Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats

2007-12-08 Thread Rick Faircloth
Thanks for the perspective, Gunlaug.

Your comments are very much appreciated.  And your help
on this list is invaluable to so many!

Rick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun
 Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 10:14 PM
 To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
 Subject: Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats
 
 Rick Faircloth wrote:
 
  However, it's good to remember that for those of us that are just
  beginning to work with CSS layouts,  that getting *anything* to work
   on any level is a big challenge.  Once we become more knowledgeable
   and experienced we can begin to work with broader concerns, like
  font-scaling, more browser compatibility, etc.
 
 The CSS learning-curve _is_ steep, but it doesn't become less steep by
 leaving out factors like the mentioned issues till later. Leaving any of
 these basics out at an early stage just means one has to go through the
 same learning-process all over again, and there's always the risk that
 hard-learned knowledge has to be unlearned and/or corrected more than
 one would like, in order to go forward.
 
  For me, just being able to make CSS-based sites without tables has
  been a big task... especially having no formal training in it.  Just
   getting them to look as good as my table-based sites has been a
  big challenge.
 
 I would think so, since the part of CSS that is best suited for
 replicating and/or improving look and feel based on table-based designs,
 is badly supported across browser-land and not at all in MSIE. It's
 called 'CSS-table', and _maybe_ IE8 will at least _start_ to support
 CSS-table now that Firefox (3) is showing signs of improving its
 support. Miracles have happened before... :-)
 
 The substitutes we use now, like floating and/or positioning major
 layout-parts, won't last forever. They are all temporary solutions, and
 both existing but badly supported, and entirely new, solutions will
 (have to) come into play.
 So the process of learning and unlearning methods and what to use them
 for, is the only constant we have in today's web design. It is not a
 good idea to make this process harder by skipping important parts early
 on - at least not knowingly.
 
  So don't expect too much of us newbies too soon... it'll only scare
  the faint-hearted away.  Sometimes a pretty picture is a big goal!
 
 Indeed. However, it would be wrong not to point out that experience
 tells us that the prettier they come, the less they can take before
 they break.
 
 It doesn't have to be like that at all (that pretty means weak), but
 it _is_ , sadly, the norm. Doesn't seem to have much to do with newbie
 or advanced status either, and a web designer's status doesn't help
 much when it comes to holding a design together under what must be
 considered to be 'normal conditions' - visitors being able to use a site
 in regular browsers. Proper use of HTML/CSS/script etc., is however
 always of immense help towards such a goal.
 
 This is why some of us ignore status, and only look at the results. We
 comment for a reason: we want to see *better results* - in a broad
 sense. The rest -- process, experience, status -- doesn't really matter
 all that much, (IMO of course).
 
 
 
 Consequently: we don't expect much of anyone - status irrelevant, as
 we're all limited by the same incomplete tools - browsers and standards.
 We just try to help whoever to find solutions they are comfortable
 with, within the range of available alternatives.
 
 This does sometimes mean we have to tell people that something doesn't
 work well or at all, and which problems one has to solve and/or avoid if
 one wants a pretty picture or whatever to work.
 This is not critique of ones status, present attempts or forwarded
 examples. It is just information that anyone can do what they want with,
 and the only expectation I have to anyone is that I expect them to do
 just that - what they want.
 
 regards
   Georg
 --
 http://www.gunlaug.no
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Spry drop down

2007-12-08 Thread Alan Gresley
Anahita Shafa wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I used the Spry menu bar, to create drop down menus in Dreamweaver CS3.
 However, I think there are issues with the css and in IE (both IE6 and IE7),
 since the menu looks very strange in IE. Also, there is a shift when I roll
 my mouse over the menu buttons.
 
 I was hoping someone could take a look at this and let me know if you have
 any solution or fix or IE hack that can correct it.
 
 Here is the link to the page:
 http://www.mcleanwebdirectory.com/mclean/index.html (please ignore the flash
 in the banner area!)
 
 Anahita :)

It looks quite a disaster in IE. Since it is a javascript driven menu, this is 
off topic for this list. There is no :hover at all in the CSS so the debugging 
is almost impossible for a non javascript person like myself. I would suggest 
that you use a CSS driven menu as an alternative.

http://css-class.com/articles/ursidae/

http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/articles/css/dropdown-low-down/

Alan
http://css-class.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] image gallery

2007-12-08 Thread Čistý Design
Hello

I was always wondering if it's possible to center image in a div - like when 
you have a photogallery of images that are vertical and horizontal and they are 
always centered so it looks tidy  I know how to do it in a table cell, but 
don't want to use a table. 
Would anyone please have any suggestion?

Thank you!!!

Jana Forsythová
---
www.cisty-design.cz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel: +420 774 924 565
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] More CSS tests

2007-12-08 Thread Gabriele Romanato
Dear all,
here we are:

http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/more/

hope it's useful.

bye,
Gabriele

-- 
http://www.css-zibaldone.com/
http://mimicry.css-zibaldone.com/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] More CSS tests

2007-12-08 Thread David Laakso
Gabriele Romanato wrote:
 Dear all,
 here we are:

 http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/more/

 hope it's useful.

 bye,
 Gabriele

   

You and Fancis Bacon [1] always have interesting things to say, see, and 
share...

[1] http://wwar.com/masters/b/bacon-francis.html

-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats

2007-12-08 Thread Rick Faircloth

 -Original Message-
 From: David Laakso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2007 8:47 AM
 To: Rick Faircloth
 Subject: Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats
  
 Now, if we can get you to just stop top-posting (it screws up the
 archives and makes it impossible to follow a logical thread), and into
 trimming the unessential (it just loads everyone's mailbox), maybe we
 can get back to what this list is all about : the practical application
 of CSS. Notice I have written below you, and what is not essential to
 communicate these thoughts, has been trimmed.
 
 Please know, as well, it is not necessary to lash-out at everyone on the
 list who is attempting to help you and others. We do the best we can.
 Accept what you can. Ignore the rest. Correct someone who has made an
 error if you feel so inclined; but, make sure, as best you can, that the
 error (or misconception) is theirs and not yours.
 
 I hope you have a pleasant and enjoyable weekend, and I look forward to
 your continued questions, answers, and support of CSS and Web standards...
 
 Best wishes,
 
 ~d

Whoa, David!

I don't remember lashing out at anyone... you included.

I've just simply notice a sometimes subtle, sometimes not,
virtual cane lashing of anyone who doesn't follow the religious CSS dogma
adopted by some or many on this list.

For example, personally, at this point, I don't care if anyone
ever reads any of my sites on a text-only browser.  If they want
to go that route, no problem here, but they have *no* right to
any expectation that anyone should ever code for that decision.

Now, again, if there are those who want to accommodate them, fine,
but there should be no expectation that they *should*... *BIG* difference.

I just make it a point to defend anyone who is being chastised for not
adhering to the CSS coding standards that someone else adopts.  What standards
everyone decides to adhere to and how far they want to employ CSS methods in
building websites is *totally* a matter of personal choice.

If there were a CSS god who dictated with absolute authority what standards
and practices should be employed, then I'd submit.

But I know of no one who has the authority over me to proscribe what my
CSS coding behavior and standards will be in this world

Some on this list just a little bit that Taliban mentality, and I don't like 
it,
and say so... just to keep things in balance.

Rick

PS - Notice... I didn't top post... see, I'm flexible!


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] image gallery

2007-12-08 Thread David Laakso
Čistý Design wrote:
 Hello

 I was always wondering if it's possible to center image in a div - like when 
 you have a photogallery of images that are vertical and horizontal and they 
 are always centered so it looks tidy  I know how to do it in a table 
 cell, but don't want to use a table. 
 Would anyone please have any suggestion?

 Thank you!!!

 Jana Forsythová
   


Tough one.

See various test runs by Bruno Fassino [1] in the section titled: 
Centering, Shrink wrapping, Images.
http://www.brunildo.org/test/

Best,

~dL

-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats

2007-12-08 Thread David Laakso
Rick Faircloth wrote:
 Ø  if you are creating a commercial
 web site then you are decreasing your web sites accessibility and
 therefore you are loosing those potential customers.
  
 Thanks for your thoughts, Davoud…

 I’m wrestling with learning totally CSS-based design, learning a
 new IDE (Eclipse/CFEclipse), trying to keep up with SEO/SEM concerns
 for my clients and generate their reports and offer perspective on them,
 learn the new tools for coding in ColdFusion 8, to which I recently upgraded,
 keep MySQL happy, keep production of new sites moving, write proposals, etc.

 It’s just matter of how many “straws” can you put on the camel’s back,
 before he buckles under the weight.  For some to complain that a site breaks
 when font size is increased to +3 may be important for some, but it’s not
 something I can add to my list of priorities right now.  I do have sympathy,
 even empathy, for those visually impaired… my increasingly poor eyesight is
 causing headaches and aggravation right now, and I do appreciate it when some
 offers the various size “A” buttons on their site to increase font size.  It’s
 just not something I’ve had time to learn to employ into my sites.  Although,
 at some point, I will.

 I’m adapting practices as fast as possible, but CSS coding can be a real pain
 in the rear with browser compatibility.  In many ways, it would be *far* 
 simpler
 to just to go back to tables.  Since my change-over to CSS-based layouts, my 
 sites
 take a lot longer to develop because of the inherent CSS compatibility 
 problems.

 I just tend to balk at the attitude of some who say “do CSS completely 
 correctly
 or don’t do it at all.”

 Rick

  

   

Do not worry about your difficulties in Mathematics. I can assure you 
mine are still greater.
-- Albert Einstein

Best,
~dL
PS Do you have a CSS question?
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats

2007-12-08 Thread Rayburn Taylor


Rick Faircloth wrote:
 Ø  if you are creating a commercial
 web site then you are decreasing your web sites accessibility and
 therefore you are loosing those potential customers.

  

 Thanks for your thoughts, Davoud…

  

 I agree with your perspective on trying to cater to as many

 users as possible.  Users *are* the standards committee for me,
   
 snipped.

Is this what one would call a hijacked thread? Just asking.

Rayburn

Waco Web Designs
http://wacowebdesigns.com
~~~
Free Domain Name with any website design  |
or web hosting plan.  |
~~~
TAYLOR's BOOK PAGE
http://taylorsbookpage.com
~~~
School, Church, Library receive a discount|
of 25% when purchased from my home page.  |
~~~



__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats

2007-12-08 Thread Rick Faircloth
David Laakso wrote:

 PS Do you have a CSS question?

I consider philosophical questions about CSS design that
impact daily work just as legitimate as How do I make a font red?,
if not more so...

Rick




__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats

2007-12-08 Thread Rick Faircloth
Possibly... maybe just a morphed thread... like any conversation,
it can branch.

Rick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Rayburn Taylor
 
 Is this what one would call a hijacked thread? Just asking.
 
 Rayburn
 
 Waco Web Designs
 http://wacowebdesigns.com



__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats

2007-12-08 Thread Ingo Chao
Rick Faircloth wrote:
 
 I consider philosophical questions about CSS design that
 impact daily work just as legitimate as How do I make a font red?,
 if not more so...
 

Does your philosophical attempt include to allege that some on this 
list have a 'Taliban' mentality?


Ingo

-- 
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats

2007-12-08 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Rayburn Taylor wrote:
 Is this what one would call a hijacked thread? Just asking.

It started as one - 'Top Bottom - Lets Keep Them Apart' and then
suddenly we had 'problems with CSS and floats' in threading mail-agents.

Now it seems the only (somewhat loose) connection with CSS we have left,
is one of browser-incompatibilities (and maybe a few other
incompatibilities for good measure :-) ).

I think it is time to chill out with a read-through of this...
http://www.webdevout.net/browser-support
...before the CIA or list-admins take over the entire thread ;-)

regards
Georg
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] [ADMIN - PLEASE READ] was Re: problems with CSS and floats

2007-12-08 Thread Alex Robinson
Is this what one would call a hijacked thread? Just asking.


Nope, this is what is called an unholy mishmash of off-topicness and, 
frankly, rudeness.

My apologies to you Rayburn for your first post descending into one 
of css-d's rare fits of losing the plot. (Though do please start new 
threads/questions with a brand new message ;)


css-discuss is not a place to discuss:


* what are the right and wrong ways of writing markup
* which users you should be addressing
* which browsers you should be targeting
* how accessible or usable you should make your site
* the benefits of using or not using standards

All declared as off topic at

http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=OffTopic


* mailing list administrator's approach to where replies go

All comments about issues which relate to the policies and 
administration of the list should be addressed off list to the owner 
of the list. That said, there is an explanation of why things are as 
they are here:

http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CssDiscussListHeaders


* quoting styles

Again, issues of list policy should be addressed directly to the list 
owner and not to the list itself. That said...

 From http://www.css-discuss.org/policies.html
Trim your replies. If you have more quotation than original text, 
think about cutting down on the quoted stuff. The list members can 
look at the message to which you responded, or check the archive. 
Prune that quoted text with ruthless abandon.

The moderators normally don't do anything more than send private 
messages to overquoters asking them to mend their ways. We also don't 
normally freak out about top posting even though we don't like it and 
advise against it. We have however, provided info on the wiki as to 
how to deal with problems that make Gmail a pain to other members of 
the list.

http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=GmailAndCssDiscuss


* philosophy

 From http://www.css-discuss.org/policies.html
css-discuss is primarily intended to be a place for authors to 
discuss real-world uses of CSS. This doesn't preclude discussions of 
theory, or nifty cutting-edge tricks that show off the power of CSS, 
or even talking about (X)HTML, DOM, and so forth. However, it's 
greatly appreciated if such discussions have some practical payoff, 
even if it's just teaching other list members a little bit more about 
how CSS works.


Finally, but most importantly, are these words of Eric's from the 
list policies which I think need repeating:

Above all, if you can't answer with a modicum of respect, or without 
feeling somehow annoyed by the question, then DO NOT ANSWER AT ALL.


OK?


Alex Robinson
css-d moderator
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Site check

2007-12-08 Thread Scott Demontluzin
Hi List,
I've been meaning to jump in for a while.I'm working on my first website
http://www.scottdemontluzin.com/
I'm using the dreaded 'Holy Grail' layout and it seems to be working ok. Any
criticisms will be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks Scott
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Site check

2007-12-08 Thread Jim Davis
Scott,

The site looks good, but I'm seeing a horizontal scroll bar when I set the
view port to 1024 px wide. in FF/win and IE6.  Also see the horizontal
scroll bar in IE6 with the view port set at 1920 wide. It may be the
margin-left setting on the sidebar ul. Looks like it is forcing the ul too
far to the right.

Jim



On Dec 8, 2007 11:34 AM, Scott Demontluzin  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hi List,
 I've been meaning to jump in for a while.I'm working on my first website
 http://www.scottdemontluzin.com/
 I'm using the dreaded 'Holy Grail' layout and it seems to be working ok.
 Any
 criticisms will be greatly
 appreciated.
 Thanks Scott

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Site check with source ordered layout with display table

2007-12-08 Thread Alan Gresley
Hi all

I have be playing around with this layout for over a month now. The concept 
originated with a list message about inline content covering floats. After 
doing some test I discovered that display:table behaves similar around floats.

The basis code is

div style=float:leftnarrow floatdiv/

div style=float:leftwider floatdiv/

div style=display:tablestatic elementdiv/

Giving display:table to the last div causes it to sit beside the narrow float. 
This happens in Gecko 1.7-1.9, Opera 9.10~9.50 and Safari 3 (beta). Under 
certain conditions this can be achieved without display:table but by simple 
placement of floats and static elements. For IE5.5~IE7 this source ordering is 
achieved by giving the wider float a clear:left causing a bug. The test layout 
which has the above technique repeated twice in it is at.

http://css-class.com/test/index4.htm

The look as seen in Safari 3 (beta) is what I am after when the other browsers 
catch up. I would please appreciate a site check with Mac and Linux browsers. I 
believe that Firefox on Mac is fine. I'm interested to see if the sticky footer 
works in the Mac browsers. I welcome any other comments to. IE/Mac doesn't 
support display:table or have the IE/Win bug, so this browser has some 
alternative style. Not sure how well this special style for IE/Mac works.

Alan
http://css-class.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Disappearing page in IE6

2007-12-08 Thread Tammy Grossbauer



In Explorer 6, nothing shows up on this page, but the background tiling. I've 
never seen this happen. Has anyone else?

http://www.webdesigntg.com/tmpeleven.html

http://www.webdesigntg.com/styleseleven.css

_
Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_102007
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Disappearing page in IE6

2007-12-08 Thread scott . swabey
Tammy Grossbauer wrote:
 
 
 In Explorer 6, nothing shows up on this page, but the background tiling. I've 
 never seen this happen. Has anyone else?
 
 http://www.webdesigntg.com/tmpeleven.html
 

Hi Tammy

It looks like your style block in the head has become incorrectly 
nested. Try:

style type=text/css media=all
!--
@import url(styleseleven.css);
--
/style

!--[if lte IE 6]
link rel=stylesheet href=tmponeIE6.css type=text/css
![endif]--

!--[if IE 7]
link rel=stylesheet href=tmponeIE7.css type=text/css
![endif]

Regards
-- 

Scott Swabey
Design  Development Director - Lafinboy Productions
www.lafinboy.com | www.thought-after.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] site check please

2007-12-08 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
12/08/2007

www.bildasfriesslakepub.com
Would appreciate a look-see in Opera (I'm in O9.24), as the nav bar anchors 
aren't working right and occasionally disappear all together on scrolling. 
Which bug and how to fix? Also a check in IE6 to make sure my green box in 
the left col isn't triggering the Peek-a-boo bug. Finally in IE, I'm getting 
extra vertical space above the main col (vertical border should touch nav 
bat above it) and in the footer above and below the content. Not a killer 
but would appreciate suggestions on how to eliminate it. Add 'has-layout' 
doesn't do it and causes other problems, since fixed.

http://www.bildasfriesslakepub.com/menu.html
Would appreciate a look-see in IE, especially IE6 to make sure the right 
column content is appearing.

Much thanks to David and Georg for getting me this far. The site is live and 
the client gassed.

Peter
www.fatpawdesign.com

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] IE6 float issue: floated element larger than container expands containing block

2007-12-08 Thread BJ Vicks
In essence: I have a header div with width 800px and height 246px  
which contains a floated image of height 313px. The floated image  
should overflow outside of the header div and cover the content that  
follows, but what's happening in IE6 is that the height of the header  
div is being altered by the floated content:

div id=header
img src=images/lct_logo.png alt= height=313 width=296  
id=looselogo /

ul id=nav
li class=page_item page-item-1a href=index.php 
title=Loose  
Change Trio HomepageHome/a
?php wp_list_pages('title_li='); ?
/ul
/div

#header {
margin: 0 auto;
height: 246px;
width: 800px;
display: block;
}
#looselogo {
display: block;
float: right;
height: 313px;
width: 296px;
}


You can see what looks like in IE6 here:

http://www.loosechangetrio.com/wp-content/themes/loosechange/images/ 
ie6.jpg

If you're using a friendlier browser you can see what it should look  
like here




__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Disappearing page in IE6

2007-12-08 Thread Matt Lee
Tammy Grossbauer wrote:

 In Explorer 6, nothing shows up on this page, but the background tiling. I've 
 never seen this happen. Has anyone else?
 
 http://www.webdesigntg.com/tmpeleven.html

Yup, it's a really silly little mistake. I ran the page throught the W3C
HTML validator, and it looks like you're missing the end to your
conditional comment..

#  Error  Line 18, Column 11: ENDIF is not a reserved name.

/style![endif]--

Because of that, IE is getting stuck.

Hope this helps,

matt



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Disappearing page in IE6

2007-12-08 Thread Rob Emenecker
Your closing /style tag is misplaced. Put it before the first conditional
MSIE statement.

 

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] image gallery

2007-12-08 Thread bookpage
Čistý Design wrote:

 Hello

 I was always wondering if it's possible to center image in a div - like when 
 you have a photogallery of images that are vertical and horizontal and they 
 are always centered so it looks tidy  I know how to do it in a table 
 cell, but don't want to use a table. 
 Would anyone please have any suggestion?

 Thank you!!!

 Jana Forsythová
  

You might try this code. Not sure it is what you are looking for or not.


.onethird {
float: left;
width: 30%;
margin-right: 1%;
text-align: center;
margin-bottom:auto
}

--

h3Eric Meyers' CSS2 Test Suite/h3
pIn the following table, the cells of the second row should be invisible,
but the space the row would have occupied should still be held open. The third
row should be removed from the table altogether, and its space should not be
held open. Using this CSS;nbsp;nbsp; .cl3 {visibility: collapse;}/p


div
p class=onethird
img alt=IE 7 src=images/ie7.gif class=pic-left height=124 
width=113brbr
This is what it looks like in IE 7./p

p class=onethird
img alt=Firefox 2 src=images/ff2.gif height=99 width=125brbrbr
This is what it looks like in Firefox 2./p

p class=onethird
img src=images/opera.gifbrbr
This is what it looks like in Opera/p
/div



__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] list-item markers vertical-align: top ???

2007-12-08 Thread Michael D Schleif
I am having problems with list-item markers in unordered lists that span
more than one (1) line being _centered_ vertically.

   11
 22
   33

I want the marker centered on the first line of list-item text.

 11
   22
   33

What do you think?

-- 
Best Regards,

mds
mds resource
877.596.8237
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] site check please

2007-12-08 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:

 www.bildasfriesslakepub.com

 Would appreciate a look-see in Opera (I'm in O9.24), as the nav bar 
 anchors aren't working right and occasionally disappear all together 
 on scrolling. Which bug and how to fix?

An old instability in Opera when trying to interpret the W3C collapsing
margins bug[1] on a parent that doesn't contain its children. The
margin ends up reversed now and then, and pushes the ul below the
#nav-container.
Opera 9.5beta does seem to have a more stable interpretation of that
particular combination.

To cure, add...

#nav ul{margin-bottom: 0;}

...which removes all confusion in all browsers, and doesn't disturb any
of them.

 Also a check in IE6 to make sure my green box in the left col isn't 
 triggering the Peek-a-boo bug.

Looks stable enough.

 Finally in IE, I'm getting extra vertical space above the main col 
 (vertical border should touch nav bat above it) and in the footer 
 above and below the content. Not a killer but would appreciate 
 suggestions on how to eliminate it. Add 'has-layout' doesn't do it 
 and causes other problems, since fixed.

Another browser's interpretation of the  standardized W3C collapsing
margins bug, on another element-combination.

Easiest way to cure it is to replace margin-bottom with padding-bottom
on the last element where collapsing margins is an issue for IE/win...

#header h4 {margin-bottom: 0; padding-bottom: 10px;}

 http://www.bildasfriesslakepub.com/menu.html

 Would appreciate a look-see in IE, especially IE6 to make sure the 
 right column content is appearing.

It appears, but stays below the left column. IE6 doesn't respect
declared dimensions, and is auto-expanding the column - making it too
wide for the reserved space.

To fix,add...

* html #rightcol {overflow-x: hidden;}


The last minor imperfection I can see in IE6 is a gap or overlap at the
bottom  of maincol - either not reaching down to footer or overlapping
it. IE6 behaves as if it's another collapsing margins interpretation
issue, and a fix for that standardized bug seems to cure it...

* html #maincol {padding-bottom: 1px;}

-

To put all additions and correction together in one place:

#nav ul{margin-bottom: 0;}
#header h4 {margin-bottom: 0; padding-bottom: 10px;}
* html #rightcol {overflow-x: hidden;}
* html #maincol {padding-bottom: 1px;}



regards
Georg


PS: of course collapsing margins isn't a bug, but W3C has kept on
adding details to the descriptions for a long time on how browsers shall
interpret and apply it for different combinations. Thus, different
browsers and browser-versions may have slightly different
interpretations of it, for the simple reason that descriptions were
missing at the time their CSS-engines were updated on those points.


[1]http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#collapsing-margins
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/