Re: [css-d] After positioning relative, IE places everything far below
Zoe M. Gillenwater mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:39 AM said: You're right, relative positioning is not useful in the way you are using it. I would use a negative margin to shift something up like that. But relative positioning, without applying any offsets, is useful for setting things for absolutely positioned elements to base off of. Offsetting relative positioned elements is very occasionally useful when it doesn't matter if a gap is left behind. I see. Thank you. Chris. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] After positioning relative, IE places everything far below
Hello, I'm just now experimenting with 'position: relative;' and I've come to find out that even when I place an element outside a div (with relatively positioned elements inside it) it is still pushed below the point where the positioned elements WOULD have been (had they not been positioned). So now it seems that I have to relatively position ALL the elements in IE that come after my initial positioned elements if I want to fill the gap. Firefox doesn't exhibit this behavior. There's got to be a work around for this or it's also possible that I'm doing something wrong. I'd submit a link but my page is on a test server that can't be reached from the outside. Thanks, Chris. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] After positioning relative, IE places everything far below
Ingo Chao mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:15 PM said: This does not sound wrong. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#choose-position When a box B is relatively positioned, the position of the following box is calculated as though B were not offset. Hmm... then I don't understand how relatively positioning anything can be useful, if after you initially position something you're forced to position ever next element after the first one. If Fx does show a different behavior, then most probably Fx is correct. I suspect the elements inside to be floated? I have no floats. Then you have a problem in getting help from those who do not have access to a crystal ball. You mean you don't have a crystal ball?? I moved everything as it is now to the public server so you can see it here: www.swatgear.com/impacst.php Thanks for your help Ingo. Chris. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
RE: [css-d] Vertically alignment of the custom list bullet (image)
Don Hinshaw mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wednesday, August 10, 2005 2:54 PM said: Hi Chris, I think this is what you are looking for: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listutorial/introduction.htm Sorry Don. I forgot to reply to this. Your link worked like a champ! Thanks, Chris. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Vertically alignment of the custom list bullet (image)
Hello, Is it possible to adjust the vertical positioning of graphical list bullets? I've got an arrow bullet that is resting about 2 pixels higher than I'd like it to. I haven't found anything that suggets it can be moved (css-d archives, google, my own experimentation). Is this possible, and if so how can I do it? Thanks, Chris. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] non-floated element aligning to bottom of floated element (IE)
Hello, I'm not sure what this is called and I was unsuccessful in finding anything about it in google. I have a column that is 'float: left; width: 220px;' and a table that is 'margin-left: 220px;'. In Fx the table looks as expected, directly adjacent to the floated column. But in IE the table is positioned to the bottom right of the floated column, just below the bottom edge of the floated element. If I take off the 'float: left;' the table stays exactly where it is when looking at it in IE. In Fx the table moves down to below the floated element (as expected). In other words both browsers look the same with the 'float: left;' commented out. I tried floating the table to the right but that didn't do anything. I also decreased the width of the table thinking it was a wrapping issue but that didn't help either. What am I missing? Chris. p.s. I'd provide a link but the site doesn't have an external ip address. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Still having a problem with scope
Hello,
This time it's on a different item (never got the other one solved, will
come back to it later).
p class=printer_friendly
a href=page.php target=_blank
img src=pic.gif alt=Printer / Printer friendly
/a
/p
The following css only affects the background!
p.printer_friendly a {
text-size: xx-small;
background: red;
}
Why???
Thanks,
Chris.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] FW: Still having a problem with scope
Chris W. Parker
on Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:23 AM said:
p.printer_friendly a {
text-size: xx-small;
background: red;
}
Why???
Because you're not paying attention Chris! It should be 'font-size' duh!
And of course I realize this IMMEDIATELY after I hit send! Ugh.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] CSS Scope: I think I'm being specific enough...?
Hello,
I've got the following HTML...
form id=order_submit
input type=submit value=Submit Order/
/form
...that is being influenced by some more general CSS rules (background
and border and width). If I declare those things within the style
attribute I can get it to look how I want. Yet when I use the following
CSS it's not affected:
form#order_submit {
width: 100%;
background: none;
border: none;
text-align: center;
}
form#order_submit input {
font-size: large;
font-family: Verdana;
}
I know that I'm referencing it correctly because my rules for the
input/ tag are working correctly. Even 'text-align' in the form's
declaration is working! It's just width, background, and border that are
not.
What am I missing here?
Thanks,
Chris.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
