[CTRL] Employment at the Vertical Bar Motel

2000-06-05 Thread Alamaine

From  www.wsws.org

WSWS : News  Analysis : North America : The Brutal Society
Prisons: a booming industry in the US and Europe
By Joseph Delius
5 June 2000
Back to screen version

For some years now, within the economically advanced countries two parallel
developments have been proceeding at an increasing pace, and in reverse
proportion to each other: the dismantling of social welfare systems and the
expansion of the prison system. The customary justification for the billions of
dollars being spent on the construction of new prisons, increases in the scope
and severity of criminal justice and the introduction of new forms of
punishment is that all this "serves to protect the public from violent crime".

Yet most crime statistics show conclusively that the violent crime rate has
declined, or at least stagnated, over the past few years. As opposed to this,
the number of prison inmates who committed offences in no way violent, but
intrinsically linked to poverty and social inequality, has increased
dramatically. Government plans and "prison reforms" are all based on the
assumption that this development will continue at an even greater pace and
become a permanent feature of society. Thus, preparations are being made to
accommodate a growing percentage of the population that will, at least
temporarily, find itself behind prison bars.

This process is becoming more and more apparent in Europe. For instance, in
Germany 2.5 billion marks ($US1.25 billion) have just been allocated for the
expansion of the prison system, for construction work alone (i.e., not
including overhead, administrative, personnel or other operational costs). The
objective is to increase prison capacity by up to 50 percent in the eastern
German states, and by about 25 percent in several of the western German states.
The same trend is evident in other European countries as well, particularly in
Britain where current planning will require the construction of at least two
dozen new prisons over the next 10 years. In France the Minister of Justice
recently announced that seven new prisons will be built, and five of the
largest existing prisons modernized at a total construction cost of 5.5 billion
francs ($US800 million).

Noteworthy as these figures are, the growth of the prison systems in Europe is
still far behind that of the "world leader" in incarceration, the United
States, where approximately two million people are now in prison. In other
words, a country whose population makes up only 5 percent of the world's
population now accounts for one quarter of all prison inmates worldwide. The
prison population of the US has increased by 61 percent over the past 10 years,
and is still growing.

Some US states are already spending considerably more on their prison systems
than on higher education. California has the highest incarceration rate in the
world with over 626 prison inmates per 100,000 state residents. (By comparison,
the incarceration rate in Indonesia is 21 per 100,000 inhabitants; Germany, 81;
France, 84; and Britain, 94). Recent official statistics and independent
studies show that California spends a total of roughly $5.6 billion dollars per
year (all costs included) on its prison system, but only $4.3 billion on its
schools and universities.

Not that this ominous "model" has damped the fervor with which European
governments and established parties are pursuing their "get tough on crime"
policies. On the contrary: The competition for recognition as the harshest
propagator of repressive criminal law is being fought out among them with the
same intensity as their vying for acclaim as the best representative of big
business interests.

Crime and society

In an article published May 4 in the German daily Sueddeutsche Zeitung,
journalist Heribert Prantl asked Christian Pfeiffer, the director of the KFN (
Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachsen) crime research institute,
what he saw as the underlying reasons for the expansion of the prison system in
Germany. Pfeiffer's conclusions are in striking contrast to official
justifications.

The criminologist stated that the increase in the number of prison inmates had
nothing to do with an increase in crime, but was rather a result of changes in
criminal law practice. He pointed out four essential aspects of this: To begin
with, the law courts had taken a much tougher approach in the second half of
the 1990s. Secondly, more and more people were being incarcerated because they
were not able to pay fines. This was due to the fact that courts were taking
less and less account of people's financial situation, sending out court orders
after the most superficial inquiries, instead of arranging for oral hearings to
establish offenders' personal circumstances.

The judicial system is truly blind in this respect, said Pfeiffer, only
noticing when it's too late that "they've ordered an unemployed person to pay a
four thousand mark fine". The third aspect Pfeiffer sees is that not only is

Re: [CTRL] Employment at the Vertical Bar Motel

2000-06-05 Thread [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a message dated 06/05/2000 5:35:27 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 The ruthless dismantling of social welfare systems and the effects of
global
 capitalism have dramatically changed the lives of millions of people. Many
who
 previously just managed to get by on the fringes of the "social network" are
 now faced with destitution.
###

This is a pre-planned process.
This is a long-term process.
In brief, here is how it works.
For illustration, we'll use the United States starting in 1928.

1.  The total tax burden on the average middleclass family is 3%
 of annual income.  (Most families are single-income families).

2.  There are virtually no federally funded "social programs".
 There are very few state funded "social programs".

3.  Most adult Americans are highly self-suficient.
 Healthcare and dental care is affordable.
 Most families can afford to go to their family doctors
 and they can afford to go to the hospital.

4.  Most Americans can afford to save money.  The national savings rate
 is far higher than it will be 60 or 70 years later.

5.  A high percentage of Americans can afford to buy a home.
 The "owner occupancy rate" is far higher than it will be 60 years
 later when many people will live in apartment houses and other
 rental properties.

6.  Most Americans are relatively debt free (excluding home mortgages).

Then, in the 1930s, the Federal government comes forward with many new
"social programs".  The government launches programs which offer to help
people do the above listed things which they have traditionally done for
themselves.
These various programs begin at a modest level.
But as time passes and people get used to the idea of "social programs",
more and more such programs are added and expanded.
Of course the government must increase taxes to pay for all of this.
The people gripe about the taxes, but they have grown to embrace
the "free" federal programs.

Over a period of 2 generations the situation has changed dramatically.
In the year 1998:

1.  The total tax burden on the average middle-class family is over 50%
 of annual income. (Most families are now dual-income families).

2.  There are almost countless federally funded "social programs".
 There are many state funded "social programs".

3.  Most adult Americans are highly dependent on the government.
 Healthcare and dental care are not affordable.
 Most families can't afford to go to their family doctors
 and they can't afford to go to the hospital without expensive
 health and medical insurance coverage.

4.   Most Americans can't afford to save money.  The national savings rate
  is the lowest since records have been kept.

5.  A high percentage of Americans can't afford to buy a home.
 The "owner occupancy rate" is far lower than it was 50 years ago.

6.  Most Americans are in debt.  (Even when excluding home mortgages).


MOST  PEOPLE HAVE BECOME HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON
THE  FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.  ONE IN EVERY FOUR  PEOPLE
IS RECEIVING FUNDS FROM THE GOVERNMENT IN ONE FORM
OR ANOTHER.
ABOUT HALF THE SCHOOL CHILDREN IN THE COUNTRY ARE
GETTING "FREE"  OR REDUCED-PRICE SCHOOL LUNCHES WHICH
ARE GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED.
MILLIONS LIVE IN GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED HOUSING.

AT  THIS  POINT  THE TRAP  IS  SPRUNG!!!

NOW COMES  THE "RUTHLESS DISMANTLING OF

SOCIAL WELFARE  SYSTEMS."

BUT HERE IS THE REALLY CRUEL AND INSIDIOUS PART OF THE PLAN.

THE HIGH TAX STRUCTURE PUT INTO PLACE TO PAY FOR THESE

PROGRAMS  IS  KEPT  IN PLACE.

NOW  THE PEOPLE  ARE  TRAPPED.

THEY CAN'T AFFORD TO PAY FOR  ALL THE "FREE" THINGS

THE GOVERNMENT WAS PROVIDING FOR THEM BECAUSE

THEY ARE STILL PAYING HALF OF THEIR INCOME TO THE

GOVERNMENT.

NOW  THEY DON'T HAVE THEIR  MONEY TO PROVIDE FOR

THEMSELVESAND THEY DON'T HAVE THE "FREE"

GOVERNMENT  PROGRAMS  EITHER!!

THIS  PLAN  IS  MUCH  FURTHER  ADVANCED  IN  CANADA

THAN  IN THE  UNITED  STATES.

UNFORTUNATELY,  WE ARE RAPIDLY CATCHING UP.

 Regards to All
 Nakano

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives