[css-d] liquid 3col - header questions

2007-09-11 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi all,

I'm developing a site based on the 'holy grail' 3col liquid layout [1].

Site: http://devel.legionpost130.org/
sub-page url:
http://devel.legionpost130.org/index.php?history (for long content)

CSS: http://devel.legionpost130.org/styles/legionpost130.css

I've added a min-height and min-width setting to #header to accommodate
the header graphic.  Herein lies my issue.  Header graphic is 535px
wide, 102px high.  On screen resolutions of 800x600 and 1024x768 I see
strange results and would like to avoid them if possible:

Screenshots:
http://captures.swhi.net/WinXPFF2.1024x768.jpg
shows 'clipping' of the left and right edges of the graphic

http://captures.swhi.net/WinXPIE7.800x600.jpg
shows loss of right column (which isn't an issue for this site, but i'm
curious as to why.

Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. The css is still a bit
messy, containing directives which are not used by the markup - all to
be cleaned up before we go live.

TIA,
~Ray


[1]http://www.alistapart.com/articles/holygrail
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] liquid 3col - header questions

2007-09-11 Thread Ian Young
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray Leventhal
 Sent: 11 September 2007 15:02
 To: css-d
 Subject: [css-d] liquid 3col - header questions


 Hi all,

 I'm developing a site based on the 'holy grail' 3col liquid layout [1].

 Site: http://devel.legionpost130.org/
 sub-page url:
 http://devel.legionpost130.org/index.php?history (for long content)

 CSS: http://devel.legionpost130.org/styles/legionpost130.css

 I've added a min-height and min-width setting to #header to accommodate
 the header graphic.  Herein lies my issue.  Header graphic is 535px
 wide, 102px high.  On screen resolutions of 800x600 and 1024x768 I see
 strange results and would like to avoid them if possible:

 Screenshots:
 http://captures.swhi.net/WinXPFF2.1024x768.jpg
 shows 'clipping' of the left and right edges of the graphic

 http://captures.swhi.net/WinXPIE7.800x600.jpg
 shows loss of right column (which isn't an issue for this site, but i'm
 curious as to why.

 Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. The css is still a bit
 messy, containing directives which are not used by the markup - all to
 be cleaned up before we go live.


Because you have used min-height and min-width, the log doesn't appear in
IE6 at all. (IE6 doesn't recognise min-width or min-height). In fact the
whole site looks, well, odd.
In the header div there is an extraeneous */ at line 131 which may be
affecting things thereafter.

Ian

IY e-Solutions
http://www.iyesolutions.co.uk

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.14/999 - Release Date: 10/09/2007
17:43

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] liquid 3col - header questions

2007-09-11 Thread Ray Leventhal


snip

 Because you have used min-height and min-width, the log doesn't appear in
 IE6 at all. (IE6 doesn't recognise min-width or min-height). In fact the
 whole site looks, well, odd.
 In the header div there is an extraeneous */ at line 131 which may be
 affecting things thereafter.

 Ian

 IY e-Solutions
 http://www.iyesolutions.co.uk

Hi Ian,

Thanks for your reply...especially for the */ which I clearly missed.

Is there a better way to work with this layout and still have my header?
 I guess that's the question - or I'll find a less imposing way to do
this. I had considered putting each of the 'emblem' graphics to the
right and left of the graphic text in their own rfloat/lfloat divs, but
that made a bit more of a mess than I'd wanted :) (pebcak, i'm sure).

~R


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] liquid 3col - header questions

2007-09-11 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Ray Leventhal wrote:
 I'm developing a site based on the 'holy grail' 3col liquid layout 
 [1].
 
 http://devel.legionpost130.org/

I don't often speak up against a solution, but I'd advice you to stay as
far away from the mentioned 'holy grail' as you possibly can.
It is one of the least tested, prepared and cross-browser reliable
solutions released onto the web in later years.

It provokes too many bugs and differences between browsers, and few of
them are cared for. This hits all versions of IE/win hard.

You can hack and tweak your way around most weaknesses in that 'holy
grail' layout, but you'll end up with a completely different
layout-solution before you've made it anywhere near cross-browser
reliable anyway, so I don't think it is worth it.


The 'negative margins' solution...
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/negativemargins
...will work in your case, as will just about any...

- header first.
- followed by 3 columns float and/or non-floats.
- maybe with a footer at the bottom.

...except the mentioned 'holy grail'.

regards
Georg

 [1]http://www.alistapart.com/articles/holygrail
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] liquid 3col - header questions

2007-09-11 Thread Ray Leventhal
 I don't often speak up against a solution, but I'd advice you to stay as
  far away from the mentioned 'holy grail' as you possibly can.
  It is one of the least tested, prepared and cross-browser reliable
  solutions released onto the web in later years.
 
  It provokes too many bugs and differences between browsers, and few of
  them are cared for. This hits all versions of IE/win hard.
 
  You can hack and tweak your way around most weaknesses in that 'holy
  grail' layout, but you'll end up with a completely different
  layout-solution before you've made it anywhere near cross-browser
  reliable anyway, so I don't think it is worth it.
 
 
  The 'negative margins' solution...
  http://www.alistapart.com/articles/negativemargins
  ...will work in your case, as will just about any...
 
  - header first.
  - followed by 3 columns float and/or non-floats.
  - maybe with a footer at the bottom.
 
  ...except the mentioned 'holy grail'.
HI Georg,

It's not often that one person's opinion is enough to influence me to
change my mind, but when we're talking about web layout and you have
strong feelings, I'd be a fool not to heed.

Thank you for that insight and your opinions which I always find valuable.

I'll post again regarding this site when I've reworked the css and
markup a bit.

Again, my thanks,
~Ray

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/