Apparently, Micro$oft IS complying with standards but it is their standards
they are complying with NOT international standards.
When they brought out IE8, they said they are doing us all a favor by "trying"
to comply with international standards. I guess they are still trying but NOT
hard enough!
--- On Mon, 11/9/09, Theresa Mesa wrote:
> From: Theresa Mesa
> Subject: Re: [css-d] The holy grail
> To: "Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh"
> Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> Date: Monday, November 9, 2009, 3:38 AM
> That would definitely be the Holy
> Grail...
>
> Stoopid IE.
>
> Let each browser express itself differently, as long as
> each is
> standards compliant and plays well with others. I find, at
> least so
> far, that with the exception of IE6, if I build
> standardized code that
> validates, I can get it to display almost exactly the same
> on every
> browser. Usually.
>
>
> Theresa
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
> wrote:
>
> > The holy grail is that place we'll all be to (soon, I
> think)
> > when we can finally stop worrying, thinking about and
> dealing
> > with IEsicks.
> >
> > --
> > /* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0>
> */
>
> __
> css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
