Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread Amy Ostrom
Dear Georg:

Thank you!  I was just able to test this out and it works nicely.  I was a
bit leery about the negative margins, but it's a quick fix for a beta
version.  Is it illegal to use negative numbers in margin or padding?
Mucho gracias!

-- 

In peace,

Amy M Ostrom
Web Interface Designer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 1/4/07, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Amy Ostrom wrote:
  http://www.kcscienceinc.org/
 
  1.  The images under the links shouldn't have the borders or
  additional padding *sigh*.  Simple, I know, but I can't find it. This
  happens in both IE and Firefox

 I would've liked to use those W3C validators, but they can't get
 anything out of your document at the moment.

 Also, too many styles that don't do much and some that don't target the
 right elements.

 Correct selector so it reads...

 #ads a:link {border: none;}

 (note the 'a:link' part)

 ...and add...

 #ads img {display: block;}

 ...for good measure.

 Delete whatever else that isn't needed in your styles.

  2.  The contact information in the footer moves over and pushed the
  background image out of the box.  This happens in IE (looks great
  in Firefox!)

 Suggest you change your positioning method...

 #contact {
 /* position:absolute; -- delete this */
 /* width:98%; -- delete this */
 margin: 0 auto -4em auto /* observe change */;
 /* keep the rest as is */
 }

 ...and it shouldn't be too far off in any browser.

 regards
 Georg
 --
 http://www.gunlaug.no

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread Barney Carroll
Under the strictest rules, all negative number values for measurement 
are illegal. However, even the most ruthless standardistas make use of 
them. Negative percentages in complex positioning occasionally causes 
problems for IE, but no more than anything else!

Regards,
Barney

Amy Ostrom wrote:
 Dear Georg:
 
 Thank you!  I was just able to test this out and it works nicely.  I was a
 bit leery about the negative margins, but it's a quick fix for a beta
 version.  Is it illegal to use negative numbers in margin or padding?
 Mucho gracias!

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread ~davidLaakso
Barney Carroll wrote:
 Under the strictest rules, all negative number values for measurement 
 are illegal. However, even the most ruthless standardistas make use of 
 them. Negative percentages in complex positioning occasionally causes 
 problems for IE, but no more than anything else!

 Regards,
 Barney
   
   
Hmm. Barney, you may want to think that sweeping generalization over a 
little.
Regards,
~dL

-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread Rimantas Liubertas
 Under the strictest rules, all negative number values for measurement
 are illegal.

False.

 However, even the most ruthless standardistas make use of
 them. Negative percentages in complex positioning occasionally causes
 problems for IE, but no more than anything else!

Most ruthless standardistas did read the spec, so they are aware, that negative
values are allowed.
Take a look at this http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#values
and also this http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#margin-properties:

Negative values for margin properties are allowed, but there may be
implementation-specific limits.


Regards,
Rimantas
--
http://rimantas.com/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread Alex Robinson
At 14:29 + 8/1/07, Barney Carroll wrote:
Under the strictest rules, all negative number values for measurement
are illegal.


Not true.

Negative values for margin properties are allowed, but there may be 
implementation-specific limits.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#margin-properties


You might have been thinking about padding properties though:

Unlike margin properties, values for padding values cannot be negative
   http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#padding-properties
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-04 Thread Amy Ostrom
Dear collective mind of the CSS-D:

I am being stupid and not seeing the obvious solution to two problems at
http://www.kcscienceinc.org/

1.  The images under the links shouldn't have the borders or additional
padding *sigh*.  Simple, I know, but I can't find it.  This happens in both
IE and Firefox
2.  The contact information in the footer moves over and pushed the
background image out of the box.  This happens in IE (looks great in
Firefox!)

This is only a dummed down version of the site as we wait for the graphic
designers to make it look pretty. :-p  So please do not be offended by
ugliness or bad code in the content area (*crosses fingers* the editor put
it in there).

Thank you in advance!!

-- 

In peace,

Amy M Ostrom
Web Interface Designer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-04 Thread Amy Ostrom
Dear All:

Oh my goodness... well, the first problem I had was simply because I needed
to increase specificity to overwrite the other rule, my bad.

I am still uncertain about the second issue of why IE is pushing the contact
information over.  Anyone have any suggestions?  Thank you so much!!

-- 

In peace,

Amy M Ostrom
Web Interface Designer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On 1/4/07, Amy Ostrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear collective mind of the CSS-D:

 I am being stupid and not seeing the obvious solution to two problems at
 http://www.kcscienceinc.org/

 1.  The images under the links shouldn't have the borders or additional
 padding *sigh*.  Simple, I know, but I can't find it.  This happens in both
 IE and Firefox
 2.  The contact information in the footer moves over and pushed the
 background image out of the box.  This happens in IE (looks great in
 Firefox!)

 This is only a dummed down version of the site as we wait for the graphic
 designers to make it look pretty. :-p  So please do not be offended by
 ugliness or bad code in the content area (*crosses fingers* the editor put
 it in there).

 Thank you in advance!!

 --

 In peace,

 Amy M Ostrom
 Web Interface Designer
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-04 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Amy Ostrom wrote:
 http://www.kcscienceinc.org/
 
 1.  The images under the links shouldn't have the borders or 
 additional padding *sigh*.  Simple, I know, but I can't find it. This
 happens in both IE and Firefox

I would've liked to use those W3C validators, but they can't get
anything out of your document at the moment.

Also, too many styles that don't do much and some that don't target the
right elements.

Correct selector so it reads...

#ads a:link {border: none;}

(note the 'a:link' part)

...and add...

#ads img {display: block;}

...for good measure.

Delete whatever else that isn't needed in your styles.

 2.  The contact information in the footer moves over and pushed the 
 background image out of the box.  This happens in IE (looks great 
 in Firefox!)

Suggest you change your positioning method...

#contact {
/* position:absolute; -- delete this */
/* width:98%; -- delete this */
margin: 0 auto -4em auto /* observe change */;
/* keep the rest as is */
}

...and it shouldn't be too far off in any browser.

regards
Georg
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/