 10-byte
truncated SHA1 (presently), so it has to be exactly 16 characters
long.

zw
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography


Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On 2013-10-31, at 11:11 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
 my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider.
 
 there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i
 agree fully.  however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure
 email.  yes your default client will balk.  this is a feature not a
 bug...  you must be this high to ride...
 
 
 still no successful encrypted responses.

-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=ENte
-END PGP MESSAGE-

 let's try an experiment: one bitcoin (~200$USD) to whoever
 successfully encrypts a message to my key.

That’s a serious sweetener. So I assume that I have misunderstood
something about this challenge.


___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography


Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Kelly John Rose
Same here, I'm fairly confident mine wasn'T encrypted correctly.

On 01/11/2013 11:47 AM, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
 On 2013-10-31, at 11:11 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
 my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider.

 there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i
 agree fully.  however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure
 email.  yes your default client will balk.  this is a feature not a
 bug...  you must be this high to ride...


 still no successful encrypted responses.
 
 -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
 
 hQMOAyheCGO7e/dQEAv+MonJWg7wyFrbCTJrQ7k4TeG6ue99TGvhZVXouiNS3o4e
 joZKdq6G7DcnkBrOWbqr6dGoqPUk07HxD4SpxyNV/mm0ns0EjmPiS5AecYAu7Pul
 YSY2LG7feo5gJdbCheb4l6WqEr+w2/3m14TePwH6pX31l9qaBiWJdpgDBymMVDPA
 0mx8AyKp5Evwa1P+R3DVn8P8wQJYbtlhCBlgMwyfQMGnoxRuiivhjxT3gL6PcKQY
 Zt1S7QTR0QTq45GxNfSuzeZpf/VdsYX1EffHkeDwMV4pzqSaSBOnY5/L+uv/ZI7G
 x8pBB85xeM7C4NqjdH0fhm9aKeTh6lhn2Ano5xx04HHmj/tCwNPtsH7gChkBs9ud
 qe8NZmBj+RfKMzwUoSbYxdCLAbc8jziSeweOl9nehgmtfVFCUiEZRi9rt6K2kpll
 luhGSH7OnXrm+SgTLX8MQc7W+O0ZuOJhkuHabcgl+X5Ig0XiO04FHFwdhXTC3vIz
 n8YX/vufZSCDu3lsVXhbDACUIoqGEwwY8wJkxCy5NDZpK+r3D+j5jiEzzNdJ8gGH
 ki9MEIBtD0vfxmjEeeHuTrIKBQPeWygFB8n+sTUw76rx77Fe7b+VvM7YGIpfXf99
 IUuVbDt9XYG6Xw+pLEn+l7OEPKkuJVvyew72oWUEIErH9afAs+/LRp/GFu2QN/DK
 3/Tx+/5SFnzVraYEOWDIYrWB8WCEt9+m8tvl05kU/NNW/yRCOnu454LMp1jBzahd
 9/Et37Ak1qKJabBL4iw1p/M8RYHbO5K8083XvS6rGc5M6k0iYyKIwmdfeq8+S/+h
 x4eZiBCxoE1aMXG3qPZqRl/Z/awJj7cT2YzhX67cVz5DrJJzVUefs6zyclMbBnON
 ahCpB4D8ll7jy7Iq8cP3v9d+xp+JAqErEIyrdxHrbWwIf+ogKgMwK9H6D7WYyIji
 lhbTWeUvptooCILO108vRgtxkHMIZ/bpeRjhsIwgqER3C0G+3QYveAlxtqZ8HrQN
 ZH269bJiVmFTH6GBSMtJTEOFAg4DZhibeqJD/S4QB/9hZut5POE/6gWRV9YmJd8G
 jjEjbxxhgMZVm4KJDhoMS/b3/UZbdnlx9G6WHech6u/SEI3QQ+fqC8AUIWZfmPZw
 r+4y71J42TKBuATwAoyw9ooA66aFP+M2bWYehurBhbU00dT+6bxq74ggfJaFgn7v
 b6Cr6cgODrNlmnxK4Ly95qwHgA5Yt+bbtANhbo/G8W17i6uFxvABu+t+38n6wQPH
 XXDspJVpcW8NCezyHyd9YLkd2Xx+c2iDWQMGvpdVhVmeJ3ITbU2I5bLBAT6MrN01
 CnZ0+hYp8ZMCMshfDMFW260nJ6ijVsPBX4LFsSftsNYPitAD4lMNJ73oikXSjHyW
 B/9C1tbCVTWaS3CMhBPUfWGQGKbFDKtt4jkj64KGkqEMRrnH0KXnfwCK0VDL0XBi
 WGCvgYHO8N0iqdbge5xDUrfCHTvUv18U8xWaDkzk9Mqp52Idui2DpDEasCCAEUpV
 EAICDV8tGQZivGoQmQP6K8Pp/05xrm8kDv1xZWjG6wdO5g71aY0KMZqryoJAc68W
 aXfKfgvokcjQqteQNc+uLPc03WBob5dnwMJqOUQiMIjnKuFRvzoGumm3zQGlZI50
 4W0gI9PRLNl4jQJxbGYF2Iv398pMmsbLdC37cx4D5HvHecPlcH5LD0l/Yt/zplar
 yJiN6gubLtbuSCU0TF3th+7HycAgSJYrW2KzuNWl0QTJwfLJkH+kfbVY7gTB7gkA
 ZXlUW/Cyzv58A6W5SxjF6OiRmTsmxvP2SWpO1+9uU4gosYJn8qQ7gcHVYTqEjtBH
 4XdvdFwDuNISK8IGuqGXOFlbnlTRBmvCYCooAvt+vmj0zl55tzUXhmpOVImY2JKf
 yQns38JEmSM/dTdlR5zJrcrCUFiSNghGSwLTAFwbQfGRU2P4emZYQ2BMxo4NfF2f
 XLfynU3muDjG6DhI/ha9JovovXEwT7B1tckoAP2Ns0KO3V8CPBC3tOtZhQETjiuK
 1Psu3NE=
 =ENte
 -END PGP MESSAGE-
 
 let's try an experiment: one bitcoin (~200$USD) to whoever
 successfully encrypts a message to my key.
 
 That’s a serious sweetener. So I assume that I have misunderstood
 something about this challenge.
 
 
 ___
 cryptography mailing list
 cryptography@randombit.net
 http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
 

-- 
Kelly John Rose
Mississauga, ON
Phone: +1 647 638-4104
Twitter: @kjrose

Document contents are confidential between original recipients and sender.
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography


[cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-10-31 Thread coderman
my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider.

there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i
agree fully.  however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure
email.  yes your default client will balk.  this is a feature not a
bug...  you must be this high to ride...

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
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==
=H0Fx
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography


Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-10-31 Thread coderman
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote:
 my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider.

 there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i
 agree fully.  however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure
 email.  yes your default client will balk.  this is a feature not a
 bug...  you must be this high to ride...


still no successful encrypted responses.  do i have to sweeten this pot?

let's try an experiment: one bitcoin (~200$USD) to whoever
successfully encrypts a message to my key.

... ready, set, go!
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography