Re: [css-d] Displaying/Simulating handwritten fonts on notebook paper
Chris, Ryan, Thanks for your kind words! CSS offers many possibilities, but in some cases it would be nice if it had more specific properties and control to avoid recurring to tricks, which frequently have a dark side :-) In this case, at least the javascript should be made more robust before using it in any real page with generic content... And, to come back to CSS, if one wants the possibility to specify a line-height, then IE7 and lower need further corrections. Best regards, Bruno -- Bruno Fassino http://www.brunildo.org/test __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Site check please
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com: Ib Jensen wrote: Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be that neither of the more important content images in the right column, reside in their respective containers in IE/6. . Apart from that the Template was _not made_ for IE6, I would like it to behave nice. About the icons, They don't matter, but if they _could_ be shown And, if push came shove, I'd consider setting a fixed width of 990px on the page outermost wrapper for IE/6.0 (only). This will prevent the float drop in narrow windows, in IE/6. And, it will resolve that IE/6 does not support min/max width. That should then be in a CC in the header or in a ie.css ? I do not know, as well, why you need be particularly concerned with the zoom toy in IE. Unless you are willing to start from scratch with a different layout concept, it may be beneficial to accept IE's zoom toy for what it is: *page zoom. * I was just testing how it behaved in a large size, but should problably instead have used browsershot.com? to test it in. -- Regards / Mhv. Ib K. jensen - http://ikjensen.dk __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Site check please
Ib Jensen wrote:
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the
missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be
that neither of the more important content images in the right column,
reside in their respective containers in IE/6. .
Apart from that the Template was _not made_ for IE6, I would like it
to behave nice.
This star html hack will set the fixed width for IE/6. Leave it in the
CSS file. Or, if you prefer, put it in an IE/6 conditional comment. It
will work either way.
* html div#side {width:990px;} /* for IE/6 */
The division ( .manchet ) in the right column that has the float right
images needs to be cleared for IE/6. Add this to the style sheet to do
that (this will not adversely effect other browsers, so no need to put
it in a CC):
.manchet:after
{
content: '.';
display: block;
height: 0;
clear: both;
visibility: hidden;
}
.manchet {
display: inline-block;
}
About the icons, They don't matter, but if they _could_ be shown
IE/6 does not support this css selector:
a[href^=mailto:;] {background-image:url(email000.png);}
IE/8, and IE/7, do support it and show your icons.
If it is necessary to have those two icons in IE/6 you'll need to feed
them to it with a simple selector. Seems more trouble than it is worth
(to me) for a browsers that is on death row. But it is your call...
I do not know, as well, why you need be particularly concerned with the
zoom toy in IE. Unless you are willing to start from scratch with a
different layout concept, it may be beneficial to accept IE's zoom toy for
what it is: * page zoom. *
I was just testing how it behaved in a large size, but should
problably instead have used browsershot.com? to test it in.
A static screen capture from browsershot will not show how the fonts
scale. IETester only enables page zoom, not font-scaling. To test the
IEs for font-scaling on a native box or the standalone versions
http://tredosoft.com/IE7_standalone.
In IE/6 it is: viewtext sizelargest. In IE 7/8 it is: pagetext
sizelargest
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Site check please
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
This star html hack will set the fixed width for IE/6. Leave it in the CSS
file. Or, if you prefer, put it in an IE/6 conditional comment. It will
work either way.
* html div#side {width:990px;} /* for IE/6 */
The division ( .manchet ) in the right column that has the float right
images needs to be cleared for IE/6. Add this to the style sheet to do that
(this will not adversely effect other browsers, so no need to put it in a
CC):
.manchet:after
{
content: '.';
display: block;
height: 0;
clear: both;
visibility: hidden;
}
.manchet {
display: inline-block;
}
Thank you, I will use it.
IE/6 does not support this css selector:
a[href^=mailto:;] {background-image:url(email000.png);}
IE/8, and IE/7, do support it and show your icons.
If it is necessary to have those two icons in IE/6 you'll need to feed them
to it with a simple selector. Seems more trouble than it is worth (to me)
for a browsers that is on death row. But it is your call...
No need for them in IE6.
I was just hoping :(
A static screen capture from browsershot will not show how the fonts scale.
IETester only enables page zoom, not font-scaling. To test the IEs for
font-scaling on a native box or the standalone versions
http://tredosoft.com/IE7_standalone.
In IE/6 it is: viewtext sizelargest. In IE 7/8 it is: pagetext
sizelargest
Thanks for this information
I know that anything you put on a webpage is sometimes shown
differently in any browser. And even more differently if the user are
using a homemade configuration of the browser
To Val Dobson
Thanks for the correction.
--
Regards / Mhv.
Ib K. jensen - http://ikjensen.dk
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
