Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-19 Thread David Hucklesby
Al Sparber wrote:
 From: Reese howel...@inkworkswell.com
 I agree with you that your suggestion is the preferred option, but 
 the menu items range from 5 to 20 characters (with spaces, some of 
 them). The text of those items is not negotiable with the client so
  I don't see that getting very far. I suppose the other option is
 to use images instead of text, I don't like that option. It isn't
 as SEO-friendly as text links and SEO-friendliness is important.
 
 That images are an SEO liability is a debatable issue (at worst).
 Image replacement is another option.
 

I'd agree with Al here. You can use text with background images and
position the text off left for the benefit of screen readers, 'bots, etc..

BTW - I was not suggesting that all menu items be set to the same width.
You can of course set each one to match the length of the text.

Cordially,
David
--

__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-19 Thread Del Wegener
 BTW - I was not suggesting that all menu items be set to the same width.
 You can of course set each one to match the length of the text.

 Cordially,
 David
 --

I suspect that is the client's call and my clients all want menu items of 
the same length/width.  And I tend to agree with them.
Del 


__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-19 Thread Bob Rosenberg
At 20:47 -0500 on 07/18/2009, Reese wrote about Re: [css-d] Problem 
with all Mac browsers according to Brow:

It isn't asnSEO-friendly as text links and SEO-friendliness is important.

So long as each image has an ALT tag with the text, the SEO Police 
should be reading it and treating it as if it were the text itself.
-- 

Bob Rosenberg
RockMUG Webmaster
webmas...@rockmug.org
www.RockMUG.org
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-18 Thread Reese
I have an inline, unordered list for a horizontal navigation menu.
What I'm seeing on BrowserCam, all Mac browsers increase the size
of the text in those hnav links, causing the list to wrap to a new
line where the wrapped text gets lost against the background.

That's BrowserCam, a Mac user tells me that this is only a problem
with Safari. That the display is correct with Mac/FF. I do not have
a Mac machine available locally so second-hand reports and BrowserCam
has been my workaround.

Before I start posting code or links, are there any known issues
with Mac (or Mac/Safari) that would explain this different handling
of linked, inline list elements?

I tried searching the Wiki but mac font size didn't bring up any
results, neither did safari font size.

Reese



__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-18 Thread David Laakso
Reese wrote:
 I have an inline, unordered list for a horizontal navigation menu.
 What I'm seeing on BrowserCam, all Mac browsers increase the size
 of the text in those hnav links, causing the list to wrap to a new
 line where the wrapped text gets lost against the background.


 Reese

   


Are all of your browsers set to default font-size.
Are all your browsers set at their default-- minimum font-size.
Are the list-items letter-spaced.
Are the list-items calling Verdana.
Is the list easily broken with font-scaling.
Is your friend on Mac 10.4 or 10.5

Best bet is a clickable link to the page...





__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-18 Thread Reese
Hello David,

David Laakso wrote:

 Are all of your browsers set to default font-size.
 Are all your browsers set at their default-- minimum font-size.

All the Win-platform browsers, yes and yes.

 Are the list-items letter-spaced.

Yes.

 Are the list-items calling Verdana.

No. Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif.

 Is the list easily broken with font-scaling.

It doesn't break with font-scaling - except IE6. IE6 breaks, but
does not easily break.

 Is your friend on Mac 10.4 or 10.5

I don't know. I've asked before, I'll ask again.
Ditto for the version of Safari he's using.

 Best bet is a clickable link to the page...

Yes, but it's proprietary stuff for a client so I hoped to avoid
extracting the relevant code for public viewing.

Reese

__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-18 Thread Reese
David Laakso wrote:

 Wild guess...
 
 Try:
 font-family: Helvetica Neue,  Geneva, Arial, sans-serif;
 and comment-out the letter-spacing.

Helvetica Neue?

The latest BrowserCam results indicate that dropping the letter
spacing fixed the line wrap (and the array of list items appears
to be a nearly identical length on both the Win and Mac platforms),
but Helvetica Neue gives me a serif font everywhere except in
Konqueror (Fedora Core 6).

I'll have to play with the letter-spacing now that I know it's
the problem child, thank you for the help.

Reese

__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-18 Thread David Laakso
Reese wrote:

 Are the list-items letter-spaced.
 

 Yes.

   
 Are the list-items calling Verdana.
 

 No. Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif.

   




Wild guess...

Try:
font-family: Helvetica Neue,  Geneva, Arial, sans-serif;
and comment-out the letter-spacing.









__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-18 Thread Reese
David Hucklesby wrote:

 ... I suggest you make the link container,
 probably an LI, a fixed width, and take out any padding to the left and
 right of the text. Give the link text breathing room to expand, at
 least to the entire width of its container. That way, differences in
 text size and font widths will have a less detrimantal effect on your
 design.

I agree with you that your suggestion is the preferred option, but
the menu items range from 5 to 20 characters (with spaces, some of
them). The text of those items is not negotiable with the client so
I don't see that getting very far. I suppose the other option is to
use images instead of text, I don't like that option. It isn't as
SEO-friendly as text links and SEO-friendliness is important.

Reese

__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-18 Thread David Hucklesby
Reese wrote:
 David Laakso wrote:
 
 Wild guess...
 
 Try: font-family: Helvetica Neue,  Geneva, Arial, sans-serif; and
 comment-out the letter-spacing.
 
 Helvetica Neue?
 
 The latest BrowserCam results indicate that dropping the letter 
 spacing fixed the line wrap ...

I think that what David is trying to tell you is that different fonts
have different widths, so changing the font-family will cause the links
to be wider or narrower than you intend.

Because you have absolutely no control over the size of text that
displays on a visitor's computer, I suggest you make the link container,
probably an LI, a fixed width, and take out any padding to the left and
right of the text. Give the link text breathing room to expand, at
least to the entire width of its container. That way, differences in
text size and font widths will have a less detrimantal effect on your
design.

Cordially,
David
--



__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

2009-07-18 Thread Al Sparber
From: Reese howel...@inkworkswell.com
 I agree with you that your suggestion is the preferred option, but
 the menu items range from 5 to 20 characters (with spaces, some of
 them). The text of those items is not negotiable with the client so
 I don't see that getting very far. I suppose the other option is to
 use images instead of text, I don't like that option. It isn't as
 SEO-friendly as text links and SEO-friendliness is important.

That images are an SEO liability is a debatable issue (at worst). Image 
replacement is another option.

-- 
Al Sparber - PVII
http://www.projectseven.com
Dreamweaver Menus | Galleries | Widgets
http://www.projectseven.com/go/apm
An Accessible  Elegant Accordion



__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/